If Keir Starmer is not robotic enough for you, his AI twin is ready for your questions

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"New AI Model Nostrada Allows Users to Engage with Digital Twins of UK MPs"

If Keir Starmer is not robotic enough for you, his AI twin is ready for your questions analysis cover image The Guardian 7.5
Image Source: https://i.guim.co.uk/img/media/e0eadc9472e546632496d024f81cfe027d924cb1/76_0_2028_1622/master/2028.jpg?width=1200&height=630&quality=85&auto=format&fit=crop&overlay-align=bottom%2Cleft&overlay-width=100p&overlay-base64=L2ltZy9zdGF0aWMvb3ZlcmxheXMvdGctZGVmYXVsdC5wbmc&enable=upscale&s=74d95977e2577a0e094fccdfb4d33e02
Original Article Source: https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2025/may/18/if-keir-starmer-is-not-robotic-enough-for-you-his-ai-twin-is-ready-for-your-questions
View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 7.5
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

A new AI model named Nostrada has been developed by Leon Emirali, a former chief of staff to a Tory minister, allowing users to engage in conversations with AI versions of each of the UK’s 650 Members of Parliament (MPs). This initiative aims to provide insights into each MP's political stances and mannerisms, offering a digital twin for diplomats, lobbyists, and the general public. Emirali emphasizes that politicians are a rich data source for training these AI models due to their extensive and varied opinions on numerous issues. The AI's ability to simulate conversations is based on a vast collection of written and spoken material from politicians available online, although its accuracy and reliability have been called into question, particularly by the politicians themselves. For instance, when asked about potential successors to Keir Starmer, many digital twins declined to respond, highlighting limitations in the AI’s ability to engage with political nuances.

Despite its potential applications, Emirali acknowledges the risks associated with relying too heavily on AI for political understanding and decision-making. He cautions that while the tool may assist those already knowledgeable about politics, it could mislead individuals who lack a deep understanding of political dynamics. Emirali's vision for Nostrada originated in 2017 when he proposed the concept of a chatbot for then-prime minister Theresa May, aiming to distill complex political issues into manageable conversations. The AI has already attracted interest from political figures and lobbying agencies, suggesting a growing recognition of its utility. However, Emirali remains concerned that the AI's limitations could hinder informed voter decision-making, as it might not capture the nuanced realities of political discourse effectively.

TruthLens AI Analysis

The article introduces a new AI model called Nostrada, created by Leon Emirali, which allows users to converse with AI versions of UK MPs. This innovation aims to provide insights into the political stances of these MPs and engage the public in political discourse. The service appears to be tailored for diplomats, lobbyists, and the general public, making political information more accessible.

Purpose of the Publication

The introduction of Nostrada seems to promote transparency in political communication. By allowing users to interact with AI representations of MPs, the goal may be to enhance political engagement and provide a clearer understanding of political positions. This could also position Emirali as a thought leader in the intersection of technology and politics.

Public Perception

The article may instigate curiosity and skepticism among readers. While some may appreciate the innovative approach to understanding politics, others might question the authenticity and reliability of such AI representations. The use of humor and light-hearted commentary, such as referencing Keir Starmer's perceived robotic demeanor, could also influence public perception, potentially leading to a more critical view of political figures.

Concealed Information

There is a possibility that the article glosses over the limitations and potential biases of the AI models. By focusing on the novelty and utility of the technology, it may obscure the challenges related to the accuracy of AI representations of complex human behaviors and opinions.

Manipulative Potential

The article could be seen as manipulative if it portrays the AI models as more reliable than they are, potentially influencing public opinion about politicians based on incomplete data. This is particularly relevant in the context of ongoing discussions about the role of AI in society and its implications for trust in political figures.

Credibility of the News

The credibility of the news is somewhat mixed. While it provides factual information about the AI's capabilities and the creator's background, the portrayal of the technology raises questions about its reliability and ethical implications. The humor used might detract from the seriousness of the subject matter, potentially undermining the article's overall credibility.

Societal Implications

The introduction of AI in political discourse could lead to increased political engagement among certain demographics, particularly tech-savvy individuals. However, it may also exacerbate existing divides if certain groups feel alienated by the technology. The potential for manipulation of public opinion through AI could also raise ethical concerns that need addressing.

Target Audience

This news piece seems to appeal to a wide range of communities, particularly those interested in politics, technology, and innovation. It may resonate more with younger, tech-oriented audiences who are more likely to embrace digital tools for political engagement.

Impact on Financial Markets

While the article does not directly address financial markets, its implications for political engagement could indirectly affect market sentiment, especially if the technology influences public opinion about political stability or governance. Companies involved in AI and technology may see a rise in interest, which could impact their stock prices.

Global Power Dynamics

In the context of global power dynamics, the implementation of AI in political discourse reflects broader trends in technology's role in society. The discussion about AI’s impact on politics is relevant today, given the increasing reliance on technology in governance and public engagement.

AI Influence in Writing

It is possible that AI tools were used in the crafting of this article, particularly in generating concise summaries or analyzing data. The tone and structure may reflect an algorithmic approach to presenting information, shaping reader perception through its presentation style.

Manipulative Language and Targeting

The language used in the article could be interpreted as manipulative, especially if it exaggerates the capabilities of the AI technology or simplifies complex political issues. This may lead to a skewed understanding of the political landscape among readers.

In summary, the article presents an innovative approach to political engagement through AI, but it requires a critical examination of the implications and limitations of such technology in shaping public opinion. The blend of humor and political commentary serves to engage the reader while also raising important questions about the future of political discourse.

Unanalyzed Article Content

Source URL: https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2025/may/18/if-keir-starmer-is-not-robotic-enough-for-you-his-ai-twin-is-ready-for-your-questions

If you are one of the few people on the planet who fancies a chat with Keir Starmer, then there’s a new AI model for you.

A former chief of staff to a Tory minister has created Nostrada, which aims to enable users to talk with an AI version of each of the UK parliament’s 650 MPs – and lets you ask them anything you want.

Founded by Leon Emirali, who worked for Steve Barclay, Nostrada gives users a chance to speak to the “digital twin”, trained to replicate their political stances and mannerisms.

It is intended for diplomats, lobbyists and members of the public, who can find out where each MP stands on each issue, as well as each of their colleagues.

“Politicians provide such a rich data source because they can’t stop talking,” said Emirali. “They have an opinion on everything and when you’re building an AI product that’s perfect because your product is only as good as your data is.”

The accuracy of the chatbots is sure to be questioned by the politicians themselves.

The Guardian asked the digital twin of every cabinet member: “If the UK were to have a new prime minister after Keir Starmer, who would you like it to be?” The majority declined to answer. The health secretary Wes Streeting’s avatar voted for himself.

The models are trained on the vast array of written and spoken material from politicians that can be found online. And no matter how much you try to convince one, it will not change its mind. This is because it will not learn from input data, so no matter what you tell it, it does not learn anything. The Guardian would like to stress it is talking about the AI models.

Emirali says that his idea was born in 2017, when he unsuccessfully tried to persuade the Conservatives tocreate a chatbot of then prime minister, Theresa May– herself nicknamed the MayBot – in order to provide “bite-size, conversational overview” on key issues.

The AI has already been used by political figures, including an account registered to a Cabinet Office email as well as two separate accounts registered to emails in foreign embassies, possibly in order to research the prime minister and his cabinet. Emirali also says several prominent lobbying and marketing agencies have used the software in the past few months.

Sign up toTechScape

A weekly dive in to how technology is shaping our lives

after newsletter promotion

For all of Nostrada’s possible potential uses, Emirali concedes there are risks the AI could be “a hindrance” for prospective voters who rely entirely on it to make up their minds for them.

He said: “There’s too much nuance in politics that the AI may not pick up for voters to rely on it fully. The hope is that for people who know politics, who have the eye for it, this can be very useful. The worry is for people who don’t have that eye for politics and don’t follow it daily, I wouldn’t want this tool to be used to influence how someone should vote.”

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian