‘Moral panic’ about new media’s influence on young voters underplays their interest in politics, creators say

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"Young Australian Voters Engage in Politics Through Independent Media Creators"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 7.5
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

Young Australian voters are actively engaging with politics, contrary to the perception that they are disengaged, according to Konrad Benjamin, a prominent creator behind Punters Politics. He argues that the corporate media and politicians often overlook the systemic issues that concern young people, which in turn drives them to seek information from independent sources on platforms like Instagram, YouTube, and TikTok. Research indicates a shift in how young individuals approach political participation, moving away from traditional forms such as joining political parties and towards issue-based activism. Professor Philippa Collin from Western Sydney University highlights that young people feel a growing responsibility to address pressing issues, including the housing crisis and climate change, which they did not contribute to creating. This engagement reflects a desire for meaningful participation in shaping the future of society, even as they navigate a media landscape increasingly dominated by influencers and independent commentators.

The rise of independent political content creators is reshaping the way young Australians consume news and engage with political discourse. Figures like Hannah Ferguson of Cheek Media Co and Jordan Shanks of Friendlyjordies have gained significant followings, with their content resonating deeply with younger audiences. These creators often present complex political topics in accessible formats, fostering a sense of community and conversation among their followers. Despite some media narratives suggesting a moral panic over the influence of these creators, Collin notes that this trend represents a new form of civic engagement rather than a decline in interest. Young voters are increasingly looking for authenticity and relatability in political discussions, and independent creators are filling the gap left by traditional media. As young Australians express their desire for a more equitable and caring society, the emergence of these voices reflects a broader shift toward participatory politics, which challenges the established narratives around youth engagement in civic life.

TruthLens AI Analysis

The article sheds light on a common misconception regarding young Australian voters, emphasizing their genuine interest in politics despite a narrative of disengagement. It highlights the voices of young creators who are actively engaged in political discourse through various social media platforms, challenging the idea that this generation is apathetic.

Perception of Young Voters

The report aims to counter the prevalent notion that young people are disinterested in traditional political processes. By presenting insights from young influencers and academic research, it seeks to reshape public perception around the political engagement of youth. The creators mentioned, like Konrad Benjamin, argue that the media and political landscape often overlook the systemic issues that concern young voters, which could lead to a misunderstanding of their level of engagement.

Moral Panic and Political Engagement

The term "moral panic" suggests an exaggerated concern regarding the rise of young online creators involved in political matters. This framing implies that while there may be fears about social media influencing political engagement negatively, the reality is that young voters are more engaged than ever, albeit in different ways than previous generations. This shift towards "issues-based" politics indicates that young people are seeking to address pressing societal concerns rather than traditional party loyalties.

Hidden Agendas and Public Sentiment

There may be an underlying agenda to shift the focus away from criticisms directed at established political structures by highlighting the proactive role of young people. By showcasing their engagement, the article may aim to foster a sense of optimism and agency among the youth, encouraging them to participate more actively in political discussions and decision-making processes.

Manipulative Elements

While the article presents valid points about youth engagement, it could be argued that the language used leans toward manipulation by painting a stark contrast between the perceived disinterest of young voters and their actual engagement. This framing may oversimplify the complexities of political participation among different demographics and could serve to rally support for a particular viewpoint.

Credibility of Information

Overall, the article appears to be grounded in research and personal testimonies, lending it credibility. However, the emphasis on moral panic and the portrayal of traditional media may lead some readers to question the objectivity of the analysis. The argument relies heavily on anecdotal evidence, which, while compelling, does not fully capture the diversity of opinions and experiences among young voters.

Potential Societal Impacts

This coverage could inspire youth to engage more with political issues, potentially influencing future elections and policy discussions. By acknowledging their concerns and activism, it may also pressure traditional political entities to adapt and address the issues that matter to younger generations, such as climate change and housing crises.

The article seems to resonate more with progressive communities who value activism and social justice, appealing to those who prioritize issues over party affiliation. It encourages a more engaged and informed electorate, particularly among younger voters who may feel marginalized by traditional political dynamics.

In terms of market impact, while the article may not directly influence stock markets, it can affect sectors related to youth engagement in politics, such as tech companies focused on social media platforms. If young voters feel empowered to participate in political processes, there could also be broader implications for consumer behavior and advocacy for corporate social responsibility.

Reflecting on global power dynamics, the article touches on significant contemporary issues, such as climate change and social equity, aligning with current global discussions. The framing of these topics within the context of youth engagement may amplify their urgency in public discourse.

Regarding the potential use of artificial intelligence in crafting this article, it is plausible that AI technologies could have influenced the structure or style of the writing. Models capable of analyzing public sentiment or summarizing research findings may have been employed to shape the narrative. However, the article's content seems to reflect human editorial decisions more than algorithmic generation, emphasizing a personal touch in the storytelling.

The article contains elements that could be perceived as manipulative, particularly through its framing of youth engagement versus traditional political apathy. The language used may evoke emotional responses aimed at galvanizing support for a particular narrative regarding the political agency of younger generations.

In conclusion, the article effectively highlights the engagement of young voters while challenging prevailing stereotypes about their political participation. However, the presentation may lean toward a specific interpretation of youth activism that could oversimplify the broader landscape of political engagement.

Unanalyzed Article Content

Young Australian voters “do actually care” about politics and current affairs, Konrad Benjamin tells Guardian Australia. “Aussie punters are not disengaged,” he says. “Most of the corporate media and politicians just refuse to talk about the big, systemic things that are broken, and how we can fix them.”

The creator behindPunters Politics, with 400,000 followers on Instagram, is a popular source of information in the lead up to the federal election, according to responses to theGuardian Australia young voter callout. He is one of a lineup of independent commentators and journalists creating content on platforms such as Instagram, YouTube, TikTok and Twitch that people told us they are turning to for political information.

While most respondents to our callout indicated they rely on a mix of social media and traditional media for news, influencers and experts have observed a “moral panic” about the increase in young online creators engaging in politics.

For at least 20 years, young people have been moving away from formal politics – such as joining a political party or a volunteering organisation – and towards “issues-based” politics, says Prof Philippa Collin from Western Sydney University. Collin researches the role of the internet in the political lives of young people.

“It’s pretty common that it has been interpreted as young people not being interested or involved in civic engagement or political participation,” she says.

But research points to an increase in participatory politics, where young people “feel a responsibility to do something about the issues that they see in the world, or that affect them directly,” Collin says.

Sign up for the Afternoon Update: Election 2025 email newsletter

“They want to have more of a say, and to influence the world around them. They are facing a lot of really big issues, which they haven’t played any part in creating … Think about the housing crisis, or the climate crisis, or various conflicts, or the general state of the economy.”

At the same time, young voters have grown up with the internet. Legacy media organisations are increasingly crafting and distributing media in new formats on new platforms, but there are already young creators on those platforms dedicated to particular issues – whether that be groups with a particular focus, such as sustainability and climate, or citizen journalists who “perhaps don’t even have a journalism background, but become important educators,” Collin explains.

Hannah Ferguson and her independent news commentary pageCheek Media Coand podcast Big Small Talk were collectively mentioned more than any other independent social media creators by people who responded to our callout.

Her Instagram pages have a total of 271,200 followers. Cheek Media Co publishes short reels on politics that attract tens to hundreds of thousands of views. One reel from January that breaks down the opposition leader Peter Dutton’s voting history on key issues such as housing affordability and Hecs indexation racked up 1.2m views, more than 40,000 likes and thousands of comments.

Ferguson, who has recently interviewed Anthony Albanese and Adam Bandt, was one of a dozen content creators invited to the 2025 federal budget lockup, a move that wascriticised bypoliticians and traditional media organisations.

Benjamin’s Punters Politics, Jordan Shanks from Friendlyjordies and Juice Media were also frequently named by respondents.

Along with his Instagram page, Benjamin has almost 140,000 subscribers on YouTube, with videos on both platforms consistently reaching hundreds of thousands of viewers. He is known for critiquing big corporate industries, such as gas companies and supermarkets.

Shanks, a comedian known for hispolitical commentary, continues to have the largest follower base and viewership on YouTube of the Australian creators mentioned by callout respondents. He posts to 1.38 million subscribers.

Juice Media, known for its “honest government ads”, has more than1 million subscribers on YouTube, with videos consistently garnering half a million views or more.

Pages such as Toilet Paper Aus on Instagram, Swollen Pickles on YouTube, and Purple Pingers on YouTube – whose creator Jordan van den Lamb is running for a Senate seat for the Victorian Socialists in this election – were also mentioned by callout respondents, as were journalists such as Antony Loewenstein, Jan Fran, the former political reporter at Guardian Australia Amy Remeikis, and Soaliha Iqbal.

Abbie Chatfield, who was a reality TV contestant and host, and who now has half a million Instagram followers, is another name mentioned by callout respondents. Her interviewswith Albaneseand Bandt on her hitpodcast It’s a Lotwerecleared of wrongdoing by the Australian Electoral Commissionafter a complaint by the Liberal party. A snippet of her interview with the prime minister posted to Instagram reached more than 700,000 viewers.

Chatfield has encouraged her followers to put the Liberal party last on ballot papers, and in response to the AEC investigation said, “there’s moral panic about influencers in politics”.

Sign up toAfternoon Update: Election 2025

Our Australian afternoon update breaks down the key election campaign stories of the day, telling you what’s happening and why it matters

after newsletter promotion

Collin agrees. She says there is a paradox here: “On one hand, we have these discourses around young people not being interested in, not engaging in or caring about political issues.

“Then, as soon as the media and actors in society who [young people] listen to and engage with start talking politics, there is big concern about what is and isn’t appropriate.

“This is just another classic moral panic around young people,” she says.

Freya Leach, who was the Liberal candidate for Balmain during the 2023 NSW election, posts conservative takes to just over 14,000 TikTok followers. Her videos on the upcoming election, frequently promoting Liberal policies to boost gas production and cut migration numbers among other things, have reached tens of thousands of viewers each.

The Australian Olympic diver Sam Fricker interviewed Dutton on his YouTube channel, which has close to 6 million subscribers, in December last year. The hour-long video reached less than 7,000 views. Fricker also recently interviewed the billionaire Clive Palmer, and energy minister, Chris Bowen, on his podcast.

Benjamin doesn’t consider himself a journalist. He says independent creators are “in a lane of our own”.

“I’m not uncovering new stories. I don’t have an editor … I don’t have a team of people making sure my facts are correct.”

While he has the social media following of an influencer, Benjamin doesn’t use that moniker. He prefers “video creator”, and says he is a “communicator”.

“You have scientists, you have journalists, you have economists.

“I feel like creators like myself step into the gap and do a bit of filtering … ‘That’s a distraction’, ‘this makes sense’, ‘let me explain this complex thing in a way that we might be able to understand’.”

Benjamin thinks Australians are looking for “authenticity” amid “the clinical way media presents information”.

Collin says what unites Ferguson, Benjamin and Chatfield is that they relate to a younger audience.

“They are disrupting the traditional discourse around young people and politics, and they are more likely to present as engaging in conversation and an exchangewiththeir audience than other forms of media and political actors who tend to speaktotheir audience.”

Benjamin describes the phenomenon as “talkback radio reincarnate” and says the goal is to make politics accessible to “everyday Aussie punters”.

The former high school teacher started Punters Politics because “it is getting harder and harder to do the very basic, simple things we are told to do”.

“Millennials, Gen Z, are told to get a job, go to uni, work hard,” he says. As younger voters grow up, they end up hitting a wall – ‘Hang on, I’m never going to own a house’.”

It is then that young people realise the system is broken, Benjamin says, and want to engage.

This sentiment was frequently raised byyoung voterswho responded to the Guardian’s callout. Collin has observed it in her research as well. She says there is increasing fear and anxiety.

“Many young people are losing hope that they can have a good life through effort and making good decisions,” she says.

At the same time, her research shows young people are increasingly expressing a desire for “a more egalitarian and a more caring society, a society that cares about the people in it, as well as the environment, and also cares about Australia’s role in the world”.

“I think there’s an interesting role that the kind of newer and more independent, unorthodox forms of media commentators or journalists are providing, and that is, they’re connecting with that search for hope that things can be different.”

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian