‘How did I get approved for $30,000?’: is buy now, pay later headed for a fall?

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"Concerns Rise Over Buy Now, Pay Later Debt Amid Consumer Financial Struggles"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 7.0
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

Nicole Hartman, a 44-year-old home aide from Berwick, Pennsylvania, found herself in significant debt after purchasing a home in 2019 that required extensive remodeling. Faced with the need to replace essential appliances and address various repairs, Hartman opened credit cards to finance these renovations after being unable to secure personal loans. Over time, her financial situation worsened, leading her to utilize buy-now, pay-later (BNPL) services like Affirm. By 2023, Hartman had accrued $30,000 in BNPL debt and an alarming $88,000 in credit card debt, all while earning a household income of $150,000. She expressed disbelief at how she was approved for such a large amount of BNPL credit, highlighting concerns about the ease of obtaining credit without adequate scrutiny of one's financial situation.

The growing popularity of BNPL services has sparked concern among consumer advocates, particularly as credit card debt in the US has surpassed $1 trillion. Critics argue that BNPL encourages overspending by presenting purchases as manageable installments rather than the full price, leading consumers to take on debts they may struggle to repay. Research indicates that while some users manage their BNPL payments effectively, others quickly experience financial distress as they neglect other obligations. Notably, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) has reduced its oversight of BNPL companies, which raises alarms about the potential for increased consumer debt. As BNPL becomes more commonplace for everyday expenses, including groceries, its impact on consumer finances continues to be a pressing concern, particularly for those with lower credit scores who rely on these services for essential purchases. Hartman's experience underscores the importance of financial education in understanding the true cost of easy credit, as she learned to manage her debt and avoid the pitfalls of overspending through self-education and awareness of the risks involved.

TruthLens AI Analysis

The article sheds light on the rising concerns surrounding the buy-now, pay-later (BNPL) services, particularly through the lens of a personal story involving Nicole Hartman. It explores the implications of easy credit access and the potential financial dangers for consumers, especially in a climate where consumer debt is at an all-time high.

Consumer Debt and BNPL Growth

The narrative highlights how Hartman, caught in a cycle of credit, accumulated a staggering amount of debt through BNPL services like Affirm. This situation reflects a broader trend in the U.S., where consumer credit card debt has exceeded $1 trillion. The article suggests that BNPL services, which can make expensive purchases seem manageable by offering installment payments, could lead consumers to spend beyond their means.

Regulatory Concerns

The piece also touches on the weakened regulatory environment for consumer finance, particularly mentioning the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB). The lack of enforcement of regulations could exacerbate the issues associated with BNPL, as companies expand their reach without adequate oversight. This raises questions about the safety net for consumers who might not fully understand the financial implications of their spending habits.

Public Sentiment and Warnings

By showcasing Hartman's bewilderment at her debt approval limits, the article aims to evoke a sense of urgency and concern among readers. It positions BNPL as potentially predatory, drawing attention to the risks of accumulating debt without proper understanding. This narrative could resonate with a broad audience, especially those who are already struggling financially or are wary of taking on more debt.

Potential Economic Implications

The concerns raised in the article could lead to a heightened awareness among consumers regarding their financial choices, potentially resulting in a slowdown in the use of BNPL services. This could impact companies involved in the BNPL sector, as consumer caution may lead to decreased spending. Furthermore, if consumers begin to default on debts, it could have ripple effects on the broader economy, including credit markets.

Target Audience

This report seems designed to engage readers who are financially conscious or vulnerable, particularly those in lower to middle-income brackets who might be more susceptible to the allure of BNPL services. It may also appeal to consumer advocates and policymakers interested in fostering a safer financial environment.

Market Impact

The implications of this article could affect the stock prices of companies like Affirm and Klarna, especially if public perception shifts negatively towards BNPL services. Investors may be wary of potential regulatory changes or a decline in consumer adoption, which could lead to volatility in these sectors.

Geopolitical Context

While the article primarily focuses on domestic consumer finance issues, it fits into a larger narrative about consumer debt and economic stability in the U.S. As financial practices evolve globally, the insights provided could resonate with similar trends in other economies, reflecting a universal struggle with consumer debt.

Use of AI in Content Creation

There is a possibility that AI tools were used in drafting this article, particularly in structuring the narrative and presenting data. The language is straightforward and accessible, which could indicate a design for broad audience comprehension. However, the content's focus on certain narratives, like Hartman's experience, suggests a deliberate choice to guide reader sentiment.

The article's manipulation potential is moderate, mainly through its emotive storytelling and selective focus on negative aspects of BNPL without equally addressing any potential benefits. This could serve to alarm readers about the nature of consumer finance, prompting caution and concern.

Considering these factors, the reliability of the article is fairly strong, as it presents factual data and expert opinions; however, it may lean towards a cautionary stance that could evoke fear rather than provide a balanced view of BNPL services.

Unanalyzed Article Content

When Nicole Hartman purchased her home in Berwick, Pennsylvania, in 2019, the place needed remodeling.

The 44-year-old home help aide needed to replace the hot water heater, get two new appliances and fix a water issue, along with making the home more medically accessible for her children.

With loans taken out for the home itself, it was impossible for Hartman, 44, and her husband to get personal loans to cover the renovations, so for the first time in her life, she opened up credit cards. And after maxing out those cards, she went on to use Affirm, which offers buy-now, pay-later (BNPL) services that allow customers to pay out their purchases in installments.

By 2023, Hartman had $30,000 of debt on Affirm and $88,000 of credit card debt. Her household income is $150,000 a year.

“How I was able to, at one time, have almost $30,000 on Affirm is insane to me,” Hartman said. “Like how did I even get approved for $30,000? It just blows my mind.”

Credit card debt has ballooned to more than $1tn in the US over the last several years, and consumer advocates are worried that the debt burden is even worse with the growth of BNPL.

“Companies like BNPL because it leads people to spend more and make things look more affordable than they are, by focusing people’s attention on one-quarter of the price rather than the full price,” said Lauren Saunders, associate director of the National Consumer Law Center. “It can lead people to take on more debt than they can really afford.”

In recent months, BNPL companies such as Klarna and Affirm have been expanding their reach across different retailers, partnering with companies such as DoorDash, Walmart and eBay so that nearly every purchase can be made using BNPL.

At the same time, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB), the US federal agency that was built after the Great Recession to be a consumer watchdog, has largely been gutted by the Trump administration. Last month, the CFPB said it wouldn’t enforce regulation against BNPL companies that put them under similar regulations that credit card companies must follow.

BNPL companiessaythat their services offer a healthier alternative to credit cards because they are fixed terms and can be interest-free. And the BNPL companies are more accessible for those who don’t have high credit scores as BNPL doesn’t require the same hard credit score checks as credit cards. But easier access to credit often comes at a higher price.

“Each purchase is essentially a different line of credit, and so each has a different repurchase schedule. You buy something and every two weeks, you get a deduction from your bank account, and that can be difficult for people to manage,” said Ed deHaan, a professor at Stanford’s Graduate School of Business. “You can do what’s called ‘debt stacking’: max out one BNPL, and go to another.”

Researchthat DeHaan and colleagues published in 2023 found that while many BNPL users were able to make their payments without problems, other users were prone to overspending with BNPL and started to see early indicators of financial distress, such as not paying down other credit balances, within weeks of using the services.

“What you need to think about is the rest of the consumer’s portfolio. If they’re making BNPL payments … maybe they’re not paying off their credit card, maybe they’re not paying their cellphone bill, and that’s actually more concerning,” DeHaan said. “They’re essentially substituting one payment for another.”

The CFPB in January published areportshowing that the majority of BNPL borrowers had multiple loans at once and were more likely to have higher balances on other forms of credit, such as credit cards.

Kelly Klingaman, a financial adviser in Austin, Texas, said that she often works with clients who have built up BNPL debt with purchases that they bought largely on a whim.

“It’s offered to you anytime you check out now,” Klingaman said. “You may not be fully aware of the total interest you’re paying and how it may be really jacking down your overall finances.”

Now that BNPL can be used to make smaller purchases, like everyday groceries or necessities, data has shown more Americans may be turning to it for necessities.

In a recent survey from LendingTree, nearly a quarter of BNPL users in the US said they have used the service to pay for groceries. Four out of 10 users also said they’ve had a late payment on the platform.

Sign up toBusiness Today

Get set for the working day – we'll point you to all the business news and analysis you need every morning

after newsletter promotion

Datacompiled by the Federal Reserve shows that about 68% of BNPL users with family incomes under $50,000 said that using the services were the only way they could afford their purchase. Only 32% of those with family incomes over $100,000 said the same.

And the service is used more by Americans with lower credit scores. Only 10% of those with credit scores above 720, which is considered to be a very good credit score, use BNPL, compared with 30% of those with credit scores below 620.

BNPL “is promoted as purely free, interest-free, affordable payments that are ended fairly quickly. It could be useful for occasional larger purchases, but it’s really quite ill-suited for everyday use. It makes no sense to put off three-quarters of the price of this week’s groceries when you have more groceries to buy in the coming weeks,” Saunders said. “It prompts people into spending more than they can really afford.”

In the first three months of 2025, Klarna said that its customer credit losses, which are due to late or missed payments, shot up 17% compared with the same period last year. The company absorbed $137m worth of these losses.

Overall, the company said it doubled its losses from the first quarter from $99m this year compared with $47m last year – reports about which led many on social media to believe that Klarna was going bankrupt.

But the company said that its losses stemmed from one-time costs, including fromreducingits workforce by 40% after making heavy investments into AI. And the company actually saw its revenue increase 13%, to $700m, in the first three months of the year, compared with the same period last year, and its user base climbed 20%, to 100m.

In astatementto NBC News, Klarna said that the increase in consumer credit losses “does not tell you much about the US consumer” and said that credit losses made up 0.54% of all “gross merchandise value” for loans – a slight increase from 0.51% last year, “but still very low”, the company said.

Under the Biden administration, the CFPB had started toregulateBNPL servicers such as credit card companies, requiring that BNPL companies provide users with legal protections that are offered to credit card holders, such as the right to dispute charges.

Last month, the CFPBsaidit will no longer enforce these regulations against BNPL services, saying that it will “keep its enforcement and supervision resources focused on pressing threats to consumers”.

Hartman said that while she was initially grateful that she was allowed access to more than $100,000 in credit, which she ultimately paid down completely, the process of learning how expensive it was to use such easy credit was painful.

“It’s just so eye-opening how much interest you’re getting charged on, for things you didn’t really need,” she said. “It helped us when we needed it, but we ended up paying probably twice as much than we needed to.”

Hartman said that self-education, including learning the dangers of easy credit, enabled her to pay down her consumer debt in less than two years.

“Had I been taught these things in school, I would have had a different outlook,” she said.

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian