‘It’s a disaster’: UK fishers angered by latest UK-EU deal

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"UK Fishermen Express Discontent Over Extended EU Access in New Trade Deal"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 6.3
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

Fisher Wesley Loveland, preparing his nets on the Amethyst trawler in Brixham harbour, expressed his frustration with the recent UK-EU deal, describing it as a disaster for local fishermen. Loveland criticized the government for prioritizing issues like pet passports over the fishing industry, which he believes could have been leveraged for better negotiations regarding access to British waters. The new agreement, which allows European fishing trawlers an extended 12-year access to these waters, has drawn ire from the fishing community, with many feeling that their interests were sacrificed. The deal was touted by Labour leader Keir Starmer as a win for both sides, facilitating easier travel for British citizens and improved trade conditions for farmers, yet the fishing sector remains skeptical and disheartened by the perceived concessions made to the EU.

The deal has sparked a broader conversation about the impacts of Brexit on the fishing industry. Ian Perkes, a fish merchant in Brixham, noted the significant drop in fish exports since Brexit, attributing a 20% decrease in business to increased regulatory costs and paperwork. He recounted instances where fish consignments were rejected due to stringent health checks and minor errors in documentation, resulting in substantial financial losses. While some in the fishing industry, like Perkes, hope the new deal will reduce red tape, others, including Paul Dyer and Kyle Evans, remain cynical, believing that political promises will not translate into meaningful change. The frustrations of these fishermen underscore a growing disillusionment with the political process, as they grapple with the ongoing challenges posed by the evolving relationship between the UK and the EU.

TruthLens AI Analysis

The article reflects the frustration of UK fishers regarding a recent deal between the UK and the EU, which they perceive as detrimental to their industry. Fisher Wesley Loveland's strong sentiments highlight the discontent among fishers about the prolonged access granted to European fishing trawlers in British waters, while the deal is presented by political leaders as a significant step forward in UK-EU relations.

Perception of Betrayal

Loveland’s comments indicate a feeling of betrayal within the fishing community, as they believe their interests were compromised in favor of other benefits, such as easier travel for British citizens and agricultural trade. This sentiment is echoed in the backlash from right-wing media, which portrays the agreement as a failure of Brexit promises. The phrase “selling out the fisherman for pet passports” encapsulates the frustration felt by those in the fishing industry, suggesting that their livelihoods were undervalued in negotiations.

Political Implications

Keir Starmer’s optimistic framing of the deal as a "win-win" contrasts starkly with the fishermen's views. This divergence in perception raises questions about the political ramifications of the deal, particularly for Starmer and the Labour Party, which may face backlash from constituents who feel ignored. The reference to past divisive issues surrounding Brexit further complicates the political landscape, as it revives old tensions that many hoped had settled.

Economic Considerations

The deal's provisions allowing for easier export of fish without veterinary checks may have positive implications for the fishing industry in terms of reducing costs. However, this benefit is overshadowed for many fishers by the perception that their rights and access to resources have been compromised. The article suggests a complex economic dynamic where short-term trade benefits do not align with long-term sustainability for UK fishers.

Public Sentiment and Social Dynamics

This news piece caters to a demographic that values local industry and the preservation of traditional livelihoods, particularly among communities dependent on fishing. The article aims to resonate with those who feel that their voices have been marginalized in broader political discussions, emphasizing a grassroots perspective on the implications of governmental decisions.

Potential for Market Impact

While the article primarily focuses on the fishing industry, its implications could extend to broader market sentiments. The perceived failure of Brexit-related promises might influence investor confidence in sectors tied to trade and exports. Stocks in the fishing industry or related sectors could be impacted by the negative media coverage and public sentiment arising from this deal.

Global Context and Relevance

The deal's relevance extends beyond the UK and EU relationship, reflecting ongoing tensions in international trade dynamics post-Brexit. It serves as a reminder of how local industries can be affected by political decisions, particularly in a globalized economy.

The portrayal of the fishermen's plight and the criticism of the deal suggests an underlying intent to mobilize public opinion against perceived governmental negligence. The language used, particularly in the quotes from Loveland and the characterizations of the deal by the press, aims to evoke a strong emotional response from readers, potentially steering public discourse toward a call for more protective measures for local industries.

In assessing the reliability of the article, it provides specific quotes and details that lend credibility. However, the framing of the deal’s impact on fishers indicates a one-sided perspective that emphasizes negative implications without equally weighing the potential advantages presented by the UK government.

Unanalyzed Article Content

Preparing the nets on board the Amethyst trawler in Brixham harbour, fisher Wesley Loveland is angered and baffled by the latest deal between the UK and the EU.

“It’s a disaster,” Loveland says. “Selling out the fisherman for pet passports.”

Keir Starmer hailed his deal with the EU, set out at a Monday summit in London, as a “win-win” for both parties, which would be the start of a “new era” in the UK-EU relationship.

The wide-ranging deal will allow more British travellers to use passport e-gates when going on holiday toEurope, while farmers will get swifter, easier access to trade on the continent as a result of an agreement on animal and plant product standards.

But the plan has been criticised over the agreement to grant European fishing trawlers a further 12 years’ access to British waters.

The rightwing, pro-Brexit press was seething with headlines including “Kiss goodbye to Brexit” in the Telegraph, “Starmer’s Surrender” in the Daily Mail and “Done Up Like a Kipper” in the Sun.

Loveland, who predominantly catches Dover sole, said the UK government should have negotiated better terms for UK fishers instead of extending the current agreement for 12 years.

“The fish in these waters are worth billions to the French and others,” says Loveland, 46, from Brixham. “He could have used the fishing industry to negotiate better terms on migration or more important things than pet passports.”

The prospects of the arguments of 2016 resurfacing trouble Loveland, who has fished for 30 years. “When Brexit was going through, it was stressful,” he says. “I haven’t even watched TV since Starmer has been in office. It’s got back to that again, divisive. It’s really divisive.”

But there is another side of the deal, the impact on exports. The UK government says fish caught in British waters can now be processed and sold into the EU without veterinary checks, eliminating huge costs created by Brexit.

Ian Perkes, who has owned his fish merchant business in Brixham harbour since 1976, said he is hopeful the deal will see a significant relaxation in red tape for his exports – although it remain unclear exactly what the deal proposes and when it will kick in.

“We’re waiting with bated breath now, waiting to see what exactly does happen,” he says.

“Since Brexit, it’s a fact, fish exports have been down 20%. They’re down 20% purely because of the extra costs involved. I’ve seen three big companies go bankrupt, purely through the extra costs.

“We started this in 1976 so for 44 years, we traded anywhere around the world, especially Europe, with no issues. And now, all of a sudden, since Brexit, we’ve gone from three pieces of paperwork per day to at least 30.”

Much of the paperwork is taken up by strict health checks introduced since Brexit which Perkes, 69, says have been devastating for the merchants. He gives an example of one catch worth £80,000 to his business that was written off because French authorities claimed the fish had been stored at -12C rather than -35C, which was disputed. Perkes had to pay another £15,000 for its incineration. Another consignment was rejected because the latin name for the species, Dover sole orSolea Solea, was written incorrectly.

Perkes voted for Brexit and has since spoken out about the devastating impact leaving the EU had on UK fish exports.

“We weren’t aware – not at any time were any charges mentioned,” Perkes says, recalling the Brexit campaign in 2016. “We assumed, naively, it seems now, that we were going down the route of a Norway scenario right, where upon it was free trade. We never envisaged these border controls.”

But back out on the harbour, the fishers remain frustrated.

Paul Dyer, who worked on boats for 17 years before becoming a superintendent responsible for the management of a fleet of boats, said: “The EU boats were only supposed to be able to fish in our waters for another year. Now it’s going to be another 12 years. It means a lot less income for UK fishermen.”

Asked how it impacted his view of politics, Dyer said: “They are all the same. Conservative. Labour. It doesn’t matter.”

Aboard the William of Ladram trawler, Kyle Evans, who describes himself as Brixham born and bred and has worked on the boats for 28 years, has been left jaded by yet another twist and turn in his industry.

“Personally I think nothing is going to change,” he says. “We’ve heard all this sort of talk before. For us, the deal basically means business as usual.”

Asked about the headlines branding the deal a “surrender”, Evans, who was about to set out on a seven-day haul, said: “It’s just usual politics. People love a story. They want there to be a row. Whatever the government says, it often turns out to be a lie anyway.”

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian