Met Office should name storms after fossil fuel companies, say campaigners

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"Campaigners Propose Naming Storms After Fossil Fuel Companies to Highlight Climate Impact"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 7.7
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

Climate campaigners are urging the Met Office to name storms after fossil fuel companies in a bid to highlight the connection between fossil fuel consumption and extreme weather events. This call to action follows the Met Office's announcement of a storm naming competition, and campaigners hope to generate public interest similar to the viral 'Boaty McBoatface' incident in 2016. They argue that naming storms after oil and gas corporations would serve as a stark reminder of the environmental consequences of climate change, particularly as research indicates that human activities, especially the burning of fossil fuels, have contributed to the increasing intensity of storms. Campaigners have submitted various suggestions, including specific company names and more playful options like 'bigoil' and 'fossily mcfuelface'. Alexis Eyre, a sustainable marketing professional, has been actively promoting the initiative and believes it resonates with the public's desire to find tangible ways to address climate issues.

The Met Office, while acknowledging the importance of highlighting climate change, maintains its policy of not naming storms after private companies. Eyre's campaign is inspired by a letter published in the Guardian, which called for a shift in storm naming conventions to reflect the real impact of fossil fuel companies on severe weather. Eyre noted that the campaign has gained significant traction on social media platforms, emphasizing the need for creative approaches to engage the public and government on climate action. Scientific studies referenced by the Met Office indicate that the intensity of storms is likely to increase due to climate change, even if the overall number of storms does not rise. As the climate crisis continues to unfold, campaigners hope that naming storms after fossil fuel companies will serve as a powerful visual reminder of the urgent need for action against climate change.

TruthLens AI Analysis

You need to be a member to generate the AI analysis for this article.

Log In to Generate Analysis

Not a member yet? Register for free.

Unanalyzed Article Content

The Met Office should name storms after fossil fuel companies, campaigners have said, after the weather forecasting service opened astorm naming competition.

Climate campaigners have recommended theMet Officenames its storms after various oil and gas corporations to remind the public of the link between burning fossil fuels and extreme weather.

They are hoping to spark a craze similar to “Boaty McBoatface”, when in 2016 the National Environment Research Council opened a competition to name a £200m polar research ship. Nationwide hilarity ensued when the public voted Boaty McBoatface as the top choice for the ship’s name. However, the name was not chosen by the government, who opted to name it the Sir David Attenborough instead.

Hundreds of people have submitted ideas to the Met Office. While some have named specific oil and gas companies, others have suggested names such as “bigoil” and “fossily mcfuelface”.

Alexis Eyre, who works in sustainable marketing, has been drumming up support for the campaign. She said it was inspired by a letter to the Guardian last year by a reader, John Uden,who suggested:“Instead of naming storms after ‘those who work to keep people safe in times of severe weather’, thereby making these severe disruptions sound innocuous, it would be more appropriate to use the names of fossil fuel companies and the manufacturers of SUVs.”

Eyre told the Guardian: “An idea like this makes it much more tangible the connection between, the companies that have helped create this damage, and actually, what the consequences are.”

She said the campaign had “gone crazy”, adding: “I’ve had hundreds of reposts on LinkedIn, and it just keeps on getting picked up everywhere on WhatsApp as well. So I definitely think it will gain some traction. Everyone’s hoping it will be like a Boaty McBoatface situation.”

The release of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases into the atmosphere has made the storms we experience more extreme, research from the forecaster has found. Anattribution studycited by the Met Office found that rainfall in the winter season of 2023-24 was 20% more intense due to human-caused climate change, and the amount of rainfall observed during the season was 10 times more likely.

Scientists predict that while the number of storms may not increase during climate breakdown, their intensity most likely will. This is because rising global temperatures contribute to more frequent weather anomalies such as the “Spanish plume”, which is when hot air from the Iberian peninsula moves northwards into the UK, creating unstable conditions that can lead to intense summer thunderstorms with heavy downpours and lightning.

Sign up toDown to Earth

The planet's most important stories. Get all the week's environment news - the good, the bad and the essential

after newsletter promotion

The Met Office does frequently draw attention to climate breakdown and clearly explains the links between extreme weather and the combustion of fossil fuels. However, Eyre said: “I think people are just grasping at different ways of how they can bring stuff to life, how do we visually get this into the public domain, and how do we grab the attention of the government to do more in this space? It wasn’t an attack on the Met Office as such.”

A Met Office spokesperson said: “We don’t name storms after any private companies.”

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian