Is it OK to read Infinite Jest in public? Why the internet hates ‘performative reading’

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"The Debate Over Public Reading: Is 'Performative Reading' Detracting from Genuine Enjoyment?"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 7.3
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

The article explores the phenomenon of 'performative reading', a term used to describe the act of reading in public spaces with the intent of being seen or judged by others. The author reflects on their own experience of reading David Foster Wallace's 'Infinite Jest' in public, amidst a culture that has increasingly critiqued the act of reading as a form of personal branding. This criticism has evolved from earlier celebrations of reading, such as the popular Instagram account @HotDudesReading, which showcased attractive individuals with books, to a current climate where reading in public is met with derision. The author recounts a recent encounter where two strangers questioned their confidence in reading alone, highlighting a societal trend that discourages individuals from enjoying literature openly, suggesting that reading has become a performance rather than a personal enjoyment.

As the author embarks on their own mini-odyssey of reading 'Infinite Jest', they navigate the anxiety of being judged by others while engaging with literature in public spaces. They describe their initial apprehension and the subsequent realization that enjoying a book in a public setting can be a fulfilling experience, free from the worries of social media scrutiny. The article posits that reading should be embraced as a personal pleasure rather than a performative act, emphasizing the importance of literature in our lives, especially in an era where digital distractions abound. The author concludes by encouraging readers to enjoy their literary pursuits openly, arguing that the enjoyment of reading should not be confined to private spaces, but celebrated in all environments, regardless of societal judgments.

TruthLens AI Analysis

You need to be a member to generate the AI analysis for this article.

Log In to Generate Analysis

Not a member yet? Register for free.

Unanalyzed Article Content

Iconsider no activity more luxurious than posting up at a bar solo with a good book. The creasing of a paperback in one hand, the weight of a wine glass in the other, the feeling of being alone in a crowd of people all make for a lovely evening. Or at least, I thought so, until recently, when two twentysomethings approached me during this ritual. “Are youreading alone?” one asked. “I could neverrrr,” the other said, and then uttered the universal mean girl slight: “I wish I hadyourconfidence.”

Reading in public – not cool. Or at least “performative reading”, as it’s been dubbed on social media, is worthy of ridicule.

Not long ago, during the peak years of corny millennial humor, we celebrated @HotDudesReading, an Instagram account-turned-book that showed attractive men toting books on trains and park benches. Now, god forbid anyone (hot dudes included) enjoy a moment of escapism during the capitalist grind, or else they might end up in someone’s mocking post. To quote thecaptionof one popular meme depicting an anonymous train passenger reading a Brit lit classic: “Poser art himbo on the subway barely 10 pages into his performative copy of Frankenstein.”

It’s called performative reading not just because someone might be pretending to read, but rather that they want everyone toknowthey read. The presumption is that they’re performing for passersby, signaling they have the taste and attention span to pick up a physical book instead of putting in AirPods. And we’re not talking about Colleen Hoover’s latest or a romantasy title; the books that qualify are capital “L” literature: Faulkner, Nabokov, Franzen. The heavier the better.

Of course, it requires a deeply broken brain to be this bothered by a stranger’s summer reading list. Chalk this obsession with performative reading up to a wariness of personal branding. We can’t even indulge in an innocent hobby without it being considered some sort of aesthetic curation.

Last month, Hailey Bieber poked fun at her vapid image in aVogue TikTok, in which she pulled out The Portable Nietzsche (“I love this one, probably my fourth or fifth time reading it, so good”) and Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason (“been taking a lot of notes from this one”). The hosts of the Run-Through, Vogue’s official podcast, latercalledthe post “satire”. Another win for the books-as-props community.

Ten years ago, John Waters’s famous quote about how if you go home with someone and they don’t have books, “don’t fuck ‘em” came printed on tote bags. Now, is the prevailing wisdom that anyone who dares read the newborn-sized Infinite Jest during their lunch break an absolute loser? I decided to find out in my own personal mini-odyssey.

The performative reading canon spans many titles and genres, and I thought about using Robert Caro’s The Power Broker, Moby Dick or The Bell Jar in this experiment. Ultimately, I chose Infinite Jest, because it clocks in at over just 1,000 pages, I’ve never met a person who had finished it, and at many times I’ve considered picking it up but reconsidered simply because I did not want to be the dude on the subway reading Infinite Jest. I found a $9 copy at my neighborhood bookstore in Brooklyn and braced myself for what I was sure would be abject humiliation courtesy of the gen Z cashier. Instead, she asked if I needed a bag.

“I think so – it’s kind of heavy,” I said, propping it on my hip dramatically as if it were a small child. She nodded for the person behind me in line to step forward with the apathy of someone who’s not being paid enough for this.

On the train, I held the behemoth in front of my face, angling so the woman with groceries across from me could not help but notice that I was Better Than Her. As I peeked over the page, I tried to clock any annoyance. But, tragically, she had things to worry about other than my reading list.

When I got to Washington Square Park, the unofficial campus center of New York University and general young person shenanigans hub, I awaited to be caught in the act, secretly filmed for a TikTok ridiculing my performance. Again, no one cared – except for a gen X man who sat on the park bench next to me, exactly the type of guy who might consider David Foster Wallace a modern-day saint. He politely asked how I was doing with the book. I told him I was 20 pages in and hadn’t quite hit footnote hell yet. He said to keep going and suggested that I literally cut the book into thirds to make it more manageable. (Apparently this is common knowledge among Wallacesupport groupsthat have popped up through the years.)

After I thanked him and went back to reading, a crazy thing happened: I enjoyed myself. One of life’s simplest pleasures is falling into a story and tuning the world out. But to get there, you have to stop worrying about what someone’s going to think of you – or whether you’ll unwittingly end up in a bitchy TikTok. And as far as I know, I didn’t.

All the finger-wagging about performative reading begs the question: wherearewe supposed to read the classics? Can it only be done at home, like a secret bad habit? For people who take public transit, especially trains with spotty wifi, commuting can be the only time when we have an hour or so to totally focus on a book (and on not missing our stop). So the next time you see one of us reading at a bar, coffee shop or the park, please leave us alone. This is not for you; we’re just enjoying the vibes.

It’s a scary time to be someone who cherishes the written word. The country is in the midst of a literarycrisis. We’retoldby college professors that students can’t read entire books anymore, that gen Z parentsdon’t like reading to their kids, that smartphonesruinedour ability to focus on anything longer than 30 seconds, that AI slop will take over publishing. Don’t be a chump. Read everywhere, and read often.

And maybe there’s still some steeze that comes from flexing an “important” book. When I posted on Instagram about reading Infinite Jest in public, a friend told me she once went to a “nudist” spa in Portland where she encountered a guy reading the book in a jacuzzi. “He had the biggest penis I’ve ever seen in my life,” she wrote. “It wasn’t a performance, it was promotion.”

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian