‘If I had to choose, I’d prefer the earthquake’: the 2015 disaster left Nepal in ruins, now record rains wreak fresh havoc

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"Nepal Faces Renewed Challenges from Climate Change After Devastating Monsoon Rains"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 7.6
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

In September, record monsoon rains devastated the village of Panauti in Nepal, causing the Roshi River to overflow and leading to widespread destruction of roads and bridges. Local resident Bishnu Humagain described the ordeal as a relentless wait for the rains to cease, reflecting on the loss of his home and livelihood. The heavy rainfall also resulted in the tragic loss of 244 lives in Kathmandu, marking the highest recorded rainfall in over fifty years. This disaster struck a nation still recovering from the catastrophic earthquake of 2015, which had already left nearly 9,000 dead and destroyed half a million homes. As Nepal grapples with these challenges, the impact of the climate crisis is becoming increasingly apparent, with erratic rainfall patterns exacerbating the country's vulnerability to floods and landslides. Experts warn that the effects of climate change are complicating efforts to build resilience, as disasters occur with greater frequency and intensity than ever before.

Despite international support following the 2015 earthquake, including significant funding for reconstruction and disaster preparedness, the recent withdrawal of USAID support has strained Nepal's financial resources for climate resilience initiatives. Local experts emphasize the importance of localized disaster response and community preparedness, as evidenced by the formation of the National Disaster Risk Reduction and Management Authority in 2017. However, challenges remain, including complacency regarding disaster regulations and the prioritization of economic growth over resilient infrastructure. Urbanization has led to the encroachment of flood plains, with infrastructure projects often lacking the necessary funding and oversight to ensure safety. As Nepal faces the prospect of future disasters, the struggle to balance development with resilience continues, leaving many residents like Humagain feeling the weight of an uncertain future. He poignantly remarked that, given the choice, he would prefer the earthquake to the ongoing devastation caused by flooding.

TruthLens AI Analysis

The report highlights the devastating impact of the recent monsoon rains in Nepal, particularly the destruction faced by the village of Panauti and the capital, Kathmandu. It draws a parallel with the catastrophic earthquake in 2015, emphasizing that the effects of climate change are compounding the challenges that the country faces in disaster preparedness and recovery.

Impact of Climate Change

The article underscores how the changing climate is intensifying the frequency and severity of natural disasters in Nepal. The rising temperatures in the Himalayas, which are warming faster than the global average, contribute to this instability, making it harder for communities to recover from disasters. The mention of scientific studies adds credibility to the assertion that climate change is a pressing issue.

Government and International Support

A significant point raised is the financial strain on Nepal’s government, compounded by the withdrawal of USAID support for disaster-preparedness programs. This aspect of the report paints a picture of a nation struggling to safeguard its citizens against increasingly severe weather events, suggesting a critical need for sustained international assistance.

Public Sentiment and Resilience

The personal account of Bishnu Humagain serves to humanize the disaster's impact, allowing readers to connect emotionally with the plight of individuals affected by natural disasters. This storytelling technique creates a narrative of resilience, highlighting the determination of people who have faced multiple calamities over the years.

Potential Manipulation and Agenda

While the article does effectively highlight the challenges faced by Nepal, it could also be construed as emphasizing a narrative that calls for more international aid and attention to climate issues. The focus on the withdrawal of support from USAID could lead readers to feel a sense of urgency for intervention, which might suggest a subtle push for policy change or increased funding from international bodies.

Credibility and Reliability

The data presented, alongside expert opinions from credible institutions like ICIMOD, lends a sense of reliability to the article. However, the emotional framing and focus on the need for external aid could lead to questions about the overall neutrality of the report. The portrayal of Nepal as a victim of circumstances may obscure the internal efforts and resilience of its citizens.

Socioeconomic and Political Implications

The article could influence public opinion regarding climate action and disaster management, potentially impacting political discourse in Nepal as well as donor countries. The narrative may galvanize support for policy changes or increased funding to address climate-related challenges.

Target Audience

The report is likely aimed at a global audience, including policymakers, environmental activists, and humanitarian organizations. It seeks to raise awareness about the plight of Nepal and the broader implications of climate change, thereby appealing to those who advocate for climate justice and disaster preparedness.

Market and Economic Impact

While the article does not directly address financial markets, it could have implications for sectors involved in disaster recovery, infrastructure development, and climate resilience. Companies operating in these areas may find their interests aligned with the urgent needs highlighted in the report.

Global Power Dynamics

This news piece reflects broader themes of climate change and disaster management that resonate globally. As climate change becomes an increasingly critical issue worldwide, the situation in Nepal serves as a microcosm of the challenges many countries face, contributing to larger discussions about global responsibility and aid.

In conclusion, this article presents a compelling narrative on the struggles faced by Nepal due to natural disasters exacerbated by climate change. It balances personal stories with scientific data, effectively calling for a renewed focus on international support while also showcasing the resilience of affected communities. The reliability of the report is bolstered by credible sources, but the emotional framing may suggest a particular agenda aimed at increasing awareness and action.

Unanalyzed Article Content

When the monsoon rains came last September, they swept away most of the village of Panauti, in the foothills of the Nepali Himalayas. The Roshi River overflowed after the unprecedented rainfall, triggering landslides and destroying most of the roads and bridges.

Peering through the thick blanket of relentless rain “felt like waiting for morning to arrive so we could see the world again”, says Bishnu Humagain. “We lost everything – our home, our agriculture, and all of our belongings.”

In Kathmandu, 20 miles away, 244 people died as the capital recorded its highest rainfall in more than half a century.

For Humagain, 45, it was the second time that he had to start again: in 2015, an earthquake left almost 9,000 dead and crumbled about half a million homes across Nepal, including his. In the years since then, Nepal has been slowly rebuilt, drawing up disaster-preparedness plans to help build resilience against future catastrophes.

A decade on, the worsening climate crisis is beginning to test that fragile balance. Nepal’s topography leaves it vulnerable to floods and landslides and this is exacerbated by increasingly erratic rainfall patterns. Studies suggest the Himalayas arewarming up to 0.7C (1.26F) faster than the global average.

Birendra Bajracharya, of theInternational Centre for Integrated Mountain Development(ICIMOD), a regional research institute, says: “Climate change is making resilience efforts more challenging, as we are observing disasters with a frequency and magnitude never seen before.”

With funding from Nepal’s government already stretched, the withdrawal ofUSAIDsupport for disaster-preparedness and climate-resilience programmes has added to the strain.

“Adding to the financial crunch that is already there, this is another setback,” says Sangeeta Singh, professor of urban planning at Tribhuvan University and a former member of Nepal’s National Planning Commission.

An initiative partly funded by USAID known as Servir, which used satellite data to “address critical challenges in climate change, food security, water and related disasters”, has been hit by the cuts, says Bajracharya.

Nepal received an outpouring of international support after the 2015 earthquake, with billions of pounds pledged for reconstruction by countries such as India and China.

Multilateral agencies, such as the UN Development Programme and the Asian Development Bank, helped the government in initiatives to “build back better”, sharing lessons on resilent design and building codes. International money and expertise helped to build wider roads, and incorporate bioengineering technology for slope stabilisation and drainage.

Those lessons proved essential for mitigating climate-related disasters. Dharam Uprety, of Practical Action Nepal, says: “Now people don’t only think about the earthquake, because Nepal is exposed to many other hazards.” Increasingly, he adds, “resilient infrastructure is coming into the discussion at policy and community level.”

Another important development after 2015 was theformation of Nepal’s National Disaster Risk Reduction and Management Authorityin 2017, with a focus on preparedness. Before the earthquake “this kind of institution was not there,” says Sagar Shrestha, the Nepal Red Cross Society’s crisis management director.

The disaster highlighted the importance of local response, he says, when damage to roads gave access challenges for national and foreign emergency responders. “The more it’s localised, the better,” he says.

Sign up toGlobal Dispatch

Get a different world view with a roundup of the best news, features and pictures, curated by our global development team

after newsletter promotion

Nepal’s Red Cross raises awareness in remote areas on how to respond during earthquakes and flooding. Running disaster simulations while collecting data on regions most at risk helps the organisation prepare, he says.

Resilience, a “buzzword” since 2015, appears now on paper but Singh says implementation and funding often fall short in reality. “When it comes to budgeting, then this is not taken into consideration.”

Climate disasters can be as destructive as earthquakes but get less global attention and international funding. Shrestha believes they deserve the same level of concern.

During the September floods, the downpour was so intense his team couldn’t reach the community for four days. “I have never experienced such continuous rainfall,” says Shrestha.

But despite the severity, the attention is “not happening”. “That is also very frustrating for us,” he says.

TheTrump administration’s aid cutsexacerbate the shortfall. In April, it was reported that the Millennium Challenge Corporation – a US foreign aid agency focused on building infrastructure in developing countries, and seen as a response to China’s Belt and Road initiative – was being shut down by Elon Musk’s department of government efficiency. One of the halted projects was a $500m (£375m) grant towards energy infrastructure and 200 miles of road repairs.

Without the money, Singh worries construction quality will suffer. With connectivity essential for development, the government has prioritised infrastructure projects – but without money, standards can slip.

“Everybody knows that [the roads] have to be resilient. It’s only that they don’t have the money to do the protective works,” says Singh. Construction in mountain areas heightens flood and landslip risk, obstructing the natural flow of water.

Complacency is also a problem, says Bajracharya. Over the years, fear of another earthquake subsides and people become “less serious on following the regulations”.

“Settlements on flood plains and haphazard construction of roads in mountain areas are big challenges,” he says.

Policies fall short, says Singh, particularly in built-up areas where economic growth can takes precedence over resilience. Only after the earthquake did people understand the importance of open spaces, she says.

“There are no significant changes in the regulations when you plan an expansion of a residential area,” she says, leading to dense urban design and overuse of drainage-limiting concrete.

Urbanisation has also led to encroachment on flood plains. In Kathmandu, one of the buildings damaged by the September floods was a large hospital, leading to the emergency evacuation of patients. It had been built on a flood plain.

With the monsoon season approaching, flooding is on people’s minds. The 2015 earthquake destroyed Humagain’s house, but the floods had a longer-term impact, he says. “All my land has been washed away, and now the river is flowing through my fields.”

“We are struggling just to survive,” he says.

“If I had to choose between the two, I would prefer the earthquake.”

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian