Man criticises Home Office for keeping visa fee of wife who died before reaching UK

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"Husband Critiques Home Office for Retaining Visa Fees After Wife's Death"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 7.9
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

Mohamed Jama, a British citizen, has publicly criticized the UK Home Office for retaining thousands of pounds in visa fees paid for his late wife, Ubah Abdi Mohamed, who tragically passed away before she could arrive in the UK. Ubah, a 25-year-old from Kenya, had been granted a spouse visa to join Jama in London, which included a significant immigration health surcharge (IHS) meant to cover any NHS care she might need during her stay. Jama had paid a total of £5,043 for the visa application and the IHS. After Ubah was diagnosed with oesophageal cancer in March 2024, Jama traveled with her to India for treatment, while their young daughter remained in Kenya. Despite initial optimism about her recovery, Ubah died unexpectedly just two days after the Home Office approved her visa on June 9, 2024. Following her death, Jama sought a refund of the IHS, arguing that since Ubah never entered the UK, the fee should be returned. However, the Home Office issued a standard response indicating that refunds are not permitted in cases of death, only in instances of visa refusals or application withdrawals, leaving Jama feeling both frustrated and heartbroken over the situation.

Jama expressed his dismay at the Home Office's rigid policy, which he characterized as cruel and illogical, given that his wife had not utilized any NHS services. He emphasized the deep bond he shared with Ubah, stating that her loss was profound and that such a policy should be reconsidered to prevent others from experiencing similar grief and financial loss. Adam Spray, a solicitor, echoed Jama's sentiments, noting that the inflexible approach of the Home Office in this tragic case highlights a broader issue of insensitivity toward the personal circumstances of applicants. Despite the Home Office's longstanding policy of not commenting on individual cases, Jama hopes that by speaking out, he might advocate for change that could benefit others who find themselves in similar predicaments in the future.

TruthLens AI Analysis

You need to be a member to generate the AI analysis for this article.

Log In to Generate Analysis

Not a member yet? Register for free.

Unanalyzed Article Content

A grieving husband has criticised theHome Officefor holding on to thousands of pounds in visa fees he paid for his wife to come to the UK, despite the fact that she died before she was due to arrive in the country.

Ubah Abdi Mohamed, 25, fromKenya, was granted a spouse visa to join her husband, Mohamed Jama, 47, a British citizen of Somali heritage who lives in north London.

UK visa fees usually include an immigration health surcharge (IHS) to fund any NHS care the person applying for the visa might need while they are in the UK. As his wife’s sponsor, Jama paid the visa application fee of £1,938, plus a £3,105 IHS.

In March 2024, Ubah Abdi Mohamed was diagnosed with oesophageal cancer. Jama then travelled with her to India to get treatment, while their three-year-old daughter, Ikran, stayed in Kenya with her grandmother.

“Everything was going well,” Jama said. “Ubah was smiling, she was putting on weight and the tumour was getting smaller. We were so happy when the Home Office granted the visa on 9 June.”

But on 11 June, Ubah Abdi Mohamed died unexpectedly while still in India. Shortly afterwards, Jama instructed his lawyer to notify the Home Office of his wife’s death and ask whether the £3,105 IHS could be refunded.

The response from the Home Office was a pro forma letter, wrongly addressed to Ubah Abdi Mohamed, saying: “We are very sorry to hear about the applicant.”

It said that there were no exceptions to the rule that relatives cannot be refunded after paying the IHS, but if the addressee was “unhappy with this policy” they could raise a complaint.

Applicants whose visas are refused, or who withdraw their applications, are entitled to an IHS refund, but there is no repayment policy in the event of a death.

“My wife was a very special person. There are no words to express the love between myself and my wife,” Jama said.

“This policy of not refunding the money to pay for any NHS treatment when the person hasn’t even entered the UK is very cruel. It’s common sense that the money should be refunded because my wife hasn’t used the NHS.

Sign up toFirst Edition

Our morning email breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what’s happening and why it matters

after newsletter promotion

“I’m speaking out because, even if the Home Office don’t change their minds in my case, it might help others in this situation in the future.”

Adam Spray, a senior associate solicitor at Wilsons, said: “This sad set of circumstances regrettably highlights the Home Office’s inflexible and all too often callous approach to real-world tragedies.

“It is frankly unconscionable that the Home Office refused to refund any of the fees paid to the grieving widower and father at such a difficult time. We hope the Home Office will take time to reflect … and reconsider.”

In response, Home Office sources pointed to a longstanding policy that it does not comment on individual cases.

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian