Luke, I am … an INTJ? Darth Vader would slice hurtful colleagues in half – not take them to an employment tribunal

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"NHS Worker Awarded £30,000 After Colleague Compares Her to Darth Vader"

Luke, I am … an INTJ? Darth Vader would slice hurtful colleagues in half – not take them to an employment tribunal analysis cover image The Guardian 7.4
Image Source: https://i.guim.co.uk/img/media/6d80a9a8ba193018236b28a88ccc722d4e8ca6b0/395_0_2915_2333/master/2915.jpg?width=1200&height=630&quality=85&auto=format&fit=crop&overlay-align=bottom%2Cleft&overlay-width=100p&overlay-base64=L2ltZy9zdGF0aWMvb3ZlcmxheXMvdGctb3BpbmlvbnMucG5n&enable=upscale&s=99696318f87d35600448815dc6450474
Original Article Source: https://www.theguardian.com/film/2025/may/08/darth-vader-star-wars-employment-tribunal-myers-briggs-test-nhs
View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 7.4
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

In a recent case that has drawn attention to workplace dynamics and the impact of personality assessments, NHS blood donation worker Lorna Rooke was awarded nearly £30,000 by a tribunal after a colleague compared her to Darth Vader through a Star Wars-themed Myers-Briggs Type Indicator personality test. Rooke expressed that the comparison was insulting and damaging to her self-esteem, leading her to resign from her position a month later. The tribunal's judge acknowledged the negative connotation associated with being likened to a notorious villain, emphasizing that such comparisons can have serious emotional repercussions in a professional environment.

The article also critiques the assumptions surrounding Darth Vader's character and the implications of personality tests. The author argues that while Vader is often viewed as a villain, he possesses qualities that could be seen as admirable, such as ambition and a strategic mindset. The author humorously contrasts their own Myers-Briggs results, revealing a connection to Obi-Wan Kenobi, whom they consider less favorable than a comparison to Vader. They suggest that rather than resigning, a true 'Darth Vader type' would have confronted the situation with more assertiveness. Ultimately, the piece reflects on the absurdity of such personality tests and their potential to cause unintended distress in workplace relationships.

TruthLens AI Analysis

The article presents a unique intersection of pop culture and workplace dynamics, highlighting the implications of a personality comparison that led to a tribunal case. It raises questions about the appropriateness of using fictional characters to define real-life personalities and the consequences of such actions in a professional environment.

Cultural Commentary on Darth Vader's Image

The notion that being compared to Darth Vader is derogatory suggests a societal view of him purely as a villain. However, the article argues for a more nuanced interpretation of his character, suggesting that his attributes could also be seen positively. This reflects a broader cultural commentary on how we perceive fictional characters and the traits we associate with them. The comparison of Vader’s INTJ personality type to notable figures like Bobby Fischer and Jane Austen indicates a defense of the character against the stigma of villainy.

Implications of Workplace Culture

The case of Lorna Rooke, who received a substantial monetary award after being compared to Darth Vader, highlights the sensitivity of workplace dynamics and the potential for harm in seemingly light-hearted comparisons. This indicates a growing trend in workplace culture that emphasizes emotional well-being and the importance of respectful interactions among colleagues. The ruling may set a precedent for future workplace disputes related to personality assessments and their implications.

Public Perception and Response

This story taps into a wider public interest in not just the Star Wars franchise, but also in how personality types are perceived and discussed in society. By framing the comparison to Darth Vader as an insult, the article encourages readers to think critically about how such labels can affect individuals' self-esteem and career choices. The public may react with support for Rooke's position, especially among those who feel marginalized or unfairly judged in their work environments.

Potential Manipulation and Underlying Messages

While the article critiques the initial comparison of Rooke to Vader, it also subtly reinforces the idea that certain personality types are deemed more acceptable than others. This could be seen as a form of manipulation, as it suggests a hierarchy of personality traits based on popular culture. The humor in the piece may distract from the seriousness of workplace bullying and the psychological impact of such comparisons.

Trustworthiness and Reliability of the Article

The article appears to be well-researched, referencing legal outcomes and cultural discussions surrounding personality types. However, its tone blends humor with serious commentary, which might lead some readers to question its reliability. The inclusion of personal reflections on personality types adds a subjective layer that could influence readers' interpretations. Overall, the article provides a thoughtful discussion, though it may blur the lines between serious critique and entertainment.

This piece aligns with ongoing discussions in society about mental health, workplace culture, and the influence of popular media on our perceptions of self and others. It resonates particularly with communities that advocate for workplace rights and mental health awareness.

Unanalyzed Article Content

Source URL: https://www.theguardian.com/film/2025/may/08/darth-vader-star-wars-employment-tribunal-myers-briggs-test-nhs

This is undeniably a bad time to be Darth Vader. A few weeks ago,Tony Gilroy revealedthat Vader would not be appearing in hisAndorseries, despite fans assuming that he would play a significant part in its climax. A few days ago, the White House shared anAI-generated imageof Donald Trump as a confusingly musclebound Sith Lord, subtly undermining Vader as the go-to Star Wars baddie. And nowa woman has been awarded almost £30,000for being compared to him.

Yesterday, it was reported that NHS blood donation worker Lorna Rooke had received £28,989.61 from a Croydon tribunal after complaining that a colleague had taken a Star Wars-themed Myers-Briggs Type Indicator personality test on her behalf online, and then informed her that her results aligned with Darth Vader. This upset Rooke and made her feel so unpopular that she resigned one month later. “Darth Vader is a legendary villain of theStar Warsseries, and being aligned with his personality is insulting,” agreed the judge while announcing her verdict.

It seems to me that this is quite unfair on Darth Vader, and makes the assumption that he’s a baddie. True, the guy was no saint, but surely you can overlook some of his iffier tendencies, many of them involving genocide, and see his good points. He’s a snappy dresser, for one, and is fundamentally outcome-oriented. Although I don’t know the exact quiz taken, many sites label Vader as a classic INTJ or “architect”: a private, complex introvert who prides himself on his logic and ambition.Bobby Fischer was an INTJ, it is said. So was Jane Austen. And, sure, Elon Musk and Jack the Ripper, too, but let’s not dwell on the negative. It’s possible to be a Darth Vader type without being completely irredeemable.

There are far worse people to be compared to. I just took a Myers-Briggs test for the purposes of this article, and discovered that I am an INFJ, or an “advocate”. You know which character from Star Wars is an INFJ? Obi-Wan Kenobi. That is an objectively far worse result than being called Darth Vader. Obi-Wan Kenobi was rubbish. He wore a crap hoodie, had the world’s dullest, most low-energy lightsaber battle and then just sort of disappeared into his clothes instead of dying. Awful. Plus,other famous INFJsapparently include Adolf Hitler and the lead singer of the Red Hot Chili Peppers. This is so much worse than being Darth Vader and I feel horrible about it. If anyone deserves 30 grand here, it’s me.

Also, without wanting to undermine the sense of hurt that Rooke must have felt at this perceived bullying at the hands of her colleagues, a more pressing problem might be that, in her case, the online Star Wars-themed Myers-Briggs test may have got it wrong. It’s just that I know Darth Vader. I’ve watched everything he’s ever done. I consider myself a fan of his. And this deep understanding of the Vader psyche leads me to believe that he probably wouldn’t have quit his job as supreme commander of the Imperial Fleet just because someone took a gussied-up BuzzFeed quiz on his behalf.

Even if the quiz results were as bad as they could possibly be – which, in this instance, is to be compared to Darth Vader, which admittedly wouldn’t be so bad if you literally were Darth Vader – it’s a fair assumption that Darth Vader would have a full arsenal of healthy coping strategies to help him overcome his disappointment.

Actual Darth Vader would find the person who took the quiz and choke them out from across the room in front of their peers. He would have sliced them in half on top of some sort of implausibly dangerous gantry. If things were really bad, he might have exploded their entire home planet with his Death Star. What I’m trying to say is that he had plenty of options, and Lorna Rooke took none of them. Instead, she resigned from her job and opted for the path of statutory jurisdiction. This leads me to believe that she isn’t actually a Darth Vader type at all. The online Star Wars-themed Myers-Briggs Type Indicator personality test industry should be ashamed of itself.

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian