Modern slavery victims opt to stay with exploiters for fear of deportation, research finds

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"Victims of Modern Slavery Avoid Government Support Due to Deportation Fears, Research Shows"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 8.7
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

Research indicates that victims of modern slavery are increasingly reluctant to seek government support due to fears of immigration enforcement, leading them to remain with their exploiters. The independent anti-slavery commissioner, Eleanor Lyons, has characterized the current system as 'deeply broken.' Two significant studies, one from Nottingham University’s Rights Lab and another from the University of Oxford, reveal alarming trends. The first report, titled Refusal to Consent, highlights that refusals to engage with the National Referral Mechanism (NRM) have reached record levels, with duty to notify reports rising over 630% since 2016. Many victims perceive the NRM as a potential trap that could expose them to deportation rather than provide the protection they seek. The hostile rhetoric surrounding immigration policies has further exacerbated this fear, causing victims to avoid the very systems designed to safeguard them. Traffickers are reportedly exploiting these fears, using government discourse about deportation to maintain control over their victims, particularly those from countries like Albania and Vietnam, where government return agreements have heightened anxiety about coming forward for help.

The second report, Barriers to Prosecutions and Convictions under the Modern Slavery Act 2015, reveals that despite the intent of the legislation to protect trafficking victims, prosecution rates remain disappointingly low. With only 1.8% of potential trafficking victims referred to the NRM resulting in convictions, the data shows a significant gap in the enforcement of the law. In the one-year period from July 2023 to June 2024, while over 17,000 potential victims were referred, only 58 individuals were convicted of modern slavery-related offences. According to Alicia Heys, an author of the study, the low conviction rates undermine the original goals of the Modern Slavery Act. Eleanor Lyons emphasizes the urgent need for reform in the NRM, stating that when fear of deportation outweighs the promise of protection, the system fails its most vulnerable individuals. The Home Office has been approached for a comment regarding these findings.

TruthLens AI Analysis

The article highlights a troubling aspect of modern slavery, revealing that victims are often reluctant to seek government protection due to fears of deportation. This situation raises critical questions about the effectiveness of current policies and the welfare of vulnerable populations.

Systemic Failures

The findings from the research commissioned by the independent anti-slavery commissioner, Eleanor Lyons, indicate a significant breakdown in the support system designed for trafficking victims. The staggering increase in reported refusals to access help suggests that the current framework is failing to inspire trust among victims. The data reflects a growing disillusionment with government mechanisms meant to protect rather than penalize.

Victim Vulnerability

The fear of deportation is a key factor contributing to the reluctance of victims to engage with the National Referral Mechanism (NRM). This fear is exacerbated by the government’s hostile immigration policies and rhetoric, which victims perceive as threats rather than safeguards. This dynamic indicates that exploiters are not just leveraging economic power but are also manipulating the legal environment to maintain control over their victims.

Impact of International Agreements

The linkage between government return agreements with countries like Albania and Vietnam and the increased fears among victims highlights a troubling intersection of immigration and human trafficking policies. The implication is that the state’s approach to immigration enforcement is directly undermining the safety of vulnerable individuals, trapping them in exploitative situations.

Public Perception and Trust

By sharing these findings, the article seeks to raise awareness about the inadequacies of the current system and foster a conversation around the need for reform. It aims to shift public perception, encouraging a more empathetic understanding of the challenges faced by trafficking victims and the systemic barriers that prevent them from seeking help.

Potential Consequences

The implications of this research are vast. If public sentiment shifts towards demanding systemic changes, it could lead to significant political pressure on government officials to reevaluate and reform immigration and anti-trafficking policies. Economically, a failure to protect victims could perpetuate cycles of exploitation, ultimately harming labor markets and social stability.

Community Response

This article may resonate particularly with advocacy groups, human rights organizations, and communities that are focused on immigration reform. These groups are likely to rally around the findings to push for policy changes that prioritize victim protection over punitive measures.

Market Relevance

While the immediate economic impacts may not be directly linked to stock markets or specific sectors, the long-term effects of systemic failures in protecting vulnerable populations can lead to broader social unrest, potentially affecting markets indirectly. Companies in sectors reliant on ethical labor practices may face reputational risks if these issues are not addressed.

The piece addresses vital current issues, linking them to broader global narratives about human rights and immigration. There is a clear urgency in the findings, reflecting ongoing debates about the balance between national security and humanitarian obligations.

Regarding artificial intelligence, while the article's language is accessible and structured, it does not exhibit clear signs of AI influence. However, the data presentation and research methodology could indicate the use of AI tools in data analysis for the studies conducted, though this would require further verification.

The overall reliability of the article appears strong, as it is based on independent research and presents factual data concerning a pressing social issue. The language used is assertive yet informative, aiming to catalyze change rather than incite fear.

Unanalyzed Article Content

Modern slavery victims are choosing to stay with their exploiters rather than access government support designed to protect them for fear of immigration enforcement, research has found.

The independent anti-slavery commissioner, Eleanor Lyons, said the system was “deeply broken”.

Two pieces of research shared exclusively with the Guardian found that, a decade after the introduction of the Modern Slavery Act, the landmark piece of legislation designed to protect trafficking victims and apprehend their perpetrators was failing.

The first study, from Nottingham University’s Rights Lab and commissioned by Lyons’ office, will be published next Wednesday.

The report, titled Refusal to Consent, found refusals to access help from the government’s support system for trafficking victims, were at record levels.

Potential victims who come into contact with the authorities but do not want to use the National Referral Mechanism (NRM) are recorded in statistics known as duty to notify. These reports have soared by more than 630% since 2016 – from 762 in 2016 to 5,598 in 2024 – a sign victims are losing trust in the system.

Fear of deportation is the primary reason victims are rejecting support, according to the report, which questioned professionals working with victims and analysed government and academic data.

Many victims believe the NRM is a trap that leads to immigration enforcement rather than protection. Hostile immigration policies and inflammatory language from the government is scaring victims away from the systems supposed to protect them, it found.

Some traffickers use government rhetoric about the hostile environment and the threat of deportation to keep their victims in a position of exploitation, according to the research.

Government return agreements with Albania and Vietnam, which have high numbers of trafficking victims, have increased fear of coming forward among victims from those countries. In 2024 victims of trafficking were among people being issued with notices of intent that they were going to be forcibly removed to Rwanda.

The second report, Barriers to Prosecutions and Convictions under the Modern Slavery Act 2015, is from the Modern Slavery and Human Rights Policy and Evidence Centre at the University of Oxford. It commissioned research from the Wilberforce Institute at the University of Hull, which analysed prosecution data since the act was introduced and found it remained low, with prosecutions as a percentage of potential trafficking victims referred to the NRM at just 1.8%.

Between July 2023 and June 2024 17,120 potential modern slavery victims were referred to the NRM while over the same period 58 people in England and Wales were convicted of offences linked to modern slavery.

Alicia Heys, an academic at the University of Hull who authored the study for the PEC, said: “Part of the intention behind the Modern Slavery Act was to ensure that perpetrators receive suitably severe punishments, yet 10 years after the introduction of the act, conviction rates remain low. Sometimes, offenders are pursued under different legislation, for example relating to drugs or controlling prostitution, which misrepresents survivors’ experiences.”

Lyons said: “It’s heartbreaking but not surprising that more and more potential victims of modern slavery are saying no to help.

“When fear of deportation outweighs the promise of protection, when there are few consequences for criminal perpetrators and people feel safer staying in exploitation than entering the system that’s meant to help them, something is deeply broken.

“This report is a wake-up call: the national referral mechanism, the government’s framework of support, isn’t just misunderstood, it’s mistrusted, mishandled, and in urgent need of reform.”

The Home Office has been approached for comment.

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian