‘I read him my seven-page sex scene’: Gay Bar author Jeremy Atherton Lin’s transatlantic love story

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"Jeremy Atherton Lin Discusses Love and Immigration in New Memoir 'Deep House'"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 8.6
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

In his latest work, "Deep House: The Gayest Love Story Ever Told," Jeremy Atherton Lin explores the complexities of love, immigration, and identity within the LGBTQ+ community. The book recounts the story of Lin and his partner, whom he met almost three decades ago at a club in London. Their relationship blossomed amidst the challenges of navigating a precarious legal landscape as Lin's partner overstayed his visa, leading to a life filled with uncertainty and fear of deportation. Lin's narrative is both personal and political, reflecting on the struggles they faced in securing a home together while living under the shadow of outdated immigration laws and societal prejudices. He intertwines his own experiences with historical context, examining significant legal cases that have shaped LGBTQ+ rights in the US, including the landmark Obergefell v. Hodges decision that legalized same-sex marriage. Through these reflections, Lin illustrates their journey, marked by love and resilience, as they sought to build a life together despite the odds stacked against them.

Lin's writing captures the ambivalence of his experiences, blending humor with poignant observations about the complexities of relationships and societal expectations. He acknowledges the thrill of living on the edge of legality, finding exhilaration in their underground existence. Yet, he also recognizes the privileges that come with marriage, which eventually provided them with some stability. The narrative extends beyond personal anecdotes, delving into broader themes of race, immigration, and the evolving landscape of LGBTQ+ rights. Lin's intimate storytelling is complemented by his reflections on the changing dynamics of the gay scene, illustrating a sense of loss for the vibrant nightlife that once defined his experiences. Ultimately, "Deep House" serves as a companion piece to his earlier book, "Gay Bar," presenting a more introspective look at the significance of home and commitment within the LGBTQ+ community, while emphasizing that domestic life can be just as meaningful as the pursuit of nightlife and social engagement.

TruthLens AI Analysis

The article provides insights into the life and work of Jeremy Atherton Lin, particularly focusing on his latest book, "Deep House: The Gayest Love Story Ever Told." It highlights themes of love, immigration, and the LGBTQ+ experience, set against a backdrop of personal and political challenges. Lin's narrative intertwines his relationship with his partner and the broader societal issues faced by the LGBTQ+ community, particularly in the context of legal and immigration hurdles.

Purpose of the Article

The intention behind this article seems to be to celebrate Lin's work while also shedding light on the complexities of LGBTQ+ relationships in the contemporary socio-political landscape. By discussing Lin's personal story and his literary contributions, the article aims to foster understanding and empathy towards the LGBTQ+ community and its struggles.

Public Perception

This piece is likely intended to create a positive perception of LGBTQ+ narratives, emphasizing love and resilience in the face of adversity. It encourages readers to reflect on the societal challenges that LGBTQ+ individuals encounter, while also illustrating the beauty of their stories.

Hidden Agendas

There doesn’t appear to be a significant hidden agenda in this article. Instead, it seems focused on elevating LGBTQ+ voices and experiences, which are often underrepresented in mainstream media. The emphasis on personal storytelling may serve to humanize broader political issues, fostering a deeper connection with the audience.

Truthfulness of the Article

The article appears to be credible, drawing on Lin's own experiences and reflections. The descriptions of his life, his writing process, and the historical context of the Admiral Duncan lend authenticity to the narrative. However, as with any personal account, subjective interpretation must be considered.

Societal Implications

The narrative can encourage discussions around LGBTQ+ rights, immigration, and the importance of community support. By highlighting the personal struggles faced by Lin and his partner, the article may motivate readers to advocate for more inclusive policies and societal acceptance.

Target Audience

This article is likely aimed at readers interested in LGBTQ+ literature, culture, and social issues. It appeals to those who value personal stories and the complexities of human relationships, particularly within marginalized communities.

Market Impact

While the article may not directly influence stock markets or economic trends, it could positively impact the publishing industry, particularly for LGBTQ+ authors and narratives. As awareness and acceptance of diverse stories grow, there may be an increase in demand for similar literature.

Global Context

In the current sociopolitical climate, where LGBTQ+ rights are still being debated in many parts of the world, the article resonates with ongoing discussions about equality and representation. It reflects a broader movement towards inclusiveness, aligning with global trends advocating for human rights.

Use of Artificial Intelligence

There is no clear indication that artificial intelligence was utilized in the writing of this article. However, if AI were involved, it could have been used for data analysis or to generate content based on established themes in LGBTQ+ literature and personal stories.

Manipulative Elements

While the article does not appear to contain overt manipulative elements, it does utilize emotional storytelling to engage readers and elicit empathy. This technique can be powerful in shaping public perception and awareness about LGBTQ+ issues but does not seem to mislead or manipulate.

In summary, the article serves as a meaningful exploration of love and identity within the LGBTQ+ community, encouraging empathy and understanding while advocating for representation and acceptance. The focus on personal narratives effectively highlights the intersection of individual lives with broader societal issues, making it a significant addition to discussions surrounding LGBTQ+ rights and experiences.

Unanalyzed Article Content

The Admiral Duncan is empty when Jeremy Atherton Lin arrives to meet me, save for a few meandering flies. In the final pages of his bestselling book,Gay Bar: Why We Went Out, Lin visits the old Soho boozer in London with his husband, where they encounter a “despondent” scene: spilled beer, backed-up toilets and a wasted drag queen. Even so, they are charmed by an older couple across the bar and wonder if they’ll be lucky enough to end up like them. The site of a homophobic nail-bomb attack in 1999, the Admiral Duncan is another kind of survivor, and Lin admires it in spite of the mess. Such ambivalence is typical of his memoiristic writing, which spirals outward into digressive analyses of social and political events.

This time, the place is quiet and clean, and Lin has come alone – all of which is probably for the best, since we’re here to discuss his latest book, Deep House: The Gayest Love Story Ever Told. At once more personal and more political than anything he has ever written, it follows him and his partner as they navigate a precarious legal landscape for immigrants and LGBTQ+ people in their effort to build a home and life together.

The couple met 29 years ago at Popstarz, a club night, when Lin was passing through London on a backpacking trip. (In Gay Bar, Lin refers to his partner in the third person, mostly as Famous Blue Raincoat. In Deep House he remains unnamed, though most of the book is addressed directly to him.)

“I depict myself in the book as feeling a little unsure and resistant at first; counterintuitively, this bashful boy is the pursuer,” Lin says. “He’s so lovable that I wanted the reader to feel a little exasperated with me, like, ‘You’re never gonna get any better than this.’” Not long after returning to northern California, Lin seemed to get the message and invited his new British beau to visit. “Famous” came and never left. Overstaying his visa, he became a fugitive for love.

It took a while for them to fully understand the implications of that decision. They struggled to find an apartment given that only Lin – on a writer’s income – could be named on the lease. Every loud noise or bright light outside their door sparked fears of an imminent raid. Accidents were a worry because “we were convinced you couldn’t go into hospital without being deported,” Lin writes.

“We found ourselves laying down roots on a fault line – literally earthquake territory, but also a contentious political framework,” he tells me today. “By 2000, when we rented our first weird, damp apartment, 18 states still had sodomy laws on the books.” They were considered “illegal” in more ways than one.

Lin writes extensively about the case law that led to the 2015 US supreme court decision in Obergefell v Hodges which legalised same-sex marriage across the US. Some of these are relatively obscure, such as Baker v Nelson (1971) and Boutilier v Immigration and Naturalization Service (1967), and he sympathetically details the lives of the plaintiffs, aware that most of them weren’t asking for much. Lin and his partner were less interested in pushing a gay rights agenda than safely crawling back into bed together. “We were half innocent and half obscene,” he writes. “We’d been infantilised by our governments – our ‘twink’ years prolonged.”

At times, this could be a minor thrill. “I can’t deny there was an exhilaration when we went underground,” he tells me. For a middle-class kid in San Francisco’s Mission District in the early 2000s, being undocumented may have seemed like a punk bona fide. Marriage certainly did not – though at the time it was unavailable to them anyway. “A lot of queers, of course, didn’t want in on the historically proprietary and patriarchal institution in the first place,” Lin writes.

Open relationships and polyamory were typical in their urban gay enclave; they duly navigated threesomes and foursomes, including, at one point, with another couple with whom they shared an apartment. The idea of marriage seemed almost too conventional by contrast. Nonetheless, Lin acknowledges that marriage “affords privileges, including mobility across borders. Marriage is, among other things, a passport”. Unable to cross international borders or even state lines without worry, Lin and his partner often felt stuck.

As a white British person, Lin’s partner was perhaps in a more privileged position than those subjected to racial profiling. Lin writes about several suits filed by Asian immigrants, many of them in San Francisco, dating back to a string of racist laws passed by the US government in the 19th century, including the Chinese Exclusion Act. He also tells the story of his own parents, who met in the 1960s after his father emigrated to the US from Taiwan. As a biracial couple, they were only able to marry in Florida because anti-miscegenation laws had been struck down by Loving v Virginia a few years earlier.

It’s unclear if Lin’s father or partner would have been able to remain in the country had Donald Trump been president at the time. Lin says he finished edits on Deep House before Trump returned to the Oval Office in January, and he never expected the immigration crackdown to be this bad. “There are a lot of moments in the book where we think that whoever comes through the door is going to be [Ice],” he says. “That was very far-fetched then. But our paranoia has become the reality.”

In 2007, Lin and his husband relocated to the UK, where they obtained a civil partnership (backdated as a marriage, once same-sex unions became fully legal in 2014). Their timing was lucky. “When my next letter arrived from the UK Home Office, with a visa that established my leave to remain, it was genuinely welcoming, almost chipper,” he notes. “But less than five years later, then home secretary Theresa May would usher in the ‘hostile environment’ policy, a brutally monikered set of measures intended to drive out undocumented denizens that would send ripples of malice toward foreign nationals and minority groups more generally.”

Lin began writing Gay Bar while working a string of retail jobs in London. “I would be writing on the cash register or on the back of the receipts,” he recalls. Eileen Myles was a big influence on his personal, essayistic prose style, as was Michelle Tea (briefly an upstairs neighbour in San Francisco). The 2010s were an exuberant time for London’s gay scene, but also a challenging one for nightlife spaces; by the time the Covid-19 pandemic hit, nearly half of the city’s clubs had already closed. Lin found himself documenting these losses, which eventually became Gay Bar.

That book won the National Book Critics Circle award for autobiography and spent weeks atop international bestseller lists. Lin never anticipated the success. “It’s amazing but also terrifying,” he says. “We weren’t prepared for it.” Meanwhile, “London had lost its sense of wonder”. He and his partner relocated to St Leonards-on-Sea, where he says they often walk along the beach twice a day. When the news cycle or writer’s block is stressing him out, he says, “We go down to the beach and pick up a pebble, name it with whatever is bothering us, and throw it into the water. It’s surprisingly effective.”

As for how Famous Blue Raincoat feels about all the public attention, Lin says his partner is able to read his work with a certain detachment. “I’m working within the idiom of nonfiction, for which the criterion is accuracy, but I’m also writing my remembrance of the past. He’s more forgiving of my confabulations, because he’s an artist. There’s a part of him that’s quite good at loosening up. Although there’s a seven-page sex scene in Deep House that I read out loud a couple years ago, and I think he felt a bit exposed,” Lin admits with a laugh.

Does he have any advice for open relationships? “Communication,” Lin says without hesitation. “So much of the communication that we’ve been fortunate to have is based on implicit trust,” he says. “I think maybe it’s so robust because of our experience feeling like it was us against the world.”

Some wisdom has also surely come with age. “I had come to identify as someone who crossed borders – but slowly understood that adult life had to involve the creation and maintenance of boundaries, a matter of recognising that the world is not just one’s own,” he writes towards the end of Deep House. Marriage may have been a way of protecting their relationship and immigration status, but it also confirmed that they really did want to settle down. If “we go out to be gay”, as Lin writes in Gay Bar, he realised that remaining home with his husband wouldn’t make him any less of a homosexual. “This book is the domestic antidote [to Gay Bar],” he explains. “It’s ‘why we stayed in’. Which is to say, inside the interior of our home, but also inside each other.”

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian