More Australians can’t afford specialist fees. Experts say it’s ‘not in the spirit of Medicare’

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"Rising Specialist Fees in Australia Strain Patients Amid Stagnant Medicare Rebates"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 8.3
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

The rising costs of specialist consultations in Australia have become a significant barrier for many patients, as new data reveals that the average initial appointment with a dermatologist has surged to nearly $300, while the Medicare rebate has lagged far behind. According to a report by the online healthcare directory Cleanbill, the Medicare rebate for an initial dermatology appointment was $72.75 in March 2017, increasing only to $84.15 by March 2025. In contrast, the average out-of-pocket cost for the same appointment rose from $148.73 to $210.18 over the same period, indicating a substantial financial burden on patients. This trend reflects a broader issue where average out-of-pocket costs for initial consultations have increased by over 40% in eight years, while Medicare rebates have only increased by 16%. The report highlights that private health insurance does not cover these out-of-pocket expenses, leaving patients to shoulder the entire cost of consultations, which has led to a significant increase in the number of Australians delaying specialist care due to financial constraints, from 176,000 in 2016-17 to 900,000 in 2023-24.

The implications of these rising costs are particularly troubling for patients with chronic conditions who often require consultations with multiple specialists. Many individuals report having to prioritize which specialists to see based on their immediate health concerns, as the financial strain of out-of-pocket costs can significantly impact their ability to access necessary care. A study published in the journal Health Policy found that a third of individuals living with chronic diseases were unable to attend specialist appointments due to cost. Experts have expressed concern that while the government has taken steps to provide cost transparency through the Medical Costs Finder, there is no comprehensive policy aimed at addressing the underlying issue of rising fees. Health Minister Mark Butler has called for the private health sector, including insurers and specialists, to take more responsibility in safeguarding patients from exorbitant bills. As the gap between Medicare rebates and specialist fees continues to widen, many Australians are left facing difficult choices regarding their healthcare, undermining the fundamental principles of Medicare.

TruthLens AI Analysis

The article highlights a significant issue in Australia regarding the increasing costs associated with specialist medical consultations, particularly dermatology. The rising out-of-pocket expenses compared to the slow increase in Medicare rebates raises concerns about healthcare accessibility for many Australians.

Financial Burden on Patients

The report outlines a stark contrast between the growth of specialist fees and the corresponding Medicare rebates. As the average initial consultation cost for dermatology has surged to nearly $300, the rebate has only increased marginally, leading to a significant financial burden on patients. This discrepancy suggests a system that is failing to keep pace with the economic realities faced by individuals seeking specialized care.

Concerns About Medicare's Integrity

Experts quoted in the article express that the situation undermines the spirit of Medicare, which is designed to provide accessible healthcare for all Australians. The sentiment is that the current system is allowing healthcare costs to rise disproportionately, making it challenging for many to afford necessary specialist appointments. This aspect of the narrative evokes concern about the sustainability of Australia's healthcare system.

Impact on Healthcare Accessibility

The article points out that many Australians are now postponing or forgoing specialist care due to these rising costs. This trend could lead to worsening health outcomes for individuals who may delay necessary treatment, thus straining the healthcare system further down the line. The mention of private health insurance not covering these consultations adds another layer of complexity, highlighting the reliance on out-of-pocket expenses.

Public Sentiment and Potential Reactions

The publication aims to raise awareness about the issues within the healthcare system, potentially mobilizing public sentiment against the rising costs. It seeks to inform and perhaps incite action from both the public and policymakers to address these disparities in healthcare access. The article could resonate particularly with lower- and middle-income communities who are most affected by these financial pressures.

Market and Political Implications

From an economic standpoint, the report may influence public opinion, which could lead to calls for reform in the healthcare system. Politically, it may pressure the government to reconsider Medicare funding and reimbursement rates to better align with the actual costs of healthcare services. This could have broader implications for healthcare policy discussions in Australia.

Community Response and Support Base

The article is likely to garner support from communities that prioritize accessible healthcare and social equity. Advocacy groups may use this data to push for reforms aimed at improving the affordability of healthcare services, making it a crucial piece for those engaged in healthcare policy and reform.

Stock Market Reactions

In terms of market implications, companies involved in healthcare services, insurance, and pharmaceuticals may experience fluctuations based on public sentiment surrounding healthcare costs. Investors might pay close attention to how this narrative influences government policy and funding in the healthcare sector.

Global Context

While focused on Australia, the issues raised in this article mirror global concerns about healthcare affordability and access. Rising healthcare costs are a common theme in many countries, making this report relevant beyond its immediate national context.

The analysis indicates that the article is grounded in factual data regarding healthcare costs and Medicare rebates, yet it also serves a broader agenda of advocating for change in the healthcare system. The language used is direct, emphasizing the urgency of the issue, which could be perceived as a call to action.

In conclusion, the article is credible as it provides data-supported insights into the challenges faced by Australians in accessing specialist care. It effectively communicates the implications of rising healthcare costs, aiming to foster awareness and potentially drive change in policy.

Unanalyzed Article Content

The cost of an initial dermatology appointment is now up to nearly $300 on average, new data shows. It reflects a broader problem: that Medicare rebates are not keeping up with the pace specialist fees are rising.

Online healthcare directory Cleanbill, which hastracked bulk billing rates among GPs, is expanding to provide data on out-of-pocket costs to see other health professionals, starting with dermatology.

The report, released on Thursday, found the Medicare rebate in March 2017 for an initial appointment with a dermatologist was $72.75, while the out-of-pocket cost was $148.73.

By March 2025, the rebate had risen by $11.40, to $84.15, while the average out-of-pocket costs, at $210.18, were $61.45 more expensive.

Over eight years, average out-of-pocket costs for an initial consultation had increased by over 40%, and average follow-up consultation costs had increased by over 55%. The rebate rose by less than 16%.

Cleanbill compared the 2017 data collected by predecessor MindTheGap for 165 dermatology clinics still currently operating, with its own data collected in October.

Sign up for Guardian Australia’s breaking news email

Based on all 280 dermatology clinics Cleanbill identified currently operating, the average upfront cost of an appointment was $296.71 – more than 3.5 times the Medicare rebate.

Cleanbill’s report highlighted that as private health insurance does not cover out-of-hospital consultations, these out-of-pockets costs are being borne entirely by patients.

Private health insurance mainly covers the cost of private hospital treatment, and may also cover non-Medicare subsidised services such as physiotherapy, psychology and dental services – but not GP or specialist consultations.

“These out-of-pocket costs far exceed the increases that we’ve seen to the Medicare rebate,” Cleanbill’s chief executive, James Gillespie, said.

“In these circumstances, it’s easy to see why the number of Australians putting off specialist care due to cost has risen from 176,000 in2016-17to 900,000 in2023-24,” he wrote in the report, citing Australian Bureau of Statistics data.

Many specialist services are available to patients for free in public outpatient clinics, but patients need a referral from their GP to qualify, and each hospital or specialist clinic has its own process for assessing urgency, accepting referral letters and making appointments.

A GP referral is needed to claim the Medicare rebate at a specialist appointment, meaning a second round of out-of-pocket costs that “stacks one on top of the other”, Gillespie said.

Gillespie said it was reasonable to extrapolate similar price increases across other medical specialists than dermatologists.

Thelatest government dataon medical specialist consultations showed patient out-of-pocket costs in non-hospital settings increased in real terms (adjusting for inflation) from $1.1bn in 2012-13 to $1.9bn in 2022-23 – or “from $213 per patient to $294 (38%)”.

In the same period, Medicare benefits paid by the government increased in real terms from $2.5bn to $2.9bn – or 16%.

The government this yearpromised $7m to expandthe much-derided Medical Costs Finder website, which the former Coalition government spent $24m setting up to see only 70 specialists – out of 11,000 registered to practice –choose to voluntarily display their fee informationas of March 2025.

Prof Yuting Zhang, an expert in health economics at the University of Melbourne, said providing cost information was only a first step – and the government had not outlined a policy to lower fees.

Zhang and her colleagues at the Health Analytics, Leadership and Economics Hubmapped specialist fees in 2023 across different areas, finding on average that rheumatology had the highest fees, followed by neurology and immunology.

Specialist fees have gone up “a lot” but the Medicare schedule fee hasn’t been properly indexed, Zhang said, remaining “quite flat” for about the last 20 years, leaving patients to absorb the increasing gap.

Sign up toBreaking News Australia

Get the most important news as it breaks

after newsletter promotion

Some fees were “super high” at about $1,200 but cost varied widely even within the same specialty for exactly the same services, she said.

“Some people might be willing to pay a lot more to see a specialist and thinking the price might be an indicator for quality – which I can assure you, it’s never the case,” Zhang said. “More expensive doesn’t really mean better.”

A third of people living with chronic diseases say they are not able to attend specialist appointments due to the cost, a studypublished in May in the journal Health Policyfound, with both the upfront cost and out-of-pocket costs being a major barrier to care.

Australian National University researchers analysed the experiences of more than 1,800 Australians living with a range of chronic conditions within 37 studies.

Assoc prof Jane Desborough, the lead author of the study, said while GPs face “consistent pressure” to bulk-bill, backed by policy initiatives, there is “no similar conversation about non-GP specialists who are also trained in the public system, who are also remunerated through Medicare … yet from the evidence, it seems quite uncommon for them to bulk-bill”.

Many Australians with multiple chronic conditions often need to see several different specialists; even a person with a single chronic condition such as psoriatic arthritis needs both a dermatologist and rheumatologist.

Those who struggled to afford specialist appointments reported often choosing who they saw based on “what’s hurting most at the time”, Desborough said.

Chronic illness often impacts people’s capacity to work.

The frustration of not being able to afford specialist visits is compounded by the long wait list for public specialist clinics, she said, as well as an increased trend by specialists towards exclusive private practice.

Those who had full access to the specialist clinics in the public system were “very grateful for what Medicare does,” Desborough said.

But as for others, having to forego important aspects of their life – like food choices, social activities, family holidays, children’s sport, school excursions – to access healthcare: “That’s not in the spirit of Medicare,” she said.

The health minister, Mark Butler, said the private health sector, including insurers and specialists, “need[s] to do more to protect patients for exorbitant bills”.

Zhang said specialist medical colleges could play a role, by developing codes of conduct around fee practices and scrutinising members who consistently charge high fees.

The government could also open more public clinics offering free specialist care for those who cannot afford the gap fees in private clinics, Zhang said.

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian