Is a US recession on the horizon amid Trump’s tariffs? | Jeffrey Frankel

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"Analysis of Economic Indicators Suggests Potential U.S. Recession Amid Tariff Impacts"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 7.8
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

The possibility of a recession in the United States has been a topic of growing concern, particularly in light of recent economic indicators and the impact of tariffs introduced by former President Donald Trump. An inverted yield curve, which occurs when long-term interest rates fall below short-term rates, traditionally signals an impending recession. While the yield curve was briefly inverted in March, it currently reflects a balance between the two rates, indicating market expectations of potential Federal Reserve interest rate cuts. However, consumer confidence has taken a significant hit, as evidenced by sharp declines in surveys conducted by the University of Michigan and the Conference Board. These declines coincide with the onset of Trump's tariff threats, leading to a notable drop in consumer sentiment and business confidence, both of which are crucial for household demand and corporate investment decisions. The Federal Reserve Bank of New York has also reported a deterioration in households' financial expectations, further emphasizing the uncertainty prevailing in the economy.

In addition to consumer confidence, professional forecasts and prediction markets are being closely monitored for indications of a recession. Recent data from the Wall Street Journal shows a mean forecast of only 0.44% annualized growth for the first quarter, with significantly increased probabilities of recession compared to earlier in the year. Prediction markets have dramatically raised their recession odds following the announcement of tariffs, with estimates now suggesting a 57% chance of recession within the next year. Other economic indicators, such as the Purchasing Managers' Index (PMI) and retail sales data, point towards a contraction in manufacturing and mixed signals in consumer spending. The Atlanta Fed's GDPNow nowcast has also adjusted its growth estimate to below zero, indicating a potential downturn. While the official declaration of a recession is made by the National Bureau of Economic Research after a thorough analysis of various economic factors, current indicators suggest a troubling landscape. Overall, the likelihood of a recession occurring within the next year is estimated at around 60%, reflecting the precarious state of the U.S. economy amidst ongoing uncertainty and tariff implications.

TruthLens AI Analysis

The article delves into the potential for an impending recession in the United States, particularly influenced by the tariffs imposed during Donald Trump’s administration. It employs a metaphor of sailing through fog to illustrate the uncertainty surrounding economic predictions, drawing parallels between observable indicators and potential outcomes.

Economic Indicators and Predictions

The article highlights the significance of the inverted yield curve as a traditional sign of an upcoming recession, suggesting that the financial markets anticipate a potential cut in short-term interest rates by the Federal Reserve. However, it also notes that this indicator does not provide a definitive prediction but rather reflects market expectations regarding future economic activity.

Consumer confidence is presented as a more immediate gauge of economic health. Recent surveys from the University of Michigan and the Conference Board indicate a substantial drop in consumer sentiment, particularly coinciding with the onset of tariff threats. This decline in consumer confidence can directly impact household demand, which is critical for economic stability.

Impact on Business Confidence

The analysis extends to business confidence, emphasizing its role in shaping hiring and investment decisions. A sharp decline in business sentiment globally is attributed to the uncertainties stemming from Trump’s tariffs. This widespread concern may further exacerbate fears of economic downturn.

Public Perception and Manipulation

The article appears to aim at fostering a sense of caution among readers regarding the state of the economy. By emphasizing the potential risks associated with tariffs and declining confidence, it may be steering public perception toward a more pessimistic view of future economic conditions. There is a subtle implication that the administration’s policies could have adverse consequences, which might suggest a critique of those policies.

Manipulation could be argued based on the language used, which emphasizes negative indicators while presenting a somewhat dire forecast. There is no overt targeting of specific groups, but the discussion of economic uncertainty may resonate more with economically vulnerable populations concerned about job security and financial stability.

Market Implications

The article could influence stock market reactions, particularly in sectors sensitive to consumer spending and business investment. Companies in retail, manufacturing, and services may experience volatility as investors react to the possibility of reduced consumer demand and economic slowdown.

Global Context and Relevance

In the broader context of global power dynamics, the article's focus on U.S. economic health is significant. Economic instability in the U.S. could have ripple effects on international markets and trade relations, especially given the interconnectedness of global economies. The discussion is timely as it relates to ongoing debates about trade policies and their implications for economic growth.

AI Involvement in Writing

While there is no explicit evidence within the article text to suggest the use of artificial intelligence in its composition, it is plausible that AI tools were employed in the drafting or editing process. The clarity of the analysis and the structured presentation of information could reflect AI assistance in organizing thoughts and data.

Overall, the article presents a credible assessment of the current economic landscape, leveraging various indicators to forecast potential outcomes. However, its language and emphasis may also serve to heighten concerns about the economic future, thus shaping public perception in a particular direction.

Unanalyzed Article Content

Imagine you are sailing a ship through dense fog, looking out for land. Your lookout spots species of birds typically found offshore. It now seems likely that you are approaching land, but it is impossible to know for sure until you see the coastline. If a US recession is land, the “birds” are already swooping into view. But these sightings offer no guarantees of what lies ahead, only probabilities.

An inverted yield curve, when the long-term interest rate falls to or below the short-term rate, is commonly considered to be a predictor of recession. The 10-year bond ratedidfall belowthe three-month Treasury rate in March, although the two are now at about the same level. In any case, the yield curve does not actually tell us much. It simply reflects financial market expectations that the US Federal Reserve might cut short-term interest rates in the future, which in turn reflects expectations that economic activity might falter.

Consumer confidence is a more direct indicator – particularly for predicting household demand. Two long-established measures of consumer confidence, conducted by theUniversity of Michiganandthe Conference Board, showed sharp declines in March, when Donald Trump’s tariff threats began to materialise. TheMichigan survey’s index of consumer sentiment, which has been falling since the start of the year,plummetedanother 11% on 11 April – well below theaveragein past recessions and thesecond-lowestlevel since records began in 1952.

The Federal Reserve Bank of New York’ssurvey of consumer expectationslikewise reports that households’ year-ahead expectations about their financial situations deteriorated in March. Similarly,business confidence– which guides firms’ hiring and investment decisions – “collapsed” on 4 April, not onlyin the USbutglobally, owing to uncertainty over Trump’s “reciprocal” tariffs.

In seeking to determine whether a recession is imminent, one might also look toprofessional forecasts, about 50 of which are aggregated by theBlue Chip Financial Forecasts. Two other sources that aggregate forecasts are theSurvey of Professional Forecastersand theWall Street Journal. On 17 April, the latter showed a mean forecast of 0.44% annualised for the first quarter, and much higher recession probabilities than at the start of the year. But the WSJ and SPF surveys are published only once a quarter and can become stale rapidly.

In any case, what people say may be less meaningful than where they put their money. Prediction markets tripled the odds they placed on recession after 3 March, when Trump applied 25% tariffs against Canada and Mexico, and 2 April, when he announced his “reciprocal tariffs.” As of 19 April, Polymarketshowsa 57% chance of recession in the coming year, and Kalshicomesin at 59% – about four times the level in a normal year (15%). If I had to look at only one type of estimate, it would probably be the prediction markets.

Forecasting a possible recession is one thing; identifying when one has already begun is another. Rather than telegraphing a downturn before it happens, theSahm rule recession indicatorsays that the economy is in recession if a three-month moving average of theunemployment raterises by at least 0.5 percentage points, relative to its lowest point from the previous 12 months. For now, the indicator does not signal a recession:unemploymentremains low by historical standards. But firms sometimes hold off on the decision to lay off workers in response to falling demand, especially in times of heightened uncertainty such as now, until after they have accumulated some unwanted inventory, and/or cut back on their output and workers’weekly hours.

A number of other early measures of actual economic activity can help us identify a recession. Purchasing managers’ indices (PMI) survey private sector firms to learn, for example, whether they have seen new orders rise or fall over the preceding month. The Institute for Supply Management’s USmanufacturing PMIfell to 49 in March. Readings below 50 indicate contraction.

The Census Bureau’sretail sales data– the earliest data on householdconsumptionto become available – are also revealing, since private consumption accounts for nearlytwo-thirdsof US GDP. The March report indicated continued growth, albeit driven largely by elevated motor vehicle sales to consumers who were trying to get ahead of impending tariffs.

Of course, the criterion that comes closest to defining a recession is a period of negative GDP growth (in most countries, lasting two consecutive quarters). But GDP is reported only quarterly, with a substantial lag (andit isoftenrevisedlater). So, “nowcasts” have emerged to provide real-time estimates of GDP, based on the most up-to-date relevant indicators, such as the PMI, industrial production, and retail sales. The estimate of first-quarter GDP growth by the most prominent US nowcast, the Atlanta Fed’sGDPNow, fell off a cliff at the end of February, from above +2% to below -2%. Even after adjusting for anunusual increasein gold imports, GDPNow shows a fall in growth to slightly below zero in April.

Whereas the birds that augur a recession offer no guarantees, the nowcast indicators can suggest that we may have arrived there. They can thus be thought of as clusters of rocks or shoals. But even then, they may or may not be attached to a larger landmass. In fact, even while the recession is under way, we do not know for sure that this is what we are experiencing.

Sign up toBusiness Today

Get set for the working day – we'll point you to all the business news and analysis you need every morning

after newsletter promotion

The officialarbiterof USrecessionsis the National Bureau of Economic Research’sBusiness Cycle Dating Committee, whichlooks atvariables likegross domestic output, real personal income (excluding social transfers), nonfarm payroll employment, real personal consumption expenditure, manufacturing and trade sales (adjusted for price changes), and industrial production. Only when all the data is in – typically a year or so after the fact – does the committee declare aturning point.

This does not help the sailor who is navigating through fog. Based on current information, I would put the odds of a US recession as high as 60% for the coming year – in line with prediction markets – and even higher for the next four years. While nothing is certain, we should not be surprised if we run aground.

Jeffrey Frankel is a professor of capital formation and growth at Harvard University. He served as a member of President Bill Clinton’s Council of Economic Advisers.

©Project Syndicate

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian