How the little-known ‘dark roof’ lobby may be making US cities hotter

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"Tennessee Lawmakers Repeal Cool Roof Requirement Amid Climate Concerns"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 8.0
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

In a recent legislative move, Tennessee lawmakers voted to repeal the state's requirement for reflective roofs on commercial buildings, a decision that has sparked significant controversy. Representative Rusty Grills, a proponent of the bill, argued that it would provide consumers with more choices regarding roofing materials. However, this change has raised alarms among public health advocates and environmentalists, who warn that the elimination of cool roofs could exacerbate urban heat, particularly affecting vulnerable communities in cities like Nashville and Memphis. Critics such as state representative Harold Love caution that the new law could lead to increased energy costs and a rise in heat-related health issues, emphasizing that light-colored roofs are instrumental in keeping buildings cooler and reducing greenhouse gas emissions. The debate around cool roofs is not limited to Tennessee; similar lobbying efforts have been observed in other cities, including Denver and Baltimore, where industry representatives have questioned the validity of the science supporting reflective roofing and claimed that a one-size-fits-all approach does not account for regional climate variations.

Research consistently demonstrates that light-colored roofs can be significantly cooler than dark roofs, often remaining over 50 degrees Fahrenheit cooler on hot days. Studies have indicated that reflective roofs can lead to substantial energy savings and can prevent heat-related illnesses. For instance, a recent analysis suggested that implementing cool roofs could have potentially saved over 240 lives during the 2018 heatwave in London. Despite the overwhelming scientific evidence favoring reflective roofs, industry groups have successfully lobbied against expanding cool roof mandates in both state and national energy efficiency codes, arguing for a more tailored approach to roofing solutions. The stakes are high as climate change continues to intensify, making the choice of roofing materials a pivotal factor in urban planning and public health strategies. As cities grapple with rising temperatures, the ongoing conflict between industry interests and environmental health advocates highlights the complexities of addressing climate resilience in urban areas.

TruthLens AI Analysis

The article sheds light on a controversial decision made by Tennessee lawmakers to repeal the requirement for reflective roofs on commercial buildings, a move primarily driven by lobbying from the manufacturers of dark roofing materials. This decision raises significant concerns about the implications for energy consumption, public health, and social equity, particularly in underserved communities.

Lobbying Influence on Policy

The influence of lobbying in this case is substantial. A well-organized campaign led by the roofing industry successfully pushed for the elimination of the cool-roof mandate, which was designed to mitigate rising temperatures and lower energy costs. The argument presented by lobbyists focuses on consumer choice, but it overlooks the broader environmental and health implications.

Public Health and Environmental Concerns

Critics of the repeal argue that it will exacerbate heat-related illnesses and increase energy costs for residents, particularly in cities like Nashville and Memphis. The scientific consensus indicates that light-colored roofs can significantly reduce temperatures and energy usage on hot days. The rollback of this requirement could lead to adverse health outcomes, especially in vulnerable populations.

Skepticism of Industry Claims

The article highlights that industry representatives have questioned the validity of decades-old research supporting the benefits of cool roofs. This skepticism, however, appears to stem from a desire to protect their interests rather than a genuine concern for public health or environmental sustainability. The scientific evidence supporting the efficacy of reflective roofs remains strong.

Potential Societal Impact

The potential societal implications of this policy change are profound. By increasing heat in urban areas, particularly in neighborhoods that already face socioeconomic challenges, the decision may worsen health disparities and economic burdens on low-income households. Furthermore, similar lobbying efforts in other cities suggest a broader trend that could jeopardize public health across the country.

Target Audience and Community Support

The news likely resonates with environmentalists, public health advocates, and community organizations focused on social justice. These groups are concerned about the disproportionate impact of such policies on marginalized communities. Conversely, the roofing industry and those advocating for deregulation may support this change, framing it as a matter of personal choice and economic freedom.

Economic Implications

In terms of economic impact, this article could influence energy companies, public health organizations, and urban planners. The removal of cool roof requirements may lead to increased energy costs over time, which could affect utility companies and their stock performance. Companies involved in sustainable building materials might also feel the effects of this policy shift.

Global Context and Current Relevance

In a broader context, this news reflects ongoing debates about climate change, urban planning, and public health policy. The implications of such decisions are not limited to Tennessee but resonate with global discussions about sustainability and environmental justice.

The article appears to be well-researched and presents a balanced view of the arguments on both sides of the issue. However, it does lean towards highlighting the negative consequences of the repeal, particularly for vulnerable communities. The straightforward presentation of facts and expert opinions contributes to its credibility.

Given the nature of the content and the framing of the arguments, this article does not seem to exhibit overt manipulation. However, the emphasis on the potential dangers of the policy could be seen as a call to action for readers to consider the long-term consequences of such legislative changes.

Unanalyzed Article Content

It began with a lobbyist’s pitch.

Tennessee representative Rusty Grills says the lobbyist proposed a simple idea: repeal the state’s requirement for reflective roofs on many commercial buildings.

In late March, Grills and his fellow lawmakers voted to eliminate the rule, scrapping a measure meant to save energy, lower temperatures and protect Tennesseans from extreme heat.

Grills, a Republican, told Floodlight that he introduced the bill to give consumers more choice.

It was another win for a well-organized lobbying campaign led by manufacturers of dark roofing materials.

Industry representatives called the rollback in Tennessee a needed correction as more of the state moved into a hotter climate zone, expanding the reach of the state’s cool-roof rule. Critics called it dangerous and “deceptive”.

“The new law will lead to higher energy costs and greater heat-related illnesses and deaths,” state representative Harold Love and the Rev. Jon Robinson said in a statement.

It will, critics warned, make Nashville, Memphis, and other cities hotter – particularly in underserved Black and Latino communities, where many struggle to pay their utility bills. Similar lobbying has played out in Denver, Baltimore and at the national level.

Industry groups have questioned the decades-old science behind cool roofs, downplayed the benefits and warned of reduced choice and unintended consequences. “A one-size-fits-all approach doesn’t consider climate variation across different regions,” wrote Ellen Thorp, the executive director of the EPDM Roofing Association, a DC-based national group which represents an industry built primarily on dark materials.

But the weight of the scientific evidence is clear: on hot days, light-colored roofs can stay more than 50 degrees cooler than dark ones, helping cut energy use, curb greenhouse gas emissions and reduce heat-related illnesses and deaths. Onerecent studyfound that reflective roofs could have saved the lives of more than 240 people who died in London’s 2018 heatwave.

At least eight states – and more than a dozen cities in other states – have adopted cool-roof requirements, according to theSmart Surfaces Coalition, a national group of public health and environmental groups that promote reflective roofs, trees and other solutions to make cities healthier.

Industry representatives lobbied successfully in recent months against expanding cool roof recommendations in national professional energy efficiency codes – the standards that many cities and states use to set building regulations.

The stakes are high. As global temperatures rise and heat wavesgrow more deadly, the roofs over our heads have become battlefields in a consequential climate war. It’s happening as the Trump administration and Congressmove to derailmeasures designed to make appliances and buildings more energy efficient.

The principle is simple: light-colored roofs reflect sunlight, so buildings stay cooler. Dark ones absorb heat, driving up temperatures inside buildings and in the surrounding air.

Roofs comprise up to one-fourth of the surface area of major US cities, researchers say, so the color of roofs can make a big difference in urban areas.

Just how hot can dark roofs get?

“You can physically burn your hands on these roofs,” said Bill Updike, who used to install solar panels and now works for the Smart Surfaces Coalition.

Study after study has confirmed the benefits of light-colored roofs. They save energy, lower air conditioning bills and reduce city temperatures. They help prevent heat-related illnesses. And they typically cost no more than dark roofs.

Astudyby the US Department of Energy’s Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory found that a cool roof on a home in central California saved 20% in annual energy costs.

In a three-story rowhouse in Baltimore, Owen Henry discovered what a difference a cool roof can make.

Living in a part of the city with few trees – and where summer temperatures often climb into the 90s – Henry wanted to trim his power bills and stay cooler while working in his third-floor office. So in 2023, he used $100 worth of white reflective roof paint to coat his roof.

Henry said he and his wife immediately saw the indoor temperature drop. They reduced their electricity use – by 24%.

Known for its durability, a black synthetic rubber known as EPDM once dominated commercial roofing. But in recent years it has been surpassed by TPO, a plastic single-ply material which is typically white and is better suited to meet the growing demand for reflective roofs.

Leading EPDM manufacturers – including Johns Manville, Carlisle SynTec and Elevate, a division of the Swiss multinational company Holcim – also make reflective roofing materials. But they have fought against regulations that threaten to further diminish their market share.

In an emailed response to Floodlight’s questions, Thorp argued that many of the studies cited to support cool roof mandates leave out important factors, such as local climate variations, roof type, tree canopy and insulation thickness.

And she pointed to arecent studyby Harvard researchers who concluded that white roofs and pavements may reduce precipitation, causing temperatures to unexpectedly increase in surrounding regions.

But Haider Taha, a leading expert on urban heat, identified flaws in the Harvard study, stating: “The study’s conclusions fail to provide actionable insights for urban cooling strategies or policymaking.”

When Baltimore debated a cool roof ordinance in 2022, Thorp’s group and the Asphalt Roofing Manufacturers Association (ARMA) lobbied hard against it, arguing that dark roofs are the most efficient choice in “northern climates like Baltimore”.

In cold climates, industry representatives note, cool roofs can lead to higher winter heating bills.

“Current research does not support the adoption of cool roofs as a measure that will achieve improved energy efficiency or reduced urban heat island,” Thorp wrote in a letter to one council member.

Multiple studies show otherwise. They’ve concluded that reflective roofs do save energy and cool cities by easing the “urban heat island effect” – the extra heat that gets trapped in many city neighborhoods because buildings and pavement soak up the sun.

Researchers have also found that even in most cold North American climates, the energy savings from cool roofs during warmer months outweighs any added heating costs in the winter.

Despite the opposition, Baltimore passed acool-roof ordinancein 2023.

Opponents of cool roof requirements like Baltimore’s say they oversimplify a complex issue. In an email to Floodlight, ARMA executive vice-president Reed Hitchcock said such rules aren’t a “magic bullet”. He encouraged regulators to consider a “whole building approach” – one that weighs insulation, shading and climate in addition to roof color to preserve design flexibility and consumer choice.

Henry, the Baltimore homeowner, said he thinks the city’s ordinance will help all residents. “Phooey to any manufacturer that’s going to try and stop us from maintaining our community and making it a pleasant place to live,” he said.

Elsewhere, the industry’s lobbyists have notched victories. They lobbied successfully to water down a cool-roof ordinance in Denver and to block stricter standards by the American Society of Heating, Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE) – a professional organization that creates model standards for city and state regulations.

The current ASHRAE standard recommends reflective roofs on commercial buildings in US climate zones 1, 2 and 3 — the country’s hottest regions. Those include most of the south, Hawaii, almost all of Texas, areas along the Mexican border and most of California.

Said Thorp in a recentinterview, “We’ve been able to stop all of those … mandates from creeping into climate zone 4 and 5.”

Another group headed by Thorp – theCoalition for Sustainable Roofing– worked with the lobbyist to propose the bill that eliminated Tennessee’s cool-roof requirement.

That rule once applied to commercial buildings in just 14 of the state’s 95 counties, but an update to climate maps in 2021 expanded the requirements to 20 more counties, including its most populous urban area – Nashville.

Brian Spear, a homeowner in Tempe, Arizona, has lived in the Phoenix area since the 1980s, back when there were fewer than 30 days a year when the temperature reached 110F. Last year, there were 70 of those days – the highest on record — followed only by 2023, when there were 55 days of 110F plus.

These days, summer mornings start out scorching, he says, “and I feel like if you go outside between 10am and 4pm, it’s dangerous.”

Spear says he’ll soon replace the aging roof on an Airbnb home that he owns. After weighing the usual concerns – cost and aesthetics – he has chosen a surface that he believes will help rather than harm: a gray metal roof with a reflective coating.

“If someone told me you couldn’t put a dark roof on your house … I’d understand,” he said. “I’m all about it being for the common good.”

Floodlightis a nonprofit newsroom that partners with local and national outlets to investigate the powerful interests stalling climate action. Read the full version of this storyhere

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian