James Bond owners say name battle is ‘assault’ on 007 franchise

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"James Bond Franchise Owners Respond to Trademark Challenge from Austrian Businessman"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 7.9
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

The owners of the James Bond franchise have expressed serious concerns over an Austrian businessman’s attempts to claim rights to the iconic superspy's name across Europe, labeling it as an 'unprecedented assault' on their multibillion-pound brand. This situation arose when Josef Kleindienst, a Dubai-based property developer, filed claims in the UK and EU, arguing that the lack of use of the James Bond trademarks has led to a lapse in protections. His challenge focuses primarily on trademarks related to merchandising, which can be contested after five years of non-use. Kleindienst, who is developing a luxury resort in Dubai, contends that the trademarks have not been fully exploited commercially, prompting his legal actions against Danjaq, the company that holds the rights to James Bond merchandising alongside Eon Productions. The legal representatives for Danjaq are preparing to defend the trademarks vigorously, asserting their significant commercial value and widespread use across various consumer products and services.

In addition to the challenges posed to existing trademarks, Kleindienst has sought to register his own trademark for James Bond in Europe, though he has not pursued similar action in the UK, likely due to stricter regulations in the British Intellectual Property Office. Danjaq's legal team is gathering evidence to demonstrate the ongoing commercialization of the trademarks while countering Kleindienst's claims as an 'abuse of process.' As the legal battle unfolds, the future of the Bond franchise remains uncertain, especially following the recent departure of Daniel Craig from the role of 007. Amazon’s acquisition of MGM Studios has granted them creative control over the franchise, with plans for new films and potential TV spin-offs in the works. However, no announcements have been made regarding the next lead actor or release date, leading to speculation about the franchise's future direction amidst these legal challenges.

TruthLens AI Analysis

You need to be a member to generate the AI analysis for this article.

Log In to Generate Analysis

Not a member yet? Register for free.

Unanalyzed Article Content

The owners ofJames Bondhave called the attempt by an Austrian businessman to take control of the superspy’s name across Europe an “unprecedented assault” on the multibillion-pound global franchise.

In February,the Guardian revealedthat a Dubai-based property developer had filed claims in the UK and EU arguing that lack of use meant various protections had lapsed around James Bond’s intellectual property, including his name, his 007 assignation and the catchphrase “Bond, James Bond”.

Nearly all of the nine trademarks being challenged relate to the merchandising of goods and services under the Bond name, which can be challenged after five years of “non-use”.

Josef Kleindienst, an Austrian who isbuilding a $5bn (£3.7bn) luxury resort complexcalled the Heart of Europe on six artificial islands off Dubai, hasargued the trademarks have been commercially underexploited.

Lawyers representing Danjaq, the US-based company which controls the rights to worldwide James Bond merchandising in conjunction with the UK-based production company Eon, have hit back, aiming to vigorously defend the 007 franchise.

“James Bond is a trademark of the highest reputation in the EU,” said Rudolf Böckenholt at Boehmert & Boehmert, one of the largest intellectual property (IP) law firms in Europe, representing Danjaq. “The trademarks are also licensed for numerous consumer products and merchandise products, ranging from very luxurious products to everyday products, as well as further services.”

“These goods and the corresponding services are covered by a number of trademarks that have been challenged and attacked by the claimant Josef Kleindienst in an unprecedented assault,” he added.

It has also emerged that Kleindienst has extended his attempt to try to take control of the spy’s various brands by also submitting his own trademark for James Bond in Europe.

He has not, however, done the same in the UK.

The European IP law firm Withers & Rogers said this was likely to be because the “intention to use test” that applications were submitted to was more stringently applied by the UK’s Intellectual Property Office than its continental equivalent the EU Intellectual Property Office.

“Danjaq would be more likely to object to the registration [in the UK] on the grounds of ‘bad faith’,” said Mark Caddle, a partner and trademark attorney at Withers & Rogers.

Danjaq’s lawyers are putting together evidence to prove the trademarks are still being commercialised, while at the same time arguing that Kleindienst’s “non-use” challenges “represent abuse of process”.

Kleindienst was approached for comment.

“The plot thickens,” Caddle said. “Opting for an ‘abuse of use’ defence suggests that Danjaq could believe that the cancellation attempt is not legitimate, and specifically, that the challenger may not be intending to use the marks commercially. While it is impossible to say for sure what the challenger’s motives are in this case, the James Bond trademark portfolio and its legacy value does make it an enticing target for opportunists, and further cancellation attempts can’t be ruled out.”

Sign up toBusiness Today

Get set for the working day – we'll point you to all the business news and analysis you need every morning

after newsletter promotion

Daniel Craig’s last outing as 007, No Time to Die, was released in 2021 and with no announcement yet of his replacement or timeline for production of the next film, the franchise is on track to beat the previous longest gap between instalments of six years and four months.

Danjaq also co-owns the copyright to the existing Bond films, along with MGM Studios, which wasacquired by Amazon for $8.5bn in 2021. Days after the report of Kleindienst’s legal challenges, it emerged that Amazon hadpaid more than $1bn to gain full “creative control”of the franchise from Barbara Broccoli and Michael G Wilson, the longtime stewards of the Bond films.

With creative control, Amazon now has the power to move forward with new films and potentially TV spinoffs, without approval from the two British-American heirs to the film producer Albert “Cubby” Broccoli, who had overseen the integrity of the character originally created in 1953 by the author Ian Fleming.

In March, Amazon confirmed thatAmy Pascal and David Heymanwould steer the next Bond film, although no release date or lead actor has yet been named.

Pascal has experience with the Bond series in her previous position as Sony’s chair of film, overseeing Casino Royale, Quantum of Solace and Skyfall. She also had producer credits on the latest Spider-Man series.

Heyman is best known as the producer of the Harry Potter films as well as the Fantastic Beasts franchise and is now in pre-production onthe HBO TV series adaptation of the stories. He is the second most commercially successful film producer of all time, with credits including Gravity, Paddington, Barbie, Wonka and Once Upon a Time… in Hollywood.

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian