Market uncertainty created by Trump worse than his 10% tariff on Australian exports, say analysts

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"Analysts Warn Market Uncertainty from Trump Exceeds Impact of 10% Tariff on Australian Exports"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 8.0
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

Recent developments in US-China trade relations have brought some optimism to Australia's economy, which heavily relies on its trade with China. Analysts note that despite President Trump's recent conciliatory tone regarding tariffs, the uncertainty surrounding his administration's trade policies is causing greater concern than the actual 10% tariff on Australian exports. Trump's shift from a combative stance to one aimed at cooperation has led to a modest increase in Australian markets, with the S&P/ASX 200 index showing a slight gain. However, experts warn that market volatility is likely to persist, as the unpredictability of Trump's decisions continues to create apprehension among Australian businesses. Jenny Gordon, a former chief economist, emphasized that countries are not approaching the US with a subservient attitude, highlighting a shift in global dynamics where nations are asserting their own power in trade negotiations.

The recent negotiations between the US and China resulted in a temporary reduction of tariffs, which has been welcomed by financial markets. However, analysts like Hayley Channer argue that the underlying issues in US-China relations remain unresolved, including longstanding American grievances regarding trade deficits and intellectual property theft. This ongoing uncertainty is seen as a significant risk for Australian companies, which would prefer a clear and stable tariff policy over the unpredictable nature of Trump's trade approach. Richard Yetsenga from ANZ noted that while the worst-case scenario of a trade embargo has been avoided, the overall global trading environment is becoming less favorable, with tariffs expected to remain as a disruptive force. As a result, experts anticipate that the Reserve Bank of Australia may adjust its interest rate policy in response to these shifting economic conditions, reflecting the complex interplay of international trade and domestic economic strategy.

TruthLens AI Analysis

Market instability stemming from Donald Trump's actions is highlighted in the article, indicating that it poses a greater challenge for Australia than the previously imposed 10% tariff on Australian exports. This situation is framed within the context of shifting trade dynamics between the US and China, which are pivotal for Australia’s economy. Analysts suggest that while a decrease in tariffs signals progress, the unpredictability associated with Trump's rhetoric and policy approach could have more severe implications.

Market Reactions and Investor Sentiment

Despite positive news from Wall Street, Australian investors remain cautious. The S&P/ASX 200 index showed only a slight increase, reflecting a lack of confidence among investors in the Australian market. Experts like Jenny Gordon underscore the ongoing uncertainty, emphasizing that countries are no longer willing to submit to US demands, as evidenced by the complex negotiations between the US and other nations.

International Trade Dynamics

The article discusses the recent trade negotiations, where the US agreed to significantly reduce tariffs on Chinese imports in exchange for China lowering its tariffs on American goods. This reciprocal agreement is seen as a potential easing of trade tensions. However, the implications for the Australian economy, which heavily relies on China, are uncertain. Analysts warn that the unpredictability of the current political landscape may overshadow the benefits of reduced tariffs.

Implications for Future Economic Policies

The content suggests that the current atmosphere may lead to a more cautious approach from international investors towards both the US and Australian markets. The uncertainty surrounding Trump's policies may deter investment and complicate economic relations. This could result in a prolonged period of volatility that affects various sectors, particularly those reliant on exports.

Potential Audience and Support Base

The article seems tailored for an audience concerned with economic stability and international relations. Business professionals, investors, and policymakers may find this analysis relevant, as it addresses the repercussions of political decisions on market dynamics.

Market Impact and Stock Relevance

The news could influence market perceptions and investor behavior, particularly in stocks related to export-driven industries. Companies heavily reliant on trade with China or the US may experience fluctuations in stock value due to the uncertainty described in the article.

Global Power Dynamics

In the context of global power dynamics, this article underscores the shifting landscape where countries are asserting themselves rather than bending to US demands. The negotiations between the US and China indicate a reconsideration of traditional power relationships, which aligns with ongoing discussions about global trade and economic influence.

Use of AI in Article Construction

There’s no clear indication that AI was used in drafting this article. However, if AI had been involved, it might have influenced the articulation of the complexities surrounding trade negotiations and market reactions, possibly to frame the narrative in a way that aligns with specific agendas or viewpoints.

The narrative constructed focuses on the precariousness of current market conditions while drawing attention to the broader implications of political decisions. This framing could be perceived as a subtle manipulation of public sentiment, emphasizing the risks associated with Trump's unpredictability rather than the potential benefits of tariff reductions.

Overall, the article is grounded in real events and expert opinions, suggesting a reasonable level of reliability, although it does carry a tone of caution that may reflect the authors' concerns about the future economic landscape.

Unanalyzed Article Content

Easing tensions between the US and China on trade is good news for Australia’s China-dependent economy, experts say, but they warn market uncertainty created by Donald Trump is “worse than the 10% tariff”.

After promising to “tariff the hell” out of China, Trump reverted to a much more conciliatory tone this week, saying “we’re not looking to hurt China” and that the agreement represented a“total reset”.

While Wall Street rallied hard on Monday night, Australian investors were less impressed. The benchmark S&P/ASX 200 share market index, which received a boost on Monday afternoon, retraced modest early gains on Tuesday to end the day just 0.4% higher at 8,269 points.

Jenny Gordon, an honorary professor at the ANU and a former chief economist at the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade, cautioned there was no end in sight to the market uncertainty.

Gordon said the experience of the UK and China demonstrated that countries were not coming to the White House as supplicants.

“I think the one thing that has changed is that the world is pushing back against this idea that there would be countries turning up to the US and offering things,” she said.

“And part of that is the Americans don’t know what they want. The Japanese asked the Americans ‘Tell us what you want’, and the response was ‘Tell us what you’ve got to give’.

“Certainly countries are not coming on bended knees.”

After negotiations in Switzerland over the weekend, the US said it would slash crippling tariffs on Chinese imports, from 145% to 30%, for 90 days.

Sign up for Guardian Australia’s breaking news email

In return and aspart of a dealthatwent much furtherthan anticipated, China reduced its levy on most American imports from 125% to 10%.

The Chinese also committed to removing non-tariff countermeasures taken against the US since the 2 April “liberation day”, including export controls on rare earths.

Hayley Channer, a director at the University of Sydney’s US Studies Centre, said it was now obvious that “Trump is fundamentally overestimating the US’s ability to unilaterally change trade relations across the board.

“He is seeing that other countries have a lot of power in terms of global supply chains that can replace the US,” Channer said.

Despite the progress, experts agreed there would be no immediate end to the huge uncertainty attached to America’s trade policy, despite the euphoric response in financial markets.

Channer said Australian businesses could find a way to cope with American import taxes. It was the uncertainty about what Trump would do next that “scared” companies, she said.

“That uncertainty is worse than the 10% tariff.

Sign up toAfternoon Update

Our Australian afternoon update breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what’s happening and why it matters

after newsletter promotion

“If Trump had said there would be 10% tariffs for the rest of his four-year term, then they (businesses) would manage that risk. It’s this unpredictability that has so many second and third order effects.”

The ANZ chief economist, Richard Yetsenga, said it was positive that theworst-case scenarioof an effective trade embargo between the US and China had been lifted.

“The good news is that the safety cover is back on the mutually assured destruction button, so we can at least book-end the range of outcomes into a more manageable range,” Yetsenga said.

But he warned recent negotiations with the UK suggested Trump’s “baseline” 10% tariff on imported goods into America were set to stay.

“The world is still less globalised and the US is still imposing tariffs, but they are more of a disruptive kind than a destructive kind.

“And it still leaves Australia facing a global economy that is less open and less multilateral. The assumption would be 10% tariffs on Australia, with the hope of something better on steel and aluminium.”

Reflecting what was good news for Australia’s economy, financial markets now see less scope for theReserve Bank of Australiato cut interest rates this year – pricing in three rather than four moves this year.

The consensus remains, however, that the central bank will cut its cash rate from 4.1% to 3.85% next Tuesday.

While the wind-back of the US-China tariffs were welcome, Channer said there was no resolution of the underlying and long-held American grievances with China.

These included Trump’s original complaint during his first term about America’s huge trade deficit with China, the coerced acquisition of American companies’ technology and theft of intellectual property, as well as accusations that the world’s second-largest economy was abusing its developing nation status to gain favourable treatment by the World Trade Organization.

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian