More than 1m older people in England waited over 12 hours in A&E last year

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"Over 1 Million Elderly Patients in England Experience Extended A&E Waits Exceeding 12 Hours"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 7.1
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

A recent report from the Royal College of Emergency Medicine (RCEM) reveals a troubling trend in emergency care for older adults in England, with over 1.15 million individuals aged 60 and above enduring waits exceeding 12 hours in Accident & Emergency (A&E) departments during 2024. This figure marks a significant increase from the previous year, highlighting a systemic issue within the healthcare system. The report indicates that the likelihood of experiencing such long waits escalates with age; for instance, patients aged 60 to 69 face a 15% chance, while those aged 90 and older have a staggering 33% likelihood of waiting over 12 hours. Dr. Adrian Boyle, president of the RCEM, emphasized the urgent need for reform, stating that the current situation is failing vulnerable patients, many of whom are left in degrading conditions on trolleys in hospital corridors, which poses serious risks to their safety and health.

Moreover, the RCEM's findings underscore that prolonged waits not only compromise patient dignity but also result in missed critical health screenings. Alarmingly, only 16% of patients over 75 were screened for delirium, a condition that could significantly affect their outcomes, and less than half of the patients were assessed for fall risks. Dr. Nick Murch, president of the Society for Acute Medicine, echoed these concerns, asserting that the extended waiting times reflect a profound failure of the healthcare system despite the hard work of medical staff. To address these issues, the RCEM advocates for the implementation of front door frailty screenings in A&E, similar to initiatives already underway in Scotland. Dr. Boyle reiterated that systemic changes are essential to ensure that older patients receive timely care, calling on the UK government to prioritize A&E improvements, particularly for the elderly population. In response, a Department of Health and Social Care spokesperson acknowledged the unacceptable nature of these wait times and highlighted government investments aimed at reducing A&E delays and improving patient access to care.

TruthLens AI Analysis

The report sheds light on a pressing issue within the English healthcare system, specifically highlighting the alarming wait times that older adults experience in Accident & Emergency (A&E) departments. By presenting data that shows a significant increase in the number of patients aged 60 and over waiting more than 12 hours for care, the article aims to evoke concern and a sense of urgency regarding the state of healthcare services for the elderly.

Public Perception and Emotional Appeal

The narrative is designed to create a sense of outrage and empathy among readers. By personalizing the issue—referring to patients as "our parents, grandparents, great-grandparents"—the report seeks to resonate emotionally with the public. It implies a moral failing of the healthcare system, urging readers to feel a protective instinct toward vulnerable populations. Such framing can mobilize public opinion and potentially lead to calls for reform.

Potential Omissions and Hidden Agendas

While the article focuses on the immediate crisis of long wait times and inadequate care, it may not delve into the broader systemic issues affecting healthcare, such as funding cuts, staffing shortages, or the impact of demographic changes. These factors could provide a more comprehensive understanding of the challenges faced by the healthcare system. The focus on emotional appeal may also distract from these underlying complexities.

Credibility of the Information

The data cited in the report originates from the Royal College of Emergency Medicine (RCEM), which lends credibility to the findings. However, the report may selectively present information that aligns with its narrative, potentially neglecting counterarguments or alternative perspectives on the healthcare system's performance.

Comparative Context

When comparing this report to other healthcare-related news, a pattern emerges where stories about systemic failures often coincide with calls for increased government funding or policy changes. This aligns with broader discussions in the media about healthcare reform, particularly in the wake of the pandemic, where health services have been under unprecedented strain.

Societal and Economic Impact

The implications of this report could be significant in various spheres. Public outcry may lead to political pressure for increased funding and reforms in the healthcare system. Moreover, the perception of a failing healthcare system could influence voting patterns and priorities in upcoming elections, impacting political stability. Economically, if the healthcare system does not improve, it could lead to increased costs for emergency care, impacting insurance and overall healthcare expenses.

Target Audience

This report appears to target concerned citizens, particularly those with elderly relatives or those advocating for healthcare reform. It may also resonate with healthcare professionals who are aware of these challenges and seek to highlight the urgent need for change.

Market Reactions

This type of news could influence healthcare stocks, particularly those related to emergency care services or companies involved in healthcare technology aimed at improving patient care. Investors may react to anticipated changes in funding or policy reforms, which could impact stock performance.

Global Implications

While the report focuses on England, it reflects broader global issues within healthcare systems, especially regarding aging populations. The challenges faced could serve as a case study for other nations grappling with similar issues, thereby influencing international discourse on healthcare reform.

Artificial Intelligence Involvement

It is unlikely that AI was directly involved in writing this article, but the data analysis and presentation may have benefited from AI tools in terms of data processing or information retrieval. The structured presentation of statistics suggests a methodical approach that could be informed by AI models specializing in data analysis.

In conclusion, the article is a credible source that effectively highlights serious issues within the healthcare system, but it may lack comprehensive context that could provide a fuller picture of the challenges at hand. The emotional appeal and urgency conveyed are intentional, aiming to mobilize public sentiment for change.

Unanalyzed Article Content

More than 1 million older people a year inEnglandare forced to wait longer than 12 hours in A&E, with many having to endure “degrading and dehumanising” corridor waits on trolleys.

The number aged 60 and over waiting more than 12 hours to be transferred, admitted or discharged increased to 1.15 million in 2024, up from 991,068 in 2023. The figure was 305,619 in 2019, according to data obtained by the Royal College of Emergency Medicine (RCEM) under freedom of information laws.

A report by the RCEM also found the risk of a 12-hour wait in an emergency department in England increased with the age of the patient. People aged 60 to 69 had a 15% chance of waiting 12 hours or more. For those aged 90 and over, the likelihood rose to 33%.

“The healthcare system is failing our most vulnerable patients – more than a million last year,” said Dr Adrian Boyle, the president of the RCEM. “These people are our parents, grandparents, great-grandparents.

“They aren’t receiving the level of care they need, as they endure the longest stays in our emergency departments, often suffering degrading and dehumanising corridor care. It’s an alarming threat to patient safety. We know long stays are dangerous, especially for those who are elderly, and puts people’s lives at risk.”

As well as long waits, the RCEM report found many older people were missing out on vital checks in A&E. Of patients aged over 75, only 16% were screened for delirium – a reversible condition linked to an increased risk of death. Fewer than half (48%) of patients were screened for their risk of falls.

Dr Nick Murch, the president of the Society for Acute Medicine, said: “This situation, where over a million older patients are known to have endured prolonged periods of over 12 hours in emergency departments, frequently in unsuitable and undignified settings such as corridors, is a matter of grave concern.

“It is clear that, despite the considerable dedication and hard work of multidisciplinary teams including emergency medicine, acute medicine and acute frailty services, these extended waiting times signify a profound failure within our healthcare system.

“We must ensure that 12-hour waits in emergency departments again become an infrequent exception rather than the norm.”

The RCEM recommends changes, including “front door frailty screening” in every A&E, which is already being introduced in Scotland.

Sign up toFirst Edition

Our morning email breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what’s happening and why it matters

after newsletter promotion

Boyle said: “It’s the system that’s the issue and will continue to disproportionally affect older people unless governments across the UK make A&E a political priority.”

A Department ofHealthand Social Care spokesperson said: “It is unacceptable that older people are waiting up to 12 hours or more in A&E. This government is investing £26bn in the NHS and social care over the next two years, has ended the resident doctor strikes so staff are on the frontline, and is committed to cutting A&E waiting times so patients are seen faster.

“Through our 10-year health plan, we will ensure that patients, including older people, are seen promptly in A&E, waiting times continue to come down, and more people get a GP appointment.”

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian