A commercial plane and an Army helicopter collided, a regional jet rolled over on landing and a family of five was killed after a helicopter plunged into the Hudson River – all three incidents from the first part of this year add to the anxieties of the flying public. The crashes are among more than a hundred incidents this year, involving everything from commercial airliners to smaller, so-called general aviation aircraft often flown by private pilots. And it’s only April. Air carriers even reported a drop in ticket sales following the string of high-profile incidents, as customers reported a fear of flying. That begs the question: Has this year been one of the most dangerous years to fly? Reports analyzed by CNN from the National Transportation Safety Board show the number of accident investigations is down for the first quarter of 2025. The NTSB led 171 civil aviation investigations from January to March 2025, which include commercial, general, rotorcraft and specialized aircraft. During the same time frame last year, there were 185 investigations. And the first three months of 2010 to 2019 averaged 215 investigations. CNN transportation analyst Mary Schiavo attributes the public’s perception of declining aviation safety to the moments caught on video that “rattle everybody.” She points to January’s midair collision between a US Army helicopter and an American Airlines regional jet landing at Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport, caught on surveillance camera, as a prime example that struck fear in the public. “The arrogance of flying through commercial air space without the proper equipment turned on or functioning,” Schiavo said. “I mean, that’s just arrogance beyond belief. In aviation, there’s just no room for arrogance.” The helicopter was flying without using a tracking system called ADS-B. “I think this year is bad, even more, other than DCA, because of all the things that have come to light. Without the NTSB, would we have ever known about the 15,000 near misses,” she said, referring to the 15,214 near miss events the board uncovered from 2021 and 2024, where aircraft were within one nautical mile of colliding at Reagan National Airport. “That’s shocking - we wouldn’t have known about that.” Proof in the data As inspector general of the US Department of Transportation from 1990 to 1996, Schiavo worked with both sides of the aisle and the FAA closely. Back then, she explained, accident, incident and pilot deviation rates were publicly available information, even broken down further by the standards for each type of operator. “Now, (The FAA) stopped doing those, at least publicly, and they said, ‘Look, there are so few commercial accidents that when one accident happens, one fatal accident, it really skews the data,’” she noted. CNN reached out to the FAA for comment, but the agency pointed to its databases online. Many public officials have been vocal about how aviation remains the safest form of travel, despite the recent string of events. Up until the fatal incident in January, there hadn’t been a major commercial air crash in the country since a flight operated by Colgan Air stalled and crashed into a house on approach to Buffalo, New York, in 2009. In 2013, an Asiana Airlines flight crashed at San Francisco International Airport and killed three people, but 287 people escaped alive. There have been other flights globally that have killed Americans, but no major fatal incidents in the US have occurred since then. But Schiavo says more needs to be done. “They’ve never defined what the level of safety is to be safe,” she said. The FAA needs to develop “an objective standard” for what safe means, she said, noting that the agency needs quantifiable safety measurements for the public to understand how it defines safe. Passenger vehicle incidents have remained the deadliest mode of transportation, statistically speaking. There were about 40,000 people killed motor vehicle crashes in the US in 2023, according to the latest numbers from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Critical to distinguish Although there are many incidents that have occurred this year, Hassan Shahidi, president and CEO of the Flight Safety Foundation, said it’s important for passengers to distinguish the small aviation incidents from the major commercial airline accidents. Besides the crash at Reagan National Airport in January, there was also a Delta Air Lines regional jet that rolled over while landing in Toronto. All the passengers and crew survived; however, it was a significant event currently being investigated by Canada’s Transportation Safety Board. Those are notably different accidents from the sightseeing helicopter, which crashed into the Hudson River, killing a family of five, the med-evac jet, which crashed into a neighborhood in Philadelphia killing everyone onboard, and one person on the ground, or a small airplane midair collision in Arizona that killed two. “These are different categories and different issues,” Shahidi said. “I wouldn’t put them all in the same bucket from our perspective. Helicopter operations are unique, different equipment, and things like that, so they need to be looked at differently than passenger accidents.” The NTSB investigations into all of this year’s crashes remain ongoing, however, the FAA stopped most helicopter flights near Washington Reagan National and after last week’s crash in the Hudson, the tour company’s operations were halted immediately. However, Shahidi said every single accident in commercial aviation is unique. Despite the deadly incidents, the year has been relatively like past years. “Anytime something like (the helicopter accident) happens, and you have a family, the victims, it really resonates with everybody. How could this happen? It’s very unfortunate,” he said.
How deadly has air travel been in 2025? Here is what to know
TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:
"Aviation Safety Concerns Rise Amid Early 2025 Incident Reports"
TruthLens AI Summary
In early 2025, the aviation industry has faced significant public concern following a series of high-profile incidents, including the collision of a commercial plane and an Army helicopter, a regional jet rollover during landing, and a tragic helicopter crash into the Hudson River that claimed the lives of a family of five. These events are part of over a hundred aviation incidents reported this year, causing ticket sales to drop as potential passengers express their fear of flying. However, analysis of reports from the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) suggests that the number of accident investigations for the first quarter of 2025 is actually down compared to previous years, with 171 investigations conducted from January to March 2025, a decrease from 185 investigations in the same period in 2024 and significantly lower than the average of 215 investigations from 2010 to 2019. Experts attribute the heightened perception of danger to the visibility of these incidents, especially those captured on video, which can amplify public anxiety despite statistical improvements in aviation safety.
Mary Schiavo, a CNN transportation analyst, emphasizes that the public's perception of aviation safety has been skewed by notable incidents, such as the midair collision at Reagan National Airport. She criticizes the lack of transparency regarding safety standards and calls for the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to establish clear, objective safety measurements for the public. While aviation remains statistically the safest mode of transportation compared to motor vehicles, which accounted for around 40,000 deaths in 2023, there is a pressing need for the FAA to address safety definitions and enhance public understanding. Experts like Hassan Shahidi, president and CEO of the Flight Safety Foundation, highlight the importance of differentiating between minor aviation incidents and major commercial accidents, noting that while the year has seen several serious events, it does not necessarily reflect a downturn in overall aviation safety. The ongoing investigations by the NTSB will provide further insights as the aviation community seeks to address these safety concerns and restore public confidence in air travel.
TruthLens AI Analysis
The article presents a concerning overview of air travel incidents in 2025, aiming to highlight the perceived dangers of flying in the current year. By detailing specific accidents and referencing the decline in ticket sales due to public fear, it taps into the anxieties surrounding aviation safety. While the statistics from the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) indicate a decrease in accident investigations, the article juxtaposes this with the high-profile incidents that have garnered significant media attention.
Public Perception of Safety
The article emphasizes how public perception can shift dramatically due to media coverage of aviation incidents. The mention of a midair collision caught on surveillance camera serves as a focal point for the public's fear, illustrating how visual evidence can create a lasting impact on perceptions of safety. The analyst's comments about the "arrogance" in aviation practices further amplify these concerns, leading readers to question the reliability of safety protocols.
Statistical Context
Despite the alarming anecdotes, the article contrasts the current year’s accident investigation numbers with those from previous years, which might suggest that 2025 is not as perilous as perceived. However, the emotional weight of the incidents tends to overshadow these statistics, indicating a disparity between reality and public perception. This discrepancy can lead to a deeper distrust in the aviation industry.
Economic Implications
The decline in ticket sales due to public fear suggests potential economic repercussions for airlines. A significant drop in consumer confidence can affect the profitability of airlines and, by extension, the broader travel industry. This economic anxiety may prompt companies to ramp up safety measures and public relations efforts to reassure travelers.
Target Audience
The article appears to resonate particularly with fearful travelers and those involved in the aviation industry. By focusing on incidents that evoke emotional responses, it seeks to engage a readership that may include frequent flyers, families considering travel, and industry stakeholders concerned about public perception.
Market Impact
Airlines and associated businesses may experience fluctuations in stock prices as a result of this news. The heightened fear might lead to reduced travel demand, impacting shares of major airlines. Investors closely monitoring consumer behavior in the travel sector could find this information relevant.
Global Context
In the backdrop of global aviation safety discussions, this article contributes to an ongoing dialogue about the safety of air travel. It taps into contemporary concerns about safety protocols and regulatory oversight, which are particularly salient in the wake of recent incidents.
Potential Manipulative Elements
While the article does provide factual information, its framing may lead to fear-mongering. The emphasis on dramatic incidents without sufficient context could be seen as manipulative, potentially exaggerating the dangers of flying. Using emotionally charged language and focusing on specific accidents can shape public opinion disproportionately compared to statistical realities. In conclusion, while the article offers a mix of factual reporting and analysis, its focus on high-profile incidents and the emotional response they elicit raises questions about the overall narrative concerning aviation safety. The reliability of the article is somewhat compromised by its potential to manipulate perceptions through selective emphasis on fear-inducing incidents.