Israel laid out its harrowing plan to take Palestinian territories in 2017. Now it is happening | Ofer Cassif

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"Israel's Renewed Military Offensive in Gaza Raises Concerns Over Long-Standing Territorial Plans"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 5.3
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

Israel's recent announcement of a renewed offensive to 'conquer' Gaza, coupled with incendiary remarks from Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich regarding the complete destruction of the region, has stirred significant concern within the international community. Observers have noted that this aggressive rhetoric is not new, as Smotrich's genocidal ideology has been apparent long before the onset of hostilities on October 7, 2023. Voices of dissent, including those from within Israel, have been warning about the government's intentions towards Gaza, suggesting that the current escalation is part of a long-term strategy. The Israeli cabinet's decision to intensify military actions has not only caused widespread suffering among Palestinians but has also instilled fear among Israeli families of hostages, who feel their loved ones' lives are being jeopardized for political gains. Matan's mother, a hostage, has publicly condemned Smotrich's actions, arguing that the military expansion will lead to further casualties among hostages, highlighting the tragic human cost of this conflict.

The roots of this situation can be traced back to a 2017 document known as the Subjugation Plan, authored by Smotrich. This plan outlines a strategy to eliminate the possibility of a Palestinian state by proposing the annexation of Palestinian territories without granting any form of rights to the Palestinian people. The plan envisions Palestinians as colonial subjects, with provisions for their expulsion and even extermination if they resist. While initially aimed at the West Bank, the current conflict in Gaza has created an opportunity for the implementation of such plans. As the world watches in horror, Smotrich's vision of new settlements continues to unfold amidst a backdrop of violence and suffering. The ongoing debate regarding whether these actions amount to genocide underscores the urgency for accountability. Calls for international intervention have been met with ineffective responses, as exemplified by the UK government's recent diplomatic gestures that lack tangible consequences. For the sake of all affected parties, it is imperative that the Israeli government is held accountable for its actions, as mere words will not suffice in addressing the grave humanitarian crisis at hand.

TruthLens AI Analysis

The article sheds light on the ongoing conflict in Gaza and the troubling statements made by Israeli officials regarding military actions and territorial ambitions. It draws attention to the historical context of these actions, linking them to a plan set forth by a prominent Israeli politician in 2017. The seriousness of the situation is not only focused on the implications for Palestinians but also on the fears and anxieties it generates among Israelis, particularly those with loved ones taken hostage.

Purpose of the Article

There is a clear intention behind this article to inform and alarm readers about the severe implications of the Israeli government's plans for Gaza. By highlighting the historical roots of current actions, the author seeks to frame them within a broader context of a long-standing agenda that aims to eradicate the prospect of a Palestinian state. The choice of language—terms like "genocidal ideology" and "harrowing plan"—suggests an emotional appeal meant to provoke outrage and concern among the audience.

Public Perception

The piece aims to shape public perception by portraying the Israeli government's actions as not only aggressive but also reckless, with potential consequences for both Palestinians and Israelis. By showcasing the emotional turmoil of Israeli families affected by the hostage situation, the article seeks to create a sense of empathy and urgency in the reader. It positions the government as out of touch with the grave realities faced by its citizens, thus fostering distrust and discontent.

Hidden Agendas

There may be a subtle attempt to downplay any supportive narratives for Israeli military actions by focusing on the negative consequences of these policies. The article could be viewed as an attempt to steer public opinion against the current Israeli leadership, particularly targeting figures like Bezalel Smotrich and Benjamin Netanyahu. The framing might intentionally obscure any complexities of the geopolitical situation that could justify military actions.

Manipulative Elements

The article exhibits a moderate degree of manipulativeness, primarily through its choice of emotive language and selective emphasis on certain events. By presenting the government's plans in stark, alarming terms, it may inadvertently or intentionally evoke strong emotional reactions from readers, potentially leading them to conclusions that align with the author's perspective.

Credibility

The credibility of the article can be questioned due to its highly charged language and the lack of neutral reporting. While it references historical documents and statements from officials, the overall tone suggests a bias against the Israeli government, which may undermine its objectivity. Nevertheless, the historical context and the cited plans do provide a foundation of truth that anchors some of the claims made.

Societal Impact

The societal implications of this article could manifest in increasing tensions within Israel regarding military actions and the handling of hostages. It may energize opposition movements and incite public demonstrations against government policies, potentially altering the political landscape. Economically, heightened tensions could impact tourism and foreign investment, while politically, it may lead to shifts in party support among Israelis.

Audience Engagement

The article seems aimed at progressive and left-leaning audiences, particularly those sympathetic to Palestinian rights and critical of Israeli government policies. It likely seeks to resonate with activists and those concerned with human rights, fostering a sense of community among readers who share similar views.

Market Reactions

The news could influence stock markets, particularly those tied to Israeli defense and technology sectors. Heightened military engagements typically lead to fluctuations in stock prices of companies involved in defense contracts. Investors may react based on perceived stability or instability in the region, affecting foreign investments.

Global Power Balance

In terms of global power dynamics, the article highlights the ongoing struggles in the Middle East, which continue to be a focal point for international relations. The situation in Gaza has broader implications for U.S. foreign policy and its relationships with both Israel and Arab nations, especially in light of recent geopolitical developments.

AI Utilization

It is unlikely that AI played a significant role in this article's composition; however, language processing tools could have been used to refine the writing style or structure. The use of emotive language and persuasive techniques suggests a human author with a specific agenda rather than an AI-generated piece.

In conclusion, while the article provides compelling insights into the current situation in Gaza and the larger historical context, its credibility is somewhat undermined by its emotive language and potential biases. The framing of the issues at hand serves to engage specific audiences while potentially alienating others.

Unanalyzed Article Content

Israel’s announcement of anew offensiveto “conquer” Gaza, along with claims by Bezalel Smotrich, the Israeli minister of finance, that the strip will be “entirely destroyed”, have flustered the international community. Observers may be distressed, disturbed or upset by these plans. But they should come as no surprise. This kind of genocidal ideology has been evident, in Smotrich’s case, since long before 7 October. And opposition voices – including mine – have been warning of the government’s intentions in Gaza since October 2023.

These latest actions by the fanatic nationalists in Israel’s government are causing misery to Palestinians, but also to Israelis. The decision of the Israeli cabinet to expand its invasion has terrified the families of Israeli hostages. They have accused Smotrich of promoting his messianic vision on the graves of their loved ones, and Benjamin Netanyahu of hiding information andlying to themabout the number of living hostages. Einav Zangauker, the mother of Matan, who was kidnapped from his home in Kibbutz Nir Oz on 7 October, went to the Knesset (the Israeli parliament) this week with a chilling warning: the expansion of military efforts in Gaza will lead to the death of hostages, she said. When she called on army reservists torefuse drafting orders, she was silenced and removed from the platform.

In October 2023, in my first interview after the massacre of 7 October, I warned that the Israeli government would utilise the brutal slaughter in order topursue its plansto annex Palestinian territories. The plan I referred to was one formulated by Smotrich in 2017, titledthe Subjugation Plan(sometimes translated as the Decisive Plan). In it, he laid out a blueprint to eradicate the prospect of a Palestinian state. In a harrowing document that discusses people as if they were pawns on a chessboard, Smotrich reshaped the borders of Israel. First, he demanded annexation of Palestinian territory without granting basic political, civil or national rights to Palestinians, treating them instead as colonial subjects. Second, those Palestinians who would not accept their lot as second-class subjects would be physically expelled from their homes, lands and their homeland altogether. And third: those who resist, who struggle for their fundamental rights as human beings, would be hunted and killed.

While at the time of its publication this plan was directed mostly towards the occupied West Bank, it is clear how today the fog of war will allow for its implementation in Gaza. I was not a prophet sent to forewarn and predict the cynical ploy of Netanyahu and his gang of settlers – I only needed to listen to what they were saying. I was subsequently suspended from my position in the Knesset, and I am now serving a second suspension for endorsingSouth Africa’s requestto the international court of justice to bring accountability and justice in the face of the violence I warned of.

How can one be surprised by the comments of Smotrich if the actions of the Israeli cabinet for the past 18 months have followed his subjugation plan? Palestinians in Gaza and the occupied West Bank have been bombed, starved, slaughtered and expelled in order to make room for Smotrich’s vision of new settlements. While the people of the world observed the war with terror and fear, Smotrich’s settlers boasted that they were living in a “miraculous time”.

In the ongoing disputation as to what extent the actions ofIsraelconstitute the crime of genocide, this plan should serve as the prime exhibit for the prosecution. “Subjugation” for Smotrich and his gang translates to ethnic cleansing, forceful transfer, illegal annexation and killings that break international law. In essence, this plan aims for the complete destruction and dissolution of the Palestinians as a national community, as a shared people, in their own homeland – isn’t this the definition of genocide?

“Any attempt to annex land in Gaza would be unacceptable” said the UK’s Middle East minister, Hamish Falconer,this week. His words, which came with no sanctions or consequences attached, dispersed into thin air. It seems truly farcical that almost 20 months into this calamity there are still those who believe the Israeli government could be persuaded to change course by words alone, or that the Israeli cabinet holds any degree of care for rule of law and international norms. But if I first felt some degree of pity towards the UK government and its ineffectual diplomacy, it quickly turned into a burning anger when I remembered the recent visit of the Israeli foreign minister, Gideon Sa’ar,to the UK. Only weeks ago he received protection from the same government that now accuses his cabinet of unacceptable and unlawful conduct of war.

For the sake of the Palestinians, the hostages and the people of Israel, the Israeli government must be held to account. This cannot be accomplished through words alone.

Ofer Cassif is a member of the Knesset, representing the Democratic Front for Peace and Equality (Hadash)

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian