Lehrmann seeks to halt Toowoomba rape case and claims police ‘illegally obtained’ his lawyers’ phone calls

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"Bruce Lehrmann Seeks to Halt Rape Case, Claims Illegal Police Interception of Legal Calls"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 7.8
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

Bruce Lehrmann is attempting to halt the ongoing rape case against him by claiming that police have unlawfully acquired phone calls between himself and his legal representatives. The allegations stem from an incident on October 10, 2021, when Lehrmann is accused of raping a woman twice after they met at a strip club the previous night in Toowoomba, Queensland. His defense attorney, Zali Burrows, has filed a request in the Toowoomba district court for a permanent stay of the trial, asserting that the intercepted communications between Lehrmann's lawyers and the Queensland Police were obtained illegally. This application follows an affidavit from Peter Blake-Segovia, a practice manager at the Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions, which revealed that police had recordings of phone calls between a detective and Lehrmann's former legal counsel that were not disclosed as part of the prosecution's brief.

The legal proceedings have highlighted the complexities of communication laws in Australia, where it is generally lawful to record a conversation without consent in Queensland, but illegal in New South Wales. The alleged victim has previously testified that she consumed cocaine with Lehrmann before engaging in consensual sex, but later awoke to find him assaulting her. Lehrmann, who has not yet formally entered a plea, has indicated through previous legal representation that he intends to contest the charges, with past arguments suggesting that the alleged victim was too intoxicated to provide consent. Burrows has also requested that Queensland police be required to disclose all evidence relevant to the defense, arguing that police should not have the discretion to determine what is pertinent. As the Ipswich district court prepares to hear Burrows' application, the case continues to unfold amidst significant legal scrutiny and public interest.

TruthLens AI Analysis

You need to be a member to generate the AI analysis for this article.

Log In to Generate Analysis

Not a member yet? Register for free.

Unanalyzed Article Content

Bruce Lehrmann has sought to halt a rape case against him, claiming that police “illegally obtained” his lawyers’ phone calls.

Lehrmann, 30, is accused of raping a woman twice during the morning of 10 October, 2021 after they met at a strip club the previous night in Toowoomba, west of Brisbane.

Defence lawyer Zali Burrows filed an application in Toowoomba district court on Monday seeking a permanent stay in Lehrmann’s pending trial.

In court documents, Burrows sought a “declaration that intercepted calls between Mr Lehrmann’s lawyers andQueenslandPolice [were] illegally obtained”.

Burrows’ application was in response to an affidavit by Peter Blake-Segovia, a practice manager at the Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions’ Toowoomba chambers.

The affidavit stated police had possession of four audio recordings of calls between a detective and Lehrmann’s previous lawyers.

Sign up for Guardian Australia’s breaking news email

Blake-Segovia stated he had emailed the arresting officer in Lehrmann’s case, Det Snr Const Ashlee Ryder, concerning material in the case.

“Can you please confirm whether a copy of anything that is relevant to the proceeding … has been disclosed?” Blake-Segovia emailed on 17 June.

In the court affidavit, Blake-Segovia stated Det Ryder had “outlined items that were in her possession that were not provided as part of the brief to the Director of Public Prosecutions”.

The items included “four audio recordings between the arresting officer and [Lehrmann’s] previous legal representatives”.

“I will review the contents of the material to ascertain whether they ought to be disclosed,” Blake-Segovia stated to the court.

In Queensland it is generally lawful for a person to record a phone conversation without the consent of the other people on the call. However, in New South Wales it is generally illegal to record a phone conversation without consent.

The alleged victim previously told Toowoomba magistrates court she consumed cocaine with Lehrmann during a night out before consensual sex at about 4am.

The woman said she was woken about 10am by Lehrmann sexually assaulting her.

Lehrmann – a former ministerial staffer to Liberal senator Linda Reynolds – has not formally entered a plea but has previously indicated through his former lawyers that he intends to fight the charges.

Lehrmann’s former defence barrister Andrew Hoare said at a prior hearing the alleged victim was too intoxicated to remember giving consent and Lehrmann could have mistakenly believed he had consent.

Burrows on Monday also applied for a declaration that Queensland police did not have the discretion to determine what is relevant to the defence case and must disclose all materials.

Blake-Segovia stated to the court that police held items, in addition to the phone call recordings, that had not been disclosed.

Those items included two audio recordings and two emails between the alleged victim and Det Ryder, an audio recording of a witness and information about Lehrmann’s account on the Snapchat messaging app.

The Ipswich district court is due to hear Burrows’ application on Wednesday.

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian