Nasal tanning sprays linked to skin cancer, trading standards officers warn

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"Trading Standards Warn of Health Risks Associated with Nasal Tanning Sprays"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 7.2
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

Trading standards officers have raised alarms regarding the dangers posed by nasal tanning sprays, which have been linked to serious health issues, including skin cancer and respiratory problems. The Chartered Trading Standards Institute (CTSI) highlighted that these unregulated products, often promoted by influencers on social media, could become as widespread as youth vaping. The sprays contain melanotan 2, a synthetic hormone that is not approved for use in the UK. This hormone can lead to a range of adverse effects, such as nausea, vomiting, high blood pressure, and an increased risk of melanoma skin cancer. The method of application—delivering the substance through the nostrils—allows for direct absorption into the body, stimulating melanin production and potentially enhancing tanning effects when combined with UV exposure. Alarmingly, the popularity of flavored variants, such as peach and bubble gum, may attract younger users, raising further concerns for their health and safety.

The self-tanning market is booming, with a valuation of £582.2 million and projections to reach £746.3 million by 2027, which could facilitate the rise of nasal tanning sprays despite their health risks. Social media videos featuring users promoting these products have fueled their appeal, often overshadowing the dangerous realities. Richard Knight, a lead officer at CTSI, emphasized the lack of safety assessments for these products, warning that influencers may not fully grasp the risks associated with their promotion. He cited the case of Edith Eagle, who suffered severe allergic reactions after using a nasal tanning spray, underscoring the potential dangers. Susanna Daniels from Melanoma Focus echoed these concerns, urging the public to reconsider the long-term health impacts of using such unregulated products. The CTSI recommends opting for safer self-tanning alternatives that adhere to UK Cosmetic Regulations, which include clear usage guidelines and safety assessments.

TruthLens AI Analysis

The article highlights serious health concerns associated with nasal tanning sprays, which have not been approved for use in the UK. This alarming information aims to raise awareness among consumers about the risks posed by these products, especially as demand is driven by social media influencers. The narrative suggests a growing public health crisis similar to youth vaping, drawing a parallel that may evoke fear and caution among readers.

Public Perception and Awareness

There is a clear intent to inform the public about the potential dangers of using unregulated cosmetic products. By citing the Chartered Trading Standards Institute (CTSI), the article seeks to add credibility to its claims and to encourage consumers to be skeptical of influencer marketing. This approach aims to foster a more cautious attitude towards such products, highlighting that they may lack proper safety assessments and health warnings.

Hidden Agendas or Omissions

While the article focuses on the dangers of nasal tanning sprays, it does not delve into the broader context of cosmetic safety regulations or the role of social media in shaping consumer behavior. This omission could suggest a purposeful narrowing of focus to highlight specific dangers without addressing systemic issues in the cosmetic industry or the responsibility of influencers. The framing may lead readers to overlook other related factors, such as the marketing practices of the beauty industry as a whole.

Manipulative Aspects

The article uses strong language and alarming statistics to create a sense of urgency, which can be seen as a manipulative technique. By characterizing the sprays as “dangerous and unregulated,” it invokes fear, thereby motivating readers to reconsider their choices. The choice of words like “unscrupulous sellers” also paints a negative image of those marketing these products, potentially leading to a vilification of certain groups without presenting a balanced viewpoint.

Comparative Context

In relation to other news articles, there is a noticeable trend of increasing scrutiny on cosmetic products influenced by social media. This aligns with a broader societal concern about health and safety in consumer products. The connections between these stories may suggest a growing movement towards consumer protection and awareness, particularly as young people are often the target demographic for these products.

Economic and Social Implications

The article points to the significant financial growth within the self-tan market, which could lead to increased sales of nasal tanning sprays despite the health risks. This could create a paradox in the market where consumer demand drives the proliferation of dangerous products. If public awareness grows regarding these risks, it may lead to calls for stricter regulations, potentially impacting manufacturers and influencing stock prices in the cosmetics sector.

Target Demographics

The focus on flavored nasal tanning sprays indicates an appeal to younger consumers, who may be more susceptible to influencer marketing. By raising awareness of the dangers associated with these products, the article may resonate more with health-conscious parents and advocates concerned about youth safety.

Market Impact

News like this can significantly influence public perception and consumer behavior, potentially leading to decreased demand for nasal tanning sprays and an increased call for regulatory action. Companies involved in the tanning industry may face scrutiny, which could impact their stock performance and market strategies.

Geopolitical Relevance

While the article primarily addresses health and consumer safety, the implications of unregulated cosmetic products can extend into broader discussions about public health policy and international regulatory standards. This aligns with ongoing global discourse about consumer rights and health safety.

The writing style of the article does not appear to suggest direct use of AI; however, it does reflect a structured approach typical of well-organized reporting. The emphasis on health risks and consumer awareness aligns with trends in responsible journalism aimed at protecting public interests.

Conclusively, the article effectively informs the public about the potential dangers of nasal tanning sprays while raising awareness about influencer marketing's role in consumer behavior. The manipulation present is evident in its fear-inducing language and selective focus on specific dangers. The reliability of the article is supported by references to reputable organizations, but its framing may lead to an incomplete understanding of the broader issues at play.

Unanalyzed Article Content

Nasal tanning sprays linked to cancer and respiratory problems and other unsafe cosmetic products pose one of the biggest threats to consumers, trading standards officers have warned.

Demand for these “dangerous and unregulated” tan-enhancing sprays, which is being driven by influencers on social media, could mirror the rapid rise of youth vaping, the Chartered Trading Standards Institute (CTSI) said.

The sprays contain substances such as melanotan 2 – a synthetic hormone not approved for use in the UK – which can cause nausea, vomiting, high blood pressure, kidney problems, and an increased risk of melanoma skin cancer.

The sprays are designed to be applied to the nostrils, where they deliver melanotan 2 directly into the body. This chemical stimulates the production of melanin, which darkens the skin, and while it can supposedly work without UV exposure, its effects are enhanced when used alongside sun exposure or tanning sun beds.

Trading standards officers also raised concerns over the rise of flavoured nasal tanning sprays, which include peach, bubble gum and lime, which may make them more attractive to young people.

The self-tan market was valued at £582.2m and is projected to grow to £746.3m by 2027, according to THG Labs’ Sunless Tanning Trend Report, raising concerns that nasal tanning sprays could capitalise on this booming demand, despite the health risks.

Videos on social media show tanned users promoting the products. The CTSI said many of these “unscrupulous sellers” are also marketing tanning drops and tanning gummies, designed to be ingested.

Richard Knight, the lead officer for cosmetics and beauty at CTSI, urged consumers to question the claims made by influencers online, warning that many may not fully understand the risks themselves.

He said: “Unlike cosmetic products, nasal tanning sprays are unlikely to have had expert safety assessment, and use of relevant health warnings and instructions for safe use are rare. This means that no one, including influencers, can truly know the risks of using these quasi-medical potions.”

Although it is illegal to sell medicinal products containing melanotan 2 in the UK, the tanners are marketed as cosmetics, meaning they fall outside the regulatory remit.

The products, which often have no ingredients list, are usually sold for about £20 each, with “extreme flavoured nasals” marketed at £30 each and cheaper alternatives for as little as £25 for two.

Users have reported severe allergic reactions to the products, and there have been cases of hospitalisation.

Edith Eagle, from King’s Lynn in Norfolk, was admitted to hospital after she suffered a serious reaction to a nasal tanning spray she bought online.

She bought the product hoping that they would give her a quick and easy sun-kissed look ahead of her holiday in April 2023, but told the BBC she felt as if she was “suffocating” and “drowning inside her own body”.

Knight said Eagle’s story should be a cautionary tale of “what can happen when putting unregulated products into our bodies”.

Susanna Daniels, the chief executive of Melanoma Focus, said: “We’re becoming increasingly concerned about the use of both nasal tanning sprays and tanning injections and their potential links withmelanoma skin cancer.

“These unregulated and illegal products not only pose serious health risks but also encourage harmful behaviours, particularly among young consumers. We urge the public to consider the long-term impacts on their health and avoid using these substances altogether.”

The CTSI advised consumers to opt for safer self-tanning options, like lotions or sprays applied to the skin, which are regulated under the UK Cosmetics Regulation and come with clear user guidelines.

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian