Liberal MPs using military uniforms in election campaign ads despite repeated pleas from defence department

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"Defence Department Requests Veterans Refrain from Using Military Uniforms in Campaign Ads"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 7.9
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

The Australian Defence Department has reiterated its concerns regarding the use of military uniforms in political campaign materials by veterans, requesting that candidates refrain from this practice. This request stems from a longstanding commitment to maintaining the military's apolitical stance and preventing any perception that it endorses specific political figures. Despite these requests, members of the Liberal Party, including first-time candidates and seasoned politicians, have continued to feature themselves in military attire in their promotional materials. For instance, the Liberal candidate for Corangamite, Darcy Dunstan, has presented himself as a former SAS soldier in campaign videos, showcasing images of his military service, which the Defence Department has specifically urged against. Similarly, Andrew Hastie, the shadow defence minister, has used images of his own military service in recent social media ads, despite having faced disciplinary action in the past for similar behavior.

The Defence Department's stance has been consistent over the years, yet it appears that candidates are increasingly leveraging their military backgrounds in an effort to connect with voters. The Liberal Party has defended its candidates, emphasizing their military service and contributions to the nation. Despite the Defence Department's polite requests, there is little recourse available to enforce compliance, particularly for candidates who are no longer active military members. Historical instances of Labor candidates also using military imagery in their campaigns highlight that this issue is not exclusive to any one party. As the 2025 election approaches, the intersection of military service and political campaigning continues to raise questions about the appropriateness of such practices and the perceptions they create among the electorate.

TruthLens AI Analysis

The article reveals a growing concern regarding the use of military uniforms by candidates in election campaigns, particularly among Liberal MPs. Despite repeated requests from the defence department to refrain from this practice, many candidates continue to showcase their military backgrounds in an effort to gain voter support. The implications of such actions raise questions about the political neutrality of the military and the ethical considerations surrounding the use of military imagery in political campaigns.

Public Perception and Political Neutrality

The defence department's stance centers on maintaining the military's apolitical nature. By allowing candidates to use military uniforms in their campaign materials, there is a risk of creating an impression that the military endorses specific political figures. This undermines the public's trust in the military as a neutral entity. The continued defiance of these requests by candidates suggests a prioritization of personal political gain over institutional integrity.

Potential Manipulation

There's a sense that the candidates may be manipulating their military backgrounds to appeal to voters' emotions, particularly in a context where veterans may hold significant sway. By presenting themselves in uniform, they evoke a sense of patriotism and sacrifice, potentially overshadowing other critical policy discussions. This strategy may obscure more important electoral issues, redirecting voter focus toward personal narratives rather than substantive policy debates.

Transparency and Ethical Concerns

While the article is grounded in factual reporting, it raises ethical questions about the transparency of candidates' intentions. The defence department's repeated requests highlight an ongoing tension between individual candidates and institutional protocols. The fact that some individuals, like Andrew Hastie, have faced disciplinary action for similar behavior in the past adds a layer of complexity to the current narrative.

Influence on Voter Behavior

The use of military imagery can significantly influence voter perception, particularly among demographics that hold military service in high regard. Candidates like Darcy Dunstan leverage their service to establish credibility, potentially swaying undecided voters. The article implies that this tactic is not only widespread but also effective, raising concerns about the integrity of the electoral process.

Broader Implications for Society and Politics

This ongoing issue has the potential to affect the broader political landscape by reinforcing a culture where military service is seen as a prerequisite for political legitimacy. If candidates continue to use their military backgrounds as a primary tool for campaigning, it could lead to a shift in how voters assess candidates, favoring those with military experience over others who may have equally valid qualifications.

The reliability of the article stems from its factual basis, though it is clear that there are underlying motivations and implications that warrant scrutiny. The framing of the candidates' actions in light of defence department guidelines suggests an attempt to provoke thought regarding the ethics of campaign strategies that involve military service.

Unanalyzed Article Content

The defence department remains concerned about veterans using images of themselves in military uniform on official campaign material and has issued another “respectful request” for them to stop doing so.

Liberal veterans ranging from first-time candidates to the shadow defence minister Andrew Hastie have used images of themselves in military fatigues jumping from planes, serving on tour and holding rifles during training drills.

Defence’s long-held opposition to military uniforms being used in campaign ads is based on a commitment to ensure the military remains an apolitical organisation and that there is no perception it endorses any political candidate.

Sign up for the Afternoon Update: Election 2025 email newsletter

“Defence respectfully requests those standing for political office to refrain from using imagery of themselves in uniform or imagery of ADF personnel as part of any campaign material,” a defence spokesperson said.

But so far, defence’s requests, now issued over several campaigns, have been ignored by candidates who are eager to emphasise their military service to win votes.

The Liberal candidate for the Victorian seat of Corangamite, Darcy Dunstan, introduces himself in one campaign video as “a former SAS soldier who has faced many challenges in my life” over images of him serving in uniform. The video contains a portrait of him in fatigues with the SAS beret.

Another video uploaded to social media shows Dunstan chatting about his service with the shadow defence minister, Andrew Hastie. The video includes images of Dunstan in fatigues undergoing physical training.

Hastie, a former troop commander in the SAS, wassacked from the army reserve in 2016after he continued to include images of himself in uniform on campaign material. The military takes a stricter approach to candidates who are active members of the reserve.

At the time, Hastie said the ADF had “used a bit of policy to try and push me around, basically”.

“I had to decide whose authority I answered to. It was the people of Canning. As a federal parliamentarian, I don’t take orders from the military.”

Almost a decade later, Hastie has launched paid ads on social media with images of himself on tour in uniform, holding rifles in helicopters and smiling in front of transport vehicles.

“In the army, in the SAS, I learned about courage, about mateship, about leadership,” Hastie said over the images. “I joined up to fight for my country. Now I’m fighting for my family, for my community, and for you.”

The Liberal candidate for Leichhardt, Jeremy Neal, was pictured in military fatigues with a rifle on campaign pamphlets introducing him to the community. Neal’sLiberal partybiography doesn’t mention any military service, but his LinkedIn profile states he was an officer cadet in the army reserves from 2016-2018.

Sign up toAfternoon Update: Election 2025

Our Australian afternoon update breaks down the key election campaign stories of the day, telling you what’s happening and why it matters

after newsletter promotion

Hastie was contacted for comment, including on whether he would continue to use images of himself in military uniform on campaign material if theCoalitionwins and he becomes defence minister. No response was received before deadline.

A Liberal party spokesperson said it was proud to have Dunstan, who is no longer a member of the SAS, as its candidate in Corangamite. Dunstan’s campaign corflutes in Corangamite describe him as a “Tradie. Soldier. Dad”.

“As an SAS soldier for over a decade, Darcy defended our country with dignity and honour, and will be rightfully acknowledged alongside all of Australia’s current and former servicemen and women on Anzac Day,” the Liberal spokesperson said.

If a candidate is no longer a member of theAustralian militaryor reserves – and is not using official defence material that is covered by copyright – there is little more the department can do than politely ask them to stop. There is no suggestion the three candidates have breached any rules.

“Defence acknowledges the contribution of former ADF personnel,” the spokesperson said.

While Guardian Australia did not find any examples of Labor candidates using military uniforms in their 2025 campaign material, there have been high-profile historical examples of this.

In 2016, then Labor candidate for Eden-Monaro, Mike Kelly, resigned from the army reserves after he received an instruction to stop using photos of himself in uniform in campaign material.

Kellytold Guardian Australiait was “a really sad day, it ended nearly 30 years of attachment to the Australian army, an institution that I love dearly”.

The Labor member for Solomon, Luke Gosling, was told to stop using images of himself in uniform on campaign corflutes in 2022. Gosling also used images of himself in uniform during the 2016 and 2019 election campaigns.

In 2022, Gosling defended his use of the military images and told the NT News that “being a veteran is a huge part of my identity and I fight on those issues for our defence community here in the territory every day”.

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian