National Gallery rehang review – ‘A momentous retelling of the story of art’

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"National Gallery's New Exhibition Reinterprets Art History with a Focus on the Northern Renaissance"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 7.0
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

The recent rehang at the National Gallery in London offers a fresh perspective on its extensive collection, emphasizing a narrative that begins with the Northern Renaissance, particularly through the works of Jan van Eyck. The exhibition showcases significant still lifes, including Floris van Dijck's 1616 depiction of gouda cheeses and Gustave Courbet's poignant Still Life With Apples and a Pomegranate, illustrating the emotional depth of the artworks. The curation also highlights the evolution of still life painting, culminating in a juxtaposition of Cézanne's transformative works with Picasso's groundbreaking cubism. This strategic arrangement not only honors the gallery's rich history but also invites visitors to engage with the masterpieces in a more introspective manner, facilitated by the museum’s improved architecture and lighting, which enhance the viewing experience without overwhelming it.

The rehang, titled 'The Wonder of Art', subtly reinterprets the traditional art historical narrative by starting from Bruges rather than Florence, allowing for a more humanistic exploration of art's development. This approach is evident as viewers traverse through the Sainsbury Wing, where they encounter iconic portraits, including Holbein’s Ambassadors and intimate works by Gainsborough. The gallery's commitment to accessibility has not diminished its artistic integrity; instead, it has fostered an emotional resonance with the artworks. Notably, the display of Gainsborough's portraits reveals a tender focus on familial love, while Rembrandt's self-portraits continue to captivate with their profound depth. Overall, this rehang not only preserves the gallery's legacy but also revitalizes the viewer's connection to the art, making it a significant moment in the narrative of the National Gallery.

TruthLens AI Analysis

The article provides a detailed review of the National Gallery's recent rehang, highlighting the changes made and the overall experience of visiting the museum. It explores the thematic connections between various artworks, focusing on still lifes and their evolution in the art world. The reviewer expresses a sense of relief that the gallery has retained its original character, emphasizing the importance of continuity in presenting art.

Curatorial Intentions

The rehang appears to be an effort to refresh the gallery's presentation without losing its historical context. The selection of artworks, including major pieces by well-known artists, aims to create new dialogues among the pieces, allowing viewers to appreciate their connections and artistic developments. This approach may be intended to draw back visitors who have stayed away since the pandemic, rekindling interest in the museum's offerings.

Public Perception

The article seems designed to foster a positive perception of the National Gallery and its curatorial team. By emphasizing the gallery's accessibility and the quality of its collection, the review aims to encourage both art enthusiasts and casual visitors to engage with the museum. The mention of a new restaurant may also serve to enhance the overall visitor experience, making the museum a more appealing destination.

Information Omission

While the article highlights the strengths of the gallery and its collection, it may downplay potential criticisms, such as the challenges faced by museums in attracting foot traffic post-COVID. By focusing on the positives, the article could be seen as attempting to mask the broader issues that cultural institutions are facing in terms of funding and visitor engagement.

Manipulative Elements

The article contains a degree of manipulation, primarily through its selective focus on the gallery's strengths and the aesthetic experience it offers. The language is celebratory, which can create an overly optimistic impression of the gallery’s situation without addressing underlying challenges. This positivity could be interpreted as a strategy to rally support for the museum in a challenging climate.

Reliability and Truthfulness

The review appears credible, as it offers specific insights into the rehang and discusses notable artworks. However, the overall tone leans towards the promotional, potentially skewing the reader's perspective. The omission of challenges faced by the gallery could affect the completeness of the information presented.

Societal Impact

The article may influence cultural tourism and the local economy by encouraging visits to the National Gallery. As museums are vital to cultural preservation and education, increased attendance could have positive ripple effects on surrounding businesses and the cultural sector at large.

Target Audience

Art lovers and potential visitors to the National Gallery are the primary audience for this article. By highlighting the quality of the artwork and the experience of visiting, it aims to attract a diverse group, from casual tourists to serious art aficionados.

Market Implications

While this article may not directly impact stock markets or financial markets, the success of cultural institutions can influence local economies. Positive reviews can lead to increased tourism, which is beneficial for businesses in the area, although specific stocks are not mentioned.

Broader Context

In terms of global power dynamics, the article highlights the importance of cultural heritage and institutions in shaping national identity. As museums worldwide adapt to post-pandemic realities, the National Gallery's approach may serve as a model for other institutions striving for relevance in a changing world.

Artificial Intelligence Influence

There is no explicit indication that artificial intelligence was used in the writing of this article. However, if AI were involved, it might have enhanced the language to be more engaging or suggested themes based on popular trends in art appreciation.

Conclusion

Overall, the article presents a favorable view of the National Gallery and its efforts to rehang its collection. While it provides valuable insights into the museum experience, it also reflects a tendency to overlook challenges faced by cultural institutions. This combination of positivity and selective omission could impact how the audience perceives the current state of the gallery.

Unanalyzed Article Content

There are so many twists, turns and fascinating detours in the National Gallery’s rehang you have to pick up some kind of thread. In my case, perhaps distracted by the thought of the National’s new restaurant, Locatelli, it’s foodie still lifes.

Two huge paintings of cheese take pride of place in one of the Dutch rooms. In Floris van Dijck’s 1616 still life, a black gouda rests on top of a yellow one, their cut and recut surfaces like walls of fat. In another room you can see Gustave Courbet’s great, melancholy Still Life With Apples and a Pomegranate, which manages to express the defeat of the Paris Commune in battered, pockmarked fruits. Finally, at the climax of Britain’s free national collection of European art from the middle ages to the birth of modernism, three revolutionary still lifes hang together so you can see how Cézanne’s pictures of fruit begin to rip apart perspective and make way for Picasso’s mind-boggling 1914 cubist masterpiece Fruit Dish, Bottle and Violin.

The Wonder ofArtmay seem a glib, even desperate, title for this rehang but I can’t really argue. This is one of the greatest museums of painting in the world, a magic labyrinth whose every picture is a door to Wonderland. My anxiety was that the curators might try to reinvent or, God forbid, reimagine their collection, without chronology or coherence. But this “new” National is reassuringly like the old one. It wasn’t broken, so they haven’t fixed it.

Seriously, what other capital city offers, free of charge, the chance to wander in casually off its main square and see masterpieces by Leonardo da Vinci, Jan van Eyck and Monet in such a calm, unfussy atmosphere, which the cool new architecture and lighting improve? I guess the National would love a bit more crowding – like other London museums it has lost visitors after Covid – but there’s a subtlety to the choices its Victorian founders made that somehow enforces introspection and seriousness. It is the most intelligent of great art museums.

That does not have to mean inaccessible or snobbish. You no longer enter the revamped Sainsbury Wing to be confronted by ranks of gold-dripping gothic altarpieces but get a welcoming embrace from Leonardo. His Virgin of the Rocks hangs right there at the start – blam! – a cool dive into shadowy depths out of which floats the pale androgynous face of art’s queerest angel. Behind is a darkened chapel containing Leonardo’s smokily drawn Burlington House Cartoon. As openers go this is as classic as a negroni. (I am thinking of Locatelli again. And his bar Giorgio downstairs.)

One of the most effective moves in this new approach is to isolate the collection’s biggest stars to let you savour their drop-dead genius. Later on Titian and Monet get rooms of their own. But a few metres from Leonardo you’ll find a wall of paintings by Van Eyck, the Flemish artist who anticipated many of the Tuscan polymath’s techniques in the early 1400s. No other gallery in the world has such a perfect group of Van Eycks and here they all are: a strangely miniaturised head of the artist himself, looking like a magician in his turban, a portrait of a young man movingly inscribed “Faithful memory”, and between them, The Arnolfini Portrait with its dead-eyed merchant and young bride, Death and the Maiden set in a perfect simulacrum of an ordinary room.

We’re not in Florence any more. The National Gallery used to tell a traditional textbook tale of art that began when perspective was “invented” in early 1400s Florence. This rehang involves a momentous retelling of the story. We now begin in Bruges with Van Eyck, which helps define the great leap forward in the Renaissance in a simpler, more human way as the discovery of the real world. You see it happen all around you as Rogier van der Weyden watches a grey-faced corpse being exhumed, a follower of Robert Campin spies on the Virgin as she breastfeeds Christ and Hans Holbein gazes into the eyes of a squirrel.

This northern Renaissance route runs right down one side of the Sainsbury Wing (or aisle, if you like the supermarket metaphor) and leads to 16th-century Basel where Holbein met the humanist theologian Erasmus. His portrait of Erasmus, a gentle half-smile on his scholarly face, is hung next to paintings that share Erasmus’s witty imagination by Bruegel, Bosch and Matsys.

We’ve gone from art discovering how to depict people as people, to portraying inner lives. This is the story the National Gallery tells, now more clearly than ever.

A brilliant room shows how portraiture became a Shakespearean art of the inner self right across 16th-century Europe. Holbein’s Ambassadors preside over a gathering that includes Giovanni Battista Moroni’s captivating portrait of an ordinary worker, The Tailor, sensitively giving you the once-over from his table as he cuts cloth with shears.

Any concessions this museum has made to accessibility have not compromised its collection one iota. Instead, emotion is allowed to bloom. The British gallery has become a purely 18th-century space, chucking out its Turners and Constables (to their own place nearby). Go Georgians! I am delighted there’s more focus on Hogarth and Gainsborough. A special wall of Gainsborough’s most intimate portraits centres on his love for his daughters, captured for ever – yet so fragile and momentary – in his heartbreaking The Painter’s Daughters Chasing a Butterfly.

The people gathered here are from other times, other worlds almost. Élisabeth Vigée Le Brun strikes a pose that nods to Rubens in her Self Portrait in a Straw Hat. Rembrandt’s Self Portrait at the Age of 63 looks back at you with eyes as deep, sad and addictive as they always will be, whatever the hang. They are all so real, so immediate. I know and love them. That’s the wonder of art.

The Wonder of Art atNational Gallery, London, opens on 10 May

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian