KGB defector turned to Britain only after US rejected him several times, book reveals

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"KGB Defector Vasili Mitrokhin Rejected by US Before Finding Refuge in Britain"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 7.3
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

Vasili Mitrokhin, a former KGB archivist, played a pivotal role in the intelligence landscape during the post-Cold War era. His defection to Britain in 1992, after being repeatedly rejected by the United States, is detailed in Gordon Corera's new book. Mitrokhin spent years meticulously copying top-secret documents that unveiled sensitive Soviet operations and spies, and he was initially determined to offer this information to the US. However, the CIA turned him away multiple times, leading to his eventual decision to approach the British instead. This rejection became a source of resentment for Mitrokhin, who expressed his frustration during a later meeting with US intelligence agents, emphasizing that he had always preferred to defect to America. His eventual acceptance by MI6 marked a turning point, as his extensive archive became invaluable for counterintelligence efforts worldwide in the 1990s, revealing the identities of numerous KGB agents operating in the West.

Mitrokhin's findings, which were made public in 1999 alongside historian Christopher Andrew, included significant revelations such as the case of Melita Norwood, a British citizen who had passed information about the UK's nuclear program to the KGB. His meticulous notes detailed the operations of Moscow's covert spies, known as 'illegals', who lived under deep cover. After the Soviet Union's collapse, Mitrokhin disguised himself as a villager to escape Russia, successfully navigating border checks with a sample of his documents hidden in a bag. The British intelligence's recognition of his potential value led to a complex exfiltration process, initially hindered by financial constraints. Ultimately, the Americans, who had previously dismissed him, ended up funding his resettlement in Britain, gaining access to critical intelligence in return. Corera's book highlights the importance of Mitrokhin's contributions to intelligence history, noting that his insights were undervalued at the time but are now recognized as crucial to understanding the dynamics of espionage during and after the Cold War.

TruthLens AI Analysis

The article sheds light on the story of Vasili Mitrokhin, a significant figure in the history of Russian defectors. It reveals that before finding refuge in Britain, Mitrokhin faced multiple rejections from the United States. This information highlights the complexities of international intelligence and the challenges faced by defectors.

Motivation Behind the Publication

This article seems aimed at showcasing the intricate dynamics of intelligence operations during the Cold War and the role of individuals like Mitrokhin in shaping counterintelligence narratives. By discussing the rejections from the CIA, it paints a picture of missed opportunities and highlights the strategic choices made by both the defector and the intelligence agencies involved.

Public Sentiment and Perception

The narrative may evoke a sense of admiration for Mitrokhin's courage and a critical view of the US intelligence community’s initial reluctance to accept him. This could foster a perception that Britain is more receptive and perhaps more effective in managing such defector cases. The article could influence public opinion by portraying the US as less accommodating, which might resonate with those critical of American foreign policy.

Potential Concealment of Issues

While the article focuses on Mitrokhin's defection, it does not address broader geopolitical implications or the present-day context of intelligence operations. This could suggest an intent to divert attention from current issues related to intelligence and security, particularly in light of ongoing tensions between Russia and the West.

Manipulative Elements

The article presents a narrative that emphasizes the failures of the US intelligence community while glorifying the acceptance by Britain. This framing may be seen as manipulative, as it could serve to provoke nationalist sentiments or criticisms against US policies without offering a balanced view of the complexities involved in such decisions.

Truthfulness of the Report

Based on historical accounts and available data, the article appears to be grounded in truth, particularly regarding Mitrokhin’s experiences and contributions. However, the selective focus on certain elements may skew the overall understanding of the situation, leading to a perception of bias.

Societal Impact

The implications of this article could extend to discussions about trust in intelligence agencies and their roles in national security. It may prompt debates regarding the treatment of defectors and the ethical responsibilities of nations in such contexts.

Target Audiences

This article likely appeals to audiences interested in history, intelligence operations, and international relations. It may resonate particularly with those who are critical of US policies or who have an interest in the dynamics of espionage during the Cold War.

Market Reactions

While the article may not have an immediate impact on stock markets, it could influence perceptions of companies associated with defense and intelligence services, especially if public sentiment shifts towards criticism of US intelligence handling.

Geopolitical Relevance

The story of Mitrokhin is relevant today as it reflects ongoing tensions between Russia and the West. It serves as a reminder of the historical context that continues to shape current international relations and intelligence practices.

Use of AI in the Article

There is a possibility that AI tools could have been employed in drafting this article, especially in structuring the narrative and analyzing historical data. However, the human element is evident in the storytelling, which adds a layer of nuance that AI may not fully replicate.

In conclusion, the article provides a compelling look at a historical defector's journey and the complexities surrounding intelligence operations. The underlying narratives suggest a careful curation of facts that may serve specific agendas while shedding light on significant historical events.

Unanalyzed Article Content

One of the most consequential Russian defectors in history was turned away several times by the US before he was eventually accepted by Britain and exfiltrated with his family fromRussia, according to revelations in a new book.

Vasili Mitrokhin, a KGB archivist who spent years copying top-secret documents on some of the most sensitive Soviet spies and operations, was brought out of Russia in 1992 byMI6. His archive of copied documents was exfiltrated separately. But London got hold of his trove only after Mitrokhin gave up trying to get the US to take him seriously.

“TheCIAturned Mitrokhin away multiple times, sometimes due to decisions of those on the ground and sometimes due to instructions from headquarters,” said Gordon Corera, a former BBC correspondent who has written a new book about the defector. “This would be the source of bitter recriminations later when his value became clear.”

Mitrokhin’s findings formed the basis for hundreds of counterintelligence investigations across the world during the 1990s. His defection was made public in 1999, when a book about his findings was published jointly with the historian Christopher Andrew. Mitrokhin lived under a new identity in Britain,and died in 2004.

The 1999 book mentioned in passing that Mitrokhin had first offered his services to the US, but it transpires that there was more than one attempt, and Mitrokhin was furious the Americans had turned him down, making it clear to them later that Britain had been his second choice.

Mitrokhin, an introvert who was sent to work in the KGB archives after a failed career as a spy, was motivated by a sense of disgust at the KGB and its role in the Soviet system and made it a condition of his defection that the documents he had copied should be made public. Many of his original files wereopened to the public at an archive in Cambridge in 2014, although some of them have now been closed again due to privacy concerns.

His notes contained the names of hundreds of agents in the west who had collaborated with the KGB. In Britain, the name that got the most attention wasMelita Norwood, who was 87 when the Mitrokhin revelations were published. She admitted passing information about the British nuclear programme to the KGB. There was also detailed historical information aboutthe “illegals”, Moscow’s most secret spies who lived under deep cover disguised as westerners.

Mitrokhin retired from the KGB in 1984, but it was only after the Soviet collapse, in 1992, that he decided to offer up his secret archive to western intelligence services. He travelled, disguised as a dishevelled villager so as not to attract attention from border guards, with a sample of his documents hidden below lengths of sausage in a scruffy bag. The disguise was so good that when he arrived as a “walk-in” at the newly opened US embassies in Riga and Vilnius, he was not taken seriously. On one occasion, a cable about him was sent back to CIA headquarters, but was not acted on.

Instead, he tried the British embassy, and a young diplomat in Vilnius offered him a cup of tea and suggested he return later, when MI6 officers could be sent out to assess his credibility. When that happened, MI6 realised that the strange walk-in was sitting on a potential goldmine. In a strange twist, the Treasury refused to pay the substantial costs for his exfiltration and resettlement, and so MI6 asked the Americans, who ended up footing the bill for the defector they had originally turned down, in exchange for full access to his material.

During a meeting in London with an FBI and CIA team, introduced to Mitrokhin by their British counterparts, the defector erupted in anger. “It is your fault that because you turned me down I am here with the British … I always wanted to be in the US,” he said.

Corera said he did not ask for or receive any help from MI6 in his research for the book, though it is understood that he was able to speak to former operatives who were involved in the Mitrokhin case. For the first time, he reveals the details of how Mitrokhin was exfiltrated from the Soviet Union with his family by MI6 operatives using a tourist minibus as a disguise.

Corera said he was drawn to the story of Mitrokhin because he had the feeling that in 1999 the importance of Mitrokhin’s disclosures was somewhat lost, given the sense that the cold war was over and the west had little to fear from Moscow’s spying.

“I think he is one of the most under appreciated spies and defectors in cold war and post cold war history. It’s only now in hindsight more than 25 years after news of his defection becomes public you can see how important he was,” he said.

The Spy in the Archive: How one man tried to kill the KGBby Gordon Corera, is published by William Collins

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian