As the dust settles on Manchester United’s post-season tour of Malaysia and Hong Kong, the question must be asked: was it worth it? United may have pocketed around £10m from their six-day, two-match visit to Asia but what they lost was arguably worse. And no, we’re not just talking about their1-0 defeat against the “Asean All Stars”in Kuala Lumpur, a scratch, invitational side that had never previously played together.
Omar Berrada, United’s chief executive,had excitedly hailed the tour as an “opportunity for us to collaborate with our valued commercial partners, and to deepen relationships with our fans”. That vision probably didn’t include Amad Diallo sticking his middle finger up at supporters, a gesture for which herefused to apologise, the winger insisting he did it in response to insults about his mother. Nor did it allow for Alejandro Garnacho sulking and yawning through his various off-pitch duties. It remains to be seen how many key performance indicators were met by the Argentinian, who finished the tour by posting a one-word caption on the runway as United departed home to Europe: “finally”.
At least Matthijs De Ligt, Joshua Zirkzee, Ayden Heaven and Patrick Dorgu put on a brave face, smiling and waving through the sparsely-attendedopen-top bus tour of Kuala Lumpur, as an accompanying PA system blared out “Glory, Glory, Man United”. Hours later, United lost their first match of the tour, against the All Stars. Ruben Amorim did little to spin the defeat into anything positive. “The boos from the fans, maybe it is something we need because every game that we lost in the Premier League they were always there,” the Portuguese manager said.
“We don’t have it in us not to choke in every exercise, in every game – that is what happened. We should win these kind of games, no matter what.”
United went 1-0 behind against Hong Kong on Friday but rallied to win the second match of the tour 3-1.
After a disastrous season in which United finished just above the relegation zone, this was meant to be a money-making charm offensive – the club promising “a summer like no other” – but the tour seems to have done more harm than good. It ended up as another opportunity for defeat and derision, enforcing the idea that United are a spent force, and widening the gap between the team and their supporters.
There were thousands of unsold tickets, while fans hoping to watch the first game in Kuala Lumpur on the club’s YouTube channel were treated to extensive buildup and the first 35 seconds of the match before being redirected to a pay-per-view MUTV broadcast. Amid all the selfies and handshakes and suggestions of “glory”, there is a sordid and calculated underbelly here. Yes, money was made, but is £10m worth it to a team that isabout to spent £62.5m on a new forward?
The disastrous nature of United’s jaunt to Asia brings into question the viability of post-season tours in general. In a world where elite clubs are all too vocal in complaining about fixture congestion and injuries, these tours add mental and physical fatigue to already exhausted bodies, not to mention needless air miles with adverse environmental impact. United’s players left for Malaysia on 25 May, just hours after their final Premier League of the season, against Aston Villa. Having landed on Saturday, most of the senior squad will now report for international duty before World Cup qualifiers this weekend. United’s senior players will not have any meaningful break until mid-June and are expected back for pre-season in early July, before the club’s pre-season tour to Sweden and the US.
United are not alone in these missteps. Tottenham and Newcastle embarked on post-season tours to Australia this time last year and played each other in Melbourne on 22 May 2024, three days after the final day of the 2023-24 season. Kieran Trippier, who captained Newcastle in that Melbourne fixture, admitted the trip was “not ideal” before his commitments with England at Euro 2024, a tournament in which the right-back struggled for fitness.
Sign up toFootball Daily
Kick off your evenings with the Guardian's take on the world of football
after newsletter promotion
Injuries and fatigue plagued Tottenham’s start to the season, too. And if Spurs’ post-season tour wasn’t directly responsible for that it certainly didn’t help, while Daniel Levy’s comments at a Tottenham fans’ forum in September that he “would like to see less games, but higher-quality games” were subsequently difficult to stomach.
It is difficult to determine exactly how big the environmental impact is for these tours. The pre-season before Sir Jim Ratcliffe bought a stake inManchester United, the club offset 450 tonnes of carbon dioxide emissions to cover the necessary air travel by players and staff to the US. Perhaps unsurprisingly for a club that is now part-owned by a company with interests in everything from petrochemicals to mass plastic production, there has been no mention of offsetting emissions for the trip to Malaysia and Hong Kong, which included 14,000 air miles for the team alone.
The Professional Footballers’ Association’s sustainability champion, David Wheeler,has spokenof the harm caused by such tours. “It’s not only irresponsible from a climate point of view, but from a player care point of view, physically and mentally,” Wheeler said. “They are human beings. They get paid very well, as we know, but they have a limit to what their bodies can take and how they cope with it from a mental health point of view”. The organisation’s chief executive, Maheta Molango, has also “expressed concern about these post-season tours”.
Despite the arguments to the contrary, post-season tours look here to stay, part of a new footballing landscape almost nobody asked for. And there will be plenty of other clubs that plead poverty and set sail for distant lands in the future. For now, we have to find something else to watch before the start of the Club World Cup in a couple of weeks’ time – a month-long tournament absurdly relaunched by Fifa, with a$1bn (£775m) prize pot. Manchester United must wish they had an invite.