I worry that I don’t ‘get’ romance and am disappointing my husband

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"Navigating Romance in a Long-Term Marriage: A Wife's Concern"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 8.5
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

The article presents a heartfelt inquiry from a woman who has been married for over 50 years and expresses concern about her perceived lack of romantic inclination, which she believes disappoints her husband. Despite their enduring love, she struggles to engage in romantic gestures, often viewing them as unnecessary or failing to recognize them altogether. The lack of romantic examples in her upbringing, coupled with her disinterest in romantic novels, has left her feeling disconnected from this aspect of her relationship. She acknowledges her husband’s romantic nature and wishes to develop her own sense of romance to align with his expectations, but she feels uncertain about how to go about it. The writer seeks advice on how to bridge this gap, indicating a desire to enhance their relationship further in their later years together.

Psychotherapist Lorraine Davies-Smith provides insights into the situation, suggesting that the couple may have differing definitions of romance and may not recognize each other's romantic gestures. She encourages the woman to explore what romance means to her and her husband, highlighting that it can manifest in various forms, such as physical affection, thoughtful gestures, or acts of care. The discussion emphasizes the importance of communication in understanding each other's love languages, and Davies-Smith recommends regular conversations about meaningful actions within their relationship. By reframing her perspective on romance, the woman may find that her relationship is filled with love and romantic gestures, even if they do not fit traditional definitions. Ultimately, the advice aims to help her connect with her husband on a deeper level by recognizing and appreciating the nuances of their relationship's romantic expressions.

TruthLens AI Analysis

The article presents a heartfelt account of a long-term marriage facing challenges in the realm of romance. It explores the complexities of emotional intimacy and the impact of upbringing on romantic expression. The writer seeks advice on how to enhance their romantic engagement to avoid disappointing their partner.

Exploring Relationship Dynamics

The crux of the article revolves around the author's sense of inadequacy regarding romance, particularly in contrast to their husband's more romantic inclinations. This dynamic raises questions about personal growth and emotional expression in relationships, especially after many years of marriage. The author’s acknowledgment of their upbringing, where romance was neither modeled nor celebrated, adds depth to their struggles. It highlights how formative experiences can shape adult relationships and emotional responses.

Underlying Emotional Themes

The article touches on deeper emotional themes, such as fear of disappointment and the desire for connection. The author's concern about not "getting" romance may stem from a broader fear of inadequacy or failure in fulfilling a partner's needs. The inquiry into why the author is reflecting on this issue now suggests a moment of introspection that could be prompted by aging, health concerns, or a reevaluation of life’s priorities.

Cultural Context and Societal Expectations

The narrative also invites a discussion about societal expectations regarding romance, particularly for older couples. There is an implicit acknowledgment that romance is often portrayed as a youthful experience, leaving older couples feeling disconnected from these ideals. This article resonates with individuals who may feel similarly and serves to validate their experiences, thereby fostering a sense of community and shared understanding.

Potential Manipulative Elements

While the article appears sincere in its exploration of personal issues, one might consider whether it subtly prompts readers to reflect on their own relationships, possibly invoking feelings of inadequacy or guilt. Although it doesn't overtly manipulate, the framing could lead some readers to question their romantic lives, which may not be the intent. The emotional language used can evoke sympathy and encourage readers to engage with their own relational challenges.

Trustworthiness and Reliability

The article seems to be a reliable source of insight into personal relationships, as it presents a genuine query supported by professional commentary from a psychotherapist. The balance of personal narrative and expert advice lends credibility, making it a useful resource for those navigating similar issues in their relationships.

The article serves as both a personal reflection and a broader commentary on romantic relationships in later life, evoking empathy and encouraging readers to consider their own emotional expressions.

Unanalyzed Article Content

I have beenmarried to my husbandformore than 50 years. We married as teenagers and are now in our 70s. We love each other, and are in love.

The problem is I don’t appear to have a romantic bone in my body. My husband is romantic, and I either nevernoticeor I think, “What’s thepoint?” I do try, but it always seems perfunctory, and I know he is disappointed when I don’t “get it”.

My parents didn’t show any signs of romance to each other, nor did I see it in my much older sister’s marriage. I never read romantic novels in my teenage years.Even now, in my extensive reading, any romantic bitsarean irritation to me.

I know this causes my husband distress, and I would love to develop this part ofmyself for his sake. I just don’t know how. Any ideas?

Almost every week when I discuss that week’s problem with my specialist we ponder on the “why now”, ie why has that person chosen to write in at that moment? Sometimes it’s obvious, sometimes it really isn’t. This week’s specialist, UKCP-registered psychotherapist Lorraine Davies-Smith, and I were both curious as to why you were writing in now.

Has something happened? Being married for more than 50 years and saying you still love – and are in love with – each other is a major achievement. However, while I would like to commend you on that (because in subsequent correspondence with me you branded yourself as a “bit of a failure”, and you really aren’t), I realise you are asking a question.

Davies-Smith wondered if “there’s something about reaching the later stage of life and having a pressure to ‘get it right’? Or, has one of you had an illness or some other event that has thrown up the need to ‘take care of things’ while you still can?” Of course, the other obvious question is, what is being romantic?

“What do you define as romantic? What does your husband think is romantic?” asks Davies-Smith. “Romance has different expressions for different couples. For some, it’s showing physical affection, like kissing each other hello/goodbye or holding hands. For others, it can be “gestures”, such as buying unexpected gifts or special dinners, or simply cooking a favourite meal. Or showing the other you are holding them in mind or caring for them in ways such as watching TV programmes that your partner likes but you don’t, or buying their favourite foods. Or is romance here a euphemism for intimacy and sex?”

It sounds as if, possibly, you both speak a different “love language” and so you don’t recognise when your husband is being romantic. It’s possible that you are romantic, but not in the way your husband recognises, either. I think it’s pretty romantic that you wrote in!

Sign up toInside Saturday

The only way to get a look behind the scenes of the Saturday magazine. Sign up to get the inside story from our top writers as well as all the must-read articles and columns, delivered to your inbox every weekend.

after newsletter promotion

This definition of what romance means is important. Someone buying flowers on Valentine’s Day – which is deemed romantic by many – leaves me cold. However, when my dad died and I couldn’t bear to clear out his “shed” (actually a cellar he rented) because it was full of his things, and where he and I used to sit and chat – and no one else in the family was interested – my husband stepped up. I still regard that as one of the most romantic things he’s ever done. I knew I could trust him to differentiate between the sentimental and the throwaway. I felt seen, listened to and taken care of, and that, to me, is romantic. When you think of it like that it may show you that romance takes on many guises.

You know one of the most romantic things a couple can do is to talk to each other – to really communicate. This is the number one gateway to intimacy. Not every day, but regularly, could you make time to sit down/go for a walk (some couples find it easier to talk when side by side) with your husband and talk about things you’ve done for each other that really mattered? You don’t have to use the word romantic to describe them if it makes you cringe (I cringe at the phrase “date night”, for example). You may be surprised to see that your relationship is already full of romantic gestures, you just may not recognise them as such.

You may also find the podcast I did with Dr Stephen Blumenthal on intimacy interesting – you can listen to ithere.

Every week, Annalisa Barbieri addresses a personal problem sent in by a reader. If you would like advice from Annalisa, please send your problem toask.annalisa@theguardian.com. Annalisa regrets she cannot enter into personal correspondence. Submissions are subject toour terms and conditions. The latest series of Annalisa’s podcast is availablehere.

Comments on this piece are pre-moderated to ensure the discussion remains on the topics raised by the article. Please be aware that there may be a short delay in comments appearing on the site.

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian