Much Ado About Nothing review – RSC boots the action to elite Italian football in a play of two halves

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"Royal Shakespeare Company's 'Much Ado About Nothing' Reimagined in Elite Italian Football Setting"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 8.3
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

The Royal Shakespeare Company's latest adaptation of 'Much Ado About Nothing' transports Shakespeare's classic tale into the world of elite Italian football, showcasing a visual metaphor that seems to be the company's new hallmark. The production opens with a sports feed announcing a thrilling European final where FC Messina triumphs over Madrid FC, setting the stage for a play that cleverly intertwines themes of competition and romance. The character of Benedick, portrayed as a cocky midfielder, is humorously labeled 'Signor Own-Goal' in a nod to modern football culture, while Beatrice's role as a sports reporter adds a contemporary twist. The play's setting allows for an exploration of misogyny and falsehoods in a world where misinformation spreads rapidly through mobile phones, thus amplifying the stakes of Hero's plight in a way that resonates with today's audiences. The juxtaposition of football jargon with Shakespearean dialogue creates a unique and engaging experience, even as some liberties are taken with the original text's nuances.

However, the production suffers from pacing issues, particularly noticeable after halftime when the vibrant football theme shifts to wedding attire, causing the initial metaphor to dissipate. Director Michael Longhurst’s handling of the tempo is called into question, as certain crucial lines, such as Beatrice's intense demand that Benedick 'Kill Claudio', lose their impact due to rushed delivery. While Freema Agyeman’s portrayal of Beatrice stands out and suggests she could be a formidable player, the overall coherence of the adaptation falters as it transitions from the energetic atmosphere of a football match to the more subdued context of romantic conflict. The set design and costumes receive praise for their creativity, but the production ultimately leaves audiences wanting, as the clever concept does not fully translate into a consistently engaging theatrical experience. This 'Much Ado About Nothing' runs at the Royal Shakespeare Theatre in Stratford-upon-Avon until May 24, offering a bold yet imperfect interpretation of a beloved classic.

TruthLens AI Analysis

The review of "Much Ado About Nothing" highlights an innovative adaptation by the Royal Shakespeare Company (RSC), setting the classic play in the world of elite Italian football. This choice of setting reflects a trend in contemporary theater where traditional narratives are reimagined through modern lenses, potentially appealing to younger audiences and sports fans alike.

Cultural Commentary on Modern Adaptations

The adaptation suggests that visual metaphor has become a hallmark of the RSC's recent productions, as seen in previous works like "Hamlet" set on a cruise liner. This shift towards integrating popular culture elements, like football, into classic literature may aim to make Shakespeare more relatable to contemporary audiences. By situating the narrative within a familiar context—football—viewers may engage more deeply with the themes of the play, such as honor, deception, and misogyny, which resonate within both the sports and theatrical worlds.

Engagement with Current Issues

The review notes that the themes of falsehoods and misunderstandings are amplified in this adaptation, particularly with the presence of mobile phones, which can both spread and complicate rumors. This modern twist could be seen as a commentary on contemporary society's struggles with misinformation, echoing broader social concerns about communication and perception in the digital age.

Critique of the Production

The article acknowledges a division in the production's effectiveness, likening it to a "game of two halves." The initial setting in football captivates the audience, but the transition to a wedding scene post-intermission reportedly diminishes the metaphor's impact. Such a critique points to a potential inconsistency in thematic execution, suggesting that while the initial concept is compelling, the realization may not fully deliver on its promise. This aspect could lead to discussions about the importance of maintaining narrative coherence in adaptations.

Perception in the Theatrical Community

By focusing on a well-known sporting environment, the production might attract a demographic that traditionally may not engage with Shakespearean plays. This approach indicates a strategic move by the RSC to broaden their audience base, as both football fans and theatergoers could find common ground in this retelling.

Implications for Audience and Market

The review's focus on the adaptation's contemporary relevance suggests that the production may impact cultural discussions surrounding gender, identity, and societal norms. It could foster a new generation of theatergoers who are more inclined to appreciate classic literature when presented through familiar cultural lenses.

Overall, the review presents a nuanced perspective on the adaptation, celebrating its innovative approach while critiquing its execution. The intentions behind this adaptation likely center around making Shakespeare accessible and relevant to modern audiences, thereby fostering a renewed interest in classic works.

Unanalyzed Article Content

Suggesting that spectacular visual metaphor is the Royal Shakespeare Company’s new house style,a Hamlet set on a cruise lineris followed by a Much Ado About Nothing based in elite Italian football. After the National Theatre’s Gareth Southgate bio-dramaDear England, this must be the first season that both big subsidised companies have filled stages with young men in replica club shirts and jockstraps.

Before this Much of the Day starts, a TV sports feed tells us that FC Messina have beaten Madrid FC 3-2 in a European final, with a hat-trick from young winger Claudio. But cocky journeyman midfielder Benedick – jibed as “Signor Own-Goal”, replacing Shakespeare’s sexualised insult “Mountanto” – refuses to be interviewed by TV sportscaster Beatrice, due to some past bad match.

While Hamlet takes place surrounded by sea, this re-sported Messina is more of a stretch, requiring “war” to become “game”, Leonato “owner” rather than “governor” and nobleman Don Pedro a “manager”, although football’s nickname culture permits him to be addressed as “Sweet Prince”, which is relatively modest in comparison with José Mourinho’s “Special One”.

And for football aficionados, it is shaming how well the game fits the plot of the brutal misogynistic slandering of a young woman, Hero. Indeed, a play revolving around falsehoods and pranking gains new power when everyone has a mobile phone. And masked balls (on which many misunderstandings depend) also feel plausible partying for Champions League millionaires.

Less happily, the footballing cliche about a game of two halves also applies to the production. After halftime, as football kit gives way to wedding gear, the metaphor visually vanishes. Also, a common football-managerial complaint about the pace of play – moving the ball faster here, tactically slowing things down there – is something director Michael Longhurst might look at before a second elsewhere.

One of the most remarkable lines in Shakespeare, Beatrice’s demand that Benedick “Kill Claudio”, is gabbled without a preceding pause, while other scenes need much quicker passing, especially as the comic coppers (cut completely fromJamie Lloyd’s recent London Much Ado) get a full game. Dogberry and the other members of his watch as hi-vis private security is a good sight gag but their lines frequently die.

Freema Agyeman’s winning Beatrice looks – although the conceit can’t encompass women’s football – as if she might be a better player than Nick Blood’s Benedick, who has the poignancy of a late-career athlete, while Peter Forbes’ sleazy Leonato would easily fail the Premier League’s “fit and proper owners” test. Eleanor Worthington-Cox’s hopeful Hero could have walked on from Amazon Prime’s Married to the Game. Jon Bausor’s set makes amusing use of a folding massage table, and the clothes, from tracksuits to designer suits and frocks, should win him a costume trophy. The overall show, though, is a little bit, as they spell it in football, Messi.

Atthe Royal Shakespeare theatre, Stratford-upon-Avon, until 24 May

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian