NSW to review law that presumes children under 14 are incapable of evil

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"NSW Government to Review Doli Incapax Law Amid Declining Youth Conviction Rates"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 8.8
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

The New South Wales (NSW) Attorney General's office has announced a review of the legal presumption known as doli incapax, which states that children aged between 10 and 14 are presumed incapable of understanding the difference between right and wrong. This review comes in the wake of a significant decrease in youth criminal conviction rates, which have fallen fivefold since 2016. The principle of doli incapax can be challenged if law enforcement can demonstrate that a child understood their actions were seriously wrong, rather than merely mischievous. The review will be led by Geoffrey Bellew SC, a former Supreme Court judge, and Jeffrey Loy, a former NSW police deputy commissioner, as the government seeks to evaluate the current application of this principle and explore potential legislative reforms to better support young individuals in the justice system. The Attorney General, Michael Daley, has highlighted the need for careful consideration of how to improve interventions for youth offenders, particularly given the concerning statistics indicating a drastic drop in proven outcomes in the children’s court for ages 10 to 13, from 76% in 2015-16 to just 16% in 2022-23.

The review also comes amid broader discussions about the implications of doli incapax, especially regarding its disproportionate impact on Aboriginal children and those in regional areas of NSW. Legal advocates are urging the government to raise the criminal age of responsibility to 14 and eliminate the presumption of doli incapax altogether. Critics argue that incarcerating young children does not enhance community safety and fails to address the underlying causes of youth crime. Instead, they advocate for a focus on crime prevention strategies and increased funding for community organizations that support at-risk youth. The review is part of a larger context of ongoing debates about youth justice and the effectiveness of recent legislative changes in NSW, including the controversial youth bail laws, which have faced criticism from experts and internal government factions alike. As the youth justice system in NSW grapples with increased detention rates and rising youth crime, the outcomes of this review could have significant implications for future policies and practices regarding juvenile offenders.

TruthLens AI Analysis

The article addresses a significant legal review in New South Wales (NSW) concerning the presumption of doli incapax, which states that children aged 10 to 14 are incapable of understanding the difference between right and wrong. This presumption's reconsideration comes in light of a dramatic decline in youth criminal conviction rates, raising questions about its effectiveness and implications for the legal system.

Legal Context and Historical Background

The presumption of doli incapax has been a longstanding aspect of common law in Australia, designed to protect children from criminal liability if they cannot comprehend the nature of their actions. However, a recent report indicates a stark decrease in the conviction rates for children aged 10 to 13, which has triggered the NSW attorney general's office to initiate a review. This suggests a possible misalignment between the legal framework and contemporary understanding of child psychology and criminal responsibility.

Impact on Youth Crime Rates

The decline in conviction rates—dropping from 76% to 16% in just seven years—raises concerns about the implications of the doli incapax presumption in practice. The article notes that over half of the charges against youths were withdrawn, indicating that the legal system may be struggling to manage cases involving minors effectively. This shift might reflect broader societal changes regarding youth behavior and accountability.

Comparison with Other Regions

The report highlights differences in the application of doli incapax across Australian states. In Queensland and Western Australia, where the principle is codified into law, the same decline in conviction rates has not been observed. This suggests that legislative clarity might provide more consistent outcomes in youth criminal cases, contrasting with the common law application in NSW.

Public Perception and Societal Implications

The discussion around this legal review may influence public perception regarding juvenile justice. There may be a push for more comprehensive reforms to ensure that children are held accountable for serious offenses while still recognizing their developmental limitations. It is likely that various community groups, especially those advocating for children's rights, will support this review, aiming for a balanced approach.

Potential Impact on Policy and Legislation

The review could lead to significant policy changes in how youth crime is prosecuted, potentially shifting the focus towards rehabilitation rather than punishment for minors. This could influence broader discussions about criminal justice reform in Australia and might set a precedent for other jurisdictions facing similar issues.

Market and Political Considerations

While this news primarily pertains to legal and societal matters, it can indirectly impact political discourse and potentially influence legislative priorities. However, its immediate effect on stock markets or specific sectors appears minimal, as it pertains more to social policy than economic factors.

Use of AI in News Writing

The article may not specifically indicate the use of AI in its composition. However, AI technologies could assist in analyzing large data sets related to crime statistics and trends. If AI was employed, it might have influenced the structure or clarity of the report, aiming to present the data in a digestible format for readers.

The article primarily aims to inform the public and policymakers about the review while potentially advocating for a reevaluation of juvenile justice systems in light of changing societal norms. Overall, it is a credible report, supported by statistical evidence and expert commentary, although its framing may elicit varied interpretations among different community groups.

Unanalyzed Article Content

A centuries-old legal presumption that children aged between 10 and 14 don’t understand the difference between right and wrong is to be reviewed afterNew South Walesyouth criminal conviction rates tumbled fivefold.

The NSW attorney general’s office said the review will consider how the principle of doli incapax – Latin for “incapable of evil” – is applied in criminal proceedings, its impact on intervention, possible improvements and a framework for legislation.

In NSW, the criminal age of responsibility is 10 but doli incapax can apply up to 14. The presumption can be rebutted if police can prove a child understood what they did was seriously wrong, as opposed to naughty.

Geoffrey Bellew SC, the state parole authority chair and a former supreme court judge, and Jeffrey Loy, a former NSW police deputy commissioner, will lead the doli incapax review, the NSW attorney general, Michael Daley, said on Thursday.

In 2016, a high court ruling clarified doli incapax, resulting in prosecutors needing to prove the child understood they were seriously wrong when committing a crime. Since then, conviction rates of children aged 10 to 13 have plummeted.

A NSW Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research (Bocsar) reportfound the proportion of 10- to 13-year-olds with a proven outcome – guilty or not guilty – in the NSW children’s court tumbled from 76% in 2015-16 to 16% in 2022-23.

The prosecution withdrew charges in more than half of all cases in 2022-23, with similar patterns in Victoria and South Australia.

Sign up for Guardian Australia’s breaking news email

The attorney general’s office said a similar decline was not seen in Queensland and Western Australia, where doli incapax has been codified in legislation (rather than as a common law understanding, as in NSW).

“The common law presumption of doli incapax dates back hundreds of years. It operates across all Australian jurisdictions and its existence in the common law has been affirmed by the high court,” Daley said in a statement.

“Recently, concerns have been raised about the operation of doli incapax. I commissioned this review to ensure close consideration of any improvements that can be made and possible legislative reforms.”

Citing Bocsar, the attorney general’s office said the result raised questions about how best to support young people to reduce future criminal involvement.

According to Bocsar, Aboriginal children and children living in regional and remote NSW aredisproportionately representedin the state’s criminal justice system. Aboriginal legal groups said the criminal age should be raised to 14 and the presumption of doli incapax removed altogether.

Camilla Pandolfini, the CEO of Redfern Legal Centre, said children “should not end up in prison”.

“Putting young children into prison isn’t going to make anybody safer. It doesn’t address the causes of crime [or] address the reasons why very young children are being criminalised. It only increases the risk of recidivism.”

Rather than reviewing doli incapax, she said the state should focus on crime prevention and boost funding of Aboriginal community organisations and local services in rural and regional communities.

The NSW government recently extended its controversial youth bail laws, despiteexperts warning it would not curb crime long term, and internalpushback from some Labor MPs.

The state Nationals have been pushing the NSW government and the Liberals to support a change to doli incapax.A budget estimates hearing was told last month that the youth justice system was about “90% full at the moment”.“The changes to bail laws in the past year have coincided with an increase,” Paul O’Reilly, the acting deputy secretary for system reform at the Department of Communities and Justice, told the hearing. “It’s not entirely clear that increase is entirely attributable to the change in the bail laws.

“What we have seen is a change in bail decision-making behaviour from police and courts generally, and we’ve also seen an increase in offending and an increase in violence in offending.“All of those things add up to more kids in detention and, at the moment, we are managing that within our current capacity.”Youth crime has remained stable over the short and medium term in NSW, the latest Bocsar data shows.However the data indicated a “significant increase” in young people shoplifting and possessing illicit weapons.

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian