Is a River Alive? by Robert Macfarlane review – streams of consciousness

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"Robert Macfarlane Explores the Rights of Nature in 'Is a River Alive?'"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 7.4
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

In his latest work, "Is a River Alive?", Robert Macfarlane embarks on a journey through various landscapes, including Ecuador's cedar forests, to explore the profound question of whether rivers possess life and consciousness. His adventure leads him to a 30-foot waterfall where he immerses himself in the turbulent waters, feeling invigorated by the experience. This moment prompts deeper reflections about the essence of rivers and their status in the natural world. Macfarlane's inquiry is rooted in the broader context of the Rights of Nature movement, which began in Ecuador in 2008, recognizing the intrinsic value of natural entities. This movement has inspired similar legal frameworks in countries like New Zealand and India, where rivers have been granted personhood and protection as vital living entities. Macfarlane's narrative resonates with urgency as he highlights the global crisis facing rivers, marked by pollution, damming, and neglect. He laments the disconnection of younger generations from the once vibrant rivers, urging a revival of awareness and appreciation for these essential ecosystems.

Throughout his travels, Macfarlane encounters both the beauty and devastation of rivers. He describes his experiences in places like Chennai, where the River Adyar is plagued by pollution, and the Ennore Creek has been essentially erased from existence due to industrial development. These stark contrasts serve to underscore the urgency of his message. Macfarlane's writing is imbued with poetic language, capturing the splendor and plight of the natural world. He grapples with the philosophical implications of viewing rivers as living beings, balancing his rationalist upbringing with the wisdom of Indigenous perspectives that regard rivers as conscious entities. Ultimately, he finds solace and inspiration in the connections formed with others who share his passion for environmental conservation. The book culminates in a poignant realization of interconnectedness, leaving readers with a renewed sense of purpose to advocate for the rights of nature, not only for the sake of rivers but for humanity's own well-being. Macfarlane's journey is a call to action, reminding us of the vital relationship between people and the natural world.

TruthLens AI Analysis

The article presents a thought-provoking exploration of the concept of rivers as living entities, particularly through the lens of Robert Macfarlane's experiences in Ecuador. It raises philosophical questions about the nature of existence and the rights of nature, reflecting on the broader environmental crisis facing rivers globally. This discussion is timely, given the urgent ecological challenges and the emerging legal frameworks that recognize the rights of natural entities.

Purpose of the Article

The primary goal seems to be raising awareness about the environmental crises affecting rivers and advocating for their recognition as living entities. By referencing various legal advancements and the Rights of Nature movement, the article aims to inspire readers to reconsider their relationship with nature and promote a sense of responsibility towards environmental stewardship.

Public Perception and Emotional Appeal

The article seeks to evoke a sense of urgency and connection to the natural world among its readers. By highlighting the plight of rivers and the notion of “generational amnesia,” it aims to provoke feelings of nostalgia and concern for future generations. The use of vivid imagery and personal experience helps create an emotional bond, making the topic more relatable and impactful.

Omissions and Hidden Agendas

While the article is largely focused on environmental issues, it may downplay the complexities involved in the legal recognition of natural entities. The challenges faced by such movements, including opposition from industries reliant on river resources, are not deeply explored. This omission could suggest a desire to maintain a positive narrative around these legal developments without addressing the potential backlash and practical implications.

Truthfulness of the Article

The information presented appears to be well-researched, drawing on notable examples from different countries. However, the framing of certain issues may lean towards an idealistic perspective, potentially glossing over the practical challenges and ongoing debates surrounding the rights of nature.

Interconnectedness with Other News

The article connects with a broader discourse on environmental justice, ecological awareness, and the legal status of nature. It resonates with other recent news stories focusing on climate change, biodiversity loss, and grassroots movements advocating for sustainable practices. This interconnectedness suggests a growing recognition of environmental issues across various platforms.

Impact on Society and Economy

The article could influence public opinion and policy regarding environmental conservation and legal frameworks for nature. As awareness grows, there may be increased pressure on governments and corporations to adopt more sustainable practices. This could lead to significant shifts in environmental policy, affecting industries such as agriculture, tourism, and urban development.

Target Audience

The article likely appeals to environmentally conscious readers, activists, and individuals interested in legal and philosophical discussions about nature. It may particularly resonate with communities advocating for indigenous rights and those involved in environmental justice movements.

Market Implications

While the article's direct impact on stock markets may be limited, companies involved in sustainable practices or conservation efforts could benefit from a positive shift in public perception. Investors may increasingly seek to support environmentally friendly initiatives, potentially influencing market trends in favor of green technologies and sustainable industries.

Geopolitical Relevance

In a global context, the discussion of rivers as legal entities aligns with ongoing debates about climate change, resource management, and the rights of indigenous peoples. This issue is particularly relevant today as nations grapple with environmental challenges and the need for sustainable development.

Use of AI in Writing

It's possible that AI tools were utilized to assist in crafting the article, particularly in organizing information and generating engaging narratives. Text generation models may have influenced the writing style, contributing to a more fluid and engaging presentation of complex ideas.

In conclusion, the article effectively highlights critical environmental issues while encouraging a reevaluation of our relationship with nature. However, its idealistic framing may overlook some challenges associated with these emerging legal frameworks. Overall, the article is a valuable contribution to the ongoing discourse surrounding the rights of nature and environmental conservation.

Unanalyzed Article Content

Tracking a river through a cedar forest in Ecuador,Robert Macfarlanecomes to a 30ft-high waterfall and, below it, a wide pool. It’s irresistible: he plunges in. The water under the falls is turbulent, a thousand little fists punching his shoulders. He’s exhilarated. No one could mistake this for a “dying” river, sluggish or polluted. But that thought sparks others: “Is this thing I’m in reallyalive? By whose standards? By what proof? As for speaking to or for a river, or comprehending what a river wants – well, where would you even start?”

He’s in the right place to be asking. In September 2008, Ecuador, “this small country with a vast moral imagination”, became the first nation in the world to legislate on behalf of water, “since its condition as an essential element for life makes it a necessary aspect for existence of all living beings”. This enshrinement of the Rights of Nature set off similar developments in other countries. In 2017, a law was passed in New Zealand that afforded the Whanganui River protection as a “spiritual and physical entity”. In India, five days later, judges ruled that the Ganges and Yamuna should be recognised as “living entities”. And in 2021, the Mutehekau Shipu (AKA Magpie River) became the first river in Canada to be declared a “legal person [and] living entity”. The Rights of Nature movement has now reached the UK, with Lewes council in East Sussex recognising the rights and legal personhood of the River Ouse.

Macfarlane’s book is timely. Rivers are in crisis worldwide. They have been dammed, poisoned, reduced to servitude, erased from the map. In the UK, “a gradual, desperate calamity” has befallen them, with annual sewage dumps (recorded by a tracker calledTop of the Poops) at despicable levels. “Generational amnesia” means that young people don’t know what clean rivers are. Macfarlane wants them to revive – and to remind us of the interconnectedness of the human and natural world, as captured in a Māori proverb: “I am the river; the river is me.”

Many Indigenous communities believe that rivers are conscious, with souls, intelligence, even memory. Macfarlane is less a philosopher wrestling with notions of sentience and pan-psychism than he is a nature writer, the author of memorable books about mountains, landscape andunderworlds, as well as a celebrant of words (acorn, bluebell, kingfisher, otter, etc) he fears children no longer know. He’s also a dauntless traveller and in his new book records trips to India and Canada as well as Ecuador. To the question “Is a river alive?” he wants to answer as simply and resoundingly as his nine-year-old son did: yes! And he wills himself to believe it by granting rivers human pronouns: instead ofwhichorthat, “I prefer to speak of riverswhoflow”. But it’s a long journey, with many challenges along the way.

He begins with a modest outing, to the springs near his home in Cambridge which, in the summer of 2022, the hottest on record, have all but dried up. He’ll see what a dead river looks like in southern India but inEcuador’s cloud forest, Los Cedros, it’s a happier story: here’s water saved from “pollutocrats” by Ecuador’s progressive constitution. But not all is as secure as it ought to be. Andean forests and rivers have been wrecked by logging, farming and mining. And a young anti-mining activist, five months pregnant, has just been shot dead in the north of Ecuador.

Macfarlane, at least, is among allies. He meets eco-centric lawyers as well as a shambling, bearded castaway, Josef DeCoux, who has fought to protect the river and cloud forest for decades. He’s awed by their tireless resistance to corporate profiteering and feels companioned by the forest: “Lushness beyond imagination. Greenness beyond measure.”

His prose aspires to poetry throughout. Fireflies “score the dark like slow tracer bullets”. Flamingos “stand in their own reflections, doubled like playing-card queens, blushing the water pink”. Glow-worms “put tapers on their yellow lantern”. Shooting stars are “scratches on the world’s tin”. A half moon is a “clipped coin”. He so rarely falters in his “love-language” for the natural world that when he describes the sun, near Chennai, “rising red as a Coke can over the ocean” it feels bathetic. But bathos is the point: along with plastic bottles, turds and effluents, the Coke can is emblematic of a polluted coastline.

Chennaiis the most dispiriting of Macfarlane’s visits. The River Adyar, reeking and sewage-stricken, is “as close to death as any river I have seen in my life”. And the Ennore Creek, a site of heavy industry, hasn’t just been infilled, built over and surrendered to heavy industry, but has been erased from the official government map, as if it didn’t exist: annihilation cartography. Amid the toxins, hope for rivers is hard to find.

He is cheered by a trip to a lakeside waterbird sanctuary (“an avian Venice”) and by rescuing turtle eggs on a beach. Still, here and elsewhere doubts creep in. He’s a researcher, not an animist (the book has 50 pages of notes). Are Rights of Nature “an over-enchanted dream”? How compatible is the “stiff discourse’” of rights with a dashing, quicksilver river? “For those who, like me, have been largely raised on rationalism, to imagine a river is alive in a way that exceeds the sum of the lives it contains is difficult, counterintuitive work,” he says. “It requires unlearning, a process much harder than learning.”

Sign up toInside Saturday

The only way to get a look behind the scenes of the Saturday magazine. Sign up to get the inside story from our top writers as well as all the must-read articles and columns, delivered to your inbox every weekend.

after newsletter promotion

The unlearning comes in a remote region of Quebec when, before his epic 100-mile journey trekking and kayaking downstream, he’s instructed by Rita, an Innu poet, activist and sage: “Don’t think too much with your head … You will be transported by the river – who will speak through you.” So it does. When he and his companions go over scary rapids it’s as if he’s been “flooded from within”, the river flowing through him, a process mirrored in the prose, which rushes in long, ecstatic paragraphs that allow themselves commas but resist full stops. The river is under threat from damming but Macfarlane himself is released, surrendering agency to the water, pantheistically enraptured by “some vast and unknowable other life-way”.

“The river has great wisdom and whispers its secrets to the hearts of men,” Mark Twain said. It’s not just Macfarlane who bears this out but the three people he spends most time with on his travels: the eerily intuitive mycologist Giuliana in Ecuador, the geomancer Wayne in Canada and the ecologist Yuvan in India with his “ductile, fast-flowing mind”. All are grieving when they begin their journeys after the death of someone they loved. But the river consoles and even heals them: “I felt my power return,” Giuliana says.

Here’s another reason to fight for the Rights of Nature – not just to save rivers and forests, but to save ourselves. “The tale of a dying river / Does not end where you stand with the visitors / at a sickbed,” Ted Hughes wrote in his poetry collection River, four decades ago. The battle is to save rivers as living beings. Macfarlane’s impassioned book shows the way, ending on a riskily lyrical high with his arrival as a waterbody complete: “I am rivered.”

Is a River Alive? by Robert Macfarlane is published by Hamish Hamilton (£25). To support the Guardian, order your copy atguardianbookshop.com. Delivery charges may apply.

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian