Israel is starving Gaza. It’s a cheap, silent and brutal way to kill | Ahmed Moor

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"Critique of Israeli Starvation Policy in Gaza Raises Humanitarian Concerns"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 4.6
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

The article draws a chilling parallel between the historical atrocities of the Holocaust and current events in Gaza, particularly focusing on Israel's starvation policy as a method of warfare. The author highlights the role of Yoav Gallant, the former Israeli defense minister, who is described as the architect of this brutal strategy aimed at the Palestinian population. The international community has begun to take notice, with the International Criminal Court issuing a warrant for Gallant and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, citing their potential criminal responsibility for the war crime of starvation. This policy has resulted in a blockade that has restricted the flow of essential supplies like food and medicine into Gaza for over two months, leading to dire humanitarian consequences, including the suffering of children like a young girl named Rahaf, who is portrayed as starving to death due to these actions.

The article further critiques the financial and moral implications of using starvation as a weapon. It argues that while traditional military operations are costly and noisy, starvation is a cheaper and quieter alternative that allows perpetrators to mask their actions from global scrutiny. The author notes that this method effectively silences victims and obscures the reality of their suffering from international observers, including leaders in the United States and Europe who support Israel. The author underscores the long-term physical and psychological effects of starvation, particularly on children, and emphasizes the moral depravity of employing such tactics against civilians. The piece concludes by asserting that the deliberate act of starving a population is not only a strategic choice but an evil one, as it systematically dismantles the very essence of human life and dignity.

TruthLens AI Analysis

The article presents a stark and controversial view on the Israeli government's actions in Gaza, equating them with historical acts of genocide and war crimes. It draws parallels between the starvation tactics employed in Gaza and the atrocities committed during the Holocaust, specifically referencing Rudolf Höss, the commandant of Auschwitz. This connection is meant to provoke a visceral reaction from readers and to frame the current situation in Gaza as one of extreme moral urgency.

Intent Behind the Article

The primary goal of this article appears to be to evoke outrage and condemnation of Israel's policies toward Gaza. The author aims to highlight the humanitarian crisis and the perceived systemic violence against civilians. By using emotionally charged language and historical comparisons, the piece seeks to mobilize public opinion against the Israeli government and its military strategies.

Public Perception and Sentiment

Through its vivid imagery and historical references, the article is likely to resonate with readers who are sympathetic to the Palestinian cause or who advocate for human rights. It taps into existing sentiments of frustration and anger towards perceived injustices in the region. The choice of words like "starvation," "genocidal act," and "collective punishment" is designed to elicit strong emotional responses, thus shaping public perception in a particular way.

Potential Omissions

While the article emphasizes the suffering of Gazans, it may downplay or overlook the complexities of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, including the actions of Hamas and the security concerns of Israel. This selective focus could be interpreted as an attempt to simplify a deeply nuanced situation, potentially leading to a biased understanding among readers.

Manipulative Elements

The piece can be seen as manipulative due to its emotional language and the historical analogies it employs. By drawing a direct line between contemporary actions and past atrocities, it can create an exaggerated sense of moral urgency. The framing of Israeli leaders as war criminals also serves to vilify them, which may not encourage constructive dialogue but rather deepen divisions.

Comparative Context

In the broader landscape of news reporting on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, this article aligns with narratives that seek to highlight human rights violations. It shares thematic similarities with reports from organizations like Amnesty International, which also criticize Israel's actions. However, it distinguishes itself by invoking historical parallels that may not be as commonly addressed in other reports.

Impact on Society and Politics

The article could energize activist movements and influence public policy discussions regarding foreign aid and military support for Israel. It may also contribute to increased polarization within communities, potentially leading to heightened tensions in discussions surrounding the conflict.

Supportive Communities

The content is likely to resonate with progressive groups, human rights advocates, and individuals who prioritize humanitarian issues. It may also attract attention from those disillusioned with mainstream narratives about the conflict.

Market Implications

While the article itself may not directly influence stock markets, the ongoing humanitarian crisis and geopolitical tensions can affect investor sentiment in sectors related to defense, humanitarian aid, and international relations. Companies involved in arms manufacturing may face scrutiny, while firms providing humanitarian services might see increased interest.

Geopolitical Relevance

The article aligns with ongoing global discussions about human rights, military ethics, and international law. It reflects current tensions in the Middle East and addresses issues that are significant in today's geopolitical climate.

AI Influence

There is no explicit evidence that AI was used in the writing of this article, but if it were, it might have been in the form of language models that assist in generating emotionally impactful content. The use of certain phrases and the structuring of the argument could have been refined by AI tools designed for persuasive writing.

In conclusion, the article presents a highly charged perspective on the situation in Gaza, employing emotional resonance and historical comparisons to generate outrage and mobilize support. While it raises important humanitarian concerns, the potential for manipulation and oversimplification warrants a critical examination of its claims and framing.

Unanalyzed Article Content

Irecently looked up a biography of Rudolf Höss. The Kommandant who led the Auschwitz prison camp in Poland during the second world war was fastidious in his duties. He successfully oversaw the extermination of millions of people from 1940 to 1943, and, according to accounts, seems to have been a father whocaredfor his five children. His home life was imagined, and captured, by the film-maker Jonathan Glazer in his 2023 movie The Zone of Interest.

John Primomo recounts, in hisbiography, how the Nazi would randomly select groups of prisoners and sentence them to die by starvation. Höss was eventually captured by Nazi hunters and hanged for his crimes, in his case a slow death on a short gallows.

Yoav Gallant, the former Israeli defense minister, is the primary architect of the starvation policy in Gaza, which is unfolding as I write. The international criminal court issued a warrant for his arrestindicating“reasonable grounds to believe that Mr Netanyahu … and Mr Gallant … bear criminal responsibility for … the war crime of starvation as a method of warfare.”

Gallant’s successor, Israel Katz, has embraced the Gallant policy. He and his boss, Benjamin Netanyahu, broke the ceasefire with Hamas in March. Since then, they have worked fastidiously to starve the people in Gaza – food, medicine and critical supplies for the maintenance of human life have all beenprevented by Israeli troops from entering the territoryfor more than two months. Thisvideoshows a young girl, Rahaf, who is starving to death.

On 2 May, Amnesty Internationalissuedan urgent notice. “Israel must immediately end its devastating siege on the occupied Gaza Strip which constitutes a genocidal act, a blatant form of unlawful collective punishment, and the war crime of using starvation of civilians as a method of warfare,” it reads.

Unable to stand idly by, a group of activists, including Greta Thunberg, organized the Freedom Flotilla, a boat carrying supplies meant for Gaza. Their goal was to break into the “139-square mile prison camp”, as the journalist Ben Ehrenreich hasdescribedGaza. On 1 May, their boat was attacked and disabled by drones, according to eyewitnesses. A reasonable person may assume the Israelis destroyed the boat.

Starvation is attractive to mass murderers for a few reasons.

First, it’s cheap.

While Joe Biden and Donald Trump – and the majority of Democrats and Republicans in Congress – have committed more than$22bnof public money to Israeli’s genocide, killing people can be expensive. Tanks, bombs, missiles, drones, bullets and incendiary devices all cost money to make and deliver.

But starvation doesn’t require any big outlays. Impose a siege, and human biology resolves the rest.

Beyond being inexpensive to implement, starvation makes little noise. For those who seek to silence their victims – as Israel has by murdering at least 155 Palestinian journalists – and obscure their actions, starvation is a useful tool. There are no bomb craters, no burning children or journalists. There are only emaciatedcorpses. And 18 months into the darkness that has enveloped the Palestinians, they do not warrant many headlines.

And that benefit – obfuscation – extends to the patrons too. The leaders of the US, UK, France, Italy, Germany and so on – who have underwritten the extermination of the Palestinians – can feign ignorance, or just ignore, what their partners inIsraelare doing. They are busy people. Bandwidth is limited.

And yet, despite its advantages, starving humans to death is evil. Not least because of how it works.

Starvation is a slow, painful way to die. For survivors, particularlychildren, the future is attenuated. Normal brain and social development is disrupted and recovery may be impossible in many cases.

In the first stages of starvation, the body uses reserves – usually fat – to keep going. Once those reserves have been depleted – a process that varies from individual to individual – the body begins to consume itself. Organs like the lungs, liver and kidneys shrink before they too begin to be destroyed.

Finally, muscle is the only store of energy remaining. The body cannibalizes its protein. And as Dr. Nancy Zucker, Director of the Center for Eating Disorders at Duke University,explainedto NPR, “once protein stores start getting used, death is not far”.

The heart is a muscle – and it too is consumed, a fitting symbol for those leaders in the West, and the Israelis they sustain. Each of them a heartless person, no matter how well fed they may be.

Ahmed Moor is a Palestinian American writer and recipient of the Paul & Daisy Soros Fellowship for New Americans

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian