Jewish organizers are increasingly confronting Trump: ‘The repression is growing, but so is the resistance’

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"Jewish Alumni Protest Trump Administration's Policies and University Actions at Columbia Commencement"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 6.4
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

On a rainy morning during Columbia University's commencement, a diverse group of Jewish alumni gathered to protest the university's investments in Israel and its perceived repression of pro-Palestinian speech. The protesters, ranging from recent graduates to those who had left Columbia over half a century ago, expressed their discontent with the university's alignment with the Trump administration's policies regarding antisemitism and academic freedom. They aimed to voice their disapproval by symbolically destroying their diplomas, although the rain curtailed their plans. Protest leader Josh Dubnau articulated a strong stance against the conflation of antisemitism with opposition to Israeli policies, emphasizing that many Jewish individuals do not support the ethnic cleansing of Palestine. Another participant, a recent graduate who faced suspension for her activism, carried a photo of a Palestinian student killed in Gaza, highlighting the responsibility of Jewish students to leverage their privilege in support of marginalized communities.

The ongoing conflict in Gaza has spurred a significant movement among Jewish Americans who oppose the war and the Trump administration's tactics against higher education, which they view as a misappropriation of antisemitism for political gain. Many Jewish students and faculty are mobilizing against policies that they believe undermine academic freedom and silence critical Jewish perspectives on Israel. The complexity of Jewish Americans' views on Israel and antisemitism is underscored by recent polling, indicating a majority are concerned about antisemitism but largely disapprove of Trump's methods. Jewish Voice for Peace has seen a surge in membership as anti-Zionist sentiments gain traction among Jews, who are increasingly vocal about their resistance to repression and the misuse of their identities in political discourse. This cross-generational mobilization reflects a broader struggle within the Jewish community to navigate their identities and beliefs in the face of external pressures and political narratives that do not represent their diverse perspectives.

TruthLens AI Analysis

The article addresses the increasing confrontation between Jewish organizers and the Trump administration regarding issues related to Israel, anti-Semitism, and academic freedom. It highlights a protest by Jewish alumni at Columbia University, reflecting deep-rooted tensions within the Jewish community concerning Zionism and the treatment of Palestinians. The sentiment expressed by the protesters suggests a significant divergence from mainstream Jewish perspectives that often align with pro-Israel narratives.

Motivation Behind the Publication

The intention behind this article appears to be to showcase the growing dissent within the Jewish community against the actions and policies of the Trump administration, particularly regarding Israel and the portrayal of anti-Zionist sentiments as anti-Semitic. By highlighting the voices of dissenting Jewish alumni, the article aims to present a narrative of resistance against perceived repression and to challenge the mainstream discourse that equates criticism of Israel with anti-Semitism.

Public Perception

The article seeks to cultivate an understanding that there is a significant faction within the Jewish community that opposes the current administration's policies and actions regarding Israel. It portrays these dissenters as brave individuals standing against a tide of repression, which could resonate with readers who share similar views or who are sympathetic to the Palestinian cause.

Potential Omissions

The article may downplay or overlook the perspectives of Jewish individuals and organizations that strongly support Israel and view the actions of the protesters as harmful or misguided. By focusing predominantly on the dissenting voices, it risks creating a skewed representation of the broader Jewish community's stance on these issues.

Manipulative Elements

The article's language is emotionally charged and aims to elicit a strong response from readers who may feel similarly to the protesters, which could be seen as manipulative. Phrases like “ethnically cleanse Palestine” and references to historical trauma are powerful rhetorical devices that provoke sympathy and urgency. The framing of the protest as a moral duty for Jewish individuals also seeks to galvanize support.

Comparison with Other Articles

When compared to other articles on similar topics, this piece stands out for its focus on dissenting voices within the Jewish community. Many articles tend to emphasize a unified Jewish perspective supporting Israel, thus creating a contrast that highlights internal divisions and differing opinions.

Image within the Sector

The publication of this article likely aims to project an image of a progressive, socially aware media outlet that champions minority voices and stands against oppression. This aligns with broader societal movements advocating for social justice, which may attract a readership that values these principles.

Societal and Political Implications

In the wake of this article, it could potentially deepen divisions within the Jewish community and among those who support Palestinian rights. It may also influence public opinion, especially among younger generations who are increasingly vocal about social justice issues.

Support from Communities

The article is likely to resonate more with progressive, left-leaning Jewish groups and individuals who advocate for Palestinian rights. It targets audiences who are disillusioned with traditional narratives surrounding Israel and seek to engage in activism.

Impact on Markets

While the article itself may not have a direct impact on stock markets or global economic conditions, the underlying issues it discusses could influence sectors related to social justice movements, such as companies involved in ethical investing or those that support progressive causes.

Geopolitical Relevance

The article contributes to ongoing discussions about U.S. foreign policy in the Middle East, particularly regarding Israel and Palestine. It aligns with current international debates about human rights, making it relevant to contemporary geopolitical discourse.

Use of AI in Writing

There is no clear indication that artificial intelligence was employed in the writing of this article. However, if AI were used, it might have influenced the tone and style, possibly aiming to evoke emotional responses through specific language choices.

Manipulative Aspects

The article may exhibit manipulative characteristics through its emotionally charged language and focus on dissenting perspectives, which could be seen as targeting specific groups while overlooking broader viewpoints.

In summary, the article offers a compelling glimpse into the complexities of Jewish identity and activism in the context of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. While it highlights important voices of dissent, it also carries potential biases that shape its narrative. The reliability of the article is contingent on the reader's awareness of these biases and the broader context of the issues discussed.

Unanalyzed Article Content

On the morning ofColumbia University’s commencement last week, an intergenerational group of Jewish alumni gathered in the rain outside the Manhattan campus’s heavily policed gates, wearing keffiyehs and shirts emblazoned with the words “not in our name”. Two had graduated more than 60 years earlier, and one spoke of having fled the Nazis to the US as a child. Others recalled participating in Columbia protests of the past, including those that led the university to divest from apartheid South Africa.

They spoke as alumni and as Jews to condemn the university’s investments in Israel, its repression of pro-Palestinian speech, and itscapitulationto the Trump administration’s assault on academic freedom in the name of fighting antisemitism on campus. They had planned to burn their Columbia diplomas in protest, but the rain got in their way, so many ripped them to pieces instead.

“As a Jewish person, I’m really appalled at the idea that they are trying to make it sound as if opposing genocide is somehow antisemitic,” said Josh Dubnau, a professor at Stony Brook University who received a PhD from Columbia in 1995 and led the protest. “There are thousands of us who don’t believe in the right of the Jewish people to ethnically cleanse Palestine. There were Jews thousands of years before Zionism, and there will be Jews when Zionism is in the dustbin of history.”

Another alumnus, who graduated last year after being suspended over her participation in campus protests, wore a graduation gown and carried the photo of one of nearly15,000Palestinian students killed in Gaza during the current war.

“We have a particular duty to show up as Jews because we are not being actively targeted in the way that Palestinian students, Muslim students and Arab students are,” said the student, who asked to remain anonymous. “It’s our duty to weaponise our privilege as Jewish students.” New York police arrested her along with another protester after they set their Columbia diplomas on fire.

Nineteen months into Israel’s war in Gaza and the US protest movement it prompted, allegations of antisemitism on campuses have become one of the primary pretexts for the Trump administration’s multipronged attack on higher education, including billions in funding cuts, demands universities submit to a string of measures curtailing their academic freedom, and thedetention and attempted deportationof international students who expressed pro-Palestinian views.

But increasingly, Jewish students, faculty and alumni are pushing back against the exploitation of antisemitism charges to justify repressive policies they say do not represent their Jewish values. They have written letters, led protests, lobbied legislators and denounced what they say is the systematic exclusion of Jewish perspectives that are critical of Israel from the national conversation over antisemitism.

Jewish Americans – some identifying as “anti-Zionists”, others with a range of views about Israel – have been at the forefront of the movement against the war in Gaza. Last summer, some 200 people, almost all Jewish, were arrested at a protest on Capitol Hill a day before a visit by Benjamin Netanyahu. Earlier this year, more than 350 rabbis, along with more Jewish creatives and activists, signed aNew York Times addenouncing Trump’s proposal to ethnically cleanse Gaza.

But Jewish-led organising has broadened in recent months. As Jewish Americans continue to protest the war, they are also taking on Trump’s onslaught against higher education in the name of Jewish safety, rallying around detained students and condemning what they view as the exploitation of antisemitism in the service of a rightwing political project. In yet another New York Times ad, several former heads of leading Jewish advocacy groups, including conservative ones like Aipac and Hillel International, criticised US Jewish groups that “have been far too silent about the stunning assault on democratic norms and the rule of law” under Trump.

“The repression has been growing, but so has the resistance,” said Marianne Hirsch, a retired literature professor atColumbia University, who researches memory and the Holocaust and is outspoken against efforts to conflate criticism of Israel with antisemitism. “I’m seeing a really cross-generational, Jewish faculty, student, and community mobilisation against this narrative.”

Jewish Americans’ views on Israel, the war in Gaza, antisemitism on campuses and the Trump administration’s actions are far more complex than mainstream political discourse may suggest.

Arecent pollby the Jewish Voters Resource Center found that a majority of Jewish Americans are concerned about antisemitism and say they are “emotionally attached” to Israel, although older respondents poll much higher on both questions than younger ones. But the survey also found that 64% disapprove of Trump’s policies to purportedly combat antisemitism, and 61% believe arresting and deporting pro-Palestinian protesters contribute to increased antisemitism. A rightwing Israelithinktank foundlast year that one-third of American Jews believe Israel is committing genocide in Gaza.

Whilelarge numbers of Jewish studentspoint to feelings of ostracization on campus in the last year and a half, their views on the campus protests vary widely. Aqualitative studyof the experiences of Jewish students, published this month, criticizes representations of campus life that “compartmentalize students into either/or categories, diminishing nuances between them”. The authors point to “a need for nuanced discussions about Israel, antisemitism, and Jewish identity that respect generational differences and diverse perspectives”.

But tackling complex questions – for instance, about when anti-Zionism veers into antisemitism – has become difficult in an increasingly repressive climate. “It is making it impossible to have discussions in the classroom,” said Joel Swanson, a Jewish studies professor at Sarah Lawrence College.

Swanson noted that many Jewish Americans are now mobilising against precisely the kind of repression their ancestors came to the US to escape. “The very liberal principles that have enabled Jewish thriving in the United States are being chipped away at systematically, one by one,” he said.

Many of those who identify as anti-Zionist have found a home under the umbrella of Jewish Voice for Peace, a pro-Palestinian Jewish group whose membership has doubled since the war started – to 32,000 dues-paying members – and whose student chapters were banned from several campuses during last year’s protests. In Baltimore, earlier this month, members of the group’s dozens of chapters gathered for a national convening. Over four days of workshops at the heavily secured event, participants talked about organising from campuses to religious spaces to promote a “Judaism beyond Zionism”, as the conference tagline read, as well as address authoritarianism in the US.

As US universities have become political battlefields, much Jewish organising is happening on campuses and academic spaces.

Responding to what they view asa crisisin their scholarly field precipitated by Israel’s atrocities in Gaza, Hirsch, the Columbia scholar, and others have launched a multidisciplinaryGenocide and Holocaust Studies Crisis Network, a group of mostly Jewish academics invoking their expertise to advocate against universities capitulating to authoritarianism.

Jewish faculty and students have also organised in defense of pro-Palestinian students detained by the Trump administration. Following the arrest ofMahmoud Khalil, a Palestinian permanent resident and Columbia University graduate who has been detained for nearly three months with no charges, more than 3,400 Jewish faculty across the country signeda letterto denounce “without equivocation, anyone who invokes our name – and cynical claims of antisemitism – to harass, expel, arrest, or deport members of our campus communities”. Several Jewish students and faculty wrote letters to the court in support of Khalil. And Jewish groups and synagogues filed a court briefing in support of Rümeysa Öztürk, a Turkish Tufts University student who was detained over an op-ed critical of Israel and released earlier this month as her case continues.

“Jewish people came to America to escape generations of similar predations,” theywrote. “Yet the images of Ozturk’s arrest in twenty-first century Massachusetts evoke the oppressive tactics employed by the authoritarian regimes that many ancestors of [our] members left behind in Odessa, Kishinev, and Warsaw.”

Faculty and students have also denounced congressional hearings against antisemitism on campuses that they say misrepresent their experiences and exclude their perspectives. As their president prepared to face legislators for a fresh round of antisemitism hearings in Congress this month, Jewish faculty and students at Haverford College issued astatementsaying that their voices “have absolutely not been represented in the current public discussion of antisemitism” andquestioning the credibilityof mostly non-Jewish, Republican legislators leading the battle over antisemitism on campuses.

Earlier this month, a group of Jewish students from Columbia University visited Congress to talk to legislators about their participation in campus protests that politicians paint as antisemitic, bringing their views “to lawmakers who are almost never hearing from that specific perspective”, said Beth Miller, the political director of Jewish Voice for Peace’s action group, who accompanied the group.

As the Trump administration has sought to justify its repressive measures in their names, many American Jews have found themselves invoking their Jewishness in a public way for the first time. “We’ve been criticising identity politics and the way everything gets siloed into identities, and suddenly we find ourselves saying ‘as Jewish faculty’ or ‘as the daughter of Holocaust survivors’,” said Hirsch.

“I’ve always tried to steer clear of having a public Jewish identity. I never felt like I had to advertise it,” echoed Joshua Moses, an anthropology professor at Haverford. “But this moment kind of demands it.”

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian