Key climate change reports removed from US government websites

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"Removal of US National Climate Assessments Raises Concerns Over Access to Climate Data"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 7.3
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

Recent reports indicate that crucial US national climate assessments have been removed from federal websites, creating significant barriers for state and local governments as well as the public in accessing vital climate information. These legally mandated reports, which are peer-reviewed and serve as authoritative sources on climate science, have been taken offline from the websites of the National Climate Assessment and the US Global Change Research Program. The White House has stated that the information will be relocated to NASA in compliance with legal requirements, yet there are no accessible links or alternatives provided. Efforts to locate these assessments on NASA's site have been unsuccessful, and inquiries directed to both NASA and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) have gone unanswered. Experts in the field, including climate scientists like Kathy Jacobs and John Holdren, have expressed deep concern over this removal, emphasizing that the National Climate Assessment is the most reliable source of climate information for decision-makers across the country. They argue that the absence of these reports could have dire consequences, especially for communities vulnerable to climate-related impacts.

The national climate assessments, required every four years by the Global Change Research Act, are invaluable resources that guide local and state officials in making informed decisions regarding infrastructure and emergency preparedness. The latest assessment from 2023 includes an interactive atlas that highlights the diverse impacts of climate change on health, security, and livelihoods across the nation, with particular emphasis on the heightened risks faced by minority and Native American communities. The removal of these reports has raised alarms about potential censorship of science, which could impede critical planning and response efforts to climate change. Experts like Katharine Hayhoe have criticized this action as part of a broader trend undermining scientific infrastructure, likening it to navigating a dangerous road while only looking in the rearview mirror. The ongoing situation highlights the urgent need for clear access to climate data as the nation confronts the challenges posed by a changing climate.

TruthLens AI Analysis

You need to be a member to generate the AI analysis for this article.

Log In to Generate Analysis

Not a member yet? Register for free.

Unanalyzed Article Content

Legally mandated US national climate assessments seem to have disappeared from the federal websites built to display them, making it harder for state and local governments and the public to learn what to expect in their back yards from a warming world.

Scientists said the peer-reviewed authoritative reports save money and lives. Websites for thenational assessmentsand theUS Global Change Research Programwere down Monday and Tuesday with no links, notes or referrals elsewhere. The White House, which was responsible for the assessments, said the information will be housed within Nasa to comply with the law, but gave no further details.

Searches for the assessments on Nasa websites did not turn them up. Nasa did not respond to requests for information. The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, which coordinated the information in the assessments, did not respond to repeated inquiries.

“It’s critical for decision-makers across the country to know what the science in the National Climate Assessment is. That is the most reliable and well-reviewed source of information about climate that exists for the United States,” said Kathy Jacobs, a University of Arizona climate scientist, who coordinated the 2014 version of the report.

“It’s a sad day for the United States if it is true that the National Climate Assessment is no longer available,” Jacobs added. “This is evidence of serious tampering with the facts and with people’s access to information, and it actually may increase the risk of people being harmed by climate-related impacts.”

Harvard climate scientist John Holdren, who was Barack Obama’s science adviser and whose office directed the assessments, said that after the 2014 edition, he visited governors, mayors and other local officials who told him how useful the 841-page report had been. It helped them decide whether to raise roads, build seawalls and even move hospital generators from basements to roofs, he said.

“This is a government resource paid for by the taxpayer to provide the information that really is the primary source of information for any city, state or federal agency who’s trying to prepare for the impacts of a changing climate,” said Texas Tech climate scientist Katharine Hayhoe, who has been a volunteer author for several editions of the report.

Copies of past reports are still squirreled away in Noaa’s library. Nasa’s open science data repository includes dead links to the assessment site.

The most recent report, issued in 2023, includes an interactive atlas that zooms down to the county level. It found that climate change is affecting people’s security, health and livelihoods in every corner of the country in different ways, with minority and Native American communities often disproportionately at risk.

The 1990 Global Change Research Act requires a national climate assessment every four years and directs the president to establish an interagency United States Global Change Research Program. In the spring, theTrump administrationtold the volunteer authors of the next climate assessment that their services weren’t needed and ended the contract with the private firm that helps coordinate the website and report.

Additionally, Noaa’s main climate.gov website was recently forwarded to a different Noaa website. Social media and blogs at Noaa and Nasa about climate impacts for the general public were cut or eliminated.

“It’s part of a horrifying big picture,” Holdren said. “It’s just an appalling whole demolition of science infrastructure.”

The national assessments are more useful than international climate reports put out by the UN every seven or so years because they are more localized and more detailed, Hayhoe and Jacobs said.

The national reports are not only peer-reviewed by other scientists, but examined for accuracy by the National Academy of Sciences, federal agencies, the staff and the public.

Hiding the reports would be censoring science, Jacobs said.

It’s also dangerous for the country, Hayhoe said, comparing it to steering a car on a curving road by only looking through the rearview mirror: “And now, more than ever, we need to be looking ahead to do everything it takes to make it around that curve safely. It’s like our windshield’s being painted over.”

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian