Is ‘chic’ political? In Trump 2.0, the word stands for conservative femininity

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"The Evolving Meaning of 'Chic' in Conservative Fashion Discourse"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 7.2
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

The term 'chic,' often viewed as a fashion industry cliché, has recently sparked significant online debate about its implications in the context of political identity, particularly among conservatives. The conversation was ignited by Tara Langdale, a lifestyle influencer, who shared a TikTok video critiquing various fashion choices she deemed 'un-chic.' In her video, she highlighted items such as tattoos, visible panty lines, and certain casual wear as lacking sophistication, arguing that true chicness is tied to wealth and a refined aesthetic. This sparked a backlash from users who perceived her comments as elitist and exclusionary, with many asserting that her definition of chic reflects a narrow, conservative viewpoint that polices women's fashion choices. Critics labeled her stance as reminiscent of a 'mean girl' mentality, suggesting that it perpetuates classism and outdated beauty standards that align with conservative ideologies, especially in the context of figures like Karoline Leavitt and Kristi Noem, who embody a specific, polished feminine aesthetic associated with Trump-era conservatism.

The dynamics surrounding the term 'chic' have evolved, with many now viewing it as a conservative dog whistle that imposes rigid expectations on women's appearances. Influencers and creators across TikTok have begun to challenge the traditional notions of chicness, advocating for a more inclusive definition that embraces diverse styles and sustainable fashion choices. For instance, some argue that true chicness should reflect resourcefulness and creativity rather than adherence to socio-economic standards. Langdale herself maintains that her interpretation of chic is apolitical, emphasizing simplicity and timelessness. However, the ongoing discourse suggests that the term's connotations are heavily influenced by current cultural and political climates, leading to a broader examination of how aesthetics intersect with identity, class, and ideology in today's society. As this conversation unfolds, it raises critical questions about the meanings we attach to fashion and the ways in which they can reflect or challenge societal norms and expectations.

TruthLens AI Analysis

The article delves into the evolving connotation of the term "chic" within the context of contemporary politics, particularly focusing on its association with conservative femininity in the age of Trump 2.0. The piece highlights how a seemingly innocuous fashion term has been appropriated to reflect deeper political and social attitudes, sparking discussions about classism and the policing of women's appearances.

Cultural Implications of 'Chic'

The term has shifted from a neutral descriptor of style to a politically charged label that carries implications about class and societal expectations. Tara Langdale’s TikTok video, which critiques certain fashion preferences as “un-chic,” serves as a catalyst for discussions on how aesthetics can reflect and reinforce conservative values. This indicates a broader cultural trend where fashion choices are increasingly being evaluated through a political lens.

Political Polarization

The backlash against Langdale's definitions of “chic” demonstrates an underlying polarization in society. Comments pointing out the classist overtones of her remarks suggest that many viewers perceive her fashion ideals as elitist. The association of “chic” with Trump-era femininity also indicates how political identities are being expressed through personal style, further entrenching divisions among different social groups.

Manipulative Language and Projected Values

The language used by Langdale and the ensuing commentary reflects a potential manipulation of societal norms. By labeling certain looks as “un-chic,” there is an implicit judgment that can alienate those who do not conform to a particular aesthetic. This can serve to uphold conservative ideals while marginalizing alternative expressions of identity and style.

Trustworthiness of the Report

The article appears to be grounded in factual events—specifically, the viral nature of Langdale's TikTok and the responses it elicited. However, it also relies heavily on subjective interpretations of the concept of “chic” and its political implications. The reliability may be influenced by the author’s perspective, as it highlights a particular narrative around femininity and conservatism that may not encompass the full spectrum of opinions.

Connections with Broader Trends

When compared to other reports discussing fashion and politics, this article fits into a growing discourse that examines the intersection of personal style and political identity. Media narratives increasingly explore how aesthetics are politicized, particularly among women, reflecting wider socio-political dynamics.

Potential Societal Impact

The framing of “chic” as a conservative dog whistle could lead to greater scrutiny of women’s fashion choices in political contexts. This might influence how women perceive their own styles or how they engage with political movements. It could also foster an environment where conformity to specific aesthetic standards becomes a marker of political allegiance.

Supportive Communities

The article seems to resonate more with progressive communities that advocate for diversity in appearance and expression. It critiques the narrow definitions of femininity that align with conservative politics, thereby appealing to those who value inclusivity and personal freedom in style choices.

Economic and Market Effects

While the article focuses on fashion and politics, it may indirectly affect consumer behavior in the fashion industry. Brands that are perceived as catering to conservative aesthetics could see a rise or fall in popularity depending on public sentiment. However, the specific impact on stock markets or individual companies is not clearly delineated in this context.

Geopolitical Relevance

While primarily a cultural analysis, the article indirectly touches on the broader geopolitical landscape by reflecting internal societal divisions that can influence national politics. As fashion becomes a vehicle for expressing political identity, it may contribute to shaping narratives that resonate beyond local communities.

Artificial Intelligence Considerations

There's no explicit indication that AI was used in the writing of this article. However, AI models might analyze trends and sentiments around topics like “chic” and its political connotations. If AI were involved, it could have shaped the narrative to accentuate the political implications of fashion, guiding the reader's understanding of the cultural significance of style.

In conclusion, the article illustrates the complex entanglement of fashion and politics, showcasing how words and aesthetics can carry significant cultural weight. The reliability of the report is moderate, as it reflects subjective interpretations while discussing real events. The discourse surrounding “chic” may serve as a lens to view broader societal trends and divisions.

Unanalyzed Article Content

The idea of “chic” is a fashion-world cliche. At best it is a know-it-when-you-see-it vibe, at worst a lazy adjective chosen by a writer to describe something that reminds her of Jane Birkin. It feels inoffensive enough. But now, “chic” has become something of a lightning rod online – a shorthand for a type of conservative-coded aesthetic.

It began last month, when a creator named Tara Langdale posted avideoto her TikTok following of just over 30,000 in which she sipped from a long-stemmed wine glass and read off a list of things she finds “incredibly UN-chic”. Wearing stacks of gold bracelets and a ballet-pink manicure, Langdale called out fashion choices like tattoos, Lululemon, visible panty lines, baggy denim andhunting camouflageas unchic, because, to her, these choices seemed “cheap”.

“Remember, money talks, wealth whispers,” Langdale said.

The not-entirely-serious video racked up views and sparked a conversation about how style preferences can carry political baggage. “This is giving mean girl,” one user wrote in the comments. “Classism isn’t chic, hope this helps,” wrote another. “Voting for Trump is unchic,” went a third. Many took particular issue with Langdale’s anti-tattoo stance, which they saw as stuffy or downright rude.

Such comments came with a strong dose of projection: Langdale, a lifestyle influencer, does not post about politics, sticking to fashion, makeup or motherhood. Nevertheless, many in the fashionTikTokcommunity felt her commentary on “chic” aligned with the feminine aesthetic of Trump 2.0, where the rigidand airbrushed beauty standards of Maga officials such as Karoline Leavitt, Kristi Noem and Nancy Mace are celebrated.

“Chic is starting to feel like a conservative dogwhistle that polices women’s looks,” said Elysia Berman, a creative director and content creator based in New York whoposteda takedown of Langdale’s unchic list. “What chic has come to mean to a lot of people is a very narrow definition of elegance. It’s this thin, white, blonde woman who speaks softly and is basically Grace Kelly.”

The ideal vision of womanhood from Donald Trump’s first term was caked foundation and clumpy mascara, as seen on the likes of Kimberly Guilfoyle and Lara Trump. But the facial augmentation and overly sexy aesthetic tied to the president’s inner circle – see “Ice Barbie” Noem, who posts full glam videos while deporting immigrants – does not necessarily match that of the president’s more social media savvy supporters, many of whom are now opting for a sleeker presentation.

MomfluencersandtradwivescelebrateRFK Jr’s “Make America Healthy Again” policies while wearing breezy milkmaid dresses.Evie Magazine, a politically conservative version of Cosmo, appropriates the trending visuals of feminist magazines with headlines that decry body positivity and promote vaccine skepticism. As New York Magazine writer Brock Colyardescribedyoung Republicans at a post-election night party: “Many are hot enough to be extras in the upcoming American Psycho remake.”

The word “chic” has always been tied to a French, or francophile, sense of femininity, usually in reference to a woman who subscribes to Vogue and innately understands how to look good. But those turning it into a dirty word on TikTok, taking note of how it aligns with a changing conservative aesthetic, see it as having a more prescriptive, even oppressive, meaning for women’s fashion.

Suzanne Lambert, a DC-based comedian whose “conservative girl” mock makeup tutorials went viral earlier this year, described the right’s obsession with all things ultra-feminine as “just this soulless, boring kind of fashion”.

“Republicans are more focused on assimilating than we are on the left, so it makes sense that they all end up looking the same,” Lambert said.

Ultimately, anyone who’s attempting to look chic – or wealthy – is probably neither of those things. Those TikTok imitators who equate chicness with pearls and a Leavitt-esque tweed shift dress? “They think it’s giving Reagan, but it’s really giving Shein,” said Lambert.

(Ironically, some of the unchic pieces on Langdale’s list – Lululemon leggings, Golden Goose sneakers, a Louis Vuitton carryall bag – come with hefty price tags and could connote liberal elitism.)

In an email, Langdale said that her definition of chic had nothing to do with politics. “Chic by definition means simplicity and timelessness,” she wrote. “Reading a neutral palette as ‘conservative’ conflates style choice with ideology. Conservatism as a moral or political stance varies widely across cultures and religious communities, so tagging a fitting tank top and trousers as ‘Republican’ is lazy stereotyping.”

Langdale called chic “this year’s version” of “old money” dressing, a TikTok trend that prioritized subdued, luxury items over the loud, brash and individualistic. “You can own every item on my unchic list and still be considered chic,” she wrote. “Labeling an item chic or unchic speaks only to its aesthetic, not a person’s style or worth.

The conversation around chic is ongoing.Other creators, inspired by Langdale’s video, posted about what they considered chic in their niches. A medical studentsaidit is “incredibly chic” to color coordinate scrubs with personal accessories; an office workerconsiderednot letting colleagues in on their personal lives the height of chicness.

Kat Brown, a 25-year-old New Yorker who works in fashion PR, made avideotalking about how it’s “not chic” to be overly trendy, with chicness coming from a more sustainable wardrobe. “Smart consumption is chic,” Brown said. “Chicness is more reflective of your resourcefulness and creativity, rather than any sort of socioeconomic element.”

For all the angst on chic-Tok, true insiders probably aren’t paying much attention. Fashion editors often make lists of words they consider so dull and unspecific that they prohibit writers from using them in copy; “chic” is usually right at the top. And when a word like chic is so bland to begin with, who cares if its wielded as an insult? As a British couturier played by Daniel Day-Lewis in the 2017 period drama Phantom Threadbemoanedof “chic”: “That filthy little word. Whoever invented that ought to be spanked in public. I don’t even know what that word means.”

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian