Megyn Kelly puts Trump clash behind her to ride the Maga media wave

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"Megyn Kelly Embraces Role as Influential Voice in Right-Wing Media Amid Trump Campaign"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 5.9
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

In a striking turn of events, Megyn Kelly has positioned herself as a prominent figure within the right-wing media landscape, leveraging her platform to support Donald Trump during the 2024 presidential campaign. At a recent rally in Pittsburgh, Kelly rallied Trump supporters by emphasizing the former president's commitment to conservative values, particularly regarding issues such as gender in sports and economic policies. Her passionate endorsement resonated with the audience, as she praised working-class men and their struggles against perceived elitism. This moment reflects a significant shift from her earlier contentious relationship with Trump during the 2016 election, showcasing how both have found mutual benefit in their respective comebacks. Kelly's podcast has surged in popularity, achieving a remarkable 176% increase in subscribers, positioning her as a leading voice in the MAGA movement and a competitor to traditional media outlets like Fox News.

Kelly's evolution from a mainstream news anchor to a key player in the right-wing media sphere highlights the changing dynamics of political commentary and audience engagement. She has adeptly blended serious political discourse with lighter topics, appealing to a diverse audience that craves authenticity and connection. Analysts note that her appeal lies in her ability to tap into the sentiments of her listeners, particularly regarding contentious issues such as immigration and transgender rights. Her recent forays into celebrity gossip have also resonated well, illustrating a savvy understanding of the media landscape's evolution. As she prepares to launch her own podcast network, Kelly's strategic maneuvering reflects a broader trend in media where traditional boundaries are blurred, allowing personalities like her to thrive without the constraints of conventional broadcasting. This not only marks a new chapter in her career but also underscores the shifting allegiances and interests within the realm of American politics, where former adversaries can find common ground for mutual gain.

TruthLens AI Analysis

The article presents a strategic overview of Megyn Kelly's resurgence in the right-wing media landscape, particularly in relation to former President Donald Trump. It highlights her recent statements praising Trump at a rally, emphasizing her shift from past conflicts to mutual benefit in the current political climate.

Intent Behind the Publication

This piece appears to aim at showcasing the evolving dynamics within conservative media, particularly the alignment between influential figures like Kelly and Trump. By portraying Kelly as a strong advocate for traditional values and working-class men, the article seeks to bolster her image and reinforce the narrative that she is a key player in the right-wing media sphere. The intent is likely to galvanize support among Trump's base and solidify Kelly's position within that community.

Public Perception Goals

The article attempts to shape public perception by emphasizing themes of traditional masculinity and the idea of "forgotten men" as a counter-narrative to more liberal viewpoints. By invoking the imagery of hard-working men and contrasting them with perceived elitist figures, the article seeks to resonate with a specific audience that feels marginalized. This aligns with broader conservative messaging aimed at rallying the base around shared values and grievances.

Potential Omissions

While the article focuses on Kelly's positive attributes and her alignment with Trump, it may downplay the complexities of their past relationship and the criticisms associated with both figures. The article does not explore dissenting voices or criticisms of their narratives, which could provide a more balanced view.

Manipulative Elements

The article carries a moderate level of manipulative intent through its selective framing of events and characters. It constructs a narrative that emphasizes loyalty and shared values while glossing over previous conflicts. The language used is designed to evoke emotional responses, particularly from conservative readers who feel their values are under attack.

Truthfulness of the Content

The report appears to be grounded in factual events, such as Kelly's attendance at the rally and her comments about Trump. However, the framing and emphasis suggest a bias towards promoting a specific political agenda, which may affect the perceived reliability of the information.

Societal Implications

The article could influence societal attitudes towards masculinity, politics, and media consumption. By reaffirming conservative values and portraying Kelly as a champion for these beliefs, it may mobilize support for Trump and similar figures ahead of the upcoming elections.

Target Audience

Kelly's rhetoric seems tailored to appeal to working-class individuals, particularly those who identify with traditional conservative values. The article likely seeks to engage audiences who feel disconnected from mainstream media narratives and who value figures that resonate with their experiences.

Market Impact

While the article primarily focuses on media and political dynamics, it could have indirect effects on market sentiments, particularly in sectors tied to media and entertainment. Companies associated with right-wing media could see increased interest from investors and advertisers seeking to capitalize on this political momentum.

Global Context

In terms of global power dynamics, the article indirectly reflects broader trends in populism and nationalism seen in various countries. The themes discussed resonate with similar movements worldwide, highlighting an ongoing struggle between traditional values and progressive agendas.

AI Influence Consideration

It is plausible that AI tools were employed to assist in content generation, particularly in structuring the narrative and optimizing for engagement. However, without direct evidence, this remains speculative. The persuasive tone and emotional framing could suggest the use of AI-driven insights into audience preferences.

The article successfully captures a moment in the evolving landscape of right-wing media, showcasing the potential for strategic alliances among influential figures. Its reliability is somewhat compromised by its selective framing and lack of opposing viewpoints, but it remains grounded in real events.

Unanalyzed Article Content

It was the night before a US presidential election that Donald Trump had called the most important in history. Who could close the deal athis campaign rallyin Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania? The answer was Megyn Kelly. Trump “will keep the boys out of girls’ sports where they don’t belong”,the rightwinger podcaster saidto rapturous applause. “And you know what else? He will look out for our boys, too. Our forgotten boys and our forgotten men.”

Turning around and pointing at Trump supporters wearing hard hats, Kelly eulogised guys “who’ve got the calluses on their hands, who work for a living, the beards and the tats, maybe have a beer after work, and don’t want to be judged by people like Oprah and Beyoncé, who will never have to face the consequences of her [Kamala Harris’s] disastrous economic policies. These guys will. He gets it. President Trump gets it. He will not look at our boys like they are second-class citizens.”

It was a remarkable intervention by a former cable news anchor whom Trump branded “nasty” whenthey feuded bitterlyduring his bid for the White House in 2016. Now Kelly and the former president understood their value to one another. Both knew what it is to be at rock bottom but, 24 hours after the Pittsburgh rally, both were celebrating their own unlikely comebacks.

Kelly, 54, has become one of the most influential figures in rightwing media. Her eponymous podcast moves with rare dexterity from heavyweight political interviews – such as the secretary of state,Marco Rubio, and director of national intelligence,Tulsi Gabbard– to topics such as Joe Biden’s cognitive decline to celebrity gossip about the likes of Halle Berry, Sean “Diddy” Combs, Meghan Markle and the Kardashians.

Clearly the formula works. The Megyn Kelly Show posted a record-breaking 176% year-over-year surge in subscribers in the first quarter of 2025,according to TheRighting, a media company that tracks rightwing outlets. She trails Ben Shapiro and Jordan Peterson but has pulled ahead of Bill O’Reilly, Mark Levin, Charlie Kirk, Glenn Beck, Sean Hannity, Laura Ingraham and Steve Bannon.

This makes her one of the most prominent cheerleaders for Trump and shapers of his Maga (Make America great again) agenda, most especially its hostility to immigrants and transgender rights. Kelly is even emerging as a rival to her former employer Fox News, which dominated the narratives of Trump’s first term in office.

Larry Jacobs, director of the Center for the Study of Politics and Governance at the University of Minnesota, said: “Megyn Kelly’s various transformations can make you dizzy if you follow them. The days when she had credibility as a truth-seeker are over, and now she’s strictly in the business of following clicks.

“Her campaigning with Trump, including on the last night, confirms what the business model is. She is trying to establish herself as the preferred media outlet for the Maga movement. She is demonstrating that even Fox is now vulnerable and is being picked apart by the podcasters who become the viewer choice.”

Kelly started out as a lawyer and has described the environment at her early law firms as having a “kill or be killed” mentality. She transitioned to journalism after being inspired by reporters who were cool under pressure. Raised in a Democratic household, she has said she was “really wasn’t political” when she joined Rupert Murdoch’s conservative Fox News network in 2004.

Kelly became a leading prime-time personality and star of the right’s culture wars. But a question to Trump during the 2016 primary debate about his past comments on women provoked him to unleash crude and misogynistic attacks, including: “There was blood coming out of her eyes, blood coming out of her wherever.”

Meanwhile her accusations of unwanted sexual advances by Fox News’s chief executive, Roger Ailes,helped lead to his firing. The difficult environment led Kelly to leave for NBC in 2017. She admits her time there “ended disastrously” after just a year when she created a furore by suggesting that it was fine for white people to wear blackface on Halloween.

But like Tucker Carlson and Piers Morgan, Kelly has reinvented herself for the new age of fragmented digital media where tie-wearing authority figures are out and smash-mouth influencers are in. In 2020 she launched a daily podcast then switched to a live radio format in a deal with SiriusXM. A video version streams on YouTube with clips shared on various platforms gaining hundreds of millions of views a month.

Frank Luntz, a political and communications consultant and pollster, said: “She had an audience on Fox that was undeniable. She didn’t succeed on network television because that audience is too broad.

“Now, once again, she’s gone back to what she’s particularly good at, which is appealing to a segment of the population that wants to hear her explanation for what’s going on in a more detailed and factual fashion than what you might get on cable. It’s the right medium at the right time and she’s the right host.”

In a world where newspaper reporters can be frowned upon for expressing an opinion in a tweet, Kelly is unabashed about owning her own bias. “Yes, I’m still a journalist,”she told the New York Timesnewspaper in March, “but I’m in this new ecosystem where the old rules don’t apply. I’m in this world with, yes, Charlie Kirk and Dan Bongino and Ben Shapiro, but my world is also Joe Rogan and Theo Von.

“It’s a very large world, and how the consumer receives it is by going on YouTube.com on their television screen, or going to the vertical integrations on Instagram or TikTok and just taking in content. What’s the content that you want to receive? I’m on the list of content creators, and so the fact that I’m also a journalist who breaks news and reports on news is an extra. But what’s most important in my business now is authenticity.”

Kelly’s renaissance is impossible to divorce from “owning the libs” mentality of Trump and his Maga movement. She told the New York Times: “It’s one of my core missions in life to defeat wokeism.” Her podcasts have foregrounded anxieties over illegal immigration and transgender children taking part in school sports.

Sign up toThis Week in Trumpland

A deep dive into the policies, controversies and oddities surrounding the Trump administration

after newsletter promotion

Transgender people are a particular obsession for Kelly. In a 2023 interview sheforced Trump on the defensivewhen she grilled him over whether a man can become a woman. In a Republican primary debate, she caricatured the former New Jersey governor Chris Christie’s stance on gender-affirming care for minors and demanded: “Aren’t you way too out of step on this issue to be the Republican nominee?”

And when another Republican candidate, Nikki Haley, said children should not be allowed to transition but those who are 18 and older should “live any way they want to live”, Kelly responded furiously on X: “This is utter bulls***. The WRONG ANSWER & an unnecessary weird pander to the rabid trans lobby. The answer is NO, A MAN CANNOT BECOME A WOMAN.”

Ari Drennen, LGBTQ programme director at Media Matters for America, a non-profit watchdog, said: “Megyn Kelly is very good at understanding where her audience is and where they want her to be and that’s part of why she’s been able to be so successful in this new media environment. There’s no doubt that throughout the 2024 presidential campaign she was a voice who was pushing GOP candidates to move further to the right on trans issues.”

But Kelly is far from a one-trick pony. She has gained particular traction this year with a topic far from Washington:the rancorous legal battlebetween the actors Justin Baldoni and Blake Lively stemming from the film It Ends With Us. Media Matters’ research found that between 1 January and 20 March, Kelly mentioned Baldoni or Lively 440 times, an average of more than five times a day.

She also interviewed Baldoni’s lawyer in a video that has 10m views on TikTok. Drennan said: “She’s leading the way with this celebrity gossip type stuff that has proven to be fertile ground for a lot of these rightwing creators this year.”

Other examples include the Daily Wire alumni Brett Cooper andCandace Owens, Drennan noted. “The right has figured that out much better than the left. I feel like on the left there tends to be more of a separation between the types of podcasts and shows that are covering celebrity gossip and the types of shows that are covering daily stuff that’s happening with the Trump administration.”

The right is also cashing in. In February Fox Corp acquired Red Seat Ventures, a production company that manages Kelly and Carlson’s shows. In March Kellyannounced plansfor her own podcast network, MK Media, another sign of how she is riding the Maga wave and adapting to the evolving media landscape.

Dan Cassino, author of Fox News and American Politics and a government and politics professor at Fairleigh Dickinson University in Madison, New Jersey, said: “The economics of cable TV or broadcast TV and the economics of podcasting are very different. Essentially this allows her to be her own boss. The fact that other people have decided she shouldn’t be on TV or can’t attract the audience that would allow her to be on TV any more is irrelevant because you can be profitable at a much lower scale.

“Part of this is also a reflection of the realities of media. Nobody has huge audiences any more. The days when you’ve got a 20 share or 30 share are gone and are never going to happen again. Podcasting is not different in type; it’s different in extent.”

Meanwhile, after all the years of their chequered relationship, Kelly would not describe herself as a Trump surrogate but is playing that role to great effect. As the president, who has spurned the neocon wing of the Republican party, toured the Gulf region this week,she remarkedwith bracing candour: “I feel like when I was on Fox News, all we did was cheerlead these wars – and kind of dismiss, or express disdain, for people who had serious questions about them … With the benefit of all this hindsight, that was wrong.”

The unholy alliance remindsDavid Litt, an author and former speechwriter for President Barack Obama, of the old observation that in politics there are no permanent enemies, and no permanent friends, only permanent interests.

Litt commented: “The crux of Trump’s argument was I’m a bad guy but you need me in the White House anyway. Nobody could speak to that argument – both Trump’s personal lack of character and, by endorsing him, say we need him anyway – better thanMegyn Kelly. He knew that and she knew that. They saw a moment of symbiosis.”

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian