John Lewis’s chair Jason Tarry to earn more than £1.3m this year

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"John Lewis Chairman Jason Tarry to Receive Over £1.3 Million in 2023"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 7.0
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

Jason Tarry, the chairman of John Lewis, is set to earn over £1.3 million this year, marking a significant increase of approximately 20% compared to his predecessor, Sharon White. Tarry, who previously held a role at Tesco, joined the John Lewis Partnership in September of last year and earned £415,000 in his initial four and a half months, which included benefits and pension payments. The company's annual report indicates that Tarry's compensation was adjusted on April 1 to align with the former chief executive officer's pay, reflecting a recalibration of the responsibilities associated with his position. The previous CEO, Nish Kankiwala, received a total remuneration of between £1.3 million and £1.35 million last year, which was notably 53 times the average basic salary of a non-management employee at John Lewis.

The increase in Tarry's salary comes at a time when John Lewis has been making significant changes within the organization, including raising hourly wages for employees by 7.4% to a minimum of £11.55. Despite this pay increase, the company has seen a reduction in its workforce, cutting approximately 4,000 jobs to a total of 69,000 in the past year. Additionally, John Lewis has not provided bonuses to employees for four of the last five years, even as its underlying annual profits rose from £42 million to £126 million. The company is also revising benefits for former employees, limiting lifetime discounts and access to staff hotels, while aiming to expand its store presence and invest in existing locations following significant losses during the Covid pandemic. This restructuring is part of a broader turnaround strategy as the company navigates the challenges posed by changing retail dynamics and its recent history of store closures and job cuts.

TruthLens AI Analysis

The article centers on the substantial pay increase for Jason Tarry, the chair of John Lewis, which raises questions about corporate governance, compensation fairness, and the impact on employee morale within the organization. It highlights a significant disparity between executive compensation and the earnings of regular employees, which can lead to public scrutiny and discontent.

Executive Compensation Disparity

Jason Tarry's pay of over £1.3 million this year is notably higher than his predecessor's, reflecting an adjustment in his role and responsibilities. This increase raises concerns about the fairness of executive compensation, especially when compared to the average salary of John Lewis workers. The article states that Tarry's pay is 53 times that of a non-management employee, which could provoke criticism regarding income inequality within the company.

Impact on Employee Relations

The report mentions that John Lewis has increased hourly wages for workers by 7.4% to a minimum of £11.55, but this adjustment appears minimal compared to the executive pay hike. Furthermore, the ongoing reductions in workforce numbers, with a total cut of around 7,500 employees over the past two years, may lead to decreased morale among remaining staff. The decision to skip bonuses for workers for the fourth time in five years also raises questions about the company's commitment to its employees.

Public Perception and Trust

By focusing on Tarry's significant pay increase amidst workforce reductions and skipped bonuses, the article may aim to shape public perception regarding corporate greed and executive privilege. There may be an underlying intent to highlight the contrast between corporate leaders' compensation and the economic realities faced by average workers, potentially fostering public outrage or advocacy for change.

Potential Manipulative Aspects

The language used in the article could suggest a manipulation of public sentiment by emphasizing the stark contrast in pay without providing a broader context of the company's financial performance or strategic decisions. This could lead readers to form a negative opinion towards John Lewis's leadership.

Broader Economic Implications

The article's focus on executive pay raises broader questions about trends in corporate governance and the ethics of compensation in retail and other industries. Such discussions could influence consumer behavior, investor sentiment, and potentially impact stock prices for companies within the sector.

Community Support and Reaction

The narrative presented may resonate more with labor advocates and those concerned about income inequality, appealing to communities that prioritize fair labor practices and corporate accountability.

In summary, the article presents a case of potential corporate governance issues, highlighting income inequality and its implications for employee morale and public perception. The framing of Tarry's pay increase alongside workforce cuts and skipped bonuses could be interpreted as a call to scrutinize corporate practices more closely.

Unanalyzed Article Content

John Lewis’s chair, Jason Tarry, is to be paid more than £1.3m this year – about a fifth more than his predecessor, Sharon White – as he takes a more hands-on role.

The former Tesco executive,who joined the group that owns Waitrose and a fleet of department stores in September last year, earned £415,000 in his first four and a half months in the job, including benefits and pension payments.

That put him on a par with his predecessor, who earned £900,000 in basic pay and £1.1m including pension and other benefits, according to the annual report from the John Lewis Partnership (JLP) which the Guardian has seen.

However, the company said Tarry’s pay had been “adjusted” from 1 April this year so that it was “equalised to the amount paid to the chief executive officer to reflect the recalibration of the role”.

John Lewis’s last chief executive,Nish Kankiwala, who stepped down in March after two years in the role, is understood to have received between £1.3m and £1.35m in total remuneration last year, as the group’s highest paid director. The chief executive role no longer exists at the retailer.

That pay package was worth 53 times the average basic pay of a non-management John Lewis worker.

A JLP spokesperson said: “Following the merger of the CEO and chairman roles, the remuneration committee recommended aligning the chairman’s compensation with that of the CEO. This reflects the chairman’s expanded responsibilities in leading both the executive team and the partnership board.”

The bump in pay for Tarry comes as the company has increased hourly pay for workers who were given a 7.4% pay rise this year, to a minimum rate of £11.55 an hour. That rate of pay puts it behind major rivals such as Marks & Spencer.

The group also reduced the average number of people it employs by about 4,000 to 69,000 people last year,after a 3,500 reduction the year before, and skipped the bonus to workers for the fourth time in five years this March even after underlying annual profitrose from £42m to £126m.

The group is also cutting costs by limiting benefits, such as a discount card, for former workers and selling off its staff golf club.

From 31 August, any leavers with more than 15 years service will only retain their benefits for the same number of years they worked for the group. Until now, leavers must have accrued between 15 and 25 years’ service and met certain other criteria to receive a lifetime discount and access to the group’s staff hotels.

A JLP spokesperson said: “We’re changing our leavers benefits to enable us to more than double the number of our Partners who are eligible. We’re incredibly proud of this package, which rewards loyalty and goes well beyond those offered by competitors.”

The company is in the midst of a turnaround plan afterdiving to a lossduring the Covid pandemic, when it was forced to close all stores during lockdowns.

It has pledged to open more Waitrose stores this year and invest in existing stores after closing 16 department stores and at least 20 Waitrose outlets and cutting thousands of head office jobs since the pandemic.

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian