Latin American leaders spend millions to influence Trump’s White House

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"Latin American Leaders Increase Lobbying Efforts to Influence U.S. Policy Under Trump Administration"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 7.5
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

Recent analyses reveal that leaders from Latin America have invested millions in lobbying efforts to influence the Trump administration on a variety of issues, including trade agreements, security assistance, and energy investments. Since the lead-up to the 2024 presidential election, at least ten countries from the region have registered their officials as foreign agents under the Foreign Agent Registration Act (FARA), which mandates transparency in foreign lobbying activities. Experts note that the Trump administration has adopted a notably transactional approach to foreign relations, allowing leaders from Latin America to leverage personal relationships with far-right factions for direct access to U.S. policy makers. The scale of this lobbying push is unprecedented, as countries seek to gain favor with the administration to advance their national interests and secure much-needed support from Washington.

Among those benefitting significantly from these lobbying efforts is El Salvador's president, Nayib Bukele, who has reportedly spent $1.5 million to secure a meeting with Trump, a nuclear energy deal, and U.S. assistance in expanding his country's prison system. Ecuador's president, Daniel Noboa, has also gained traction through a lucrative contract with Mercury Public Affairs, resulting in increased arms shipments and positive intelligence assessments ahead of his election. Argentina's Javier Milei has taken a different approach, spending money to dine with Trump and secure a potential $20 billion IMF deal. The lobbying landscape extends across the region, with leaders from Panama to Colombia employing various strategies to ensure their countries are not overlooked in U.S. foreign policy discussions. As Latin American nations ramp up their lobbying efforts, they are becoming increasingly influential in Washington, reflecting a shift in how these countries engage with U.S. political dynamics under the current administration.

TruthLens AI Analysis

The report highlights the significant financial investments made by Latin American leaders to sway the Trump administration's policies. This lobbying effort, driven by the desire for favorable trade agreements, security assistance, and energy investments, indicates a proactive approach by these nations in navigating the political landscape of the United States.

Motivation Behind the Report

The article appears to aim at shedding light on the intricate web of lobbying that connects foreign leaders with the U.S. government. By detailing the expenditures and outcomes of these lobbying efforts, it seeks to inform the public about the transactional nature of political influence under the Trump administration. This narrative might be intended to foster a sense of transparency regarding foreign influence in U.S. politics, particularly among readers concerned about ethical governance.

Public Perception Goals

The article might also be designed to provoke scrutiny of the relationships between U.S. officials and foreign leaders. By illustrating how these foreign entities are willing to spend millions to gain access and favorable outcomes, it could be encouraging a critical view of the potential implications of such interactions on domestic policy and national interests.

Omitted Information

There's a possibility that the report could be downplaying broader geopolitical dynamics, such as the motivations behind the U.S.’s foreign policy decisions or the domestic political pressures that might influence these leaders' actions. The focus on lobbying expenses might divert attention from underlying issues like economic dependency or historical relationships between the U.S. and these countries.

Manipulative Potential

This report could be perceived as manipulative due to its framing of lobbying as a transactional and perhaps morally questionable activity. By emphasizing the financial aspects, it may inadvertently suggest that such practices are inherently corrupt, while failing to acknowledge the complexities of international diplomacy. The language used and the examples chosen may target specific audiences that are already skeptical of foreign influence in U.S. politics.

Credibility of the Information

The information presented in the article appears credible, particularly as it cites government records and expert opinions. However, the framing and selective focus on certain leaders and their lobbying efforts could influence the reader's perception of the overall landscape of U.S.-Latin America relations.

Framing and Audience Targeting

The way the article is structured suggests a target audience that is concerned with political ethics and transparency. It may resonate more with individuals who are wary of foreign influence, particularly in light of past controversies surrounding foreign interference in U.S. elections.

Potential Economic and Political Impact

The ramifications of this report could influence public discourse around foreign lobbying practices, potentially leading to calls for stricter regulations. It may also impact the stock market, particularly for industries related to trade and defense, as investors react to perceptions of stability or instability in U.S.-Latin America relations.

Global Power Dynamics

In terms of global power dynamics, the report underscores a trend where foreign nations seek to align closely with the U.S. administration to secure their interests. This reflects broader geopolitical strategies, especially as these countries navigate their relationships with major powers, including China and Russia.

Use of Artificial Intelligence

It is unlikely that AI was significantly involved in the writing of this article, given the nuanced analysis required. However, if AI models had contributed, they might have influenced the tone or structure, potentially streamlining the presentation of facts. The objective would be to engage a wide audience while maintaining a persuasive narrative.

In summary, this report serves to illuminate the complex relationships between Latin American leaders and the Trump administration, raising pertinent questions about the nature of political influence and lobbying in the current geopolitical climate.

Unanalyzed Article Content

US government records revealLatin Americanleaders have spent millions hiring Washington’s top lobbyists to push for a laundry list ofrequests– from free-trade deals, security assistance and energy investments – heard by theTrump administration, according to an analysis by the Guardian andThe Quincy Institute.

Since the lead-up to Donald Trump’s election as president in November 2024, Department of Justice records show that at least 10 countries in Latin America and the Caribbean have registered their top officials and envoys as foreign principals under the Foreign Agent Registration Act (Fara). Fara aims to promote transparency by requiring those working as foreign agents to disclose their activities and compensation.

“Under Trump, we’ve seen a more directly transactional approach to influencing government,” said Jake Johnston, director of international policy at the Washington-based Center for Economic and Policy Research (Cerp). “The very personal relationships that have developed with the far right in Latin America have given direct access to the White House. I wouldn’t say this influence peddling is unprecedented, but the magnitude is.”

El Salvador’s president,Nayib Bukele, has arguably seen the greatest return to his three-year, $1.5m lobbyingspree. Since February, Bukele has scored an Oval Officemeetingwith Trump, a nuclear energydeal, USassuranceto help expand his country’s notorious mega-prison and an upgraded travel safetyratingfrom the state department.

A lucrativecontractwith Mercury public affairs may have helped the Ecuadorian president, Daniel Noboa,securehis sought-after photo op with Trump at Mar-a-Lago, winapprovalfor increased arms shipments to tackle a devolving security situation, and rack up a positive US intelligenceassessmentabout his candidacy just days beforewinninga presidential runoffmarredby irregularities.

Argentina’s Javier Milei has taken a somewhat different route to becoming Trump’s “favorite president”, spending tens of thousands todinewith Trump at Mar-a-Lago andappearing alongside Elon Muskat February’s conservative CPAC conference in Washington, easing the path toward a $20bn, US-backed IMFdealand avisitto Buenos Aires from the treasury secretary, Scott Bessent, with expectations of an Oval Officevisitand a tradedealcoming soon.

FromPanamatoGuyana,HondurastoHaiti, theDominican RepublictoColombia(and Venezuela’s opposition,too), leaders across the hemisphere are playing Trump’s uniquely transactionalgameto provide cover for controversial policies, position themselves electorally, and curry favor with top lawmakers and officials running policy for the next four years toward their often-overlooked countries.

Key among these efforts is the Argentinian American Damian Merlo of the Miami-based Latin America advisory group, who renewed his $75,000-a-monthcontractwith Bukele for another year last June and previouslylobbiedfor Argentina’s then-candidate Milei.

After winning Argentina’s December 2023 election, MileidroppedMerlo, a veteran Republican insider, to smooth things over with the Biden administration. Since then, Milei’s contact with the Trump world has only grown stronger,facilitatedby the US and Argentinian operators atTactic Global, a strategic advisoryfirmwhich helped organize the CPAC Argentina conference last December and recentlyhostedParaguay’s president, Santiago Peña, and Ecuador’s ambassador to the US at a Los Angeles reception with top Trump officials.

Merlo, afixturein Trump circles whostoodbehind Bukele in the Oval Office alongside members of the Salvadorian president’s “Venezuelan shadow cabinet,” previously worked for five years as vice-president of the lobbying firm run by Otto Reich, a longtime Republican official focused on Latin America.

Reich, a Cuban American,introducedanother Cuban-American lobbyist, Mauricio Claver-Carone, to Trump’s then-national security adviser, John Bolton, who brought the latter on to become the top official for Latin America policy at the national security council in 2018.

Claver-Carone, who for more than a decade through the US-Cuba Democracy political action committee helpedfunnelmillions of dollars to legislators on both sides of the aisle to block increasing calls for engagement with Cuba, isnowTrump’s special envoy to Latin America, working side by side with his longtimeally, secretary of state, Marco Rubio.

Sitting behind Rubio at his Senate confirmation hearing in January was anotherTrump-connectedLatin America lobbyist, retired Cuban-American ambassador Carlos Trujillo, who was widelyrumoredto be tapped for a high-level post in the new administration.

Trujillo, who served as Trump’s ambassador to the Washington-based Organization of American States (OAS) and was later nominated but not confirmed to be assistant secretary of state for western hemisphere affairs, has recently taken on the Caribbean nations ofHaiti,Guyanaand theDominican Republicas his clients at Continental Strategy LLC,coincidingwith Rubio’s trips to the region.

Trujillo’s firm, whichnetted$3.6m in the first quarter of 2025 and added 50 new clients since Trump’s victory, also employs the White House chief of staff Susie Wiles’s daughter, Katie, and Rubio’s former chief of staff in the Senate, Alberto Martinez.

Continental was reportedlykeyto brokering the $23bn deal for a BlackRock-led consortium that included itsclientMediterranean Shipping Company to wrest control from China of strategic ports in Panama and around the globe, which Trump hailed as a step toward “reclaiming” the Panama canal, a top priority for his administration.

Panama’s government, like that ofColombiaandHonduras, has retained a more ideologically mixed group of lobbyists to preserve historically bipartisan support in Congress for their foreign policy objectives, includingrestrainingthe US military presence in the Panama Canal Zone,maintainingtrade preferences for Colombian exports andstrengtheningUS-Honduran cooperation on immigration and security.

To those ends, Panamahiredthe Democratic strategist Manuel Ortiz, together with the longtime TrumpallyDavid Urban, in January as part of $2.5mdealwith BGR Group, while a month before Trump’s election Colombia extended a $60,000-a-monthagreementwith Squire, Patton and Boggs, tapping a former Obama administration trade official (who has sincedeparted) and the deputy chief of staff to former Republican House speaker John Boehner.

Honduras, for its part,extendeda $90,000-a-month contract with the former US ambassador to the country, Hugo Llorens, along with a state department veteran who worked in the Bush, Obama and Trump administrations, Tom Shannon, as part of adealwith the lobbying giant Arnold and Porter.

Latin America is by no means the region of the world whose leaders spend the most lobbying US officials, nor is it uncommon under a new US administration, Democratic or Republican, for foreign governments to seek access to freshly nominated political appointees and elected lawmakers.

Yet for a region analysts say will beprioritizedunder the current administration – but has historically spentlittleto ensure that is the case – Latin America is increasing its lobbying to ensure its seat at the table, in turn becoming a prominent player in Washington’s vast foreign influence web.

“Given Florida’s general involvement in this administration, specifically in foreign policy, and the state’s centrality to Latin American politics, that combines to create greater relevance and attention to the region than we’ve seen before,” said Johnston. “Now that some of these folks are in government or have direct access to government, Latin American leaders will certainly find more fertile breeding ground to pursue their interests.”

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian