I’m a woman of 48 – and as replaceable in the office as the swivel chair at my desk | Nilanjana Bhowmick

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"The Intersection of Ageism and Gender Discrimination in the Workplace for Women Over 45"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 7.8
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

In a candid reflection on her experiences as a 48-year-old woman in the workforce, Nilanjana Bhowmick highlights the challenges posed by ageism and gender discrimination, particularly in India. She shares her frustrations during a recent job search, noting that many women in her age group face similar hurdles, often feeling compelled to lower their salary expectations to secure employment. Bhowmick recounts her own experience of accepting a significant pay cut to retain a position, only to realize that her age rendered her as replaceable as office furniture. She introduces the concept of 'menopenalisation,' where ageism intersects with menopause, further complicating the professional landscape for women over 45. This phenomenon is exacerbated by the lack of nuanced data on how many women have left their jobs due to this double penalty, which often leads to their exclusion from leadership roles during a critical period in their careers.

Bhowmick emphasizes that menopause typically begins around age 47 in India, coinciding with a crucial phase for women in leadership. Citing research, she points out that many women consider reducing their work hours or retiring early due to the physical and emotional symptoms associated with menopause, leading to a loss of experienced professionals in the workforce. She argues for a supportive work environment that accommodates the needs of older women, advocating for flexible hours and considerate leave policies. Despite her personal struggles with perimenopause, Bhowmick remains productive, having authored multiple books and launched a website aimed at addressing women's health and leadership issues. She calls on women to speak out against discrimination related to their reproductive timelines and urges for systemic changes in workplace policies that prioritize the inclusion and support of older women, challenging the notion that experience and age make them less capable or hireable.

TruthLens AI Analysis

The article addresses the challenges faced by women in their late 40s in the workplace, particularly highlighting the intersection of ageism and gender discrimination. The personal anecdotes shared by the author, Nilanjana Bhowmick, resonate with many women who experience similar frustrations in their careers. It sheds light on the broader societal implications of these issues and aims to foster a conversation about ageism, particularly as it relates to menopause.

Gender and Age Discrimination

Bhowmick emphasizes the unique struggles women face regarding age discrimination, coining the term "menopenalisation" to describe how menopause exacerbates the challenges of being an older woman in the workforce. This insight pushes readers to consider the additional layers of difficulty that women encounter compared to their male counterparts. The mention of statistics, such as the low percentage of women in senior leadership roles in India, underscores the systemic nature of the problem.

Cultural Context

The article reflects on the specific cultural dynamics in India, where menopause typically begins earlier than the global average. This context is critical in understanding the experiences of Indian women in the workforce and the potential reasons for their diminishing presence in decision-making roles. By highlighting the lack of nuanced data on this topic, Bhowmick calls for more research and awareness regarding the effects of age and gender on women's careers.

Public Sentiment and Community Impact

The narrative aims to resonate with a specific demographic: older working women. By sharing personal experiences, the article seeks to validate the feelings of many who may feel marginalized in their professional lives. This connection to the audience can foster a sense of community and support among women facing similar struggles, potentially leading to collective action or advocacy for change.

Economic and Political Consequences

While the article primarily focuses on individual experiences, the broader implications of these issues could affect the economy and workplace dynamics. If a significant portion of the workforce is sidelined due to age and gender discrimination, it can lead to a loss of valuable experience and insight in leadership positions. This could have long-term effects on organizational performance and economic growth.

Market and Investment Considerations

Though the article does not directly address market implications, it raises awareness about a demographic that is often overlooked in corporate structures. Companies that prioritize diversity and inclusion may benefit from a broader talent pool, suggesting that businesses could see advantages in investment and market performance by addressing these issues.

Global Power Dynamics

The issues highlighted in the article contribute to a larger global conversation about gender equality and women's rights in the workplace. As conversations around equity and diversity gain momentum, the insights shared can inform policy discussions and initiatives aimed at improving conditions for women in the workforce.

The article does not appear to utilize artificial intelligence in its writing, as it presents personal narratives and subjective experiences rather than data-driven analysis. The storytelling approach is aligned with traditional editorial practices, aiming to evoke empathy and provoke thought rather than manipulate.

In summary, the article is a poignant commentary on the intersection of gender, age, and workplace dynamics, highlighting the urgent need for societal change. The author's personal experiences serve as a microcosm of a larger issue, calling for awareness and action.

Unanalyzed Article Content

“If I take another pay cut, I might as well start working pro bono,” I joked with a friend recently, during another brutal round of job hunting in my home-city, Delhi. She, in her early 40s, laughed and said: “I feel the same.”

A few weeks later, I had deja vu on a call with another writer friend in her early 40s. “I’m tired of trying to find a job that pays what I’m worth. No one will hire me unless I drop my expectations to entry level,” she lamented.

I have done that, too. In my last full-time role, I took a 50% pay cut – the alternative was losing the job. So I accepted it, thinking of how I would dazzle them and soon influence them to raise my salary. I forgot one crucial factor – as a 48-year-old woman, I was as replaceable as the swivel chair at my desk.

If I had known that my shelf life ended when I turned 45, I would have been more amenable – and taken up one of those jobs that devalued me even further.

There is a need to look at the gender aspect of the age penalty – because for women, ageism coincides with their menopause. It is what I call a “menopenalisation”. Many, like me, who have managed to make it through the marriage penalty and the child penalty, are now caught in the age penalty – right when we are also struggling with menopausal blues.

Over the past five years, I have worked in teams where my colleagues were a decade younger or more. So where did all the women of my age go? InIndia, menopause typically begins about age 47, earlier than theglobal average of 51– the age a working woman would typically be in middle or senior leadership.

According to areport by LinkedIn and the Quantum Hub, the percentage of women in senior leadership roles in India was 18.3% in 2024.

But there is a lack of nuanced data on this issue inIndia. For instance, how many of the 260 million working-age women not in decision-making roles have quit due to menopenalisation, or have been sidelined due to the false perception that menopause makes them less capable?

Global data might shed some light. A2022 survey of American women aged 40 to 55found that nearly a third considered switching from full-time to part-time work, and 22% were considering early retirement. Another survey from the UK showed that18% of women going through menopausewere thinking about quitting altogether. In 2015, a UK government report suggested thattalent progression for women stops when they are about 45.

There is little doubt that many women in their late 40s or early 50s – prime years for leadership – are leaving the workforce because of menopenalisation. Physical and emotional symptoms such as hot flushes, brain fog or anxiety are being used to dismiss them as less capable during this phase of life. It is a deadly combination of ageism and the menopause penalty.

What women need at this time is a supportive work environment that offers flexible hours and considerate leave policies, not one that takes advantage of this life stage to provide less favourable conditions. The age penalty is not just a personal crisis for each of us, but a collective failure.

I have been in perimenopause for a few years now. And yes, I struggle with sudden hot flushes, spiralling anxiety over the most mundane things, sudden car sickness and inexplicable depressive episodes.

But it has not taken away my skills and my productivity. I am at my creative peak – I wrote two books while in perimenopause, and another two are slated for next year. I recently launched a website calledWednesday, a one-stop destination for information on various aspects of women’s lives, including caregiving, work, leadership and health, including information on menstrual health and menopause – taboo topics in India.

I have done all this while feeling oddly unwell some days, with inexplicable pains and aches, and sudden brain fogs – sometimes all at once. I am still here and still productive, but I am apparently unhirable.

Women need to be more vocal about discrimination around their reproductive timeline. We need policies that protect older women in the workforce and leadership pipelines that do not just look like boys’ clubs with a token woman thrown in. We need workplaces that are sensitive to women’s needs at various stages of their reproductive lives. Above all, we need to stop allowing ourselves to be exploited for being experienced, knowledgable and, yes, older.

Nilanjana Bhowmick is awriter based inDelhi, India

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian