‘I saw cars on fire. People were lying at my feet’: Ukrainian survivors describe Russia’s attack on Sumy

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"Survivors of Missile Attack in Sumy Describe Chaos and Tragedy"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 6.3
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

Last weekend, a tragic incident unfolded in Sumy, Ukraine, when a bus carrying passengers was struck by two Iskander ballistic missiles. Among the passengers was Alla Shyrshonkova, who described the serene atmosphere before the attack, noting the bus was crowded with families heading to church for Palm Sunday. The peaceful day turned catastrophic as the first explosion hit a university congress center, followed by a second blast that caused widespread destruction. Shyrshonkova recounted the chaos that ensued, with debris flying and blood pouring from her injuries. Amid the wreckage, she witnessed the horrifying scene of cars ablaze and people lying injured on the ground, as she urged them to get up, only to find silence in response. The attack resulted in the deaths of 35 individuals, including two children, while 129 others were wounded, with many suffering critical injuries. The aftermath of the bombing left the city in shock, and local residents mourned the loss of innocent lives by leaving toys at the site of the tragedy.

The attack on Sumy marks one of the bloodiest moments in the ongoing conflict between Ukraine and Russia, with the latter intensifying its bombardments on civilian areas. Survivors expressed their anger towards global leaders, particularly U.S. President Donald Trump, who they believe is failing to adequately support Ukraine. They accused him of downplaying the severity of the attacks and favoring Russia in diplomatic negotiations. Survivors like Hennadii Smoliarov described the ongoing violence as genocide against the Ukrainian people, while others, like Viktor Voitenko, shared their personal tales of injury and loss. The conflict, which has persisted for years, continues to inflict pain and suffering on the people of Ukraine, with many expressing a longing for peace amidst the relentless assault. As the war drags on, the hope for a resolution appears to dim, leaving communities like Sumy grappling with the immediate consequences of violence and the long-term impacts of a devastating conflict.

TruthLens AI Analysis

The article presents a harrowing account of a tragic event in Sumy, Ukraine, detailing the aftermath of a missile strike that killed and injured numerous civilians. Through the personal narrative of a survivor, it seeks to evoke empathy and a sense of urgency regarding the ongoing conflict in Ukraine.

Purpose of the Article

The primary objective of this report is to highlight the humanitarian crisis resulting from the conflict in Ukraine, specifically focusing on the civilian impact of military actions. By sharing the vivid experiences of survivors, the article aims to draw attention to the brutality of the attacks and foster a deeper understanding of the consequences of war.

Public Perception and Emotional Impact

The narrative evokes strong emotional responses, encouraging readers to feel sympathy for the victims and survivors. By including graphic descriptions of the scene, such as "cars on fire" and "blood gushing," it aims to create a visceral connection to the tragedy. This emotional appeal can serve to galvanize public support for Ukraine and strengthen calls for international action against Russian aggression.

Potential Omissions and Biases

While the article focuses on the suffering of civilians, it may omit broader geopolitical contexts or the perspectives of those who support Russia's actions. By concentrating solely on the devastation in Sumy, it risks presenting a one-sided view of the conflict, potentially neglecting the complexities involved.

Reliability of the News

The report appears to be credible, relying on first-hand testimonies and factual details about the missile strike. However, the emotional language and focus on tragedy may influence readers' perceptions, leading to questions about objectivity. The use of personal stories can enhance relatability but may also introduce bias depending on the broader narrative framework.

Connections to Other News

This article aligns with a growing trend in media coverage that emphasizes the human cost of the conflict in Ukraine. It can be seen in conjunction with other reports highlighting civilian casualties and the destruction of infrastructure, which collectively aim to build a narrative of urgency and need for intervention.

Impact on Society and Politics

Such reports can significantly influence public opinion, potentially prompting increased support for humanitarian aid or military assistance to Ukraine. They may also affect political discourse, leading to calls for accountability and stronger sanctions against Russia in international forums.

Target Audience

The article is likely aimed at a global audience, particularly those sympathetic to Ukraine's plight. It seeks to mobilize support from communities that prioritize human rights and humanitarian issues, appealing to individuals and organizations invested in peace and stability.

Market and Economic Implications

The news may impact the financial markets by influencing investor sentiment regarding the stability of the region. Stocks of companies involved in defense or humanitarian aid could see fluctuations based on public perception and government response to the conflict.

Geopolitical Relevance

This incident underlines the ongoing geopolitical tensions between Ukraine and Russia, which remain relevant to current global discussions about security, territorial integrity, and humanitarian responsibilities. The repercussions of such attacks can extend beyond regional borders, affecting international relations and alliances.

Use of AI in Reporting

There is no direct evidence to suggest that AI was used in crafting this article. However, the structured narrative and the way it presents survivor accounts could reflect trends in journalistic practices that utilize AI for data analysis or content curation. If AI were involved, it might have influenced the selection of impactful language or the framing of the story to elicit specific emotional responses.

Manipulative Elements

The article contains elements that could be viewed as manipulative, particularly through its emotional language and vivid imagery. By focusing on personal suffering and the innocent victims of the conflict, it may aim to sway public opinion in favor of more aggressive support for Ukraine, which could be seen as a strategic choice to promote a particular agenda.

The combination of personal testimony, emotional appeal, and the portrayal of tragedy creates a powerful narrative. However, readers should remain aware of the potential biases and motivations behind such reporting, ensuring they seek a balanced understanding of the conflict.

Unanalyzed Article Content

Last weekend, Alla Shyrshonkova got on the 62 bus on a journey to her cottagenear the Ukrainian city of Sumy. It was a warm spring day. “I thought I’d sit with friends, have some tea. Birds were singing. The weather was beautiful. It was so nice,” she recalled.

“The bus was packed. There wasn’t a single free seat. People were standing. Some were going to church for Palm Sunday. There were families with children.”

As she reached the city centre she heard a loud bang. Two minutes later – as the bus made its way down Petropavlivska street – there was a second massive explosion. “The blast was in front of me, so I didn’t see it. I only heard it. I was sitting behind the driver, with my back to him. When I heard the noise, I covered my head with my hands and ducked.”

After that, she said, “rocks, glass and everything went flying”. Shyrshonkova lifted her head. Blood was gushing “like a fountain” from her arm. “I saw cars on fire and smoke. People were lying at my feet. I said to them: ‘Get up, get up.’ They were silent.”

A conductor called the name of the driver – “Kolya” – but there was no reply. Passengers tried to climb out of a window. Eventually, a teenage boy opened a door and she staggered out.

The double strike on Sumy was thebloodiest single moment this year in Russia’s murderous war against Ukraine. The Iskander ballistic missiles carried deadly cluster of munitions which released a wave of shrapnel. Thirty-five people were killed.

Two of the victims buried last week were children, aged eleven and seven. Sumy residents left toys at the spot where they perished: a bear, a hippo, a toy car and a football.

Shyrshonkova was one of 129 people wounded. Among them are 15 children. Some are critically injured, hovering “between life and death”, as Tetyana, a nurse at Sumy’s general hospital, told theObserver. The first missile crashed into a university congress centre, plunging through a glass atrium and a basement theatre. The second turned the city into a vision of hell, with bodies on the ground and a little girl crying and covered in blood.

The war seems further away than ever from a peaceful resolution. On Friday, Donald Trumpsignalled he is ready to “take a pass”on brokering an agreement unless the two sides reach a deal “very shortly”.

More than a month ago, Ukraine accepted a US proposal for a 30-day ceasefire. Russia didn’t. Since then, it has demonstratively escalated its bombing campaign on civilians and infrastructure,hitting Sumy, Kharkiv and Dnipro.

As many predicted, Trump’s negotiating strategy has been to favourRussia. He has effectively ended military assistance to Kyiv, while falsely blaming Volodymyr Zelenskyy and Joe Biden for “starting” the war.

No similar pressure has been applied to Moscow. Trump downplayed last weekend’s Sumy strike, calling it a “mistake”. His special envoy, Steve Witkoff – whomet European leaders on Thursday– parrots Kremlin disinformation.

Speaking from hospital, survivors expressed anger at the US president, accusing him of laziness and a bewildering partisanship. “What happened in Sumy is terror, obviously – nothing else,” Shyrshonkova said. “Trump is basically supporting Russia now.

“I wish he would come toUkraineand see what his belovedpuylo[a slang term for Putin, meaning prick] is doing. I want Trump to help us at the same level as Joe Biden.”

Another wounded survivor, 72-year-old Hennadii Smoliarov, said the Russians were carrying out genocide. “They are trying to destroy all Ukrainians. They hate us. Putin says we are not a people.

“They promote the concept ofRusskiy Miror ‘Russian World’. That means conquering everywhere.”

Smoliarov said that, when he was studying in Moscow in the 1980s, he was called aKhokhol, a derogatory term for Ukrainians.“Prejudice is widespread,” he noted.

He had been sitting on the 62 bus, having gone into town to fetch eyedrops for his wife, Anna. After the first strike the bus stopped outside Sumy state university’s institute of applied physics. Shrapnel from the second missile hit his lung and head. “There was a strong shockwave. You couldn’t see inside. The smoke was like a fog, it was so thick.”

A woman lay motionless at his feet. “I lost strength and collapsed right inside the bus,” he recalled.

A volunteer grabbed Smoliarov by the collar of his brown leather jacket and dragged him on to the pavement.

The explosion blew the wooden doors and glass from the 19th-century institute, sending shards into its garden and flowerbeds. A quartz wall clock on the ground floor stopped at the moment of impact: 10.20am and 40 seconds. Across the road, a giant hole was gouged in the white-painted economics and business faculty building.

Another wounded survivor, Viktor Voitenko, said Sumy was in its fourth year of war. “We’ve had so many attacks, withShahed drones and missiles,” he said. “The air raids don’t stop.”

The city, a key military hub, is located less than 20 miles from Russia. From here, Ukraine’s armed forces launcheda surprise mini-invasionlast August into Russia’s neighbouring Kursk region. Theywithdrew in March. Fighting continues in villages along the border, where Ukrainian troops hold a sliver of Russian territory.

Voitenko works at the physics institute as a security guard. He was in the foyer when the second Iskander dropped. A metal fragment hit him in the spine. “I couldn’t feel my legs. I called my wife and she reached me in five minutes. After that, the police took me to a safe place,” he said.

Lying in a hospital bed, Voitenko said it was unclear if he would walk again: “It’s in God’s hands. My operation went well. The doctors say they can’t guarantee anything.”

Aged 56, Voitenko previously worked as a builder and as a “liquidator” – a member of the clean-up crew sent to the Chornobyl nuclear power station after the 1986 disaster.

The Kremlin, he said, was addicted to reckless imperialism. “Before the war, we lived well. We had everything. I have a beautiful wife, an 11-year-old daughter and two cars.”

The bus driver, Mykola Leon – killed on Palm Sunday, together with most of his passengers – was a distant relative, he said.

Shyrshonkova spoke to theObserverfrom the neighbouring hospital room. She put her survival down to a class she attended in the 1950s as a schoolgirl in the Soviet Union.

“We had civil defence lessons. The teachers told us capitalism was bad. They also explained what to do in the event of a nuclear attack. We were taught to keep our mouth closed and to cover our head and eyes.

“When I heard the explosion on Sunday it came back to me. Some instinct took over,” she said.

Once she left hospital, Shyrshonkova said she hoped to visit her dacha. “I’ve planted tomatoes and peppers on the balcony. I want to see them growing.”

Luke Harding’sInvasion: Russia’s Bloody War and Ukraine’s Fight for Survival, shortlisted for theOrwellprize, is published by Guardian Faber

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian