Miley Cyrus: Something Beautiful review – solid pop that’s about as ‘psychedelic’ as a baked potato

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"Miley Cyrus Releases Ninth Album 'Something Beautiful' with Ambitious Claims and Mixed Reception"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 6.4
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

Miley Cyrus's ninth album, 'Something Beautiful,' has been positioned not only as a musical endeavor but as a cultural commentary aimed at healing societal ailments. Cyrus describes the album as a concept piece infused with 'healing sound properties' intended to elevate listeners' frequencies. Accompanying the album is a film that Cyrus calls a 'one-of-a-kind pop opera,' inspired by Alan Parker's adaptation of Pink Floyd's 'The Wall.' However, the album's ambitious claims raise eyebrows, particularly given Cyrus's history of unpredictable releases, such as her eclectic 'Miley Cyrus & Her Dead Petz.' Despite the hype, the film, which consists largely of pop videos interspersed with spoken word segments, lacks a coherent narrative and resembles more of a collection of stylized performances rather than a cohesive story, leading to skepticism about its artistic value.

Musically, 'Something Beautiful' begins with a soulful title track that quickly shifts into a chorus filled with distorted vocals and rock guitar, setting a somewhat erratic tone. The album transitions into more conventional pop sounds, featuring 80s-inspired tracks and dancefloor-ready beats, reminiscent of the hi-NRG genre popular in mid-80s gay clubs. While the production is polished and Cyrus's powerful vocals shine, the album fails to deliver a standout single that could drive commercial success. Tracks like 'End of the World' and 'Every Girl You've Ever Loved' are well-crafted but lack the undeniable catchiness needed to resonate with a wider audience. Ultimately, while the album offers a varied listening experience, it may struggle to meet the lofty expectations set by Cyrus's own declarations, potentially leading to a tepid reception among fans and critics alike.

TruthLens AI Analysis

The review of Miley Cyrus's album "Something Beautiful" presents a critical perspective on the artist's ambitious claims about her music. The article highlights the disparity between Cyrus's grand promises and the perceived reality of the album, suggesting a potential disconnect between her artistic vision and execution.

Analysis of Intent

The article seeks to question the authenticity of Miley Cyrus's narrative around her new album. By emphasizing the contrast between her lofty descriptions and the actual content, the review appears to challenge the credibility of her artistic intentions. This aligns with a broader critique of celebrity culture, where grandiose claims can often overshadow the actual artistic output.

Public Perception

The review might contribute to a mixed perception of Cyrus within the pop culture landscape. While some fans may appreciate her experimental approach, others might view her work as lacking substance. This dichotomy could lead to a polarized audience, impacting her fan base and overall popularity.

Potential Omissions

There is no apparent indication that the article is trying to hide or obscure any significant information. However, by focusing on the negative aspects and comparing the album to less favorable references, it may inadvertently minimize the positive aspects of Cyrus's work, thereby shaping a specific narrative.

Manipulative Elements

The article employs a somewhat sarcastic tone, particularly in its comparisons and descriptions. This could be seen as manipulative, as it guides the reader toward a specific interpretation of Cyrus's work. The use of humor and irony might influence public opinion, potentially swaying fans and critics alike.

Credibility of the Review

While the review presents valid points regarding the disparity between expectations and reality, it also relies heavily on subjective interpretation. The credibility of the review hinges on the reviewer’s personal biases and the expectations they bring to Cyrus's music. The reader should consider this when evaluating the overall reliability of the article.

Cultural Reflection

This review reflects broader cultural conversations about authenticity in pop music. Cyrus's attempts to innovate and address cultural issues through her work resonate with audiences who seek meaningful content. However, the critique highlights a tension between artistic ambition and commercial viability in the music industry.

Impact on Communities

The article likely resonates with critical listeners who appreciate deeper analyses of pop music, while it may alienate die-hard fans who prefer to celebrate Cyrus's artistic choices without skepticism. This could lead to discussions about the nature of celebrity and the expectations placed on public figures.

Market Implications

The impact of this review on global markets or stock prices appears limited, as Miley Cyrus's work primarily influences the music and entertainment sector rather than broader economic indicators. However, her popularity may affect associated brands and merchandise, especially if her album generates significant public discourse.

Geopolitical Context

The review does not directly address global power dynamics or current events. However, the themes of cultural critique and artistic integrity may resonate with ongoing discussions about authenticity in various sectors, including politics and entertainment.

AI Involvement

There is no clear indication that artificial intelligence played a role in the writing of this review. The tone, humor, and critical analysis suggest a human touch rather than algorithmic generation. If AI were involved, it might have influenced the structure or language but would likely lack the nuanced understanding present in this critique.

The review ultimately raises questions about the integrity of artistic statements in the pop music industry, serving as a lens through which to examine broader cultural phenomena.

Unanalyzed Article Content

Miley Cyrus has made some very grand claims for her ninth album. Something Beautiful is not merely a concept album, but one the 32-year-old pop star has described as “an attempt to medicate somewhat of a sick culture through music”. One filled with “healing sound properties” designed to “impact frequencies in your body that make you vibrate at a different level”. And it’s not just all of that, but an accompanying film as well: a “one-of-a-kind pop opera” apparently inspired by Alan Parker’s 1982 film adaptation of Pink Floyd’s The Wall “but with a better wardrobe and more glamorous”.

For all that the executives at Cyrus’s label are unlikely to say no to a huge star whose last album featured the world’s biggest-selling single of 2023 – Flowers, 2.7bn streams – you can still imagine them swallowing very hard when presented with all this. After all, Cyrus has form when it comes to going wildly off-piste: Bangerz, her biggest-selling album, was followed with Miley Cyrus & Her Dead Petz, a sprawling collection of stoned jokes, musical non-sequiturs and psychedelic collaborations with the Flaming Lips. Furthermore, when her record label suggested that an hour and a half of this might try her fans’ patience, Cyrus’s response was to make Petz even longer, by including a recording of her playing Tibetan singing bowls.

Cyrus also has form for announcing releases that don’t quite fit their initial billing: 2017’s not-actually-very “country” album Younger Now; 2020’s Plastic Hearts, which presented itself as new-wave rock, with guest appearances from Joan Jett and Billy Idol and its logo borrowed from shock-rockers the Plasmatics, but turned out to be all over the shop stylistically. So it proves here. The film has no more in common with Parker’s adaptation of The Wall than it does Mrs Brown’s Boys: D’Movie. It has absolutely no plot, not because it’s a wilfully confusing exercise in non-linear arthouse cinema, but because it’s just a load of pop videos, albeit divided into three “acts” and interspersed with spoken-word interludes.

A lot of them are straightforward in-studio performances; the rest look like extended perfume commercials: Miley Cyrus walking through a film studio’s backlot in a pair of fluorescent blue furry chaps, or down Hollywood Boulevard at night in order to do a spot of writhing around on Arnold Schwarzenegger’s Walk of Fame star. Miley Cyrus pretending to ride a motorbike and palling around with Naomi Campbell in matching bustiers and heels. It’s perhaps for the best that it isn’t a contemporary remake of The Wall, an album and film that’s essentially about a multimillionaire’s peevish solipsism and bitter score-settling – there’s already quite enough ofthatin 2025, thank you. Nevertheless, you do wonder if premiering it at the Tribeca film festival doesn’t amount to gilding the lily a little.

A similar sense of “huh?” attends the album itself, given the talk of healing sound properties and indeed of Cyrus wishing to be “a human psychedelic”. It certainly gets off to a relatively left-field start. The title track opens like an old-fashioned soul ballad, complete with tasteful horns, then erupts into a chorus thick with distorted vocals and crashing, discordant rock guitar. But thereafter it turns much more straightforward: sparkly 80s pop sprinkled with Dancing Queen-ish piano flourishes on End of the World; Easy Lover’s lightly disco-laced soft rock; ballads that are, respectively, synthy (More to Lose) and primed to soundtrack the end credits of a movie rather more substantial than the one Cyrus has made (Give Me Love).

Sign up toSleeve Notes

Get music news, bold reviews and unexpected extras. Every genre, every era, every week

after newsletter promotion

The album’s second half focuses more on the dancefloor: pumping four-to-the-floor beats, a preponderance of Patrick Cowley and Bobby O synthesisers. The choruses melodically evoke a variety of music from continental Europe: French chanson on Reborn, Abba (again) on Every Girl You’ve Ever Loved, balls-out Eurovision finalist on Walk of Fame. What it really recalls is hi-NRG, the electronic soundtrack of choice in mid-80s gay clubs. Reanimating this sound isn’t a bad idea – it’s one of the few areas of 80s pop that the 21st century has yet to really scavenge from – and it’s done really well here. The synths sound edgy, the choruses stick, there’s a smattering of knowing period details (Syndrums, sampled orchestral stabs), and it’s a delight to hear Brittany Howard of Alabama Shakes repurposing her voice as a stentorian Grace Jones-y roar on Walk of Fame.

If the rest of the album steadfastly fails to make the listener vibrate at a different level – it’s all about as psychedelic as a baked potato – and you struggle to identify any kind of concept, it’s still all very well written and well made, a varied succession of good vehicles for Cyrus’s powerfully raspy voice. What it lacks is the kind of obvious smash-hit single by which her albums stand or fall commercially: the most obvious candidates, End of the World and Every Girl You’ve Ever Loved, are strong but not undeniable. Rather than the disparity betweenCyrus’s intentions for Something Beautiful and the reality, it’s that which might doom it to a muted reception.

Saint Etienne – GladA marvellous single heralds Saint Etienne’s final album: a collaboration with Chemical Brother Tom Rowlands that puts a perfect pop spin on his psych-y breakbeat backing.

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian