‘It normalises the abhorrent’: is The Handmaid’s Tale the most frustrating show on TV?

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"'The Handmaid's Tale' Returns for Final Season Amid Ongoing Themes of Despair and Authoritarianism"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 6.2
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

The sixth and final season of 'The Handmaid's Tale' has returned, offering viewers a deep dive into a world of despair and authoritarianism, which resonates with current societal issues. The series, based on Margaret Atwood's novel, has transitioned from a semi-faithful adaptation to a complex narrative that seems to perpetuate cycles of suffering and oppression. The first season featured memorable scenes that starkly illustrated the violent realities of a dystopian future, particularly in its depiction of women’s rights being stripped away. As the show progresses, it has become increasingly frustrating for viewers, as the protagonist, June, repeatedly escapes the oppressive regime of Gilead only to return in a quest for vengeance. This pattern raises questions about character development and the effectiveness of the plot, especially regarding characters like Serena Joy, who oscillates between being a victim and a political player within the oppressive system.

In its latest episodes, the series appears to acknowledge its repetitive nature, striving for a more focused narrative while still grappling with its established themes. The opener of season six centers around a train transporting refugees from a Canada that has capitulated to Gilead's influence, reflecting the normalization of authoritarianism in contemporary society. The characters' interactions highlight the show's ongoing exploration of motherhood and the complex dynamics between women in a patriarchal society. Although the series is lauded for its production quality and acting, it remains entrenched in its bleak narrative style, which often leaves viewers feeling despondent rather than hopeful. Despite its attempts to reset the narrative arc, the series is likely to continue its tradition of portraying a world where hope is systematically crushed under the weight of despair, leaving audiences anticipating the next move in this harrowing saga.

TruthLens AI Analysis

The article provides a critical analysis of the television series "The Handmaid's Tale," particularly focusing on its sixth and final season. The author expresses frustration with the series' narrative loop, despite acknowledging its quality in production and acting. It frames the show within the context of contemporary societal concerns regarding authoritarianism, making it relevant to current discussions about women's rights and freedom.

Purpose of Publication

The intention behind this article appears to be a critique of the show's direction while also underscoring the importance of its themes in today's socio-political climate. The author aims to engage viewers and critics alike, provoking thought about the implications of the story and its potential normalization of despair.

Public Perception

The article is likely designed to foster a mixed perception among viewers, prompting some to reflect critically on the show's narrative choices while reminding others of the real-world issues it addresses. This duality can create a sense of urgency regarding the themes of oppression and autonomy.

Omissions and Concealment

There is no explicit indication that the article seeks to hide or obscure information. However, by focusing on the frustrations with the narrative structure, it may downplay the broader significance of the show's commentary on authoritarianism, which might distract from deeper societal critiques.

Assessment of Manipulative Elements

The article leans towards a manipulative narrative by emphasizing the frustrations with the show's plot while simultaneously highlighting its relevance to current issues. The emotional language used could evoke a strong response from readers, particularly those who feel strongly about women's rights and political freedoms.

Truthfulness of the Content

While the frustrations expressed may resonate with some viewers, the article’s subjective analysis may not reflect the views of all audiences. However, the facts about the show's production and its thematic relevance to current events are grounded in reality.

Societal Implications

The article suggests that the ongoing examination of authoritarianism in the series could influence public discourse, potentially affecting political activism and awareness of women's rights issues. This could inspire viewers to engage more actively in societal debates.

Target Audience

The article appeals to a demographic that is critically engaged with media, particularly those interested in feminist issues and political commentary. It may resonate more with audiences who are already sympathetic to the themes presented in "The Handmaid's Tale."

Market Impact

The series has the potential to influence discussions around media representation and women's rights, possibly affecting stock performance in related sectors, such as streaming services and production companies. Companies involved in similar content might see shifts in viewership patterns based on the article's critique.

Global Power Dynamics

While the article does not directly address global power dynamics, the themes it discusses relate to broader conversations about authoritarian regimes worldwide. The relevance of these discussions is heightened in contemporary politics, making the series a significant cultural artifact.

AI Influence on Writing

There is no clear evidence that artificial intelligence was used in crafting the article. However, if AI were involved, it might have influenced the tone and structure to cater to reader engagement. Language models could shape narratives by emphasizing certain themes or concerns.

Potential Manipulation

The article does contain elements that could be seen as manipulative, particularly through its emotionally charged critique of the narrative choices in "The Handmaid's Tale." The author's language choices may provoke strong reactions from readers, driving them towards a specific interpretation of the show.

The overall reliability of the article is moderate. While it presents valid critiques and observations about the series, the subjective nature of the commentary limits its objectivity. The focus on emotional reactions may overshadow a balanced analysis of the show's impact and significance.

Unanalyzed Article Content

Great timing! For those who are finding the second season ofThe Last of Ustoo upbeat, too optimistic, just too damn cheerful, here comesThe Handmaid’s Tale, returning for a final run of utter despair and soul-destroying misery. The Emmy-winning take on Margaret Atwood’s novel is back for a sixth and last season, having remarkably stretched out the first novel from a semi-faithful adaptation into a sprawling dystopian hellhole that never lets anyone win.

I find it one of the most frustrating series on television. It is well made, well acted and sits on the foundations of important conversations, particularly as the western world continues its steady turn towards authoritarianism. Thefirst season’s most unforgettable sceneis the one in which, prior to being forced into a life of reproductive servitude, June (Elisabeth Moss) and Moira (Samira Wiley) attend a protest, marching against the removal of women’s rights to their own finances. To an eerie remix of Blondie’s Heart of Glass, the soldiers begin to beat those at the front, before turning their guns on the civilians. Just as the novel is rooted only in acts of violence, corruption and autocracy that had already taken place, the show was a compelling horror because it offered a vision of a near-future that seemed, or seems, ever closer.

Yet as it continues to make the story go far beyond the novel, it has fallen into a maddening spiral. Every season, June liberates herself from the barbarism of Gilead and the Sons of Jacob, then chooses to return to that world to avenge some new or lingering personal injustice. Similarly, Serena Joy (an excellent Yvonne Strahovski) is allowed to develop complexities – has she been brainwashed by her own trad-wife propaganda, or is she still a political operator so shrewd that she has everyone dancing to her own tune? – but then is simply returned to where she began.

In the first episode of season six, the series seems to have recognised its own circularity. It has a growing tendency to throw its cast in the air and scatter them freely, and while some subplots feel as if they have earned their place (the colonies, the trauma of refugees), others are struggling to find a purpose. But this opener suggests it knows it is time for a reset, and does so not by making the story bigger, but by making it more focused, to a near-theatrical degree. Most of the episode is set on the train transporting refugees out of an increasingly hostile Canada, to one of the last remaining outposts of the United States. Canada has decided to capitulate to the strength of Gilead, in part due to some profitable trade agreements, and wishes to improve relations with its autocratic neighbour.

These attempts at normalising the abhorrent are the show’s most astute thread. Simultaneously, Gilead is attempting to smooth the edges of its own religious extremism by remaking its image with a more feminine touch: New Bethlehem is a place where Gilead’s refugees can return and live under a softer version of the same regime.

The show is not big on subtleties: when characters, particularly women, dare to dream of hope, they do so under sunlight, in nature, surrounded by birdsong. When the bad men of Gilead perform their political manoeuvres, it’s over cigarettes, by the dim light of an open fire, in a room lined with dark wallpaper. The angel and the devil are on the shoulders of the World of Interiors magazine.

On the train, Serena Joy and June, the former commander’s wife and her former handmaid, assess their new situations. They both have small children; Serena, in particular, thinks they share a twisted bond, and perhaps they do. Mothers have always been a big theme here, and they become even more prominent as it begins to bow out. To watch these two women examining each other, animal-like, as each tries to figure out the other’s motives, suggests that, at last, the show has ripped up its bleakly repetitive template.

Then along comes the second episode, and unsurprisingly, it snaps back to more familiar ground. As I say, it’s well made and well acted, and something about its horrors clearly keeps viewers coming back for more. But don’t expect any radical departure from what it has always done, which is bludgeon hope to death. Happy viewing!

The Handmaid’s Tale is on Prime Video and Channel 4.

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian