If aid doesn’t enter Gaza now, 14,000 babies may die. UN peacekeepers must step in | Michael Fakhri

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"UN Calls for Humanitarian Intervention as Gaza Faces Severe Crisis"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 6.0
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

On Monday, Israel commenced a significant ground offensive dubbed Operation Gideon’s Chariots, aimed at establishing full control over Gaza. This escalation follows a recent ruling by the International Court of Justice, which deemed Israel's occupation of Palestinian territories illegal and called for an immediate cessation of hostilities along with reparations for Palestinians. The humanitarian situation in Gaza has deteriorated drastically, with Israel having blocked all food, water, and supplies for over 75 days. Reports indicate a staggering 80% increase in child acute malnutrition since March, and the cost of basic food items, such as wheat flour, has skyrocketed by 3,000%. The World Food Programme recently ran out of food supplies, and without immediate aid, it is estimated that 14,000 Palestinian babies could perish due to starvation and lack of resources.

Israel's actions are viewed as a continuation of a strategy that weaponizes hunger against civilians, a tactic employed since 2000. The Israeli government has linked the provision of humanitarian aid to the release of hostages by Hamas, despite international laws prohibiting the use of aid as leverage. Recent efforts to deliver aid have been minimal, with only a fraction of the supplies needed reaching Gaza. The UN has criticized Israel's proposed aid plan as a means to control and limit assistance, potentially exacerbating the humanitarian crisis. The international community's response has been tepid, with calls for action from the UN Security Council largely unheeded due to U.S. veto power. In light of these circumstances, there is a growing call for the UN General Assembly to intervene and deploy peacekeepers to facilitate humanitarian aid delivery into Gaza, aiming to alleviate the suffering of the 2.3 million Palestinians currently enduring severe deprivation and starvation.

TruthLens AI Analysis

The article reports on the dire humanitarian situation in Gaza amid escalating violence from Israel, particularly highlighting the consequences for vulnerable populations, such as infants. It emphasizes the urgent need for humanitarian aid and critiques the Israeli government for its blockade and military actions, framing them as violations of international law.

Humanitarian Crisis and Urgency for Aid

The article outlines the severe consequences of the ongoing blockade, stating that 14,000 babies are at risk of dying without immediate aid. This stark statistic serves to evoke a sense of urgency and moral obligation for the international community to intervene. By providing these figures, the author aims to galvanize support for humanitarian efforts and raise awareness regarding the plight of civilians in Gaza.

Legal and Ethical Implications

The piece references international legal frameworks, suggesting that Israel's actions constitute war crimes, particularly in using starvation as a weapon. This framing positions the issue not just as a humanitarian crisis, but as a legal and ethical one, calling into question the legitimacy of the Israeli government's actions and the complicity of other nations, especially the United States. The mention of the International Criminal Court adds weight to the argument, appealing to a broader audience that values international law.

Public Perception and Mobilization

By detailing the historical context of the blockade and military actions, the article seeks to shape public perception and foster a sense of urgency for action. It is likely aimed at audiences sympathetic to humanitarian causes, particularly those who advocate for Palestinian rights. The language used is emotive and designed to provoke a reaction, suggesting that the author wishes to mobilize public opinion against the current policies.

Potential Manipulation and Bias

While the article presents factual information, the emotive language and focus on specific statistics may indicate a bias, as it primarily portrays the Israeli actions in a negative light without equally discussing any potential complexities or differing perspectives on the conflict. This could lead to an oversimplified narrative that may not fully capture the intricacies of the situation.

Impact on Society and Politics

The implications of such reporting could be significant, potentially influencing public opinion and policy decisions regarding humanitarian aid and foreign relations. If the narrative gains traction, it may lead to increased pressure on governments to act, change in funding allocations, or even shifts in international diplomatic relations.

Global Market Reactions

In terms of economic impact, news portraying humanitarian crises often leads to fluctuations in markets, especially those related to defense, humanitarian aid, and international relations. Companies involved in these sectors may see changes in stock prices based on public and governmental response to the crisis.

Geopolitical Context

The situation in Gaza is part of a larger geopolitical landscape, and such articles serve to highlight ongoing tensions in the region. This narrative connects with broader discussions about human rights and international law, showing the potential for these events to influence global power dynamics.

Use of AI in Reporting

There is a possibility that AI tools were utilized to aggregate data or generate certain aspects of the report, particularly in the statistical presentation. However, the emotive language and critical tone suggest a human touch in crafting the narrative, which could be aimed at eliciting specific responses from the audience.

Considering the various aspects of the article, it presents a compelling narrative that seeks to inform and mobilize readers. However, the potential for bias and manipulation through language is present, urging readers to approach the content thoughtfully.

Unanalyzed Article Content

On Monday, Israel launched an intensive ground offensive named Operation Gideon’s Chariots as part of itsplan to cause as much pain and damageas possible to everyone in Gaza. Israel hasannounced its intentto gain full indefinite control over Gaza, in effect aiming for annexation. This was after the international court of justice found Israel’soccupation of Palestinian territory illegaland demanded it end its occupation as rapidly as possible and provide full reparations to Palestinians.

Israel’s increased violence in the Occupied Palestinian Territory also comes after it denied all food, water and supplies from entering Gaza for over 75 days. In March,child acute malnutritionincreased by more than 80%. The price of wheat flour hasincreased by 3,000%since February. The World Food Programmeran out of foodfor kitchens in Gaza on 25 April and the World Central Kitchenclosed its operationson 7 May. If adequate aid does not enter Gaza immediately,14,000 Palestinian babies may die.

None of this is new, since Israel has been using hunger as a weapon against civilians in Gazasince 2000. When BenjaminNetanyahu announcedon 1 March that the “entry of all goods & supplies to the Gaza Strip [would] be halted”, he was flagrantly defying international law – snubbing the international criminal court warrant calling for his arrest for the war crime of starvation and the international court of justice provisional measures in March 2024 recognizing that famine and starvation was rampant in Gaza, creating a risk of genocide. Israeli officials, along with theUS ambassador to Israel, Mike Huckabee, have conditioned the provision of humanitarian relief to Palestinian civilians on Hamas’s release of hostages. Whilehostage-taking is bannedunder international law, there is no situation in which humanitarian aid to civilians can be used as a bargaining chip.

Last week, Hamas released Edan Alexander, the last living US citizen that they held. Soon after, on Monday, with Israel’s permission, the UN arranged fornine trucks to go to Gaza, followed by another 93 trucks on Tuesday.

This is welcome but still amounts to almost nothing. Before October 2023, 50% of people inGazawere hungry and 80% relied on humanitarian relief – and this was when 500 trucks of supplies were coming in every day. After 19 months of a starvation campaign, Palestinians in Gaza need a lot more than 500 trucks a day.

Israel has put forward an aid plan for Gaza that has beendescribed by the UN secretary generalas not based on international legal principles of humanity, impartiality, independence and neutrality but rather a system of “controlling and callously limiting aid down to the last calorie and grain of flour”.

Israel’s aid plan is designed to forcibly displace and concentrate Palestinians into southern Gaza all under the close screening and surveillance of mercenaries or Israeli armed forces. The UN has described the plan as a “military strategy” and a “deliberate attempt to weaponize aid”. Unicef has said that Israel is using aid as “bait” to lure civilians into militarized zones, forcing civilians to choose between “displacement and death”.

Last week,Tom Fletcher, under secretary general for humanitarian affairs and emergency relief coordinator,briefed the UN security councilon the humanitarian situation and the protection of aid workers in Gaza. Fletcher was very clear: “Israel is deliberately and unashamedly imposing inhumane conditions on civilians in the Occupied Palestinian Territory.” He described the Israeli-designed aid plan plainly: “It practically excludes many, including people with disabilities, women, children, the elderly, the wounded … It makes aid conditional on political and military aims. It makes starvation a bargaining chip. It is cynical sideshow. A deliberate distraction. A fig leaf for further violence and displacement.”

The US may be taking over the aid plan in Israel. The US government operation will be run by a private foundation, theGaza Humanitarian Foundation, and supported by Israeli military protection. This private foundation isopaquewith no clear details about its source of funding or how it will operate in Gaza. Regardless of who runs it, this “made in Israel” plan has beenrejected by the UNand has been determined by UN-supported experts to be a plan that willnot prevent famine. All this while hundreds of UN humanitarian trucks are at the Gaza borders ready to enter and take advantage of the long-standing relief networks. Recently, when an unarmed civilian ship tried to bring humanitarian aid into Gaza, it wasbombed by a dronein international waters in the Mediterranean Sea.

While Israel’s brutality and the US’s callousness aligns with their public statements, the international response has been slow and ghastly. On Monday, the UK, France, and Canadastated: “If Israel does not cease the renewed military offensive and lift its restrictions on humanitarian aid, we will take further concrete actions in response.” On Tuesday, the UK suspended trade negotiations with Israel. For 19 months I haveclosely followed the situation in Gaza, bearing witness to how 1 million children in Gaza have been starved by Israel. At this point, unsubstantiated political threats and suspended trade negotiations ring hollow.

Fletcher called upon the security council to act now to prevent genocide. But the security council is predictably debilitated by the US veto. What is to be done?

When the security council fails to act to a threat of peace or security because of veto, the UN charter empowers the UN general assembly to step in through what’s called the “Uniting for Peace” provision. Under this provision, the general assembly can pass a resolution calling for UN peacekeepers to accompany humanitarian convoys and deliver the necessary aid into Gaza, regardless of Israel’s plans and permissions. The UN general assembly must break the illegal blockade and stop the starvation of 2.3 million Palestinians.

Michael Fakhri is a UN special rapporteur on the right to food

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian