Lawyers investigate whether Hannah Thomas could sue police over alleged excessive use of force at Sydney protest

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"Investigation Underway into Police Conduct During Sydney Protest Involving Hannah Thomas"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 7.7
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

Lawyers are currently investigating the potential for civil lawsuits against New South Wales police following allegations of excessive use of force during a pro-Palestine protest in Sydney. The incident involved Hannah Thomas, a former Greens candidate who was arrested at the protest and has since reported a significant injury that may result in loss of sight in her right eye. The protest, which took place in Belmore and was attended by approximately 60 individuals, focused on the alleged involvement of a local business in supplying services to Israel's military. Thomas, along with four other protesters, was charged with resisting police and failing to comply with dispersal orders. The legal firm O’Brien Criminal and Civil Solicitors, representing Thomas and others involved, is examining the viability of taking legal action due to the circumstances surrounding the arrests and the recent changes in protest laws that have expanded police powers to disperse demonstrators.

The assistant police commissioner, Brett McFadden, has denied any wrongdoing by the police, asserting that a review of body-worn camera footage showed no misconduct. However, following Thomas's serious injury, a critical incident investigation has been launched, overseen by the Law Enforcement Conduct Commission. This investigation was prompted by the injury's severity and the police's request for Thomas's medical information. The controversial protest laws, which were recently expanded under the NSW Labor government's legislation, have been criticized for potentially suppressing peaceful protests. Critics, including NSW Greens spokesperson Sue Higginson, have called for the repeal of these laws, arguing they infringe on the right to peaceful assembly. The protests were reportedly sparked by a previous demonstration against a member of the Israel Defense Forces, highlighting the tensions surrounding political expression in NSW, especially in relation to issues involving Israel and Palestine.

TruthLens AI Analysis

You need to be a member to generate the AI analysis for this article.

Log In to Generate Analysis

Not a member yet? Register for free.

Unanalyzed Article Content

Lawyers are investigating whether protesters could sueNew South Walespolice over alleged excessive use of force during a pro-Palestine protest in Sydney, after which the former Greens candidate Hannah Thomas said she could lose sight in her right eye.

Thomas, 35, who ran against the prime minister at the federal election, was arrested at the Belmore protest which was attended by about 60 people on Friday. She was subsequently taken to hospital and underwent surgery.

O’Brien Criminal and Civil Solicitors said on Monday it was acting for several people, including Thomas, involved in the protest and the firm was “investigating the viability of civil proceedings”.

Thomas and four others were arrested and charged after Friday’s protestoutside a business in Belmoreaccused of “supplying electroplating and surface coating services for a variety of applications including aerospace and defence technology” to Israel.

The 35-year-old was charged with resisting police and refusing or failing to comply with a direction to disperse.

Principal solicitor Peter O’Brien said in a statement: “Given that recent changes in the law in relation to protests have attempted to expand police powers to give directions, now subject to constitutional challenge, police may well have felt emboldened to act without proper and lawful acknowledgment of the right to protest.

“The government was warned that these changes to expand police powers to disperse protestors could lead to serious and ugly confrontations,” the lawyer said.

Sign up for Guardian Australia’s breaking news email

The assistant police commissioner Brett McFadden on Monday morningdenied any police wrongdoing. McFaddentold the ABC he had reviewed body-worn-camera footage, and it did not show “any misconduct on behalf of my officers”.

On Monday afternoon, McFadden declared a critical incident investigation into Thomas’s arrest after police determined “the level of injury warranted a critical incident declaration”. Police said they had requested Thomas’s medical information multiple times before being given the information needed to declare a critical incident.

The investigation would be overseen by the police watchdog, the Law Enforcement Conduct Commission.

TheNSW Labor government passed legislationearlier this year aimed at curbing antisemitism. It expanded police move-on powers for protests near places of worship.

The protest does not have to be directed at the place of worship. The legislation does not define how “near” a person must be to a place of worship before police can enact the powers.

A constitutional challenge now under way against the laws by the Palestine Action Group recently heard that the catalyst for the lawswas a protest outside a synagoguewhere a member of the Israel Defense Forces was speaking.

The reforms were met with a fierce backlash, including from one Labor MLC whotold an internal meetingit was the most “draconian” change to protest laws in decades.

Sign up toBreaking News Australia

Get the most important news as it breaks

after newsletter promotion

The NSW Greens spokesperson for justice, Sue Higginson, wrote a letter to Minns on Monday urging the charges against Thomas and four other protesters to be withdrawn.

She urged Minns to repeal the anti-protest laws, arguing they were “introduced as a mechanism to chill legitimate and peaceful political expression in NSW”.

Minns told reporterson Monday that policedid not use the controversial places of worship legislation and instead relied on previously existing powers.

However, Higginson rebutted this, arguing NSW police “expressly included references to a place of worship in their fact sheets that describe the alleged offences that led to the arrests and assault at Belmore”.

Police alleged one protester was issued a second move-on order after she walked “across the road to the opposite side of SEC Plating which is a place of worship”.

The protest was outside SEC Plating, which protesters claimed was manufacturing parts for used in the F-35 Jet program. However, SEC Plating has denied this is the case.

The business is across the road from a mosque called the Teebah Islamic Association.

Police arrested and charged five people, including Thomas, a 29-year-old woman and three men aged 24, 29 and 41.

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian