Mankeeping: why single women are giving up dating

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"The Rise of 'Mankeeping': Women Reassess Emotional Labor in Relationships"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 5.3
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

The term 'mankeeping' has emerged to describe the phenomenon where women feel responsible for managing the emotional needs of their male partners. This trend is rooted in the growing emotional isolation experienced by many men, who often find it difficult to share their feelings with male friends. Consequently, they turn to their female partners for support, effectively expecting them to take on roles akin to that of an unpaid therapist. This dynamic highlights an extension of emotional labor that has traditionally been the responsibility of women in relationships, encompassing tasks like remembering birthdays and organizing social events. Researchers from Stanford have linked this behavior to a broader 'male loneliness epidemic,' where shrinking social circles leave men reliant on their partners for emotional expression and support, intensifying the burden placed on women in heterosexual relationships.

In light of these issues, many women are choosing to withdraw from the dating scene altogether. According to a study by the Pew Research Center, only 38% of single women are currently seeking partners, compared to 61% of single men. This shift suggests a growing awareness among women about the emotional labor they have been expected to perform in relationships. While some argue that this trend may exacerbate men's loneliness, the underlying message encourages men to take responsibility for their emotional health. Advocates suggest that men should seek therapy, join social clubs, and cultivate their own social circles to alleviate the burden on their partners. The conversation around mankeeping underscores the need for a cultural shift in how emotional responsibilities are shared in relationships, promoting healthier dynamics where both partners contribute to emotional well-being.

TruthLens AI Analysis

You need to be a member to generate the AI analysis for this article.

Log In to Generate Analysis

Not a member yet? Register for free.

Unanalyzed Article Content

Name:Mankeeping.

Age:Semantically, about a year old.

Appearance:Needy and exhausting.

OhGod, a new term with the word “man” as a prefix. These are alwaystedious.Go and cry about it in your man cave, you manspreading mansplainer.

See? It’sa cheap andlazy rhetorical device.Yes, but mankeeping is a real thing: men don’t mankeep; women mankeep.

How so?Increasingly, the dynamic in a heterosexual relationship seems to be that a woman is tasked with coaching her partner through his problems.

I don’t understand.A whole generation of men don’t feel comfortable opening up to their male friends, which means some of them dump their worries on their female partner. It’s an extension of emotional labour – remembering birthdays, organising social calendars – but effectively it requires the partner to act as an unpaid therapist.

Why?TheStanford researcherswho coined the term think it’s a result of the so-calledmale loneliness epidemic. As the social circle of men continues to shrink, their partners bear the brunt of everything that has historically been shared among friends, colleagues and acquaintances.

It’s sweet that you think this is a new phenomenon.OK, fine, some men have always been lousy at this sort of thing. But this is the first time that women are starting to unionise against it.

How?Many of them have stopped dating. In the US, only 38% of single women are on the dating market, compared with 61% of single men, according to thePew Research Center.

But that will just make men more lonely, which will only exacerbate the problem.Right. The only way to solve this problem is to make women have sex with undesirable men.Way to go, Gilead.

So, what, men should work on themselves instead?Bingo. Perhaps if men weren’t so beholden to ridiculous masculine archetypes and developed a toolkit for processing their emotions, some of this discrepancy would disappear.

And then men wouldbe so desirable that they could go out andpull a load of10s.I don’t think you’ve got this quite right.

I have. It’s brilliant! If we canconvincinglyfake emotional regularity, wecan have more sex.I think that number just went down to 37%.

Oh fine, you’re right.I am. You shouldn’t need to rely on women to shoulder the burden of your emotional constipation. Get a therapist. Join some clubs. Develop a well-rounded social circle. It will enrich you beyond words.

And then youwill have sex with me?Er, 36% and falling.

Do say:“It’s not my job to carry your entire emotional burden.”

Don’t say:“This is exactly why I don’t open up to women.”

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian