Minister says Labour’s welfare bill rebels ‘trying to do their job well’ as No 10 considers concessions – UK politics live

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"UK Government Considers Concessions Amid Labour Rebellion Over Welfare Cuts"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 8.6
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

The UK government is facing a significant backlash from within its ranks regarding proposed welfare cuts, particularly concerning the Universal Credit (UC) and Personal Independence Payment (PIP) reforms. Despite previous assertions from ministers about their commitment to these cuts, it has become evident that the bill lacks sufficient support to pass in its current form, as over 120 Labour MPs have signed a reasoned amendment aimed at blocking it. In response to this mounting rebellion, Downing Street is reportedly considering major concessions to appease dissenting MPs, especially concerning the eligibility criteria for disability benefits, which have been made more stringent by the proposed reforms. The ongoing discord within the government highlights divisions on how to address the rising discontent among MPs, with some factions advocating for pulling the bill entirely, while others suggest making concessions to facilitate its passage.

Trade Minister Douglas Alexander has publicly acknowledged the concerns raised by Labour MPs, characterizing their actions as part of their parliamentary duties. He emphasized that there is a shared recognition of the need for welfare reform, although disagreements persist on how to implement these changes effectively. Alexander's comments reflect a shift in tone from the government, as he expressed a willingness to engage in discussions about the principles underlying the proposed reforms. This ongoing dialogue underscores the delicate balance the government must maintain as it navigates the complexities of welfare reform while addressing the legitimate concerns of its own party members. The upcoming days are expected to be crucial as ministers and MPs continue to negotiate the specifics of these welfare changes, striving to find common ground that respects the party's values and responsibilities toward the vulnerable populations affected by these reforms.

TruthLens AI Analysis

You need to be a member to generate the AI analysis for this article.

Log In to Generate Analysis

Not a member yet? Register for free.

Unanalyzed Article Content

Good morning. Irresistible force meets immovable object and … it turns out that the object is movable after all. Until yesterday afternoon, in public at least, ministers were insisting that they were fully committed to the welfare cuts in the universal credit (UC) and personal independence payment (Pip) bill – even though it has no chance of passing in its current form because so manyLabourMPs have signed a reasoned amendment to kill it.

But last night it emerged that ministers are now looking at major concessions in a bid to get it through.Jessica Elgot,Kiran Stacey,Aletha AduandPippa Crerarhave the details here.

This is how their story starts.

Number 10 is preparing to offer concessions toLabourMPs amid a major rebellion over the government’s planned welfare cuts.Downing Street is understood to be considering watering down changes to the eligibility for disability benefits which had been significantly tightened by the reforms in the bill.

More than120 MPsare poised to rebel against the government next Tuesday and there remains division at the top of government over how to stem the growing anger.

Concessions under consideration include changes to the points needed for eligibility for personal independence payments (Pip), a benefit paid to those both in and out of work.

MPs also want to see changes made to other reforms affecting the health top-up for universal credit which applies to those who cannot work.

Archie Blandhas more on this in his First Edition briefing.

Bland says: “Up until now, Downing Street appears to have been divided on the right way forward, with one source saying: ‘There is a camp for pulling it, a camp for concession and a small but insane camp for ploughing on.’ Reeves is understood to be particularly opposed to pulling the vote.”

This morningDouglas Alexander, the trade minister, has been on the interview round. While he did not announce any concessions, his tone could not have been more different from ministers, including Keir Starmer, speaking on this topic over the past few days. He was complimentary about the rebels, describing them as acting in good faith and implying their concerns were reasonable. And he said the government was listening.

He told Sky News:

The first thing that strikes you when you read the reasoned amendment [to block the bill, now signed by 126 Labour MPs] is the degree of commonality on the principles. Everyone agrees welfare needs reform and that the system was broken. Everyone recognises you’re trying to take people off benefit and into work, because that’s better for them and also better for our fiscal position. And everyone recognises that we need to protect the most vulnerable.

Where there is, honestly, some disagreement at the moment, is on the issue of ‘how do you give implementation to those principles?’ … The effect of what’s happened with this reasoned amendment being tabled is that that’s brought forward the discussion of how to give implementation to those principles.

So given the high level of agreement on the principles, the discussions over the coming days will really be about the implementation of those principles.

Alexander also said the rebels were, in effect, only doing their jobs as Labour MPs.

It’s right to recognise these issues touch very deeply the Labour party’s sense of itself and the rights and responsibilities of members of parliament.

What I see is everyone trying to do their job well, ministers trying to be open with parliament as to the ambitions that we have, members of parliament being clear as to their responsibility to scrutinise this legislation and get it right.

And that’s the character of the conversation that’s taking place between ministers and members of parliament in the hours and days ahead.

Here is the agenda for the day.

9.15am:Keir Starmergives a speech at the British Chambers of Commerce Global annual conference in London.Graeme Weardenis covering the BCC conference on his business live blog.

But I will be monitoring the political speeches here too.

9.30am:The Ministry of Justice publishes quarterly criminal court statistics.

After 10.30am:Lucy Powell, leader of the Commons, takes questions from MPs on next week’s business.

After 11.30am:Starmer is expected to make a statement to MPs about the G7 and Nato summits.

11.30am:Downing Street holds a lobby briefing.

3.25pm:Kemi Badenochspeaks at the BCC conference.

If you want to contact me, please post a message below the line when comments are open (normally between 10am and 3pm at the moment), or message me on social media. I can’t read all the messages BTL, but if you put “Andrew” in a message aimed at me, I am more likely to see it because I search for posts containing that word.

If you want to flag something up urgently, it is best to use social media. You can reach me on Bluesky at @andrewsparrowgdn.bsky.social. The Guardian hasgiven up posting from its official accounts on X, but individual Guardian journalists are there, I still have my account, and if you message me there at @AndrewSparrow, I will see it and respond if necessary.

I find it very helpful when readers point out mistakes, even minor typos. No error is too small to correct. And I find your questions very interesting too. I can’t promise to reply to them all, but I will try to reply to as many as I can, either BTL or sometimes in the blog.

In his final answerStarmerexplained how he thought government and business should work together.

A true partnership is not two people or two bodies trying to do the same thing. It’s two people or bodies realising they bring different things to the table.

Government shouldn’t try to run businesses. It’s done that in the past and it doesn’t work particularly well.

So business should run business. Government should partner business by creating the conditions which makes it easier for businesses to run their businesses.

In response to a question about devolution,StarmersaysLabourwas originally “a bit wary” about metro mayors. But now he thinks they work really well.

Q: Do you get the concerns of business about the employment rights bill [which will increase costs for firms because it imposes high standards, particularly in relation to people doing casual work]?

Starmersays he does understand their concerns. They don’t hold back when they speak to him.

But he says a secure workforce is good for business. And he says many good businesses are already doing the things mandated in the bill.

At the BCC conferenceKeir Starmerhas finished his speech. He is now taking questions.Clive Myrie,the broadcaster, is chairing the session and he starts by. asking about Iran.

Q: How worried should we be about what is happening in Iran?

Starmersays people should be concerned. But he says happily there is a ceasefire now.

I think I’m right in saying that the impact of international affairs on us domestically has never been so direct as it is at the moment.

He cites the Ukraine war, and its impact on oil prices, as an example.

He says the world has become more unstable.

And it is not just defence, he says. On trade, the situation has changed too, he says. He says the era of tariffs, introduced by President Trump, won’t end soon.

Whatever we think of tariffs, they are undoubtedly an attempt to change the way the world economy is run, and we have to recognise that.

I don’t think we’re going to be going back in a few weeks or months to how it was before this administration [President Trump’s in the US] came in. We’re in for a different future. We need to think through what that means.

The Commons authorities have confirmed thatKeir Starmerwill make a statement to MPs about the G7 and Nato summits at about 11.30am.

Starmersays the government is today launching its trade strategy.

Here is our overnight story about it, byKiran StaceyandJasper Jolly.

Here is theDepartment for Business and Trade’snews releaseabout the strategy. And this is how DBT sums it up.

The strategy will make the UK the most connected nation in the world and secure billions worth of opportunities for businesses, helping deliver the economic growth needed to put money in people’s pockets, strengthen local economies, create jobs, and raise living standards.

It takes a more agile and targeted approach than the previous government’s, focusing on quicker, more practical deals that deliver faster benefits to UK businesses. It strengthens trade defences, expands export finance - especially for smaller firms - and aligns trade policy with national priorities like green growth and services. It’s a smarter, more responsive plan for a changing global economy.

UPDATE:Starmersaid:

What we want to do is push not just for traditional trade agreements, but also for smaller deals that we can make quicker, at pace – whether that’s a digital trade agreement with Brazil, Thailand or Kenya; clean energy co-operation with the Philippines and Mexico, professional qualification recognition all around the world.

But perhaps most importantly, in this uncertain and challenging world, we will also give ourselves new powers on trade defence. To make sure that if your businesses are threatened by practices like dumping, that we have the right powers to defend you.

Starmersays the government has stablised the economy, and is now moving to a new phase, where it is focusing on investment.

He says he wants Britain to be the best place in the world for enterprise. He goes on:

I do believe we’ve got to stop doing that British understatement thing – we do it all the time, including me – because, believe you me, this is a great moment to get on the phone to the world and say, ‘Take another look at Britain.’

He recalls talking recently to the boss of Nvidia, who told him that Britain was in a “Goldilocks” position on AI.

Starmerstarts by praising the contribution to the country made by business.

None of the investment made by the government would be possible “without your contribution”, he says. “And I say thank you.”

Starmer does not spell it out directly, but he seems to be referring, at least in part, to the fact that business are now paying a lot more to the government in tax as a result in the rise in employer national insurance.

Keir Starmeris now speaking at the British Chambers of Commerce conference.

There is a live feed at the top of the blog.

Good morning. Irresistible force meets immovable object and … it turns out that the object is movable after all. Until yesterday afternoon, in public at least, ministers were insisting that they were fully committed to the welfare cuts in the universal credit (UC) and personal independence payment (Pip) bill – even though it has no chance of passing in its current form because so manyLabourMPs have signed a reasoned amendment to kill it.

But last night it emerged that ministers are now looking at major concessions in a bid to get it through.Jessica Elgot,Kiran Stacey,Aletha AduandPippa Crerarhave the details here.

This is how their story starts.

Number 10 is preparing to offer concessions toLabourMPs amid a major rebellion over the government’s planned welfare cuts.Downing Street is understood to be considering watering down changes to the eligibility for disability benefits which had been significantly tightened by the reforms in the bill.

More than120 MPsare poised to rebel against the government next Tuesday and there remains division at the top of government over how to stem the growing anger.

Concessions under consideration include changes to the points needed for eligibility for personal independence payments (Pip), a benefit paid to those both in and out of work.

MPs also want to see changes made to other reforms affecting the health top-up for universal credit which applies to those who cannot work.

Archie Blandhas more on this in his First Edition briefing.

Bland says: “Up until now, Downing Street appears to have been divided on the right way forward, with one source saying: ‘There is a camp for pulling it, a camp for concession and a small but insane camp for ploughing on.’ Reeves is understood to be particularly opposed to pulling the vote.”

This morningDouglas Alexander, the trade minister, has been on the interview round. While he did not announce any concessions, his tone could not have been more different from ministers, including Keir Starmer, speaking on this topic over the past few days. He was complimentary about the rebels, describing them as acting in good faith and implying their concerns were reasonable. And he said the government was listening.

He told Sky News:

The first thing that strikes you when you read the reasoned amendment [to block the bill, now signed by 126 Labour MPs] is the degree of commonality on the principles. Everyone agrees welfare needs reform and that the system was broken. Everyone recognises you’re trying to take people off benefit and into work, because that’s better for them and also better for our fiscal position. And everyone recognises that we need to protect the most vulnerable.

Where there is, honestly, some disagreement at the moment, is on the issue of ‘how do you give implementation to those principles?’ … The effect of what’s happened with this reasoned amendment being tabled is that that’s brought forward the discussion of how to give implementation to those principles.

So given the high level of agreement on the principles, the discussions over the coming days will really be about the implementation of those principles.

Alexander also said the rebels were, in effect, only doing their jobs as Labour MPs.

It’s right to recognise these issues touch very deeply the Labour party’s sense of itself and the rights and responsibilities of members of parliament.

What I see is everyone trying to do their job well, ministers trying to be open with parliament as to the ambitions that we have, members of parliament being clear as to their responsibility to scrutinise this legislation and get it right.

And that’s the character of the conversation that’s taking place between ministers and members of parliament in the hours and days ahead.

Here is the agenda for the day.

9.15am:Keir Starmergives a speech at the British Chambers of Commerce Global annual conference in London.Graeme Weardenis covering the BCC conference on his business live blog.

But I will be monitoring the political speeches here too.

9.30am:The Ministry of Justice publishes quarterly criminal court statistics.

After 10.30am:Lucy Powell, leader of the Commons, takes questions from MPs on next week’s business.

After 11.30am:Starmer is expected to make a statement to MPs about the G7 and Nato summits.

11.30am:Downing Street holds a lobby briefing.

3.25pm:Kemi Badenochspeaks at the BCC conference.

If you want to contact me, please post a message below the line when comments are open (normally between 10am and 3pm at the moment), or message me on social media. I can’t read all the messages BTL, but if you put “Andrew” in a message aimed at me, I am more likely to see it because I search for posts containing that word.

If you want to flag something up urgently, it is best to use social media. You can reach me on Bluesky at @andrewsparrowgdn.bsky.social. The Guardian hasgiven up posting from its official accounts on X, but individual Guardian journalists are there, I still have my account, and if you message me there at @AndrewSparrow, I will see it and respond if necessary.

I find it very helpful when readers point out mistakes, even minor typos. No error is too small to correct. And I find your questions very interesting too. I can’t promise to reply to them all, but I will try to reply to as many as I can, either BTL or sometimes in the blog.

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian