Kathy has terminal cancer and cares for her son with a profound disability. At a crisis point, his NDIS funding ran out

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"Family Faces Care Crisis as NDIS Funding for Disabled Son Runs Out Amid Mother's Terminal Illness"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 7.4
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

Steven Rieger, a 37-year-old man living with cerebral palsy, requires constant care due to his severe disabilities, including being nonverbal and suffering from seizures. His mother, Kathy, has been his primary caregiver throughout his life but is now facing terminal breast cancer that has metastasized to her bones and brain. The family, which includes Steven's elderly parents, has been struggling since they lost their National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS) funding in March. Despite their efforts to manage care needs and overspending issues, the funding ran out, leaving them in a state of panic. Kathy and her family reached out for assistance, launching a GoFundMe campaign and contacting local representatives, resulting in a new plan that offers only 10 hours of care per day, which they feel is insufficient given Steven's high needs. They are currently in debt to caregivers for unpaid services during the funding gap, amounting to around $15,000, which adds to the family's stress during this challenging time.

Advocates for disability rights highlight that the Rieger family's situation is not unique and reflects broader systemic issues within the NDIS. They point to delays in plan renewals and inadequate communication about changes that have left many families struggling. The NDIS has seen an increase in appeals related to funding decisions, indicating that many participants are facing similar crises. El Gibbs, CEO of the Disability Advocates Network Australia, emphasizes the need for a responsive system that can quickly adapt to families' needs, especially during emergencies. As Kathy struggles to provide care for Steven due to her own declining health, the NDIS's current processes are criticized for failing to offer timely support. The family awaits a forthcoming occupational therapist's report, but Kathy expresses concern about the future, stating that with Steven’s condition, there should be no need for regular reviews of his care plan, as his needs are unlikely to change significantly. The situation underscores the urgent need for reforms in the NDIS to ensure that vulnerable families receive the support they require without accruing debt or facing unnecessary hardships during crises.

TruthLens AI Analysis

The news article presents a deeply concerning situation faced by Kathy, a mother suffering from terminal cancer, who is also the primary caregiver for her son Steven, who has significant disabilities. This narrative highlights the struggles of families reliant on the National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS) in Australia amid reported systemic issues within the program.

Underlying Purpose of the Article

The intent behind this article appears to be to shed light on the vulnerabilities faced by individuals and families who depend on government assistance for care. It emphasizes the urgent need for reforms in the NDIS, showcasing how bureaucratic inefficiencies can have devastating effects on those in dire need. By detailing Kathy's plight, the piece seeks to provoke empathy and a call to action from the public and policymakers alike.

Public Perception and Awareness

The article aims to raise awareness about the systemic failures within the NDIS, potentially shaping public perception to advocate for reform. By illustrating the tangible consequences of funding cuts and administrative delays, it seeks to generate a sense of urgency and injustice among readers. The emotional appeal of Kathy's situation is designed to resonate strongly with the audience, fostering a deeper understanding of the challenges faced by disabled individuals and their families.

Possible Oversights and Hidden Aspects

While the article presents a compelling narrative, it may also gloss over broader systemic issues or data that could provide a fuller picture of the NDIS challenges. For instance, it does not delve into potential reasons for underfunding or the complexities of care assessment processes. The focus is predominantly on individual stories, which, while powerful, may inadvertently simplify a multifaceted issue.

Manipulative Elements and Reliability

The article employs emotional storytelling, which could be seen as manipulative if it oversimplifies the complexities of the NDIS's challenges. However, the facts presented seem grounded in reality, as they reference specific experiences and systemic issues. The reliability of the article is bolstered by the inclusion of direct quotes from Kathy and references to advocacy groups, suggesting a commitment to representing the situation accurately.

Societal and Economic Implications

The narrative has significant implications for society, particularly regarding public health policy and disability funding. If the issues highlighted lead to increased public outcry, there may be pressure on the government to provide more funding and resources for those reliant on the NDIS. Economically, this could influence budgeting decisions and resource allocation in the healthcare sector.

Target Audience and Community Support

The article likely appeals to various communities, including those directly affected by disability, healthcare advocates, and social justice activists. By sharing personal experiences, it aims to unite these groups in a common cause for better support systems for individuals with disabilities.

Impact on Financial Markets

While the article focuses primarily on social issues, it could have indirect implications for companies involved in healthcare services and disability support sectors. Investors may take note of the public sentiment surrounding NDIS reforms, potentially influencing stock performance in related industries.

Global Context and Current Relevance

This story resonates within the broader context of discussions about healthcare and welfare systems worldwide, particularly in light of increasing demands for better support for vulnerable populations. It reflects ongoing global conversations about the adequacy of social safety nets, making it relevant in today's socio-political climate.

Use of AI in Writing

There is no clear evidence that AI was used in the creation of this article. However, if it were, it might have been involved in data analysis or generating certain phrases. The narrative style suggests a human touch, focusing on personal stories rather than purely factual reporting.

The article highlights critical issues surrounding disability support in Australia, effectively raising awareness while advocating for necessary reforms in the NDIS. Its emotional appeal serves to connect with readers, prompting reflection on the societal obligations toward the most vulnerable.

Unanalyzed Article Content

Next to the bed Steven Rieger spends most his life in is a framed print that says: “This is my happy place.” For him, it is – his small room on the eastern outskirts of Melbourne is covered in Collingwood paraphernalia and basked in warm light.

Steven, 37, needs round-the-clock care. He lives with cerebral palsy, is nonverbal and suffers from seizures – natural light can trigger them so he spends almost all of his time in his room.

His parents are both in their 70s – his father Rodger has had several strokes and is partly deaf. His mother, Kathy, who has cared for him most of his life, is dying – her breast cancer has metastasised, spreading to her bones and brain.

In March, the family lost their national disability insurance scheme (NDIS) funding, and Steven’s paid carers felt obliged to work for free – the family could not cope by themselves.

They had been overspending on their plan, but the family say they were underfunded for their care needs. When the money ran out they panicked. Steven’s sister Kylie started a GoFundMe and Kathy rang their local member of parliament, Julian Hill. They have now been put on a plan that provides 10 hours of care a day, but they need more.

“It was almost three weeks where there was no funding,” Kathy says. “The carers that do look after Steven were nice enough to still come in here, but they weren’t getting paid. They were doing their normal shifts but without pay.”

Sign up for Guardian Australia’s breaking news email

Advocates say participants have become collateral damage as the NDIS goes through massive changes, with many plans expiring and reviews dragging on. They say crucial funding is not getting where it needs to go.

In January, Kathy had started preparing everything for the annual review of Steven’s plan. As she was getting sicker she knew they needed to be funded for 15 hours of care a day.

“It was very stressful for me,” she says. “I was getting things organised … and hoping the funding wouldn’t run out, but it did.

“We started calling NDIS a few weeks before this funding was going to run out, and they said it wouldn’t run out. They said they would escalate [the case] every time.”

The family say they now owe around $15,000 to carers for the three weeks of work. Twice a day, Steven is lifted into a chair and fed through a drip.

El Gibbs, CEO of theDisabilityAdvocates Network Australia, says the NDIS is delaying plan renewals for so long, people run out of personal funds.

“We had a meeting a few weeks ago, and all our members reported a 50% or more increase in their waiting list for help with AAT [administrative appeals tribunal] appeals, where people with disability and their families are fighting for the support that they need,” Gibbs says.

Under the changes, NDIS plans are meant to automatically continue if the review has not taken place yet. Because the Riegers were asking to increase Steven’s care hours, their plan ran out.

The last quarterly reports show an increase in participants taking their review decision to the AAT, with the number of new cases as a proportion of active participants increasing from 0.66% in the March 2023 quarter to 1.05% in the March 2025 quarter.

Gibbs says the delays mean people in crisis are falling through the cracks, as is the case for the Riegers – Steven’s funding running out while Kathy is dying worsens the family’s situation.

Sign up toBreaking News Australia

Get the most important news as it breaks

after newsletter promotion

“Our disability support system has to be able to meet them where they are,” Gibbs says.

“If a family goes through a crisis, and informal supports aren’t there any more then, of course, the NDIS needs to step in and do it quickly and make sure a terrible situation isn’t made harder.”

Gibbs says vulnerable families should not be accruing debt to get the right care and the massive reforms to the NDIS need to be more clearly communicated.

“At the moment, the changes are often rushed and harsh, and the communication about them isn’t clear to people with disability, to families, to support coordinators,” she says.

“So it is really hard for everyone to understand what is happening and to have a clear pathway about what comes next.”

A spokesperson for the National Disability Insurance Agency said its priority was “ensuring every participant, like Steven, has access to the disability-related supports they require”.

“The agency continues to work with Steven and his parents regarding his future needs.

“When a participant’s circumstances change a request for an early plan reassessment can be requested. The agency cannot make decisions to change a participant’s plan without being provided appropriate evidence.”

Jenny McAllister, the minister for the NDIS, was contacted for comment.

An occupational therapist report to possibly increase Steven’s care to 15 hours a day is set for three weeks’ time, but Kathy is struggling.

“I physically can’t care for Steven any more,” she says.

“With extremely high needs like Steven’s, there shouldn’t be a review in their plan. They’re not going to get better. There’s no change.

“They’re not going to wake up one day and go, ‘Oh, hi Mum, I’m all good. I’m going to work now.’”

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian