‘I’m paranoid all the time’: surveillance and fear in a city of immigrants as White House ramps up deportations

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"Immigrants in New York Face Increased Surveillance Amid Heightened Deportation Efforts"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 5.7
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

Juan, a Colombian asylum seeker, arrived in New York two months ago with his teenage daughter, fleeing death threats. However, his first day at a construction job was marred by the bulky GPS ankle monitor strapped to his leg, which drew unwanted attention from his employer. The manager's reaction, advising Juan to return once he resolved his immigration status, left him feeling criminalized and anxious. Juan's experience reflects the broader plight of over 12,000 immigrants in New York enrolled in Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) programs such as Alternatives to Detention (ATD) and the Intensive Supervision Appearance Program (ISAP). These individuals, primarily asylum seekers from Central and South America, live under constant surveillance despite having no criminal records, navigating a heavily backlogged immigration court system that adds to their stress and instability.

Genesis, a 25-year-old from Panama, shares a similar story, having worn an ankle monitor for over 18 months. She faces stigma in her community, where other parents avoid her son due to her monitoring status. The ATD-ISAP program, while purportedly a more humane alternative to detention, imposes significant burdens on participants, including the discomfort of the monitoring devices and the anxiety of sudden check-ins or office appointments that disrupt their daily lives. The heightened enforcement climate, exacerbated by the Trump administration's policies, has increased the surveillance of undocumented immigrants, leading to widespread fear within immigrant communities. As local businesses report declining customers and community support groups adapt to heightened anxiety, the impacts of surveillance extend beyond those monitored, creating a pervasive atmosphere of fear and uncertainty among immigrant populations in New York City. Despite the challenges, immigrants like Juan and Genesis hold onto hope for a better future, striving for stability and safety for their families amidst the overwhelming reality of their circumstances.

TruthLens AI Analysis

The article highlights the experiences of immigrants in New York who are subjected to constant surveillance through electronic monitoring systems like ankle bracelets. This situation arises as they seek asylum from life-threatening circumstances in their home countries, such as Colombia and Panama. The piece delves into the psychological toll of this surveillance, revealing feelings of paranoia and stigma associated with being monitored while navigating the complexities of the U.S. immigration system.

Purpose Behind the Publication

The intention of this article appears to be to shed light on the human rights implications of current immigration policies, specifically the use of surveillance technology on individuals who are already vulnerable. By sharing personal stories, the article aims to evoke empathy and highlight the often-overlooked struggles of asylum seekers. This is indicative of a broader advocacy for immigration reform and the protection of immigrant rights.

Public Perception and Sentiment

The narrative constructed in the article is designed to foster a sense of compassion for immigrants while simultaneously critiquing the punitive measures of surveillance. It portrays immigrants not as criminals but as individuals fleeing violence and seeking a better life for their families. This portrayal is likely to resonate with progressive audiences, particularly those concerned with social justice and human rights.

Potential Omissions or Concealments

While the article focuses on the personal experiences and emotional impacts of surveillance, it may omit broader discussions about the legal and political frameworks that enable such practices. By concentrating on individual narratives, it risks simplifying complex systemic issues related to immigration policy. The emphasis on personal stories may also divert attention from the responsibilities of the U.S. government in addressing the root causes of immigration and asylum-seeking.

Manipulative Aspects of the Article

The article employs emotional language and personal anecdotes to create a sense of urgency and moral obligation towards immigrants. This could be interpreted as a form of manipulation, as it seeks to provoke a specific emotional response from readers. The choice of words and the framing of immigrants’ experiences aim to elicit sympathy and support for their plight, potentially influencing public opinion and policy discussions.

Trustworthiness of the Report

The reliability of the article hinges on its sourcing and representation of immigrant experiences. While personal stories provide valuable insights, they must be contextualized within broader data and trends regarding immigration. The lack of statistical backing or expert commentary may affect the perceived credibility of the claims made. However, the alignment of the stories with known issues in immigration policy does lend some credibility to the narrative.

Societal and Economic Implications

The issues highlighted in the article could have significant implications for society and politics. As public awareness of the challenges faced by immigrants grows, there may be increased pressure on policymakers to reform immigration laws and practices. This could lead to a shift in public policy towards more humane treatment of asylum seekers, potentially affecting the political landscape and social dynamics in the U.S.

Target Audience and Community Support

This article is likely to resonate with communities advocating for immigrant rights, social justice, and human rights. It appeals to those who are empathetic towards the struggles of marginalized groups and aim to support movements for reform. Conversely, it may not appeal to audiences with opposing views on immigration, who may perceive such articles as biased or overly sympathetic.

Impact on Markets and Financial Sectors

While the article primarily addresses social issues, any significant shifts in immigration policy could have economic implications, particularly for sectors that rely on immigrant labor. Increased support for immigrant rights could boost industries that depend on a diverse workforce, potentially impacting stock prices in those sectors.

Global Context and Relevance

The themes discussed in the article are increasingly relevant in today’s global political climate, where migration and asylum seeking are contentious issues in many countries. As nations grapple with the influx of immigrants and changing demographics, the article serves as a reminder of the human stories behind these statistics, emphasizing the need for a compassionate approach to immigration.

Use of Artificial Intelligence in Writing

It is plausible that AI tools may have been employed in drafting or editing the article, particularly in organizing data or generating language. However, the emotional depth and personal anecdotes suggest a human touch in the storytelling. If AI were involved, it might have influenced the structure and clarity of the narrative but less so the emotional resonance of the personal stories shared.

Overall Assessment of Manipulation

While the article effectively raises awareness about critical issues affecting immigrants, its emotional framing and focus on individual experiences may also invoke a degree of manipulation. The language used is designed to engage readers on an emotional level, potentially steering public sentiment in a particular direction.

The article serves as a poignant reminder of the struggles faced by many immigrants in the U.S. today, highlighting both their humanity and the need for systemic change in immigration policy.

Unanalyzed Article Content

Two months after fleeing death threats in Colombia, Juan landed a construction job inNew York. But on his first day, the bulky GPS monitor strapped to his ankle caught the manager’s attention. It wouldn’t fit inside standard work boots. The boss shook his head. “Come back when you’ve resolved your status,” he said.

Since arriving in the US with his teenage daughter to seek asylum, Juan has lived in a state of constant anxiety. “It feels like I committed a crime, like they’re going to arrest me at any moment,” he said, speaking near the migrant shelter where they now live in Queens. Juan started wearing oversized pants to hide the monitor, a style he finds uncomfortable. “I’m paranoid all the time,” he said.

Genesis, a 25-year-old from Panama, lives in the same shelter as Juan with her two-year-old. She has worn an ankle monitor for more than 18 months. “When I go to the park with my son, other parents don’t want their kids to play with him,” she said. The stigma of the monitor, she added, makes her feel like a bad mother. Genesis fled after members ofTren de Aragua, a transnational criminal group from Venezuela, threatened her life there, she said.

Juan and Genesis are among the more than 12,000 immigrants in New York enrolled in Immigration and Customs Enforcement (Ice) schemes called Alternatives to Detention (ATD) and the Intensive Supervision Appearance Program (ISAP).

Most of them are asylum seekers from Central or South America who came to the city seeking safety and the chance to work, according to a recent report from the American Bar Association, a national group of lawyers. They don’t have any criminal convictions, yet without legal status, they live under constant surveillance as their cases wend their way through the badly backed-upUS immigrationcourt system.

Under ATD-ISAP, people can be monitored through GPS ankle bracelets, wrist-worn trackers, telephone check-ins or a mobile app called SmartLINK.

The number of undocumented people under electronic monitoring related to their lack of immigration status alone is believed to have more than doubled since 2021, when the number in the USwasabout 85,000, according to theTransactional Records Access Clearinghouse (Trac)at Syracuse University, although the organization “advises the publicto be extremely cautious” about data on this from Ice.

Ice’s internal budget for ATD-ISAP has increased from $28m in 2006 to nearly $470m by the end of 2024.

While attention in the second Trump administration has been ondetention and deportation, electronic monitoring is still a significant factor in many immigrants’ lives and has beenincreasingly so in recent years.

Ice promotes ATD-ISAP as a “humane and cost-effective” alternative to detention, but while it is certainly better than being locked up, lawyers and advocates argue it embeds unnecessary state control into homes, workplaces and public spaces, trapping people in cycles of fear, stigma and instability.

Those assigned body-worn monitors often report skin irritation, discomfort and the need for frequent charging. When the battery runs low, the device emits a loud alert that draws unwanted attention. “People made comments while I was working at McDonald’s. I’m not a criminal,” Genesis said. Even routine activities like showering can trigger connectivity issues, leading to phone calls from ISAP officers or sudden demands for in-person check-ins.

SmartLINK, by contrast, requires participants to submit geotagged selfies, typically once a week, rather than being tracked continuously throughout the day.

ATD-ISAP is managed byBI Incorporated, a subsidiary of theprivate prison giant Geo Group. In 2020, Donald Trump’s first administration awarded the company a five-year, $2.2bn contract.

Regardless of the type of surveillance assigned, participants remain under acute risk of arrest and deportation. Some have started the asylum application process; others came relatively recentlyfrom Texaswhen that statewas bussingasylum seekers to Democratic-led cities, and so far are merely trying to find their footing, perhaps a lawyer and some advice about starting the process to get papers and a work permit.

They are expected to report in person to the ISAP office with little notice. The office is located in a basement near Ice’s 26 Federal Plaza headquarters in lower Manhattan. Appointments are usually scheduled during working hours, forcing many to miss work, arrange childcare or lose out on daily wages, all while being in terror of arrest and summary detention.

On weekday mornings, people can be seen lining up outside the building while anxious loved ones wait nearby. “It’s very difficult to have a normal life,” said a man from Guatemala whose wife has been monitored for three years. He asked to remain anonymous. “We can’t even leave the city,” he added.

Some people enrolled in the ADP program were arrested amid record enforcement earlier this week,NBC reported, in a nationalramping-upof effortson the ordersof senior Trump administration officials, including in New York.

The effects of surveillance aren’t limited to those being tracked. Entire neighborhoods are feeling its presence.

Liliana Torres, a psychologist who offers weekly mental health support in Spanish to newly arrived immigrants, said that cameras, patrol cars and even the sound of sirens regularly spark panic among her clients. “Everyday elements of the city become triggers,” she said.

Sign up toThis Week in Trumpland

A deep dive into the policies, controversies and oddities surrounding the Trump administration

after newsletter promotion

This fear is especially felt in areas of the city such as Corona, home to New York’s largest Latin American immigrant community. Local business owners reported a noticeable drop in customers the first few months of theTrump administration.

“People think they’re going to take all of us,” said a nail salon worker who asked to remain anonymous due to concerns around her legal status. “But we can’t afford to stay home. We have to work.”

Vendors at Corona Plaza say police presence has increased in recent months, especially since the launch of Operation Roosevelt last fall, a citywide crackdown on unlicensed vending and sex work. The measures disproportionately affected undocumented residents. Neighbors and advocates worry the heightened enforcement signals deeper coordination between the New York police department and federal immigration authorities.

“There’s a noticeable uptick in the use of digital surveillance tools, including social media monitoring and data-sharing with local agencies,” said Veronica Cardenas, an immigration attorney who left her role as an Ice prosecutor in 2023 after witnessing first-hand the treatment immigrants receive. “More people who would have previously been considered low priority are now at risk.”

Fear spreads online, too. “We see people on TikTok saying Ice is coming when it isn’t,” said Niurka Meléndez, founder of Venezuelans and Immigrants Aid (VIA), a volunteer-run group that connects asylum seekers to legal and social services. “Or worse, spreading confusion about immigration law.”

VIA has been leading a regular event called Miracle Mondays at the St Paul & St Andrew United Methodist church in Manhattan since 2022. Once considered sanctuary spaces, churches are no longer off limits to Ice, prompting VIA to take extra precautions. Event locations are now shared privately via WhatsApp, rather than being posted publicly on social media.

In response to growing fears, the Venezuelan-led group has also started organizing legal clinics in neighborhoods such as Corona to reach those too afraid to attend the church. At one such event in March, dozens of Latin American migrants gathered to ask lawyers from the New York Legal Assistance Group how they could regularize their immigration status.

“If I give birth here and they deport me, will they keep my baby?” asked Stefani, a Venezuelan woman eight months pregnant. One lawyer responded cautiously, explaining that while she would have the right to bring her baby with her, the government can still act in ways that disregard the law. Lawyers also handed out one-page notices saying that individuals with pending asylum cases cannot be detained without due process.

Local community groups such as Ice Watch have adapted to this new climate by educating communities about their rights. Ice Watch tracks immigration enforcement and sends real-time alerts via encrypted Signal chats across the five boroughs. Its members also conduct training to teach people how to recognize Ice agents, document encounters and support those being targeted. Social workers, English teachers activists and small business owners are often among those who attend.

For Juan, who fled Colombia after gang members shot his father in the head, life in New York has come at the cost of constant paranoia and a sense that genuine safety remains out of reach. His 16-year-old daughter notices everything. “She sees how I live and blames herself,” he said. At times, they’ve talked about returning to Colombia, but the risk of being kidnapped and tortured by mobsters is very real for him and his family.

“I fear something worse than death could happen if I go back,” Juan said.

Despite the stress, he holds on to small signs of progress, such as watching his daughter attend school and slowly but steadily pick up English. “I need to give her at least the option to have a better life than I had,” he said.

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian