M3gan 2.0 review – hit-and-miss sequel replaces horror with action comedy

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"M3gan 2.0: A Shift from Horror to Action-Comedy in the Sequel"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 7.4
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

The sequel to the surprise hit M3gan, titled M3gan 2.0, takes a notable departure from its horror roots, steering into action-comedy territory while retaining some of the original's humor. Directed by Gerard Johnstone, the film opens with a dramatic setting on the Turkish-Iranian border, which sets an unexpected tone reminiscent of a Bond film. The original M3gan was a clever blend of AI horror and dark comedy, capturing audience attention and generating significant box office success. However, M3gan 2.0 attempts to elevate the stakes with a two-hour runtime that some may find excessive, and a narrative that leans heavily into political conspiracy and corporate intrigue, at times straying from the essence of what made the first film successful. The plot revolves around M3gan teaming up with her creator, Gemma, portrayed once again by Allison Williams, to confront a rogue robot named Amelia. This shift from horror to action-comedy may not resonate with all viewers, as the film's energy and humor do not always land effectively, with some comedic moments feeling forced rather than organic.

Despite its shortcomings, M3gan 2.0 offers a fresh take on the franchise, drawing comparisons to other sequels that have made similar tonal shifts. While the film showcases Johnstone's ambition and potential for larger projects, it also reflects the compromises that often accompany studio systems. The humor, which was a strong point in the first film, struggles to maintain its charm in the sequel, with only a few standout comedic moments. The film ultimately presents a familiar superhero-style finale, with messages about coexistence with AI that may not fully resonate with audiences. Although M3gan 2.0 does not mark a significant upgrade or downgrade from its predecessor, it leaves room for improvement, suggesting that future installments could benefit from a more innovative approach to storytelling in the realm of AI-driven narratives.

TruthLens AI Analysis

You need to be a member to generate the AI analysis for this article.

Log In to Generate Analysis

Not a member yet? Register for free.

Unanalyzed Article Content

As the very first image of devil doll sequelM3gan2.0 emerges on screen, of a desert with the words “somewhere on the Turkish-Iranian border” popping up like it’s a Bond movie, you’d be forgiven for double-checking if you’re in the right cinema.

The original, a grabby artificial intelligence (AI) riff on Child’s Play and Annabelle, was a brisk, by-the-numbers domestic horror, released on the first weekend of 2023, a slot usually given to the very worst genre films. M3gan wassmarter than most, often sly and frequently funny and introducing what’s now become a rarity, an almost instant non-IP pop culture icon, whose virality exploded the film into a surprise smash (raking in over $180m from a $12m budget). Like the films it was inspired by, a franchise was inevitable although where we’re taken in M3gan 2.0 was far less of a given. For the follow-up, writer-director Gerard Johnstone has swerved from horror to action while retaining and tweaking the comedy with a release date that’s been upgraded to summer blockbuster territory. It doesn’t always work – a two-hour runtime that’s a little too long, world-saving stakes that are a little too big, funny lines that are a little too not funny – but it’s a mostly watchable second-tier event movie that, in a world of inconsequential sequels that fail to justify their existence, will do.

For M3gan 2.0, Johnstone has picked the Terminator 2 model, resurrecting M3gan to help destroy an even more evil robot called Amelia (Ukrainian actor Ivanna Sakhno) who has gone rogue. Since the previous film, understandably haunted roboticist Gemma (a returningAllison Williams, giving it her all once again) has rejigged her thinking on technology, fighting for the ethical use of AI and urging people to step away from their smartphones. But she’s forced to team up with the monster she created when Amelia threatens not just the lives of those around her but the entire world.

The details of how we get there are absurdly convoluted and it takes a while for Johnstone to convince us that an evil doll movie really needs this much political conspiracy and corporate intrigue (with the addition of every new espionage element, I had to keep reminding myself I was watchinga M3gan movie). But it just about works with time, mostly down to its sheer energy, Johnstone pitching it as a goofy Mission: Impossible for younger teens (I did enjoy this mildly more than Tom Cruise’s boringly bloatedFinal Reckoning). The tonal swerve is reminiscent of that employed in another Blumhouse sequel,Happy Death Day 2Uthat transformed a fun, gimmicky slasher into an indecipherable sci-fi romp. That film couldn’t find a way out of the overly complicated mess it made for itself and the comparatively simple M3gan 2.0 finds a slicker way to reinvent itself.

No one could have predicted just how many memes the first film would spawn but it was still written, by Malignant’s Akela Cooper, with enough self-awareness to suggest that it wouldn’t be a complete surprise. The campaign for the sequel had been rather worrying, however, veering from self-aware to smug, ads built entirely on camp cheek, trailers soundtracked by Britney Spears’s Oops!… I Did It Again, grimly suggesting the film would be crippled by its thirst to go viral. It’s surprisingly restrained though in that regard and any studio-mandated repetition – yes, she dances again; yes, she sings another ballad at an inopportune moment again – feels mostly organic (a rendition of Kate Bush’s This Woman’s Work is arguably more effective than Sia and David Guetta’s Titanium was in the first). One of the major problems is that the comedy just doesn’t quite land this time around, bar one genuinely funny bit involving Steven Seagal film titles. Johnstone took over writing duties from Cooper but he hasn’t found a way to sustain M3gan’s humour despite ample insert-zinger-here moments.

It’s also clear that Johnstone has retrofitted the film to act as an audition tape for bigger things, showcasing flashier adeptness on a much larger canvas, a sizzle reel to be sent on to execs looking for the next Marvel minion. His debut,Housebound, a thrilling comedy horror that pitched him as a mix of Steven Spielberg and Peter Jackson, was a film of incredible ingenuity and it’s hard not to feel a little disappointed, if not exactly surprised, that his way up the studio system has demanded that edges be smoothed out and ambitions remain boringly generic. The finale of M3gan 2.0 is as familiar as any superhero ending, if a little more coherently choreographed, and while it’s sort of kind of just about effective enough (even if some muddled messaging about learning not to fear but coexist with AI is hard to stomach), I kept wishing we were in less well-charted territory. M3gan 2.0 isn’t an upgrade or a downgrade, but M3gan 3.0 could do with some new code.

M3gan 2.0 is out in cinemas now

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian