Inside the plight of Blackburn Rovers: this is a call for football to do better | Rachel Dugdale

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"Blackburn Rovers' Self-Relegation Highlights Urgent Need for Reform in Women's Football"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 7.7
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

The recent decision by Blackburn Rovers to self-relegate from the Championship has sparked significant concern among players and advocates for women's football. Following a tumultuous season where the team operated on an extremely low budget, players were optimistic about proposed plans to meet new financial standards for the Women's Super League 2 (WSL2). Despite assurances from management about budget submissions and contract discussions, the atmosphere shifted dramatically just days before their final match, leading to a disheartening realization that the club was withdrawing support. The lack of communication from ownership has left players in uncertainty regarding their future, with many facing the possibility of needing to relocate for opportunities in a sport that is still struggling for stability and investment. This situation mirrors the issues faced by Reading Women last year, raising questions about accountability and the treatment of women's teams in professional football.

The call for reform in women's football is underscored by the need for better investment and support from club owners and governing bodies. The current landscape shows that many clubs are not prioritizing their women's teams, often viewing them as secondary to men's teams. This neglect is compounded by inadequate marketing efforts and a failure to engage fans, which ultimately leads to low attendance at matches. Advocates, including Rachel Dugdale, stress the importance of protecting women's football by ensuring that owners of clubs demonstrate a commitment to investing in their women's teams. With new minimum standards being introduced, there is hope for improvement, but the fragility of the women's game remains evident. As the women's Championship continues to grow, the demand for responsible ownership and long-term investment is critical to secure a sustainable future for aspiring athletes and the sport as a whole.

TruthLens AI Analysis

The article sheds light on the troubling situation faced by Blackburn Rovers, particularly in relation to the decision made by the club's owners to self-relegate from the Championship. The author, who previously experienced a similar scenario with Reading, emphasizes the emotional impact on the players and critiques the management's lack of transparency. The narrative reveals a disconnect between the club's leadership and its players, raising questions about accountability in football management.

Emotional Impact on Players

The piece highlights the feelings of betrayal and confusion among the players. They were led to believe that there were plans in place to meet the new standards set for the Women's Super League 2 (WSL2), only to find out that the situation had drastically changed at the last minute. This sudden shift not only affects their current standing but also their future prospects within the sport.

Critique of Management Decisions

The author challenges the decision-making process of the club's owners, pointing out the discrepancies between the financial resources allocated to the men's team versus the women's team. The call for a five to six-fold increase in budget for the women's team, against a backdrop of a £45 million budget for the men's team, underscores a systemic issue of inequality in funding and support within the same club.

Call for Change in Football Governance

Through this article, there is a broader call for football organizations to be more responsible and fair in their treatment of women’s teams. The narrative serves as a critique of how women's football is often sidelined and undervalued, and it pushes for greater support and resources to ensure equitable treatment.

Potential Consequences for the Community

The implications of this news extend beyond the club itself. It raises concerns about the future of women's football in England and the need for a shift in how clubs prioritize their women’s teams. If clubs continue to make unilateral decisions without input from players or staff, it could lead to a loss of trust and support from fans and the community, ultimately affecting attendance and sponsorships.

Target Audience and Support

This article is likely to resonate with fans of women's football, advocates for gender equality in sports, and those concerned about transparency in club management. It seeks to engage individuals who are passionate about the development of women's sports and the fair treatment of athletes.

Market Impact

While this news may not directly affect stock markets, it could influence sponsorship deals and investments in women's football. Clubs that do not prioritize their women's teams may find it challenging to attract sponsors or fans, ultimately impacting their financial health.

Global Context

The issues raised in this article reflect larger trends in sports governance and the treatment of women in various industries. The ongoing conversation surrounding gender equality in sports makes this topic relevant not just in the UK but globally.

Assessing the reliability of the article, it appears to be a credible account based on the personal experience of the author and the broader context of women's football. The emotional tone and firsthand observations lend authenticity, though it is important to consider potential biases stemming from the author's experiences.

Unanalyzed Article Content

Last year, I was advised to protect myself and not speak out when Reading’s owners made the decisionto self-relegate usfrom the Championship. I followed that advice. But after the confirmation that Blackburn Roversare taking the same path, I believe it’s time to speak out.

As players we were blindsided by the decision of the club to withdraw us from the Championship. We had felt positive throughout the season, we knew we had by far the lowest budget in the league but we felt like the underdogs going into every game, and so there was no pressure on us. It was a miracle we avoided relegation.

Right up until our last week of training, our manager and the general manager were telling us that the proposals for how the club would meet the new minimum standards being brought in for WSL2, the renamed Championship, next season had been put together. The club were supposedly submitting the minimum budget that would hit the new criteria. The budget would need to increase five-fold or six-fold from £100,000, but in the context of an alleged £45m budget for the men’s team that did not seem unreasonable.

On the Thursday before we played Newcastle in our final game of the season, the coaches were still feeling positive; the owners were set to come in for talks and to sign off on the plans, and one-to-one meetings with players had already been scheduled for Monday for discussions on contract extensions and each individual’s future.

I was a little more cautious than some of my teammates given this wasn’t my first time in limbo having been at Reading when the women’s team were withdrawn from the Championship last year. That it was all being left so late rang alarm bells. Sure enough, when we came back in on Saturday ahead of the final game, the tone had completely changed. The team talk for Sunday was all about how the dressing room was never going to look the same and that we were playing for ourselves and not the club.

The players clocked on to the fact that all wasn’t right at that point, but a week went past and we still had no news. Our one-to-ones were cancelled without any further information, and on the Monday of the public announcement of the withdrawal the owners called a meeting at short notice with the coaching staff telling them that it would be live within an hour. Our coach messaged us to tell us to jump on a call regarding what was going on.

We’ve had very little contact from the owners about their intentions since, bar a very basic last-minute email from HR. . We have no idea what the future looks like, what tier the club is going to enter in at or what redundancies there will be from a staffing point of view. We have so many unanswered questions and there is a lot of anxiety within the group.

This is not as an emotional response to one club but a call for football to do better and protect our game. This isn’t a one-off and, coming so soon after Reading’s situation, shows that change is needed. Not enough attention has been paid to how we can stop this from happening again. I want to protect the women’s game more than I want to protect myself.

Did Reading receive enough criticism last year? Should there have been sanctions? Did their actions make it acceptable for clubs like Blackburn to U-turn on their women’s teams and submit £0 budgets? Could they be encouraged or required to sell the women’s side to new investors rather than self-relegate? Reading Women had multiple offers to be bought out. There are legitimate investors out there who see the long-term potential in women’s sport. Outdated mentalities are holding us back and too much is being done to accommodate and keep owners happy. They are being allowed to make excuses as to why they won’t invest. Don’t get me wrong, for many that buy into men’s clubs the women’s team is an add on that comes with it. If you don’t care, step aside gracefully and let someone else invest the money, time, and passion. You can then miss out on the rewards.

And does the “fit and proper owners” test have a category for the women’s team? When owners pass this test to take on the men’s team is there any requirement for their intention to invest in the women’s team, because we are always the first thing to be sacrificed?

In the club statement, the fans were blamed for low attendance. But fans are frustrated with the owners – they aren’t attending the men’s games either. There’s also been a complete lack of investment in marketing and advertising for the women’s games. You can’t expect fans to turn up without a proper strategy. Emma Clark, head of commercial, worked tirelessly to bring in new sponsors, but her creativity and ambition were constantly restrained.

Blackburn’s academy has produced countless internationals, such as Ella Toone, Keira Walsh and Georgia Stanway. The next one now has no pathway to professional football. Talented girls will have to leave just to have a shot at progressing. That may mean traveling over an hour to places like Manchester, often during GCSEs or A-levels.

The minimum standards being brought in by WSL Football, the body in charge of the WSL and WSL2, are a positive step forward. They includes a minimum salary. For someone my age, that would be £27,000. This year, I was only paid £15,000 – less than minimum wage. Many of my teammates were on £9,000 or less. But because our training day was condensed, and we had to leave the ground after lunch, the hours just about kept it classed as “part-time” despite what can be considered full-time demands. These new rules will force owners to run women’s teams properly.

Sign up toMoving the Goalposts

No topic is too small or too big for us to cover as we deliver a twice-weekly roundup of the wonderful world of women’s football

after newsletter promotion

Another improvement: this year, the deadline for decisions regarding self-relegation was brought forward. We’re finding out in May, not July, as was the case at Reading. That gives players and staff more time to find new clubs and allows the league time to replace us in order to maintain 12 teams. Last year’s late decision left the league with an odd number.

Despite it all, the Championship – WSL2 – is growing every year, Newcastle versus Sunderland had a record attendance of 38,502 while clubs like London City and Birmingham have budgets over a £1m already.

Saying this, the women’s game remains fragile. We need owners and investors who see the long-term gain and are willing to risk their time and money on something truly special. You can’t under-invest, neglect the team, and then expect to profit when the sport becomes more lucrative. Either invest – or let someone else do it properly.

This is an expanded version of a call to action posted on LinkedIn by Rachel Dugdale

If you have any questions or comments about any of our newsletters please emailmoving.goalposts@theguardian.com.

This is an extract from our free weekly email, Moving the Goalposts. To get the full edition,visit this page and follow the instructions. Moving the Goalposts is back in to its twice-weekly format, delivered to your inboxes every Tuesday and Thursday.

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian