Money problems: have we had enough of TV shows about rich people?

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"Critique of Wealth Portrayals in Contemporary Television Raises Concerns"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 7.2
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

The release of the film 'Mountainhead' has sparked a conversation about the portrayal of wealth in contemporary television, with some viewers feeling overwhelmed by the saturation of stories centered around ultra-rich characters. Saloni Gajjar, writing for the AV Club, argues that shows like 'The White Lotus' and 'Nine Perfect Strangers' have created a narrative landscape that appears unable to depict anything beyond the misadventures of the wealthy elite. While this critique highlights the trend of featuring rich antiheroes, it also suggests a deeper issue: television's persistent glorification of wealth itself. Viewers are increasingly detached from narratives as they find themselves scrutinizing the luxurious lifestyles depicted on screen, leading to a sense of disconnection from the characters' experiences.

This trend raises questions about the intention behind these portrayals. While shows like 'Succession' and 'Billions' manage to critique wealth by showcasing the moral and ethical dilemmas faced by their wealthy characters, other series risk losing their narrative depth by merely presenting opulence as an aesthetic choice. The author notes that when wealth becomes a mere backdrop without critical examination, it transforms from meaningful commentary into 'wealth porn.' This shift, exemplified by the 'Selling Sunset-ification' of television, may not inspire envy but rather alienation, as viewers are left wondering about the authenticity of these portrayals. Rather than serving as aspirational content, these depictions can create a disconnect, propelling audiences to question the reality of the lives being portrayed, and whether these characters could comprehend the struggles faced by the average person.

TruthLens AI Analysis

You need to be a member to generate the AI analysis for this article.

Log In to Generate Analysis

Not a member yet? Register for free.

Unanalyzed Article Content

As fun as it was, Mountainhead seems to have broken something in quite a lot of people. For some, it was simply too timely. After all, it’s one thing to release a film about tech billionaires fighting over the remnants of a world ravaged by war and AI, but quite another to do it while that exact thing was really happening.

For others, Mountainhead marked the point where ultra-rich antiheroes reached full saturation. Writing in theAV Clublast week, Saloni Gajjar made the argument that – between Mountainhead, Your Friends & Neighbors, The White Lotus and Nine Perfect Strangers – we have now arrived at a moment where television seems unable to tell stories that are about anything but the badly behaved rich.

Gajjar’s point is well made, but I think the truth might be a little bit more insidious than that. Yes, we do appear to be in the middle of an unceasing wealth glut on television, but the problem isn’t just rich antiheroes. It’s the rich, full stop.

If you watch enough TV, you might have noticed a slow creep of aspiration. Houses are getting bigger. Clothes are becoming more stylish. Home furnishings have become so universally luxe that no matter what I’m watching – Shrinking, maybe, or The Four Seasons – I’ll almost always find myself detaching from the plot to wonder where the characters bought their nice lamps.

And once you start to notice it, you’ll see it everywhere. The Better Sister is a generic murder mystery that is impossible to engage with because everyone lives their lives in a heightened state of monied comfort. Sirens is a whirlwind of impeccable interiors and not much else.

Nobody on And Just Like That has spent even a second worrying about money, even though Carrie Bradshaw has basically got the exact same job as me and I can barely make it halfway around Lidl without having a panic attack about exceeding my overdraft. When I watched Good American Family, my first thought wasn’t ‘How awful that these people abandoned their infant daughter alone in an apartment while they moved to Canada,’ but ‘How the hell did these people afford an entire separate apartment for their infant daughter?’

And this is the problem. At least when the rich people are the baddies you can argue that the shows are attempting to make a point about them. Succession essentially trapped its characters within the confines of their wealth. They might have it all, the show said, but only because they had to cash in their souls. And whileThe White Lotushas to return to the same well too many times by dint of its format, it still has plenty to say about the wealthy. This year, especially, it was the newly wealthy. Watch how quickly Belinda, a lowly spa manager in season one, traded in all of her defining traits the moment a windfall hit her account.

I’d even argue that Mountainhead didn’t qualify as wealth porn, because every single character was caught up in a frantic, exhausting status game to the exclusion of everything else in their lives. True, it featured a massive house but, as Variety’s recentgroup interviewrevealed, they only chose it because it made the cinematographer want to kill himself. I’m no expert, but I don’t think that the appeal of porn is how many suicidal tendencies it triggers.

In other words, depictions of extreme wealth on TV are OK if they have a point. All these shows had a point. Billions had a point. Even Schitt’s Creek managed to say something about money. The problem is when this wears away and characters are only rich because producers want to give the viewer something nice to look at. Sometimes this shift even happens on the same series. The Morning Show might have started as a glossy satire about Reese Witherspoon’s plucky reporter being thrust into the well-to-do world of New York media, but it lost that bite long ago. Now it exists as a weird kind of internal competition to see which character can have the shiniest hair.

And it’s this Selling Sunset-ification of television that needs to stop. When we’re confronted with such an unyielding parade of upscale comfort, the effect isn’t as aspirational as producers probably think. We aren’t left with a growling envy of how the other half lives; we’re instead left worrying that they wouldn’t know what real life was like if you bonked them over the head with a Poundland flipflop. Although if anyone from The Four Seasons does want to get in touch to tell me where all their nice lamps came from (and, where possible, some acceptable Temu dupes) I’d appreciate it.

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian