‘Like sinking into a warm bath’: why Jaws is my feelgood movie

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"'Jaws' Remains a Comforting Classic, Blending Fear with Fascination"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 7.6
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

The article reflects on the enduring appeal of the film 'Jaws,' which is celebrated for its ability to evoke a sense of comfort and familiarity for the author. Having watched the film numerous times and engaged with its various adaptations, the author finds that viewing 'Jaws' feels akin to sinking into a warm bath. While many associate the movie with fear and avoidance of the ocean, the author’s background—growing up around sailors and ports—shapes a different perspective. Instead of feeling terror, they have developed a fascination with marine life, even pursuing scuba diving and cage diving with great white sharks, which they describe as a thrilling experience. This unique relationship with the film contrasts with the fear it instilled in many viewers during its initial release, but for the author, it has always represented a connection to the sea rather than a deterrent from it.

The article also delves into the craftsmanship behind 'Jaws' and its profound impact on film history. The author appreciates how Spielberg's direction transforms the narrative into a tightly constructed adventure that remains engaging and relevant. The film's portrayal of shark attacks is balanced by moments of humor and humanity, particularly in the interactions between the characters. The dynamics of Amity Island, the urgency of the shark threat, and Brody's character development are all expertly woven into the storyline. Furthermore, the author notes how 'Jaws' has been subject to various interpretations over the years, highlighting its complex themes that go beyond the surface-level horror of a man-eating shark. Ultimately, the film's lasting legacy lies in its ability to resonate deeply with audiences, offering new insights upon each viewing, while also sparking critical conversations about humanity's relationship with nature and the ocean's inhabitants.

TruthLens AI Analysis

The article reflects on the personal connection the author has with the film "Jaws," emphasizing how it serves as a feel-good movie for them despite its horror genre. The narrative intertwines nostalgia, personal experiences with marine life, and a critical perspective on the film's broader impact on shark populations and public perception.

Emotional Resonance

The author describes a deep emotional connection to "Jaws," noting that the film feels familiar and comforting rather than terrifying. This indicates that films classified as "feelgood" do not necessarily need to be romantic comedies but can instead evoke positive memories or experiences. The author's description of watching "Jaws" as akin to "sinking into a warm bath" suggests a strong sentimental value, which can resonate with audiences who have similar nostalgic ties to classic films.

Cultural Reflection

Through the lens of personal anecdotes, the article highlights the film's dual nature—entertaining yet problematic. While "Jaws" is celebrated as a landmark in cinema history, the author underscores its unintended consequences, particularly the negative impact on shark populations and how it shaped public fear. This reflection invites readers to consider the cultural and environmental ramifications of media, prompting a discussion that goes beyond mere entertainment.

Potential Misleading Aspects

While the author acknowledges the film's adverse effects on sharks, the narrative may downplay the gravity of these consequences by focusing more on personal enjoyment and the thrill of marine adventures. This could lead to a perception that the film's entertainment value outweighs its ethical implications, which might not align with the views of conservationists or those focused on wildlife protection.

Trustworthiness of the Content

The article appears credible, as it combines personal narrative with factual observations about the film's impact. The author's experiences and reflections do not seem to manipulate the audience but rather present a nuanced view of a beloved film. However, the absence of a wider range of expert opinions on the ecological crisis caused by "Jaws" could limit its objectivity.

Community Appeal

The narrative likely resonates with film enthusiasts, marine life advocates, and those nostalgic for classic cinema. By sharing a personal journey that intertwines with the film, the author appeals to a community that values both cinematic history and environmental awareness.

The article does not seem to directly influence stock markets or global economics; however, it may indirectly affect public interest in marine conservation efforts, potentially impacting organizations that rely on public support for funding.

In terms of global power dynamics, the article does not present a significant geopolitical issue but rather focuses on cultural and environmental themes. It reflects a growing awareness of the consequences of media narratives on real-world issues, relevant in today's context where environmental concerns are increasingly prominent.

There is no clear indication that artificial intelligence was used in writing this article, as it presents a personal narrative style that typically reflects human experience and emotion. AI models, if used, might have contributed to structuring the content or enhancing readability, but the inherent subjectivity suggests a human touch in its composition.

Overall, the article navigates the landscape of nostalgia and critical reflection effectively, inviting readers to appreciate "Jaws" while also considering its broader implications.

Unanalyzed Article Content

What makesa film “feelgood”? If it’s not a romcom, or otherwise setting out to impart warm fuzzies, familiarity plays a big part. I’ve seenJawsso many times that watching it now truly feels like sinking into a warm bath.

It’s always been my favourite film; I’ve read the book, got the hat,seen the play. (Did you know that, on set, the animatronic shark was called Bruce?) Far from keeping me out of the water, Jaws stoked my interest in marine life, even inspiring me to get my scuba qualification.

A few years ago I fulfilled my dream of cage diving with great whites. When the 3-meter-long shark, a juvenile female, heaved into view, it was like spotting a celebrity in the wild – I was starstruck.

I appreciate it’s not the standard response toSteven Spielberg’s defining summer blockbuster. When Jaws hit cinemas 50 years ago this June, it had peoplescreaming in their seats; many still credit it with keeping them out of the water.

But my parents are passionate sailors and I spent much of my childhood around ports or at sea, meaning Jaws’s maritime setting is less inherently unsettling or alien for me than it may be for the average viewer. There are even moments of cosy recognition: my father had no more success teaching me to tie a bowline knot than Quint (Robert Shaw) does with Brody (Roy Scheider).

That is perhaps why the facts spouted by self-described “shark addict” Matt Hooper (Richard Dreyfuss) made a greater impression on me than the terrifying attacks – because I understood that they were more representative.

Ultimately Jawsproved disastrousfor shark species, encouraging their mass slaughter in game-fishing tournaments and tarring them with a villainous reputation that has persisted through decades of attempted damage control. Sharks may bite people, but very rarely – you are more likely to be killed by a cow – and they certainly don’tseekrevenge.

BothSpielberg and Peter Benchley, the late author of the Jaws novel, have expressed regret at its negative impact on sharks. But if you set aside the use of dramatic licence, the film is otherwise quite diligent about matching fear with fascination.

After the shark claims its first victim, in what must be one of the most shocking openings in blockbuster history, police chief Brody’s response is to check out a book. “You know people don’t even know how old sharks are!” he exclaims to his wife Ellen.

That’s true – as is the fact that tiger sharks, like the one Hooper guts on the dock, really have been known to chow down on car licence plates. That sort of detail gives Jaws’s world a lived-in quality: it seems textured, immediate and real, even for viewers without any particular connection to the ocean. (In 1975, a teenage girl in landlocked Kansaswas hospitalised with psychological trauma, later attributed to “cinematic neurosis” from having recently watched Jaws at the cinema.)

On my more recent watches, I’ve been struck most by what a well-made picture it is – at once rich and economical. Spielberg stripped the distractions from Benchley’s novel (such as Hooper’s affair with Ellen) while amping up the humanity of its hero Brody to create a “perfect engine” for adventure (to give Hooper’s awed epithet for the shark).

A large part of the “feelgood” satisfaction of watching Jaws, I find, is feeling yourself to be in capable hands – particularly these days, when the most crowd-pleasing blockbusters are typically also bloated and predictable. From the moment Chrissie Watkins sets out for that fateful midnight swim, Jaws hooks you almost as violently as it does her, then for two hours doesn’t let go.

There’s no empty dialogue, no wasted shots. The claustrophobic dynamic of Amity Island, the stakes of the imminent high season and Brody’s uneasy authority as an outsider are all established briskly but elegantly.

Even the bit parts have punch. Lee Fierro makes the most of the minutes she’s onscreen as the grieving mother of the shark’s second victim, while Murray Hamilton is note-perfect as Amity’s craven mayor (name-checked by Boris Johnson as his pandemic-eraleadership model, in a mystifying moment of self-awareness. Fierro, incidentally, died from Covid-19 in 2020, aged 91).

The confines of word count don’t permit me to do justice to the three central performances. Suffice to say, the bitchy sniping between Hooper and Quint never fails to delight me (and is made all the more delicious by knowledge of Dreyfuss and Shaw’son-set feud).

The heart of the film is Scheider’s Brody, triumphing over the shark when Hooper’s brains and Quint’s brawn fail. JawsfollowsJoseph Campbell’s time-honoured hero’s journey arc, pushing Brody to conquer his fear of water. But the film also endorses his initial trepidation: the mass slaughter of sharks is too far, but the ocean and its inhabitants certainly deserve our respect.

Indeed, the truest, most resonant things it has to say are about people – not fish. The thought and care that has gone into each element is why Jaws has endured: it’s a sufficiently watertight picture to sustain a half-century of interpretations, from apandemic parabletoChristian allegory.

Yes, it’s about a man-eating shark – but there’s so much more beneath the surface. I find something new to chew on every time.

Jaws is available to rent digitally in the US and is on Amazon Prime in the UK

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian